Switch Theme:

40k 7th Edition release 24th may - All info in 1st post, psychic power cards added (5/21)  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus





Hopefuly the fact that Unbound lists cant contest objectives at all is a big disincentive towards actually trying to play Unbound seriously.

Sounds like unbound is for ploping models on a table and trying to table each other, which can be fun too if its just that

3000
4000 
   
Made in us
Stoic Grail Knight





Raleigh, NC

This thread reads like it needs a BAM! after a lot of comments



I just pray that the 6th edition rule book + FAQ/Errata will be a viable approach, although the signs seem to be coming together to read as "no." I think that if that is the case and the rules turn out to be okay, I will wait a while to obtain a rules-only edition of the game. After only two years with the LE copy, well, I won't get fooled again!
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




Just curious since I haven't read it in a few days. Are people still going to quit 40K? Or maybe the "I quit" crowd already quit?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Lockark wrote:

I already know a player or two who will try to get games with broken spam lists with unbound. Bassiclt picking on newer players for the lulz


OH a bully then?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 17:37:38


Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus





 Accolade wrote:
This thread reads like it needs a BAM! after a lot of comments



I just pray that the 6th edition rule book + FAQ/Errata will be a viable approach, although the signs seem to be coming together to read as "no." I think that if that is the case and the rules turn out to be okay, I will wait a while to obtain a rules-only edition of the game. After only two years with the LE copy, well, I won't get fooled again!


You'll probably have to kill a few trees printing out the FAQ

3000
4000 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




 WrentheFaceless wrote:

Sounds like unbound is for ploping models on a table and trying to table each other, which can be fun too if its just that


I thought this was how a lot of people play. Especially when they say, this unit sucks since it doesn't make it's points back.

Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus





Davor wrote:
 WrentheFaceless wrote:

Sounds like unbound is for ploping models on a table and trying to table each other, which can be fun too if its just that


I thought this was how a lot of people play. Especially when they say, this unit sucks since it doesn't make it's points back.


Well model efficiency is important too, If i put a big beasty on the table i expect it to be worth its point cost

3000
4000 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




 WrentheFaceless wrote:
 Accolade wrote:
This thread reads like it needs a BAM! after a lot of comments



I just pray that the 6th edition rule book + FAQ/Errata will be a viable approach, although the signs seem to be coming together to read as "no." I think that if that is the case and the rules turn out to be okay, I will wait a while to obtain a rules-only edition of the game. After only two years with the LE copy, well, I won't get fooled again!


You'll probably have to kill a few trees printing out the FAQ


So it's ok to kill the environment by surfing the net that takes electricity? This is more harmful than killing a few trees. Also what if he is not printing it out and using an iPad or some other tablet?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 17:41:41


Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






New Orleans, LA

 ClockworkZion wrote:
 Sir Arun wrote:
Still you cannot argue that there isnt a steady powercreep in Magic. But I guess this is the industry norm pretty much in every game series still in existence today.

Can we take the MtG talk to a different thread before the mods get mad?


The mods are always mad. That's their secret.

2 years is way too soon for a new edition in my book. I don't like it. But, to stay current, I'll buy one from my FLGS anyway.

Dag nabbit!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 17:42:32


DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut






 Jidmah wrote:

Well, kind of. Even if it was the same person(was supposed to be a bunch of unrelated examples), he would have gotten a game after driving home gameless for six Saturdays, and then finally found a game (which he still might not have enjoyed) after not playing at all for almost two months. That's a lot of wasted fuel and time, if you ask me. That's why pick-up games simply ask for points and then duke it out. If the kid with the rhinos wants to play, I'll play him and go easy on him. Even if I'm not getting the game I'm looking for, I get to play. If the other guy is setting down the Warhound Titan, I'll see if I can beat it, even though it would take a lot of luck. Still better than standing around in a store with nothing to do but hoping that someone without a lord of war comes in.

But even in all of your examples, you still have the "Welp, better than nothing I guess" option. I'm merely suggesting that instead of simply accepting a game you don't find fun, that you might have an actual conversation with the person to see if there is perhaps some middle ground to be reached. Perhaps I'm being optimistically naive, but I'd like to think someone there for a fun game would be willing to try to make it fun for both people.

 Jidmah wrote:

That's my point. Either you get a game in and might get tabled, or just just don't play a game. For what we know, that imaginary person might totally suck at generalship and you manage to beat him easily. Or you get tabled, get to know that person and arrange a game with him for next week. Still better than simply refusing to play.

Because that person might not be present, is already playing a game with other people, didn't bring the models to play the game you're looking for or simply doesn't want to play you for other reasons. Not everyone can afford to hang around the store for hours and days, waiting till someone comes to play your way. Most of the time, there are only one or two opponents to chose from, and a lot of times, those people don't have the same idea of how the game is supposed to be played as you. The smallest common ground are GW's rules. If you leave that common ground, you are willingly skipping out of games. The farther you leave, the less games you get. If you refuse to play against Tau, Eldar, Daemons, Escalation, Stronghold, Grey Knights and anything from forgeworld - which is exactly what many people are suggesting - good luck on finding any games at all.

Ah, here may be where I think we've run into a communication disconnect. I wasn't suggesting you simply refuse to play anyone and everyone who doesn't want to play exactly as you do (which I realize is also not what you're suggesting, but rather was is hyperbolically being suggested at you). I'm suggesting that cries of "UNBOUND WILL COMPLETELY RUIN PUGs!" are off base in that it's not as though you can't speak with that other person and see if some agreement can be reached. Sure, sometimes there is nothing either of you can budge on, but in that case you're still really where you were before you asked: forced to either play or not play. That other person is presumably in the same situation you are: they want to play a game but have a limited supply of opponent's to choose from.
   
Made in se
Waaagh! Warbiker





Sweden

 ClockworkZion wrote:
 jhnbrg wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
 jhnbrg wrote:
So everyone think its fine paying another 100$ in an obvious moneygrab? So next edition will be in about 12 months?

And STILL no ork codex!

Orks in June.


This year?
Doubt it.

This year. We've been getting rumors for like 5 months now that they are the next codex after the Guard codex.


There has been wishlisting for a couple of years now, orks is always the next codex after whatever.

 
   
Made in us
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis




On the Internet

Davor wrote:
So it's ok to kill the environment by surfing the net that takes electricity? This is more harmful than killing a few trees. Also what if he is not printing it out and using an iPad or some other tablet?

Hydroelectric power here.

Seriously, I expect a massive FAQ for this. And it will be magical.
   
Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus





 ClockworkZion wrote:
Davor wrote:
So it's ok to kill the environment by surfing the net that takes electricity? This is more harmful than killing a few trees. Also what if he is not printing it out and using an iPad or some other tablet?

Hydroelectric power here.

Seriously, I expect a massive FAQ for this. And it will be magical.


It will probably be the length of the 6th ed rulebook

3000
4000 
   
Made in us
Stoic Grail Knight





Raleigh, NC

 jhnbrg wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
 jhnbrg wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
 jhnbrg wrote:
So everyone think its fine paying another 100$ in an obvious moneygrab? So next edition will be in about 12 months?

And STILL no ork codex!

Orks in June.


This year?
Doubt it.

This year. We've been getting rumors for like 5 months now that they are the next codex after the Guard codex.


There has been wishlisting for a couple of years now, orks is always the next codex after whatever.


Hey, they did just give WHFB WE an update. People were speculating they were going to be squatted.

I think if WE can get updated, then Orks can't be far away.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 17:50:09


 
   
Made in us
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis




On the Internet

 WrentheFaceless wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
Davor wrote:
So it's ok to kill the environment by surfing the net that takes electricity? This is more harmful than killing a few trees. Also what if he is not printing it out and using an iPad or some other tablet?

Hydroelectric power here.

Seriously, I expect a massive FAQ for this. And it will be magical.


It will probably be the length of the 6th ed rulebook

....I may need another ream of paper then.
   
Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus





So seems instead of an allies matrix theres a 'faction' now. Probably imperium/chaos/eldar/everyone else? lol

3000
4000 
   
Made in us
Stoic Grail Knight





Raleigh, NC

 WrentheFaceless wrote:
So seems instead of an allies matrix theres a 'faction' now. Probably imperium/chaos/eldar/everyone else? lol


Will Sisters be in their own separate-but-hated bracket?
   
Made in us
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis




On the Internet

 WrentheFaceless wrote:
So seems instead of an allies matrix theres a 'faction' now. Probably imperium/chaos/eldar/everyone else? lol

I think they renamed the "Primary Detachment" to being a "Faction" instead. More thematic that way.
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran






Western Massachusetts

 optometris wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
via an anonymous source on Faeit 212
These are in Australian prices
Standard edition 140
Collectors Edition 360
Physhic Cards 16
Objective Tokens 12
Anyone care to translate that to prices for the rest of the work?


Though from what I understand Aussie prices tend to be inflated somewhat

For her majesty's empire

Standard £67
Collectors £200
psychic cards £9
tokens £7
(all rounded up a bit)

for you yanks

standard $131
Collectors $337
psychic cards $15
tokens $11.20

Edit: bah beaten to it


Okay, I still have a few pages yet to read through, but just in case nobody else has filled you all in yet:

Standard: $85US
Munitorum (Collectors): $340US
Psychic Cards: $15US
Tactical Objectives: $8US

   
Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus





Accolade wrote:
 WrentheFaceless wrote:
So seems instead of an allies matrix theres a 'faction' now. Probably imperium/chaos/eldar/everyone else? lol


Will Sisters be in their own separate-but-hated bracket?


Maybe they'll have no faction and get all the bonuses? haha

ClockworkZion wrote:
 WrentheFaceless wrote:
So seems instead of an allies matrix theres a 'faction' now. Probably imperium/chaos/eldar/everyone else? lol

I think they renamed the "Primary Detachment" to being a "Faction" instead. More thematic that way.


Maybe, itll be interesting to say the least, this weeks WD should have more information

3000
4000 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






New Orleans, LA

 Dullspork wrote:

Standard: $85US
Munitorum (Collectors): $340US
Psychic Cards: $15US
Tactical Objectives: $8US


$85 seems high, GW. I mean, sure I'll pay that and then some for a FW book, but that's quality stuff.

Basic Rule book? Your killing me, smalls!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 18:04:29


DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






Hmm, Imperial/Chaos/Xenos? Nids will still just eat everyone though.
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





 Dullspork wrote:
Standard: $85US
Munitorum (Collectors): $340US
Psychic Cards: $15US
Tactical Objectives: $8US

Not that I doubt you, but source?

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in us
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis




On the Internet

 WrentheFaceless wrote:
Maybe, itll be interesting to say the least, this weeks WD should have more information

I'm hoping it leaks soon. We got last week's on Monday, so were is the next one?
   
Made in de
Joined the Military for Authentic Experience






Nuremberg

Still waiting for the most important information of all- the models in the starter.
If Orks are up soon, then having them in the starter makes sense, and it's also possibly sensible to have Blood Angels be with them, since BA haven't had an update in a wee while, they could be next after that.

If it's Orks and Blood Angels, I'm leaning a little more towards picking up a starter, for nostalgia reasons.


Still haven't painted my last starter's worth though! Should really get on that.

   
Made in us
The New Miss Macross!





the Mothership...

 Da Boss wrote:
Still waiting for the most important information of all- the models in the starter.
If Orks are up soon, then having them in the starter makes sense, and it's also possibly sensible to have Blood Angels be with them, since BA haven't had an update in a wee while, they could be next after that.

If it's Orks and Blood Angels, I'm leaning a little more towards picking up a starter, for nostalgia reasons.


Still haven't painted my last starter's worth though! Should really get on that.


Starters have traditionally come out a few months AFTER the big rule book for recent editions IIRC.
   
Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus





Starters usually do, but since this edition is comming out quicker than prior ones, perhaps the starter will be out a bit quicker as well?

3000
4000 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






New Orleans, LA

 warboss wrote:
 Da Boss wrote:
Still waiting for the most important information of all- the models in the starter.
If Orks are up soon, then having them in the starter makes sense, and it's also possibly sensible to have Blood Angels be with them, since BA haven't had an update in a wee while, they could be next after that.

If it's Orks and Blood Angels, I'm leaning a little more towards picking up a starter, for nostalgia reasons.


Still haven't painted my last starter's worth though! Should really get on that.


Starters have traditionally come out a few months AFTER the big rule book for recent editions IIRC.


You are correct:

5th edition: July 2008
Assault on Black Reach: Sept 2008

6th Edition: June 2012
Dark Vengeance: Sept 2012

 WrentheFaceless wrote:
Starters usually do, but since this edition is comming out quicker than prior ones, perhaps the starter will be out a bit quicker as well?


Here's hoping!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 18:13:52


DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




 ClockworkZion wrote:
 WrentheFaceless wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
Davor wrote:
So it's ok to kill the environment by surfing the net that takes electricity? This is more harmful than killing a few trees. Also what if he is not printing it out and using an iPad or some other tablet?

Hydroelectric power here.

Seriously, I expect a massive FAQ for this. And it will be magical.


It will probably be the length of the 6th ed rulebook

....I may need another ream of paper then.


Get with the times. Get an iPad. Will be cheaper with all that paper, and it will save some trees.

BTW I see you are like me. You can't decide if you are Canadian or American.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/12 18:16:08


Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in de
Joined the Military for Authentic Experience






Nuremberg

Ah well, no harm. Gives me a little more time to paint what I've got!

   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut



Las Vegas

 Dullspork wrote:
 optometris wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
Spoiler:
via an anonymous source on Faeit 212
These are in Australian prices
Standard edition 140
Collectors Edition 360
Physhic Cards 16
Objective Tokens 12
Anyone care to translate that to prices for the rest of the work?


Though from what I understand Aussie prices tend to be inflated somewhat

For her majesty's empire

Standard £67
Collectors £200
psychic cards £9
tokens £7
(all rounded up a bit)

for you yanks

standard $131
Collectors $337
psychic cards $15
tokens $11.20

Edit: bah beaten to it


Okay, I still have a few pages yet to read through, but just in case nobody else has filled you all in yet:

Standard: $85US
Munitorum (Collectors): $340US
Psychic Cards: $15US
Tactical Objectives: $8US

If the "Tactical Objectives" is the 36 card deck of objectives for "Maelstrom of War" missions, that's a surprisingly low price.
   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: