Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 14:50:57
Subject: Re:Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Looky Likey wrote:Virules wrote:Thanks for the clarification....sounds like it's a detachment not a formation? From your description it seems like you lose Objective Secured from a CAD, but you buff the Master of the Hordes ability (assuming that's what you took). Still wondering whether they changed the wording of the Master of the Horde to say "Ongoing Reserves? instead of "Reserves" but I guess if they copy-pasted it, then sadly probably not...
How much more expensive are platoons per model, since they come with BS3/WS3 base? In IA13 it's a little different since it's a flat squad upgrade...
Its a detachment, poor phrasing on my part. The rule is clearly written to cover anything going back into reserves for the recycling special rule, very clearly doesn't give that rule to anything that doesn't already have it.
As mentioned in my side by side comparision of the two books, troops are exactly the same in everyway. My initial thoughts were based on what I (mis)remembered from IA13.
Thanks a bunch. That sounds incredibly strong, even with the loss of Objective Secured. So excited. 90 guys coming back on 2+ sounds so strong.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 16:09:56
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
ImAGeek wrote: aka_mythos wrote:I have no doubt FW is repeating what they did with the Mechanicum by producing for the Imperial army a number of lists that build upon each other, each representing a broader and broader force. First we had the Ordo Reductor list, the Legio Cybernetica, and then finally the Tagmatta Omnissiah. Now we have Solar Aulia, then Imperalis Auxilia... And we'll probably get a third.
Solar Auxilia are their own force, like Stormtroopers in 40k. The force coming in Book V is more like PDF forces, less elite than the SA. So I think it's different to the way they did the Mechanicum.
Those three Mechanicum armylists represent 3 entirely seperate branches of the Mechanicum's military forces, each it's own force. In this era they are all very seperate arms of the Mechanicum. FW has used their similarities to cascade and build up into a larger list. You draw the stormtrooper parallel... Stormtroopers are in both their own list and the Imperial Guard lists... And I'd bet Solar Auxilia will be likewise their own list and elites in the Imperialis Auxilia. Automatically Appended Next Post: SirDonlad wrote: aka_mythos wrote: ...First we had the Ordo Reductor list, the Legio Cybernetica, and then finally the Tagmatta Omnissiah. Now we have Solar Aulia, then Imperalis Auxilia... And we'll probably get a third.
sorry to be technical here (I'm an engineer, I can't help it) but the Ordo Reductor wasn't a list until book two came out and allowed its units to be used as one; the 'Ordo Reductor list' was included as an allied detachment (never intended to be fielded on it's own) for a loyalist player.
honestly, I'm just bitter that the whole Ordo Reductor has to be the shattered remnants of the Isstvan atrocity.
Technically (I'm an engineer too) they're included in the appendix where there is nothing saying they can't be taken as their own Armylist. The Legion Armylist is the only mention of them as allies and just says that a Legion can take them as an ally. There is no restriction on them being taken standalone.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/12 16:20:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 16:31:08
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
There's too much in the SA list to be elites in the Imperial Army list, whenever it comes out. And the next list is the PDF type force, which they've already said is different to SA, not elite, more numbers. So already it's different to how they did the Mechanicum.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 16:41:22
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
ImAGeek wrote:gasdg wrote:Must point out, I love Girlyman. I know will still be any wip however believe he or she appears great. Be intriguing to determine exactly how this individual turns out.
He or she..? Guilliman is definitely a he.
No kidding, right?
That "funny" spelling has to be one of the least funny misspellings, ever.
I HOPE it is just because "Roboute Guilliman" is, I guess, kind of hard to remember how to spell correctly?
Maybe?
I hope?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 16:42:58
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
Agreed, Girlyman is one of my pet peeves. Guilliman is in my autocorrect now so it does it for me haha.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 16:43:40
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
The only thing harder than spelling it is saying it! Automatically Appended Next Post: Plus, he is a bit of a ponce.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/12 16:44:12
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 17:16:27
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Row Boot Eh Gill e man
Thats how that one guy said it in that audio book
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 17:20:26
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
We'll find out soon enough eh.
|
Desubot wrote:Row Boot Eh Gill e man
Thats how that one guy said it in that audio book
One of the audiobook narrators had it as Rowboat Goolieman, I cracked up so hard at the sound of it that the whole bus looked at me like I was mad
|
I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 17:23:35
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
Assuming it's pseudo French, which it looks like, the 'guil" could actually be "gwee" so his surname could be gweeliman.
Then his first name could be row-boot, but equally could be rob-oot.
Ultimately, made up name is made up, so say it how you like, but it's a damn sight harder than Horus!
|
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 17:36:05
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
I think it is just simpler to go with rowboat girlyman.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 17:45:24
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Row, row, row your boat...gently down the warp stream.
...
...
Sorry.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 17:53:00
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
aka_mythos wrote:
Automatically Appended Next Post:
SirDonlad wrote: aka_mythos wrote: ...First we had the Ordo Reductor list, the Legio Cybernetica, and then finally the Tagmatta Omnissiah. Now we have Solar Aulia, then Imperalis Auxilia... And we'll probably get a third.
sorry to be technical here (I'm an engineer, I can't help it) but the Ordo Reductor wasn't a list until book two came out and allowed its units to be used as one; the 'Ordo Reductor list' was included as an allied detachment (never intended to be fielded on it's own) for a loyalist player.
honestly, I'm just bitter that the whole Ordo Reductor has to be the shattered remnants of the Isstvan atrocity.
Technically (I'm an engineer too) they're included in the appendix where there is nothing saying they can't be taken as their own Armylist. The Legion Armylist is the only mention of them as allies and just says that a Legion can take them as an ally. There is no restriction on them being taken standalone.
yeah, the appendix was intended for people to use their titans as LOW choices and we were given a single troop choice and a single unique character which couldnt join other squads! at that point it was in NO WAY intended as a standalone list i emailed them about it when i got betrayal and thats what they said - they also admitted to me at the time that the mechanicum models were much more popular than they were expecting and a full list may be around the corner (shame i didnt save that e-mail, i honestly didnt think i would ever need it!).
go get your copy of betrayal: look at caleb's entry in the bottom right on the right-hand side; theres a bit titled 'Castellan Reductor' - first line states:
"Calleb Decima is a HQ choice for an Ordo Reductor Allied Detachment, and if you are using the isstvan 3 campain, this detachment may only be chosen by the Loyalist side"
it was a massive deal for me and i went ahead and made a primary detachment from it anyway! i just made sure that if they renaged on their e-mail that i could have a sizeable reductor allied detachment with only enough marines to technically count as my primary.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/12 17:54:32
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-px27tzAtVwZpZ4ljopV2w "ashtrays and teacups do not count as cover"
"jack of all trades, master of none; certainly better than a master of one"
The Ordo Reductor - the guy's who make wonderful things like the Landraider Achillies, but can't use them in battle.. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 19:25:43
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
I heard Alan Merritt pronounce it "Row-boo-tah Jewel-i-man" (with a very soft "j" sound, like the french "je sui").
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 20:04:35
Subject: Re:Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
Zingraff wrote:
At the bottom of the first column on the table of contents, as seen here:
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Images/Product/AlternativeFW/xlarge/VRAKS-CONTENTS.jpg
You'll notice that Krieg has two detachments, "Krieg Death Rider Squadron - Battle-Forged Detachment" and "Krieg Gorgon Assault Squadron - Battle-Forged Detachment".
I believe the list on the table of contents reveal all the units they intend to be used with a DKoK Siege army. As I mentioned the other day, I find it a little odd that they've left out aircraft.
Yes, I saw the table of contents, I was asking what the rules for the DKoK detachments are.
And leaving out the aircraft makes sense, if this is supposed to be a Vraks-focused list. There weren't any aircraft involved with the trench warfare, and they kind of contradict the theme of a static gunline with a horde of meatshields. Plus, it's all part of the same IG faction so you can just include a few Vendettas in your DKoK detachment even if they aren't in the DKoK army list.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 20:31:22
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
Vraks did see an active air war in the later stages though.
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 22:45:17
Subject: Re:Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
Salt Lake City
|
Peregrine wrote:
Yes, I saw the table of contents, I was asking what the rules for the DKoK [Battle-forged] detachments are.
This. Can someone provide us a general idea what the composition/rules are for these two, new DKK detachments? My imagination tells me they're awesome!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 23:16:27
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:I heard Alan Merritt pronounce it "Row-boo-tah Jewel-i-man" (with a very soft "j" sound, like the french "je sui").
Based on his Chaptehouse testimony, I wouldn't trust him to get his own name correct!
|
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 23:18:16
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Is 'Eavy Metal Calling?
|
Azreal13 wrote: H.B.M.C. wrote:I heard Alan Merritt pronounce it "Row-boo-tah Jewel-i-man" (with a very soft "j" sound, like the french "je sui").
Based on his Chaptehouse testimony, I wouldn't trust him to get his own name correct!
I don't know what you mean he was one of chapterhouse's best witnesses
|
LOL, Theo your mind is an amazing place, never change.-camkierhi 9/19/13
I cant believe theo is right.. damn. -comradepanda 9/26/13
None of the strange ideas we had about you involved your sexual orientation..........-Monkeytroll 12/10/13
I'd put you on ignore for that comment, if I could...Alpharius 2/11/14 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 23:18:27
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
Azreal13 wrote: H.B.M.C. wrote:I heard Alan Merritt pronounce it "Row-boo-tah Jewel-i-man" (with a very soft "j" sound, like the french "je sui"  .
Based on his Chaptehouse testimony, I wouldn't trust him to get his own name correct!
So... you're saying not to put any merit into Merritt's words?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/12 23:18:50
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 23:49:58
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
Would've worked better as:
"Don't put any merit into Alan's words!"
And having said that, let's ALL move on now, yes?
Thanks!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/12 23:50:12
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Anyone know what sort of special Ultramarine units we might see along side their Primarch?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/13 00:00:23
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 07:33:30
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
Guys with BALLS. BIG BALLS. BIG BALLS of ADAMANTIUM.
Probably some sort of honour guard with boarding / combat shields.
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 07:36:53
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
BrookM wrote:Probably some sort of honour guard with boarding / combat shields.
I think I heard that too ... Honor Guard. I do not know about the shields though. Ultramarines may even get more than just two elite units if I remember correctly ...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 07:56:55
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant
|
Snrub wrote:Anyone know what sort of special Ultramarine units we might see along side their Primarch?
A few pages back there are the shots of the WIP sculpts of the UM command squad and pictures of the proto van/sternguard unit we are getting. Even further back there are pictures from warhammerfest of the UM boarding marines with the shields. Only one I am expecting that we haven't see yet is the fancy UM terminators, there are pictures of them in the Battle for Macragge comic book, see bottom right here:
As every other legion has had them so far, no reason for UM not to be getting them as well.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 08:03:07
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Looky Likey wrote:As every other legion has had them so far, no reason for UM not to be getting them as well.
Well, not every legion gets a special Terminator unit ... I am especially missing the Atramentar.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 08:24:29
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Hey, maybe the new honor guard unit will mesh well with the fine cast/metal ones we have from GW, so we can mix them for our 40k forces.
A man can dream, right?
|
warboss wrote:Is there a permanent stickied thread for Chaos players to complain every time someone/anyone gets models or rules besides them? If not, there should be. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 08:33:28
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant
|
Fireball wrote: Looky Likey wrote:As every other legion has had them so far, no reason for UM not to be getting them as well.
Well, not every legion gets a special Terminator unit ... I am especially missing the Atramentar.
I'd expect them in the book covering their fight with the Dark Angels, otherwise you'd be getting nothing new in that book.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 09:04:36
Subject: Re:Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Alexis Pollux up for pre-order ...
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/New_Stuff/ALEXIS_POLUX_405TH_CAPTAIN_OF_THE_IMPERIAL_FISTS.html
It will be nice to get him and Sevatar with the same order ...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 09:09:59
Subject: Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
Gorgeous model, though a pity a helmet isn't included.
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/13 09:15:43
Subject: Re:Latest Forge World news and rumour thread : P83 Vraks revised edition
|
 |
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant
|
I didn't get chance to look at the model properly over the weekend, do we know if this model is much taller than a normal marine as he is meant to be much taller according to the books or am I misremembering?
|
|
 |
 |
|