| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 04:07:58
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Faithful Squig Companion
|
In all the fluff I've read Chimeras are amphibious, but does this mean that all things on the chimera chassis are? I figured the Leman Russ or basilisk wouldnt be because of ammo and turret weight, but maybe a devil dog or griffon, since they would have less/lighter ammo?
|
I like everything in 40k, except eldar....well, ocasionally even eldar. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 08:56:17
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Leader of the Sept
|
The russ has a different chassis.
You could probably argue that a Griffon would still probably float, especially if you added a bit of a skirt in the same way the WW2 DD tanks were fitted out. The hellhound, I'm not so sure about as the flamer fuel would add a heck of a lot of weight.
|
Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!
Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 10:05:20
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon
Scotland, but nowhere near my rulebook
|
How could something called a Devil Dog NOT be allowed to be amphibious?
The Basalisk - probably not. Unless they have a rowboat full of ammo behind it, since it appears to have no stowage itself...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 10:06:06
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
Australia
|
Umm, doesn't petrol float though?
|
4th company
The Screaming Beagles of Helicia V
Hive Fleet Jumanji
I'll die before I surrender Tim! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 10:20:20
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon
Scotland, but nowhere near my rulebook
|
Not when it's in a heavily armoured steel container.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 12:07:01
Subject: Re:Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest
|
Bear in mind that "amphibious" doesn't mean that it floats. Rather, it means that it's waterproof enough to travel underwater. Think James Bond's Lotus Esprit, only instead of jetting along we're tracking along the seabed.
If I recall correctly, Land Raiders can do it too.
|
"Hard pressed on my right. My centre is yielding. Impossible to manoeuvre. Situation excellent. I am attacking." - General Ferdinand Foch |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 14:31:06
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader
DC Metro
|
Land Raiders are vacuum and pressure rated enough to drive on a seabed or operate attached to the hull of a starship.
Chimeras just float and happen to have some sort of aquatic drive mechanism. I'd imagine the ordnance tanks built on the chassis have either weight distribution issues or lack the open internal volume to provide buoyancy.
For the Hellhound variants, promethium might be lighter that water, but it is inevitably heavier than air. The more powerful engines may also be incompatible with the Chimera's aquatic drive mechanism, or just too heavy. I'm sure someone with a copy of IA1 can track down the fully loaded weight of a Chimera and a Hellhound to see how they compare.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 16:44:27
Subject: Re:Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
I have never heard of Chimeras floating.
Amphibious tanks travel on the sea floor.
If they float... they'd be boats.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 16:56:10
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader
DC Metro
|
No. Amphibious tanks float. Check out the USMC's AAV7 for an example. The UK's Royal Marine Viking is another example of a tracked vehicle that can be sea-worthy, though the Viking requires a few minutes of bolting on a piece or two.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 17:03:32
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
DaddyWarcrimes wrote:No. Amphibious tanks float. Check out the USMC's AAV7 for an example. The UK's Royal Marine Viking is another example of a tracked vehicle that can be sea-worthy, though the Viking requires a few minutes of bolting on a piece or two.
I'm not talking about real world tanks.
I'm saying I've never heard of CHIMERAS floating.
Though I must admit that the AAV7 look's to be the inspiration for the Chimera.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/05 17:05:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 17:09:11
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It says they're amphibious but how exactly do they propel themselves through water? I could see them being able to trudge through a shallow river, but can you take them on open water?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 17:25:57
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
More Dakka wrote:It says they're amphibious but how exactly do they propel themselves through water? I could see them being able to trudge through a shallow river, but can you take them on open water?
Perhaps a bunch of Servitors with life-jackets swim underneath and carry it along.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 17:35:12
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Temple Prime
|
More Dakka wrote:It says they're amphibious but how exactly do they propel themselves through water? I could see them being able to trudge through a shallow river, but can you take them on open water?
Some amphibious vehicles tracks can act like water scoops to propel them along, presumably so can the Chimera's.
|
Midnightdeathblade wrote:Think of a daemon incursion like a fart you don't quite trust... you could either toot a little puff of air, bellow a great effluvium, or utterly sh*t your pants and cry as it floods down your leg.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 17:41:12
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Avatar of the Bloody-Handed God
Inside your mind, corrupting the pathways
|
They just drive on the bodies of the guardsmen sent to secure the waterways.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 17:44:33
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader
DC Metro
|
Or it has a hydrojet system built into each track assembly. Who knows? I'm sure one of the IA or Black Library books has addressed it at some point.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 17:53:32
Subject: Re:Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest
|
Can anyone point to a fluff source that states it either floats or drives on the bed?
Note that the word "amphibious" doesn't count either way.
|
"Hard pressed on my right. My centre is yielding. Impossible to manoeuvre. Situation excellent. I am attacking." - General Ferdinand Foch |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/05 20:51:56
Subject: Re:Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
The chassis itself may be amphibious but with the extra weight of the guns any of the artillery pieces are probably not amphibious.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/06 00:38:35
Subject: Re:Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I think either case would fit with the fluff. Ie it would depend on the STC that it was made from to determine it* . Its perhaps a bit arbitrary to argue which one it does though seeing as there's that many variants out there, just as long as its capable of travelling across water.
I interpret it as the thing actually floating though, as that fits in more with the style of vehicle that GW based the thing on in the first place.
*Ie like where most chimeras are powered by Promethium, but more advanced ones have nuclear reactors (the source stating that the knowledge was lost and so an alternative had to be made)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/06 02:37:18
Subject: Re:Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Faithful Squig Companion
|
I didnt know that bit about landraiders, quite cool. But I bet Chimeras would float and use the treads as paddles like modern APCs do. The landraider is high tech fancy stuff so driving along the bottom seems a bit more in line for it.
|
I like everything in 40k, except eldar....well, ocasionally even eldar. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/06 06:06:23
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
The Chimera is supposed to be amphibious because it's supposed to be a BMP (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMP_development ), it's not a rule I see referenced commonly, since water terrain is annoying to implement physically on the board in many cases.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/06 09:07:02
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
A vehicle that is amphibious is one that is capable of crossing a body of water safely, whether floating or submerged. The BMP-2 is an amphibious APC that floats in the same way the DUKW did. I would imagine the Chimera, being quite near in appearance to the BMP APCs would probably float and is probably propelled, with a few adjustments, by conversion of the movement of the tracks into water jets.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/06 09:07:45
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/06 09:41:27
Subject: Re:Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Imperial Agent Provocateur
Mystical Warp Storm
|
Honestly I imagine Chimeras to be like the IFV's in BF3 crossing water, just like in rush on kharg island
Just the chimera has more dakka and its bigger
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/06 09:41:39
"We need a new driver, this one is dead"
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/06 15:30:08
Subject: Chimera Chassis Amphibiousness
|
 |
Leader of the Sept
|
Is there a relevant difference between "amphibious" and "submersible" when applied to vehicles? To me amphibious means it floats. Also while it is well known that you can run land raiders along the sea bottom, in-game they don't have the amphibious rule.
|
Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!
Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|