Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
Well, look on up. Apparently driving the US into the stone age is the same as the Libertarian party's platforms.
Equally moronic, in different ways. I can't imagine how the world's largest military is going to be funded by the honor system.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/08 17:44:02
We were once so close to heaven, St. Peter came out and gave us medals; declaring us "The nicest of the damned".
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
The reckless email thing and paranoid/delusional kinda go hand in hand though
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/08 17:44:47
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
Never gonna vote for Hillary... besides, her recklessly exposing our nation's secrets is fething fair game.
So, I'm going to exercise my right to punch in a "protest vote".
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Not to mention her ghoulish history, in which her opponents seem to die at just the right moment.
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Well, sure. That's why I qualified her as "least worst". Surely, making it more difficult to buy another AR-15 is trivial compared dismantling the IRS, or taking all the coal and nuclear reactors off-line, or deporting all the Muslims.
Like it or not, America's got to choose between those four, and HRC is objectively the least worst.
We were once so close to heaven, St. Peter came out and gave us medals; declaring us "The nicest of the damned".
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
To be fair I tried to do some one offs on the Republican platform but it was 62 pages long and literally said nothing . Give Stein credit, she said something.
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Well, sure. That's why I qualified her as "least worst". Surely, making it more difficult to buy another AR-15 is trivial compared dismantling the IRS, or taking all the coal and nuclear reactors off-line, or deporting all the Muslims.
Like it or not, America's got to choose between those four, and HRC is objectively the least worst.
Hillary is problematic specifically because she will actually manage to get her legislation passed. Trump won't get his wall. Stein and Johnson won't get enough support from either side to pass any of their nuttier legislation. Hillary WILL get her 1 million Iraqi/Syrian immigrants during her first term.
The problem with having a 15% tax on business income and limits on the estate tax is that, even if they are the best ideas ever, they directly benefit Trump in a big way.
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
Ok, as much as I dislike Hillary, where is this "one million Syrians" coming from? How would you even transport nearly 5% of Syria's population across the seas in four years? And do so with a Republican dominated legislature?
I'm all for bashing Hillary where she deserves it, but I dont see where the idea that we're going to import a million Syrians in four years has any basis. The closest I've seen is a million *muslims* from across the entire planet, almost exclusively reported by places like Breitbart and WND.
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.
New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights! The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts.
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Well, sure. That's why I qualified her as "least worst". Surely, making it more difficult to buy another AR-15 is trivial compared dismantling the IRS, or taking all the coal and nuclear reactors off-line, or deporting all the Muslims.
Like it or not, America's got to choose between those four, and HRC is objectively the least worst.
Hillary is problematic specifically because she will actually manage to get her legislation passed. Trump won't get his wall. Stein and Johnson won't get enough support from either side to pass any of their nuttier legislation. Hillary WILL get her 1 million Iraqi/Syrian immigrants during her first term.
Politifact puts HRC's projected immigrant figures around 150,000. Not sure where you get the one million figure from.
We were once so close to heaven, St. Peter came out and gave us medals; declaring us "The nicest of the damned".
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Well, sure. That's why I qualified her as "least worst". Surely, making it more difficult to buy another AR-15 is trivial compared dismantling the IRS, or taking all the coal and nuclear reactors off-line, or deporting all the Muslims.
Like it or not, America's got to choose between those four, and HRC is objectively the least worst.
Hillary is problematic specifically because she will actually manage to get her legislation passed. Trump won't get his wall. Stein and Johnson won't get enough support from either side to pass any of their nuttier legislation. Hillary WILL get her 1 million Iraqi/Syrian immigrants during her first term.
Edit: I should apologize - I should have generally referred to Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than specifically to Iraqis and Syrians.
Politifact puts HRC's projected immigrant figures around 150,000. Not sure where you get the one million figure from.
They put the figure at 65k per year. A term is 4 years. This is IN ADDITION to the number of Middle East Muslims who are already entering the US permanently under green cards.
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Not to mention her ghoulish history, in which her opponents seem to die at just the right moment.
This old tired load of BS that's been circulating for 20 years? Really?
The problem with having a 15% tax on business income and limits on the estate tax is that, even if they are the best ideas ever, they directly benefit Trump in a big way.
I thought Trump would have to divest should he be elected. I know past Presidents have had to put their financial portfolios into blind trusts to avoid any impropriety. Would it be legal to continue as CEO of a corporation while serving as President?
The problem with having a 15% tax on business income and limits on the estate tax is that, even if they are the best ideas ever, they directly benefit Trump in a big way.
I thought Trump would have to divest should he be elected. I know past Presidents have had to put their financial portfolios into blind trusts to avoid any impropriety. Would it be legal to continue as CEO of a corporation while serving as President?
Pretty sure it would be toxic, if not illegal, to do that. I have heard that he'd give up his leadership positions to his kids if he were to be elected.
The problem with having a 15% tax on business income and limits on the estate tax is that, even if they are the best ideas ever, they directly benefit Trump in a big way.
I thought Trump would have to divest should he be elected. I know past Presidents have had to put their financial portfolios into blind trusts to avoid any impropriety. Would it be legal to continue as CEO of a corporation while serving as President?
The problem with having a 15% tax on business income and limits on the estate tax is that, even if they are the best ideas ever, they directly benefit Trump in a big way.
I thought Trump would have to divest should he be elected. I know past Presidents have had to put their financial portfolios into blind trusts to avoid any impropriety. Would it be legal to continue as CEO of a corporation while serving as President?
Pretty sure it would be toxic, if not illegal, to do that. I have heard that he'd give up his leadership positions to his kids if he were to be elected.
But he would still own them, or at worst his kids would benefit magnificently.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/08 19:51:18
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
In his defense, the Clinton plan is double down on Obama, so neither side is inventing the wheel here.
Not like the Wiener Dog Platform:
*A rub for every belly.
*A sofa to lay on to watch the telly.
*A pile of bacon on every plate.
*Thats the course for the wiener dog's ship of state.
And death to the cats. We will spend trillions to build satellite death rays to take out the cats from orbit. because its the only way to be sure.
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
The problem with having a 15% tax on business income and limits on the estate tax is that, even if they are the best ideas ever, they directly benefit Trump in a big way.
I thought Trump would have to divest should he be elected. I know past Presidents have had to put their financial portfolios into blind trusts to avoid any impropriety. Would it be legal to continue as CEO of a corporation while serving as President?
NuggzTheNinja wrote: Not to mention her ghoulish history, in which her opponents seem to die at just the right moment.
This old tired load of BS that's been circulating for 20 years? Really?
Especially since she's had more acquaintances die (other than natural causes) than enemies.
Just like everything else about Hillary, 20+ years of investigating her and spreading BS about her convinces people of BS. Anyone in power will have quite a few 'acquaintances' . Inevitably, something will happen to them.
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Well, sure. That's why I qualified her as "least worst". Surely, making it more difficult to buy another AR-15 is trivial compared dismantling the IRS, or taking all the coal and nuclear reactors off-line, or deporting all the Muslims.
Like it or not, America's got to choose between those four, and HRC is objectively the least worst.
Hillary is problematic specifically because she will actually manage to get her legislation passed. Trump won't get his wall. Stein and Johnson won't get enough support from either side to pass any of their nuttier legislation. Hillary WILL get her 1 million Iraqi/Syrian immigrants during her first term.
Edit: I should apologize - I should have generally referred to Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than specifically to Iraqis and Syrians.
Politifact puts HRC's projected immigrant figures around 150,000. Not sure where you get the one million figure from.
They put the figure at 65k per year. A term is 4 years. This is IN ADDITION to the number of Middle East Muslims who are already entering the US permanently under green cards.
I've read elsewhere that the 2014 figure is closer to 150k.
150k + 65k = 215k * 4 = 860k, or close to 1 million.
Come on, dude. "Hillary's plan for a million Muslims" is actually adding 55k to the 10k that are already coming in. The 100k that are coming in legally have been doing so for decades and will continue to do so, regardless of who sits in the White House.
"Hillary's plan" would add 55x4= 220k refugees to the US. Not 1 million.
We were once so close to heaven, St. Peter came out and gave us medals; declaring us "The nicest of the damned".
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
Frazzled wrote: In his defense, the Clinton plan is double down on Obama, so neither side is inventing the wheel here.
Not like the Wiener Dog Platform:
*A rub for every belly.
*A sofa to lay on to watch the telly.
*A pile of bacon on every plate.
*Thats the course for the wiener dog's ship of state.
And death to the cats. We will spend trillions to build satellite death rays to take out the cats from orbit. because its the only way to be sure.
I'm sorry Frazz, but I will take up arms in defense of my cat.
And thus the economy rebuilds. The Public (death ray defense contracts) and Private (people buying weaponry to protect against the death ray satellites) partnership!
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Yeah, but the Obama plan works
Thats not what ,millions of underlempoyed and discouraged workers say. Oh and do we even make anything in this country any more?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/08 20:21:58
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
Frazzled wrote: In his defense, the Clinton plan is double down on Obama, so neither side is inventing the wheel here.
Not like the Wiener Dog Platform:
*A rub for every belly.
*A sofa to lay on to watch the telly.
*A pile of bacon on every plate.
*Thats the course for the wiener dog's ship of state.
And death to the cats. We will spend trillions to build satellite death rays to take out the cats from orbit. because its the only way to be sure.
I'm sorry Frazz, but I will take up arms in defense of my cat.
And thus the economy rebuilds. The Public (death ray defense contracts) and Private (people buying weaponry to protect against the death ray satellites) partnership!
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Yeah, but the Obama plan works
Thats not what ,millions of underlempoyed and discouraged workers say. Oh and do we even make anything in this country any more?
Armalite Rifles. But I'm sure she'd work to shut that down.
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Well, sure. That's why I qualified her as "least worst". Surely, making it more difficult to buy another AR-15 is trivial compared dismantling the IRS, or taking all the coal and nuclear reactors off-line, or deporting all the Muslims.
Like it or not, America's got to choose between those four, and HRC is objectively the least worst.
Hillary is problematic specifically because she will actually manage to get her legislation passed. Trump won't get his wall. Stein and Johnson won't get enough support from either side to pass any of their nuttier legislation. Hillary WILL get her 1 million Iraqi/Syrian immigrants during her first term.
Edit: I should apologize - I should have generally referred to Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than specifically to Iraqis and Syrians.
Politifact puts HRC's projected immigrant figures around 150,000. Not sure where you get the one million figure from.
They put the figure at 65k per year. A term is 4 years. This is IN ADDITION to the number of Middle East Muslims who are already entering the US permanently under green cards.
I've read elsewhere that the 2014 figure is closer to 150k.
150k + 65k = 215k * 4 = 860k, or close to 1 million.
Come on, dude. "Hillary's plan for a million Muslims" is actually adding 55k to the 10k that are already coming in. The 100k that are coming in legally have been doing so for decades and will continue to do so, regardless of who sits in the White House.
"Hillary's plan" would add 55x4= 220k refugees to the US. Not 1 million.
Bringing migrants here from Syria would also be done "legally." The legality of it is irrelevant.
No amount of "come on dude"ing will convince me that these people are culturally compatible with Western ideals. Let them practice their religion on their own land. Let their Muslim brothers in the Gulf states take them in. I don't want them murdering homosexuals, stoning women to death, and practicing their legal system in the West. Trump's popularity is a direct consequence of the fact that many Americans hold the same opinion.
Have you ever given pause to think about why exactly the Gulf states don't want these people?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/08 20:35:53
Frazzled wrote: my rebuilds. The Public (death ray defense contracts) and Private (people buying weaponry to protect against the death ray satellites) partnership!
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Yeah, but the Obama plan works
Thats not what ,millions of underlempoyed and discouraged workers say. Oh and do we even make anything in this country any more?
Compare the economy of Kansas to that of New York Sorry, but Republican policies (The trickle down load and privatize everything) load of bull is what causes the economic problems. They, quite frankly, don't work.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
NuggzTheNinja wrote: Trump's popularity is a direct consequence of the fact that many Americans hold the same opinion.
Yes, Lack of education and exposure to multiculturalism means people hate what is different and support repulsive ideologies that support their bigotry.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/08 20:39:13
I can't believe you think reckless emailing is on par or worse than a racist bigoted clownshoes; a dark-ages idolizing hippy; and paranoid delusional antivaxxer.
You do realize her uncharged criminal actions aside, there are other reasons people don't want to vote for her, right?
Such as her gun control policy. That's the complete antithesis to conservative policy.
Well, sure. That's why I qualified her as "least worst". Surely, making it more difficult to buy another AR-15 is trivial compared dismantling the IRS, or taking all the coal and nuclear reactors off-line, or deporting all the Muslims.
Like it or not, America's got to choose between those four, and HRC is objectively the least worst.
Hillary is problematic specifically because she will actually manage to get her legislation passed. Trump won't get his wall. Stein and Johnson won't get enough support from either side to pass any of their nuttier legislation. Hillary WILL get her 1 million Iraqi/Syrian immigrants during her first term.
Edit: I should apologize - I should have generally referred to Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than specifically to Iraqis and Syrians.
Politifact puts HRC's projected immigrant figures around 150,000. Not sure where you get the one million figure from.
They put the figure at 65k per year. A term is 4 years. This is IN ADDITION to the number of Middle East Muslims who are already entering the US permanently under green cards.
I've read elsewhere that the 2014 figure is closer to 150k.
150k + 65k = 215k * 4 = 860k, or close to 1 million.
Come on, dude. "Hillary's plan for a million Muslims" is actually adding 55k to the 10k that are already coming in. The 100k that are coming in legally have been doing so for decades and will continue to do so, regardless of who sits in the White House.
"Hillary's plan" would add 55x4= 220k refugees to the US. Not 1 million.
Bringing migrants here from Syria would also be done "legally." The legality of it is irrelevant.
No amount of "come on dude"ing will convince me that these people are culturally compatible with Western ideals. Let them practice their religion on their own land. I don't want them murdering homosexuals, stoning women to death, and practicing their legal system in the West. Trump's popularity is a direct consequence of the fact that many Americans hold the same opinion.
So ah...do we have any evidence or data that these particular subsets of immigrants from Syria and Iraq are responsible for a disproportionatly large number of homosexual murders or stoning women to death or attempting to impose their religious laws on the legal system in the US...?
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.
New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights! The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts.
Sorry, but Republican policies (The trickle down load and privatize everything) load of bull is what causes the economic problems. They, quite frankly, don't work.