The possibility of Counter Earth

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**FITZZ**

halonachos wrote:
FITZZ wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:
halonachos wrote:
corpsesarefun wrote:They did a lot of tests and found it happened a statistically significant amount of the time, current ideas coming from CERN is that the neutrinos cheated and took a shorter path through other spacial dimensions which gave the illusion of them moving faster than light.

So they discovered the warp and declared David Blaine a minion of Tzeentch?

no,thats obama

I believe something in my brain may have just ruptured..

Check your ears and nose for fluid.

Nothing but peanut butter...which has amazingly begun to spawn new life...yarrr...take that creationist.

**lord commissar klimino**

FITZZ wrote:
halonachos wrote:
FITZZ wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:
halonachos wrote:
corpsesarefun wrote:They did a lot of tests and found it happened a statistically significant amount of the time, current ideas coming from CERN is that the neutrinos cheated and took a shorter path through other spacial dimensions which gave the illusion of them moving faster than light.

So they discovered the warp and declared David Blaine a minion of Tzeentch?

no,thats obama

I believe something in my brain may have just ruptured..

Check your ears and nose for fluid.

Nothing but peanut butter...which has amazingly begun to spawn new life...yarrr...take that creationist.

quick! get that to a lab! you'll be famous! and possibly rich!

**Krellnus**

lord commissar klimino wrote:
Howard A Treesong wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:
Howard A Treesong wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:nope,not a fan of evolution either. did you know fossils could easilt not be that old? the found human made wire fossilized in the ocean that couldn't be older than a thousand years old yet at 1st they thought it was a billion year old dino or some other thing. until they broke it open.

Have you got some sort of source for this that we can actually read? Because I'm not about to reject some of the fundamental ideas of modern science based on a confused recount of some claim online. I mean dinosaurs aren't a billion years old for a start so it doesn't strike me as a well informed post.

http://creation.com/fascinating-fossil-fence-wire

Now you do realise that site is written by religious quacks who may have a slight bias and don't and not report actual scientific findings.

They are in fact full on six day young earth creationists.

The days in Genesis do not correspond to geologic ages, but are six [6] consecutive twenty-four [24] hour days of Creation.

Not to be taken seriously by anyone at all.

By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.

Basically if it doesn't fit the bible then it's not valid evidence.

Durrrr, if I read that moronic site too much I might catch the stupid from them.

*shrug* not the best 'evidence' but ive yet to see good evidence of evolution and the big bang. i stick to my thoughts: both are as BS as the Germans having used alines in WW2.

Here is an example of a species being recorded evolving in real time;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._coli_long-term_evolution_experiment

**halonachos**

n0t_u wrote:
halonachos wrote:
FITZZ wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:
halonachos wrote:
corpsesarefun wrote:They did a lot of tests and found it happened a statistically significant amount of the time, current ideas coming from CERN is that the neutrinos cheated and took a shorter path through other spacial dimensions which gave the illusion of them moving faster than light.

So they discovered the warp and declared David Blaine a minion of Tzeentch?

no,thats obama

I believe something in my brain may have just ruptured..

Check your ears and nose for fluid.

Maybe we shouldn't have added that jet engine.

That wasn't it, maybe Fitzz hasn't eaten enough pulled pork. Quick, get the man a sandwich!

**FITZZ**

Hmm, wonder if they'd have pulled pork on counter Earth?

**Corpsesarefun**

Nah, they have porked pull there.

**lord commissar klimino**

Krellnus wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:
Howard A Treesong wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:
Howard A Treesong wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:nope,not a fan of evolution either. did you know fossils could easilt not be that old? the found human made wire fossilized in the ocean that couldn't be older than a thousand years old yet at 1st they thought it was a billion year old dino or some other thing. until they broke it open.

Have you got some sort of source for this that we can actually read? Because I'm not about to reject some of the fundamental ideas of modern science based on a confused recount of some claim online. I mean dinosaurs aren't a billion years old for a start so it doesn't strike me as a well informed post.

http://creation.com/fascinating-fossil-fence-wire

Now you do realise that site is written by religious quacks who may have a slight bias and don't and not report actual scientific findings.

They are in fact full on six day young earth creationists.

The days in Genesis do not correspond to geologic ages, but are six [6] consecutive twenty-four [24] hour days of Creation.

Not to be taken seriously by anyone at all.

By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.

Basically if it doesn't fit the bible then it's not valid evidence.

Durrrr, if I read that moronic site too much I might catch the stupid from them.

*shrug* not the best 'evidence' but ive yet to see good evidence of evolution and the big bang. i stick to my thoughts: both are as BS as the Germans having used alines in WW2.

Here is an example of a species being recorded evolving in real time;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._coli_long-term_evolution_experiment

too random. evolution is considered more "controlled". or is it more of a mutation to you guys? still don't believe it. whoohoo,tiny cells can adapt to what we trow at them,soooooooo major epic awesome sauce proof!

**Corpsesarefun**

Evolution is the adaptation of life over a series of generations to better suit the environment by means of natural selection, I think your problem is you don't actually understand what evolution is other than an alternative to intelligent design.

**SagesStone**

lord commissar klimino wrote:
Krellnus wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:
Howard A Treesong wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:
Howard A Treesong wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote:nope,not a fan of evolution either. did you know fossils could easilt not be that old? the found human made wire fossilized in the ocean that couldn't be older than a thousand years old yet at 1st they thought it was a billion year old dino or some other thing. until they broke it open.

Have you got some sort of source for this that we can actually read? Because I'm not about to reject some of the fundamental ideas of modern science based on a confused recount of some claim online. I mean dinosaurs aren't a billion years old for a start so it doesn't strike me as a well informed post.

http://creation.com/fascinating-fossil-fence-wire

Now you do realise that site is written by religious quacks who may have a slight bias and don't and not report actual scientific findings.

They are in fact full on six day young earth creationists.

The days in Genesis do not correspond to geologic ages, but are six [6] consecutive twenty-four [24] hour days of Creation.

Not to be taken seriously by anyone at all.

By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.

Basically if it doesn't fit the bible then it's not valid evidence.

Durrrr, if I read that moronic site too much I might catch the stupid from them.

*shrug* not the best 'evidence' but ive yet to see good evidence of evolution and the big bang. i stick to my thoughts: both are as BS as the Germans having used alines in WW2.

Here is an example of a species being recorded evolving in real time;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._coli_long-term_evolution_experiment

too random. evolution is considered more "controlled". or is it more of a mutation to you guys? still don't believe it. whoohoo,tiny cells can adapt to what we trow at them,soooooooo major epic awesome sauce proof!

Evolution is random, it is the adaptation to external influences. It is not always going to solve issues and it takes a long time...

**halonachos**

corpsesarefun wrote:Evolution is the adaptation to better suit the environment by means of natural selection, I think your problem is you don't actually understand what evolution is other than an alternative to intelligent design.

I hope he's just trolling, I met intelligent design only people in real life before. When even your priest believes in evolution its hard to say it doesn't exist.

**Corpsesarefun**

halonachos wrote:
corpsesarefun wrote:Evolution is the adaptation to better suit the environment by means of natural selection, I think your problem is you don't actually understand what evolution is other than an alternative to intelligent design.

I hope he's just trolling, I met intelligent design only people in real life before. When even your priest believes in evolution its hard to say it doesn't exist.

He isn't trolling, he is a young man from texas who has been raised in a (presumably strongly) religious family.

**lord commissar klimino**

you guys just gave me 2 definitions that mean different things. before you dis me,at least agree on the same thing 1st.

Automatically Appended Next Post:

corpsesarefun wrote:
halonachos wrote:
corpsesarefun wrote:Evolution is the adaptation to better suit the environment by means of natural selection, I think your problem is you don't actually understand what evolution is other than an alternative to intelligent design.

I hope he's just trolling, I met intelligent design only people in real life before. When even your priest believes in evolution its hard to say it doesn't exist.

He isn't trolling, he is a young man from texas who has been raised in a (presumably strongly) religious family.

i leave religion out of these conversations as much as possible. i hate most sections of Christianity anyways. not overly strong either,if anything its part of the reason i hate mt family.

**Corpsesarefun**

We said exactly the same thing in different terms.

**SagesStone**

We gave the same definition. Survival of the fittest is where the failed adaptations are killed off due to being inferior. Mine was for evolution in general whilst he elaborated on the selection process.

**Aerethan**

FITZZ wrote: Hmm, wonder if they'd have pulled pork on counter Earth?

A good attempt to bring this thread under control. Alas, to no avail.

**halonachos**

In which case humanity has completely screwed up evolution in humans.

**SagesStone**

lord commissar klimino wrote: you guys just gave me 2 definitions that mean different things. before you dis me,at least agree on the same thing 1st.

Automatically Appended Next Post:

corpsesarefun wrote:
halonachos wrote:
corpsesarefun wrote:Evolution is the adaptation to better suit the environment by means of natural selection, I think your problem is you don't actually understand what evolution is other than an alternative to intelligent design.

I hope he's just trolling, I met intelligent design only people in real life before. When even your priest believes in evolution its hard to say it doesn't exist.

He isn't trolling, he is a young man from texas who has been raised in a (presumably strongly) religious family.

i leave religion out of these conversations as much as possible. i hate most sections of Christianity anyways. not overly strong either,if anything its part of the reason i hate mt family.

Creationism is the religious equivalent to evolution. Ergo you leave religion out of a religious point your are trying to make. You're even the one who brought religion into this thread.

**Corpsesarefun**

Humans are overrated.

GO COUNTER-EARTHMEN

**SagesStone**

Wonder what the Counter-Earthmen would be like. Perhaps three arms or something.

**Corpsesarefun**

What if we were the counter-earthmen all along?

**lord commissar klimino**

n0t_u wrote:Evolution is random, it is the adaptation to external influences. It is not always going to solve issues and it takes a long time...

corpsesarefun wrote:Evolution is the adaptation of life over a series of generations to better suit the environment by means of natural selection, I think your problem is you don't actually understand what evolution is other than an alternative to intelligent design.

one says its random,and doesn't always solve problems.

the other falsely claims what i know, and says it does always solve problems.

**SagesStone**

That's an interesting possibility. This could be the counter-earth.

Wouldn't that make us the evil us?

**lord commissar klimino**

n0t_u wrote:
lord commissar klimino wrote: you guys just gave me 2 definitions that mean different things. before you dis me,at least agree on the same thing 1st.

Automatically Appended Next Post:

corpsesarefun wrote:
halonachos wrote:
corpsesarefun wrote:Evolution is the adaptation to better suit the environment by means of natural selection, I think your problem is you don't actually understand what evolution is other than an alternative to intelligent design.

I hope he's just trolling, I met intelligent design only people in real life before. When even your priest believes in evolution its hard to say it doesn't exist.

He isn't trolling, he is a young man from texas who has been raised in a (presumably strongly) religious family.

i leave religion out of these conversations as much as possible. i hate most sections of Christianity anyways. not overly strong either,if anything its part of the reason i hate mt family.

Creationism is the religious equivalent to evolution. Ergo you leave religion out of a religious point your are trying to make. You're even the one who brought religion into this thread.

no...no i didnt. i posted an article,were it had religious and no religious stuff,and you guys only looked at the religious and then started using that to say it must be 100% fake cause religion is involved.

**halonachos**

n0t_u wrote:That's an interesting possibility. This could be the counter-earth.

Wouldn't that make us the evil us?

What if the difference is that on counter-earth humans are used as fuel by oil creatures?

**FITZZ**

n0t_u wrote:That's an interesting possibility. This could be the counter-earth.

Wouldn't that make us the evil us?

Um...you do realize that we're discussing drugging baboons, arming them and releasing them on the populace in another thread...

**Corpsesarefun**

lord commissar klimino wrote:
n0t_u wrote:Evolution is random, it is the adaptation to external influences. It is not always going to solve issues and it takes a long time...

corpsesarefun wrote:Evolution is the adaptation of life over a series of generations to better suit the environment by means of natural selection, I think your problem is you don't actually understand what evolution is other than an alternative to intelligent design.

one says its random,and doesn't always solve problems.

the other falsely claims what i know, and says it does always solve problems.

Evolution is always random and means an species becomes better suited to it's environment, this is entirely subjective in that if you took a fish out of the water it's highly evolved gills would be rendered useless. By the same token if you put a human in space with no protection our highly evolved heads would pop.

"solving problems" is a very human way to look at things, nature doesn't care about "solving problems" but rather about producing offspring.

**halonachos**

FITZZ wrote:
n0t_u wrote:That's an interesting possibility. This could be the counter-earth.

Wouldn't that make us the evil us?

Um...you do realize that we're discussing drugging baboons, arming them and releasing them on the populace in another thread...

Yeah, we're the evil-earth. But that means we're the fun Earth, I think. Does evil make fun?

**Corpsesarefun**

halonachos wrote:
n0t_u wrote:That's an interesting possibility. This could be the counter-earth.

Wouldn't that make us the evil us?

What if the difference is that on counter-earth humans are used as fuel by oil creatures?

I presume the oil creatures are the counter-earth counterpart to bushes

**infinite_array**

n0t_u wrote:That's an interesting possibility. This could be the counter-earth.

Wouldn't that make us the evil us?

Oh no. It makes perfect sense.

The Middle East is a giant hug fest. Pakistan and Indian are a single country. China exports kittens instead of lead, and asks politely for new technology so they can help improve on it. The US loves everyone, Vietnam was resolved via tickle fights, and every 2nd Friday of each month is 'Mexican Nationality Appreciation Day'. Ice cream cakes and pie are mandatory.

4chan is world renowned as a place where the greatest minds go to solve any world problems that may occur.

**Aerethan**

corpsesarefun wrote:What if we were the counter-earthmen all along?

profound.

and intelligent design is not necessarily a religious concept.

I refer you to the documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. netflix it.