Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 21:55:12
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot
|
Here's a little thought for people to consider. I've been playing this game since 3rd ed. In that time, I've seen many predictions of doom when some new thing comes out. I've also seen the system and the community absorb those things and keep trucking along. For his points, Magnus is not the worst thing I've seen come along by any stretch.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 21:57:30
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Northridge, CA
|
Grand.Master.Raziel wrote:Here's a little thought for people to consider. I've been playing this game since 3rd ed. In that time, I've seen many predictions of doom when some new thing comes out. I've also seen the system and the community absorb those things and keep trucking along. For his points, Magnus is not the worst thing I've seen come along by any stretch.
For his points and powers he is pretty tame and not stupidly overpowered or stupidly underpowered. It makes me hopeful for the things to come in the next year in regards to chaos.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 22:26:08
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
So a 700 point model is tougher when you bring ANOTHER 100 points of miniatures that really needs annother 200 points of bodyguard to support.
So a few units worth 1000 points are tough. For a thousand points, shouldn't they be?
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 22:50:36
Subject: Re:Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Black Templar Dreadnought
|
Hmmm, Magnus, a Daemon Prince and was a freaking Primarch who was the pinnacle of psycher / magic power.
As long as a Primarch or maybe two are about an equivalent I would list that as "about right".
|
A revolution is an idea which has found its bayonets.
Napoleon Bonaparte |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 22:57:52
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Omnipotent Necron Overlord
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: Xenomancers wrote: Galef wrote:
Why? Pscilencers wound him on 6s and only ever do 1 wound to him....because he is Eternal Warrior.
Which is a reason DKs would only ever try to use Sanctuary, since Force is worthless and Magnus can deny Banishment on a 3+ (+1 for Psyker, +1 for Ad Will, and +1 for being higher ML)
andysonic1 wrote: Also, his beam is five warp charges and 18 inches, so he has to get pretty close to your models to hit them with it, putting him closer to your guns and retaliation. In fact, most of his offensive spells are 18 inches. He has to get right up to you. I have no idea where you are getting the idea that he's going to just be spamming powers like some kind of primarch of the psyker god when he takes up so much of your army and brings only 5 warp charges with him.
Magnus has 2 D powers, 3 if you have any D shooting. The D-beam, the D shot from Change lore, and the power that takes control of an enemy unit and can shoot you will it.
Magnus also harnesses WC on 2+, meaning that he really only needs to roll 1 more die per WC to reliably get off any power.
5 WC only really need 6 dice for him to succeed.
Magnus is better that 2 DPs for sure. He costs the same as Fateweaver and Belakor combined, yet can do a lot more damage that both, although FW & Bels are better support units
Eternal warrior - holy crap - this just keeps getting better and better. He is immune to all but 6's on d shots. Which he is practicaly immune to by being flying and being able to use your own D against you...jezz.
He's 650 points. Did you not expect EW or something? Like, really?
EW like a deamonprice? like FW? like Belakor?
|
If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 23:01:08
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Ragin' Ork Dreadnought
|
Xenomancers wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote: Xenomancers wrote: Galef wrote:
Why? Pscilencers wound him on 6s and only ever do 1 wound to him....because he is Eternal Warrior.
Which is a reason DKs would only ever try to use Sanctuary, since Force is worthless and Magnus can deny Banishment on a 3+ (+1 for Psyker, +1 for Ad Will, and +1 for being higher ML)
andysonic1 wrote: Also, his beam is five warp charges and 18 inches, so he has to get pretty close to your models to hit them with it, putting him closer to your guns and retaliation. In fact, most of his offensive spells are 18 inches. He has to get right up to you. I have no idea where you are getting the idea that he's going to just be spamming powers like some kind of primarch of the psyker god when he takes up so much of your army and brings only 5 warp charges with him.
Magnus has 2 D powers, 3 if you have any D shooting. The D-beam, the D shot from Change lore, and the power that takes control of an enemy unit and can shoot you will it.
Magnus also harnesses WC on 2+, meaning that he really only needs to roll 1 more die per WC to reliably get off any power.
5 WC only really need 6 dice for him to succeed.
Magnus is better that 2 DPs for sure. He costs the same as Fateweaver and Belakor combined, yet can do a lot more damage that both, although FW & Bels are better support units
Eternal warrior - holy crap - this just keeps getting better and better. He is immune to all but 6's on d shots. Which he is practicaly immune to by being flying and being able to use your own D against you...jezz.
He's 650 points. Did you not expect EW or something? Like, really?
EW like a deamonprice? like FW? like Belakor?
A Deamonprince of Belakor both cost half what he does, and aren't Primarchs. Also, I wouldn't say he's 'Immune' to all but 6s on D shots, since he still has to pass an invuln. (Admittedly, he's got about a 2/3rds shot of passing that invuln, but still.)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 23:25:05
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
Melissia wrote:So a 700 point model is tougher when you bring ANOTHER 100 points of miniatures that really needs annother 200 points of bodyguard to support.
So a few units worth 1000 points are tough. For a thousand points, shouldn't they be?
Plus troops and objective grabbers... What 500 + transport
Maybe 1500 before you even wanna top up for flavour, fun or cheese...
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 23:27:39
Subject: Re:Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Xenomancers wrote:
Magnus is easily the most broken unit "rules wise" that GW has ever laid on 40k. That much is already quite clear. In case you havnt seen - change has a beam D shot (meaning autohit - ignores cover and can bypass invis) - in the same turn he can shoot your best unit at your next best unit and possibly cast some novas and witch-fires after. Easily capable of destroying 400 points a turn or more starting at turn 1. Anything a flying daemon could do before Magnus is doing about twice as good.
Having fought against Warhound and Reaver Titans, as well as a Stompa loaded up with Mechaniks in pick up games, I really can't get behind the whole "Magnus is the most broken unit evar" thing.
Also the whole emphasis on D being super nasty is generally over done, IMO. While D is powerful, unless it rolls a 6 it's defensible, and it's rare that the 6 roll really has a worthwhile target. Unless the other player is bringing big, nasty, multi-hundredpoint models like Knights, WK etc, in which case D feels like a reasonable counter.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 23:49:25
Subject: Re:Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Insectum7 wrote:Having fought against Warhound and Reaver Titans, as well as a Stompa loaded up with Mechaniks in pick up games, I really can't get behind the whole "Magnus is the most broken unit evar" thing.
Also the whole emphasis on D being super nasty is generally over done, IMO. While D is powerful, unless it rolls a 6 it's defensible, and it's rare that the 6 roll really has a worthwhile target. Unless the other player is bringing big, nasty, multi-hundredpoint models like Knights, WK etc, in which case D feels like a reasonable counter.
The thing is, most players want to bring their mega-point cheese and have it run roughshod over the opponent. S(D) puts a stop to that in a pretty elegant way, esp. if backed by Stomp 6. That's why SMs are so adamantly against WKs - WKs were specifically designed and costed as hard counters to those crutch units.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 23:52:13
Subject: Re:Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
JohnHwangDD wrote: Insectum7 wrote:Having fought against Warhound and Reaver Titans, as well as a Stompa loaded up with Mechaniks in pick up games, I really can't get behind the whole "Magnus is the most broken unit evar" thing.
Also the whole emphasis on D being super nasty is generally over done, IMO. While D is powerful, unless it rolls a 6 it's defensible, and it's rare that the 6 roll really has a worthwhile target. Unless the other player is bringing big, nasty, multi-hundredpoint models like Knights, WK etc, in which case D feels like a reasonable counter.
The thing is, most players want to bring their mega-point cheese and have it run roughshod over the opponent. S(D) puts a stop to that in a pretty elegant way, esp. if backed by Stomp 6. That's why SMs are so adamantly against WKs - WKs were specifically designed and costed as hard counters to those crutch units.
That inadvertently makes WKs a hard counter to everything in the game
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 23:55:32
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Nah. WKs totally suck against things like mobs of Boyz and such.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/29 23:58:44
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
I dunno about that. It'll sweep them rather quickly.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 00:14:48
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 00:17:26
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
Waaaghpower wrote: Xenomancers wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote: Xenomancers wrote: Galef wrote:
Why? Pscilencers wound him on 6s and only ever do 1 wound to him....because he is Eternal Warrior.
Which is a reason DKs would only ever try to use Sanctuary, since Force is worthless and Magnus can deny Banishment on a 3+ (+1 for Psyker, +1 for Ad Will, and +1 for being higher ML)
andysonic1 wrote: Also, his beam is five warp charges and 18 inches, so he has to get pretty close to your models to hit them with it, putting him closer to your guns and retaliation. In fact, most of his offensive spells are 18 inches. He has to get right up to you. I have no idea where you are getting the idea that he's going to just be spamming powers like some kind of primarch of the psyker god when he takes up so much of your army and brings only 5 warp charges with him.
Magnus has 2 D powers, 3 if you have any D shooting. The D-beam, the D shot from Change lore, and the power that takes control of an enemy unit and can shoot you will it.
Magnus also harnesses WC on 2+, meaning that he really only needs to roll 1 more die per WC to reliably get off any power.
5 WC only really need 6 dice for him to succeed.
Magnus is better that 2 DPs for sure. He costs the same as Fateweaver and Belakor combined, yet can do a lot more damage that both, although FW & Bels are better support units
Eternal warrior - holy crap - this just keeps getting better and better. He is immune to all but 6's on d shots. Which he is practicaly immune to by being flying and being able to use your own D against you...jezz.
He's 650 points. Did you not expect EW or something? Like, really?
EW like a deamonprice? like FW? like Belakor?
A Deamonprince of Belakor both cost half what he does, and aren't Primarchs. Also, I wouldn't say he's 'Immune' to all but 6s on D shots, since he still has to pass an invuln. (Admittedly, he's got about a 2/3rds shot of passing that invuln, but still.)
Also Be'lakor has Eternal Warrior anyway. So yes, like Be'lakor
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 00:31:14
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
It's got Stomp and it doesn't need to roll a 6 to kill all the boys it steps on
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 00:42:09
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
CrownAxe wrote:
It's got Stomp and it doesn't need to roll a 6 to kill all the boys it steps on
Not to mention that the boyz themselves can't even hurt the damn thing, outside of strength buffs from things like hammerhand which is hard to get and pull off with Weirdboyz. Boyz mobz literally have to rely on characters or their Nobz with PK's to do anything against a WK, who can stomp them out of the unit if they roll that 6.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 00:43:40
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
Or if they roll a 2-5. S6 AP4 won't one-shot a nob, but all it takes is two stomps...
|
Clocks for the clockmaker! Cogs for the cog throne! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 01:00:29
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
Since a unit of nobs are a significant portion or exceeds the cost of a WK, and all the nobs die in one phase against it, I don't know how you figure this.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 02:56:59
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
No they don't. You're nuts. Or in denial. WK are massively undercosted.
"That's why SMs are so adamantly against WKs"
Only in your mind.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/11/30 02:57:56
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 03:09:37
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
why does this thread still exist when there's no thread about the splitting pink horrors?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 03:17:52
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Androgynous Daemon Prince of Slaanesh
|
Just ordered the model AND the book to spite the original poster. No, actually, I loved the look of the model. But someone telling us to boycott it even if we like it? Balderdash and horse pucky. We're all adults (well, most of us) on here. We can all make our own purchase decisions on our own. And I am SERIOUSLY looking forward to building and painting Magnus.
|
Reality is a nice place to visit, but I'd hate to live there.
Manchu wrote:I'm a Catholic. We eat our God.
Due to work, I can usually only ship any sales or trades out on Saturday morning. Please trade/purchase with this in mind. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 03:40:06
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
axisofentropy wrote:why does this thread still exist when there's no thread about the splitting pink horrors?
Because OP is actually tactically terrible, and doesn't know what's really broken?
As opposed to guys like me who no longer care, as long as we push models around and make pew-pew noises.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 05:27:32
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
JohnHwangDD wrote: axisofentropy wrote:why does this thread still exist when there's no thread about the splitting pink horrors?
Because OP is actually tactically terrible, and doesn't know what's really broken?
As opposed to guys like me who no longer care, as long as we push models around and make pew-pew noises.
It's true, OP is a bad poster.
Now someone start a thread panicking about THE HORRORs!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 05:57:39
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
War Walker Pilot with Withering Fire
|
I won't lie, the OP is kind of my favorite troll. He's some mix of not quite smart enough to understand big picture and angry enough to let that enrage him.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 06:27:20
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot
|
HuskyWarhammer wrote:I won't lie, the OP is kind of my favorite troll. He's some mix of not quite smart enough to understand big picture and angry enough to let that enrage him.
He's earned the official title of Dakka's Fovourite Troll for a good reason, and this thread exemplifies why.
And of course, there's my favourite part of the original post:
Traditio wrote: Somebody please tell me of a TAC answer to a hard to hit model with anywhere from a 2-4++ rerollable and a 4+ armor save.
I don't have the words to express how stupidly constricting this question is let alone what the question says about Traditio.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 09:18:15
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Brutal Black Orc
|
IllumiNini wrote:HuskyWarhammer wrote:I won't lie, the OP is kind of my favorite troll. He's some mix of not quite smart enough to understand big picture and angry enough to let that enrage him.
He's earned the official title of Dakka's Fovourite Troll for a good reason, and this thread exemplifies why.
And of course, there's my favourite part of the original post:
Traditio wrote: Somebody please tell me of a TAC answer to a hard to hit model with anywhere from a 2-4++ rerollable and a 4+ armor save.
I don't have the words to express how stupidly constricting this question is let alone what the question says about Traditio.
That he needs to learning the meaning of "combined arms warfare?" Automatically Appended Next Post: Matt.Kingsley wrote:Yes he can draw los to everything, however you have to look at this in context.
His longest range shooting attacks are 24". One is Str 5 and the other is a Str D6+1 blast.
Most of his other psychic shooting attacks have a 9" or 18" range, and are WC2 or WC3. He is not a long range shooter.
Note that I'm not saying that magnus is OP (He's well balanced IMO) but you're making a wrong assumption: he's 9-18-24 of range PLUS his movement, and he'll move at least 12'', so he actually has a nice threat-range once you factorize that.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/11/30 09:51:37
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 12:19:06
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
|
Didn't get the model.
Setteled for a limited edition instead.
Maybe I'll get the model at some future point, but first I need 2 more tartaros squads to build a full war coven out of my BoP set.
|
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 12:31:42
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot
|
Lord Kragan wrote: IllumiNini wrote:And of course, there's my favourite part of the original post:
Traditio wrote: Somebody please tell me of a TAC answer to a hard to hit model with anywhere from a 2-4++ rerollable and a 4+ armor save.
I don't have the words to express how stupidly constricting this question is let alone what the question says about Traditio.
That he needs to learning the meaning of "combined arms warfare?"
Pretty much. Needs to learn that there's more than one list and one type of tactics he can run haha.
Matt.Kingsley wrote:Yes he can draw los to everything, however you have to look at this in context.
His longest range shooting attacks are 24". One is Str 5 and the other is a Str D6+1 blast.
Most of his other psychic shooting attacks have a 9" or 18" range, and are WC2 or WC3. He is not a long range shooter.
I'm still kicking myself that every time I read WC on this forum, I think Warcraft (as in the game) instead of Warp Charge haha
On the original topic: I'd buy the model since it's a cool-ass model that looks bloody awesome when assembled and painted. Spiting Traditio via such a purchase is just a bonus haha. But alas, I need to buy more Black Templars.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 12:55:00
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Wicked Warp Spider
|
Lord Kragan wrote: IllumiNini wrote:HuskyWarhammer wrote:I won't lie, the OP is kind of my favorite troll. He's some mix of not quite smart enough to understand big picture and angry enough to let that enrage him. He's earned the official title of Dakka's Fovourite Troll for a good reason, and this thread exemplifies why. And of course, there's my favourite part of the original post: Traditio wrote: Somebody please tell me of a TAC answer to a hard to hit model with anywhere from a 2-4++ rerollable and a 4+ armor save. I don't have the words to express how stupidly constricting this question is let alone what the question says about Traditio. That he needs to learning the meaning of "combined arms warfare?" OP post is.. too radical even for my tastes, but let's not deceive ourselves: there is no deep tactics in current 40k. A bit perhaps, but is more spamhammer and gimmicks. You can often predict the outcome looking at the list. Better to do not lecture people on "combined arms warfare" with current 40k, is disingenuous, at best.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/11/30 12:55:33
Generic characters disappearing? Elite units of your army losing options and customizations? No longer finding that motivation to convert?
Your army could suffer Post-Chapterhouse Stress Disorder (PCSD)! If you think that your army is suffering one or more of the aforementioned symptoms, call us at 789-666-1982 for a quick diagnosis! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/30 13:17:57
Subject: Why You Should Boycott Magnus the Red
|
 |
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot
|
Kaiyanwang wrote:OP post is.. too radical even for my tastes, but let's not deceive ourselves: there is no deep tactics in current 40k. A bit perhaps, but is more spamhammer and gimmicks. You can often predict the outcome looking at the list. Better to do not lecture people on "combined arms warfare" with current 40k, is disingenuous, at best.
Even so, Traditio seems to be incapable of adapting to the meta and what his opponent might/will take. Traditio seems to think that all list can and should be able to be dealt with by a very limited style of list and a very limited style of play. From my understanding of what little of this thread I've actually read, this seems to be one of Traditio's fundamental flaws (and it's also a fundamental flaw that helped in the creation of this thread).
|
|
 |
 |
|