Switch Theme:

40k 7th Edition release 24th may - All info in 1st post, psychic power cards added (5/21)  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Slaanesh Veteran Marine with Tentacles






South Yorkshire, England

Spoiler:
 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
 ascended_mike wrote:
 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
 ascended_mike wrote:

Why on earth would you need permission from GW in the form of an official rule to do that? Really, what was stopping people from doing this before?


The idea of GW creating a way to Balance it out pleases me. The fact troops with "objective secured" can't be contested by anyone that doesn't have this rule, is a pretty cool change. I'm sure there's more to come.

Relax mate.


Relax? I am relaxed. I don't appreciate the sarcasm.

And you still havn't answered my question. If people playing with their friends want to ignore FOC rules and just throw waves of models at each other, what was stopping them beforehand from making up houserules? Why do people need to be spoonfed by GW?


Sarcasm? I'm not being sarcastic at all. I'm telling you to relax because you're jumping down my throat for saying I like a change they've made. There's nothing sarcastic there at all. With regards to house ruling... You could say the same about anything rule they implement!



I'm not jumping down your throat. I'm asking you to explain something that you said that I find mind boggling.

If people playing friendly games with their friends wanted to do something, why would they wait for years until a new Edition from GW said they could do it?

What's to stop you and your friends from making a 6th/7th edition Ork codex as play it using house rules? Nothing. A lot of people moan about GW's latest 6th editio, It's nice to see GW implementing stuff so it doesn't have to be house ruled. I for one like the changes.


What was stopping you and your friends making houserules in 6th Ed to ignore the FOC?

Are you just sour because you don't like it? If you don't like it, Don't play with or against people using unbound lists. Simple as that.
I don't understand the problem.

You can just 'house rule' that Unbound doesn't exist


STILL not answering the question.


We could be here all day at this, There is nothing stopping anyone from house ruling anything. Your question has been answered by way of example. What did you not understand about that? How does that impact what I said at all? It doesn't.
I like the idea of having an official rule set for such games. Is that a bad thing? Can't see how it is.
In fact.. What you're coming out with is Mind Boggling...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 10:43:29


Check Out My Blog -
http://sanguinehammer.blogspot.co.uk
For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my battle-brother eternal. 
   
Made in nz
Disguised Speculo





Aw yeah, gonna re-roll dat warlord trait so hard

Doesn't matter how many riptides you have if my warlord causes fear now does it?
   
Made in gb
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle





 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
 Steve steveson wrote:
What dose it matter that they have added these rules? It means people are given rules in which to do it. If people don't like it they can just not use the unbound rules, as per the video.


Still not answering my question...


 ascended_mike wrote:

The idea of GW creating a way to Balance it out pleases me. The fact troops with "objective secured" can't be contested by anyone that doesn't have this rule, is a pretty cool change. I'm sure there's more to come.


Both of those look like answers to me. What was stopping people? Nothing, but it is nice to have rules.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 10:49:02


 insaniak wrote:
Sometimes, Exterminatus is the only option.
And sometimes, it's just a case of too much scotch combined with too many buttons...
 
   
Made in gb
Slaanesh Veteran Marine with Tentacles






South Yorkshire, England

Additionally, where abouts did it say "All units including vehicles can score" ? - Timestamp?

Check Out My Blog -
http://sanguinehammer.blogspot.co.uk
For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my battle-brother eternal. 
   
Made in gb
Nasty Nob






Where are people getting the idea that all units are scoring from?

The text in the video refers to 'scoring units' which kind of implies that there are still such things as non-scoring units.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 10:50:19


   
Made in gb
Boom! Leman Russ Commander




Northampton

So from what I've gathered from the video and other stuff...

Troops and things with a certain rule can contest and claim objectives, but nothing else can?

That sort of turns Unbound on its head to a point as you will need Troops.

I think there's going to be a big change in scenarios where objective taking is going to be even more important.

Mr Mystery wrote:Suffice to say, if any of this is actually true, then clearly Elvis is hiding behind my left testicle, and Lord Lucan behind the right.
 
   
Made in gb
Slaanesh Veteran Marine with Tentacles






South Yorkshire, England

Puscifer wrote:
So from what I've gathered from the video and other stuff...

Troops and things with a certain rule can contest and claim objectives, but nothing else can?

That sort of turns Unbound on its head to a point as you will need Troops.

I think there's going to be a big change in scenarios where objective taking is going to be even more important.


Troops with that rule cannot have their units contested except by other units with said rule.

Check Out My Blog -
http://sanguinehammer.blogspot.co.uk
For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my battle-brother eternal. 
   
Made in de
Longtime Dakkanaut





Germany

 Dakkamite wrote:
Aw yeah, gonna re-roll dat warlord trait so hard

Doesn't matter how many riptides you have if my warlord causes fear now does it?


I think I have joked somewhere around here that the big bonus of battleforged lists will be free pick of the warlord trait...

Waaagh an' a 'alf
1500 Pts WIP 
   
Made in gb
Slaanesh Veteran Marine with Tentacles






South Yorkshire, England

 Kosake wrote:
 Dakkamite wrote:
Aw yeah, gonna re-roll dat warlord trait so hard

Doesn't matter how many riptides you have if my warlord causes fear now does it?


I think I have joked somewhere around here that the big bonus of battleforged lists will be free pick of the warlord trait...


It's not even THAT good! (Well, it's good for Tau Ethereals.. but that's all.)

Check Out My Blog -
http://sanguinehammer.blogspot.co.uk
For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my battle-brother eternal. 
   
Made in br
Fireknife Shas'el




Lisbon, Portugal

 AkharaVect wrote:



Looks good to me!


If only GW did this kind of video every time they launched new rules...

Looks promising. The Combined Army benefits are interesting - re-rolling WT is meh but useful, while Objective Secured is awesome
Oh, and Troops inside Formations can totally score - no need for heated discussions

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 11:13:01


AI & BFG: / BMG: Mr. Freeze, Deathstroke / Battletech: SR, OWA / Fallout Factions: BoS / HGB: Caprice / Malifaux: Arcanists, Guild, Outcasts / MCP: Mutants / SAGA: Ordensstaat / SW Legion: CIS / WWX: Union

 Unit1126PLL wrote:
"FW is unbalanced and going to ruin tournaments."
"Name one where it did that."
"IT JUST DOES OKAY!"

 Shadenuat wrote:
Voted Astra Militarum for a chance for them to get nerfed instead of my own army.
 
   
Made in gb
Fully-charged Electropriest



UK

Puscifer wrote:
So from what I've gathered from the video and other stuff...

Troops and things with a certain rule can contest and claim objectives, but nothing else can?

That sort of turns Unbound on its head to a point as you will need Troops.


It looks like Unbound troops can't contest an objective from Battle forged troops, so not only do you need troops to score but you also have to wipe out the enemy troops before you can score at all.


I think the Warlord re-roll might be good for an AM tank commander as you have more chance of getting the outflank trait which is one of the more useful ones.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 11:16:01


 
   
Made in nz
Disguised Speculo





 Kosake wrote:
 Dakkamite wrote:
Aw yeah, gonna re-roll dat warlord trait so hard

Doesn't matter how many riptides you have if my warlord causes fear now does it?


I think I have joked somewhere around here that the big bonus of battleforged lists will be free pick of the warlord trait...


Yeah that cracked me up lol, and the idea of re-rolling the warlord trait to try and get it was even worse.

The funny thing is, that this bonus is literally as bad as "warlord causes fear". I knew they'd feth this up.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 11:22:15


 
   
Made in au
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






That video has successfully waylaid my fears about the Unbound stuff. It was literally the only thing keeping me back about being excited about this edition.

I think GW did a great job by releasing that video.
   
Made in gb
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan






Maybe Fear will get a buff in 7E

Someone hurry up and leak this Saturday's WD plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
   
Made in gb
Boom! Leman Russ Commander




Northampton

Loopstah wrote:
Puscifer wrote:
So from what I've gathered from the video and other stuff...

Troops and things with a certain rule can contest and claim objectives, but nothing else can?

That sort of turns Unbound on its head to a point as you will need Troops.


It looks like Unbound troops can't contest an objective from Battle forged troops, so not only do you need troops to score but you also have to wipe out the enemy troops before you can score at all.


I think the Warlord re-roll might be good for an AM tank commander as you have more chance of getting the outflank trait which is one of the more useful ones.


So unbound... Isn't strictly unbound as you need some common sense to build the army in the first place.

That balances things out a lot and turns unbound on its head.

Mr Mystery wrote:Suffice to say, if any of this is actually true, then clearly Elvis is hiding behind my left testicle, and Lord Lucan behind the right.
 
   
Made in gb
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle





 Cheexsta wrote:
That video has successfully waylaid my fears about the Unbound stuff. It was literally the only thing keeping me back about being excited about this edition.

I think GW did a great job by releasing that video.


Ye, I honestly think GW are changing there ways to some extent. Now, if this 7th dose turn out to still be quite close to 6th with just an errata and they do some FAQs it will be very good.

 insaniak wrote:
Sometimes, Exterminatus is the only option.
And sometimes, it's just a case of too much scotch combined with too many buttons...
 
   
Made in cz
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant




Czech Republic

 Dakkamite wrote:
 Kosake wrote:
 Dakkamite wrote:
Aw yeah, gonna re-roll dat warlord trait so hard

Doesn't matter how many riptides you have if my warlord causes fear now does it?


I think I have joked somewhere around here that the big bonus of battleforged lists will be free pick of the warlord trait...


Yeah that cracked me up lol, and the idea of re-rolling the warlord trait to try and get it was even worse.

The funny thing is, that this bonus is literally as bad as "warlord causes fear". I knew they'd feth this up.


Yeah, better chance to have Trait for outflanking units or extra order...such lousy bonus...me, poorly guardsman...

Being optimistic´s worthless if it means ignoring the suffering of this world. Worse than worthless. It´s bloody evil.
- Fiddler 
   
Made in gb
Courageous Grand Master




-

Jervis has been unleashed! My name's Jervis and I work for Games Workshop! Been laughing at this all morning.

For some strange reason, when I watched this video, I was reminded of what the Lady Galadriel said in The Two Towers:

Kirby will use his puppet, Johnson, to destroy the free peoples of Dakka. 7th edition has been unleashed!

For 130+ pages, most people have lamented the death of 40k. Now, after 3 minutes of video, 40k is the best thing since sliced bread!

It's often been said that women are a mystery and no man will ever understand them. Substitute women for dakka members...unless of course these dakka members posting are female 40k fans, which would explain a lot of things!

Personally, I think 7th will be the final nail in the coffin for 40k. I hope not.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 11:58:24


"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd 
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





 Steve steveson wrote:
 Cheexsta wrote:
That video has successfully waylaid my fears about the Unbound stuff. It was literally the only thing keeping me back about being excited about this edition.

I think GW did a great job by releasing that video.


Ye, I honestly think GW are changing there ways to some extent. Now, if this 7th dose turn out to still be quite close to 6th with just an errata and they do some FAQs it will be very good.


As long as it doesn't invalidate the Space Marine codex I just bought last december...
   
Made in gb
Fully-charged Electropriest



UK

 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:


As long as it doesn't invalidate the Space Marine codex I just bought last december...


It wont. New editions never invalidate a Codex, look at Orks they haven't had a new one for a couple of editions.

 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Runnin up on ya.

Loopstah wrote:
 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:


As long as it doesn't invalidate the Space Marine codex I just bought last december...


It wont. New editions never invalidate a Codex, look at Orks they haven't had a new one for a couple of editions.


Except when they do.....3rd edition would like a word with you.

Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do 
   
Made in gb
Slaanesh Veteran Marine with Tentacles






South Yorkshire, England

 agnosto wrote:
Loopstah wrote:
 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:


As long as it doesn't invalidate the Space Marine codex I just bought last december...


It wont. New editions never invalidate a Codex, look at Orks they haven't had a new one for a couple of editions.


Except when they do.....3rd edition would like a word with you.


Can't see it happening. To invalidate a series of codex they only just released would be a major turn off for the consumer base. They seem to be trying to tailor things to their players now. Something we've been waiting for, for a LONG time.

Check Out My Blog -
http://sanguinehammer.blogspot.co.uk
For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my battle-brother eternal. 
   
Made in us
Storm Trooper with Maglight





Buffalo, NY

Loopstah wrote:
 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:


As long as it doesn't invalidate the Space Marine codex I just bought last december...


It wont. New editions never invalidate a Codex, look at Orks they haven't had a new one for a couple of editions.


Not sure if sarcasm or just
   
Made in us
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide







 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:


For 130+ pages, most people have lamented the death of 40k. Now, after 3 minutes of video, 40k is the best thing since sliced bread!

.


Without going through 130 pages I'm going to guess that
these are different posters with new ones jumping into the
conversation after the video dropped.

DR:70+S+G-MB-I+Pwmhd05#+D++A+++/aWD100R++T(S)DM+++
Get your own Dakka Code!

"...he could never understand the sense of a contest in which the two adversaries agreed upon the rules." Gabriel Garcia Marquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Runnin up on ya.

Very true. I'll wait and see and hope that we don't see a rapid release of dataslates that update armies to 7th at another $50 per.

Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do 
   
Made in au
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator





Brisbane

 malfred wrote:
 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

For 130+ pages, most people have lamented the death of 40k. Now, after 3 minutes of video, 40k is the best thing since sliced bread!
.

Without going through 130 pages I'm going to guess that
these are different posters with new ones jumping into the
conversation after the video dropped.


There has been a noticeable shift. The smug is strong with those of us who poked fun at the early melodramatics

 
   
Made in gb
Skillful Swordsman






Uk Preston

Might be the kick i need to get back into 40k. At the very least new blood angels in the starter box!
   
Made in de
Longtime Dakkanaut





Germany

I think it is nice that they made the video and actually explained some things. That might be counted as an first attempt to communicate with the fanbase...

Waaagh an' a 'alf
1500 Pts WIP 
   
Made in gb
Boosting Black Templar Biker





Forest of Dean

Do you really think GW would do stuff to invalidate space marines, GWs poster boys and their bread and butter products. I think we can probably feel quite safe about that.

I'm looking forward to 7th, sounds like ti will be quite interesting

10000+pts
2000pts
No pity! No remorse! No fear
 
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





 Kosake wrote:
I think it is nice that they made the video and actually explained some things. That might be counted as an first attempt to communicate with the fanbase...


Na...True communication would be two way, and involve actually listening to what the fans/customers have to say bout your products.

I'm tgoing o reserve judgement until people get their hands on the new rulebooks and can do a detailed review and analysis. I'm hopeful that they'll fix the various issues, but I have absolutely no faith that they will do so.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/05/12 12:37:48


 
   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: