| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/10/26 23:53:10
Subject: [Kings of War] Mantic Fantasy News & Rumors
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
mattl wrote: Eilif wrote:
It doesn't affect me at all since I don't use Mantic minis and I base everything separately so that they can be used with many different rules but for some reason it rubs me the wrong way.
Another way to think about it is if Mantic is selling Kings of War models primarily to Kings of War players, most of the plastic bases included would be unused. I probably have 200+ bases that I'm not really using and that's a lot of plastic to ship around the planet to just sit in people's homes and not get used.
And if you're basing models for other game systems, you might want Citadel style bases for your models anyway.
Which brings me back to my earlier question:
Is multibase the norm now for KOW players?
I assumed that multibase was always a minority approach, but I haven't been paying too much attention.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/10/27 00:14:32
Subject: [Kings of War] Mantic Fantasy News & Rumors
|
 |
Grumpy Longbeard
|
Yes.
I would also assume that if someone is buying Kings of War models for a different game then they're probably hobby savvy to acquire bases on their own.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/10/27 01:36:38
Subject: [Kings of War] Mantic Fantasy News & Rumors
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
May be a stupid question as I'm going off of hazy memories from the early days when WHFB collapsed but the players at my FLGS always used big square multibases for formations of units. They got very creative with them adding terrain and such when converting over their fantasy figs. Am I not remembering that correctly? Or is this a different style multibase?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/10/27 02:50:24
Subject: [Kings of War] Mantic Fantasy News & Rumors
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
I guess I missed the transition from "a cool option" to "the new normal".
Our little group didn't multibase anything, even the couple players who used actual Mantic armies. Probably unsurprising though as our armies see use across several rulesets of which KOW is only one.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/10/27 05:55:31
Subject: [Kings of War] Mantic Fantasy News & Rumors
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
The only reason not to do it is if you need the models for other games that require single based models and one doesn't want dedicated armies
But for those who made armies dedicated for KoW this was already the "normal" in 2nd Edition and earlier as it reduces the amount of models needed by a lot without looking bad
|
Harry, bring this ring to Narnia or the Sith will take the Enterprise |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/10/28 22:15:47
Subject: [Kings of War] Mantic Fantasy News & Rumors
|
 |
Armored Iron Breaker
New England/cyberspace
|
warboss wrote:May be a stupid question as I'm going off of hazy memories from the early days when WHFB collapsed but the players at my FLGS always used big square multibases for formations of units. They got very creative with them adding terrain and such when converting over their fantasy figs. Am I not remembering that correctly? Or is this a different style multibase?
Yes this is what multi basing or unit basing is.
Some people try to get as many of the 20 models onto a 20 man base, some (like me) try to get as few models as possible while adding terrain, etc. I like the crafting element.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/10/28 22:57:35
Subject: [Kings of War] Mantic Fantasy News & Rumors
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
mattl wrote: warboss wrote:May be a stupid question as I'm going off of hazy memories from the early days when WHFB collapsed but the players at my FLGS always used big square multibases for formations of units. They got very creative with them adding terrain and such when converting over their fantasy figs. Am I not remembering that correctly? Or is this a different style multibase?
Yes this is what multi basing or unit basing is.
Some people try to get as many of the 20 models onto a 20 man base, some (like me) try to get as few models as possible while adding terrain, etc. I like the crafting element.
Thanks for confirming. I definitely agree it was more fun as a casual spectator to see how folks customized the blocks of models compared with just seeing them ranked up in formation. So is the change people were referring to above that they're no longer an option but instead mandatory instead of just placing square bases together in a formation whfb style?
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|