Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
I don't expect to see a serious federal crackdown on legalized marijuana not only because of the outrage it would provoke but from the blatant trampling of State's rights that they supposedly support. They wouldn't be able to spin that fast enough or hard enough to look good outside the diehard base.
I really hope you are right, but let's be honest, the only thing they love more that "states rights" is being "tough on crime." Which is the only reason the war on drugs was started.
A Town Called Malus wrote: No-one is upset or up in arms. We're just laughing at him for being an idiot.
Guess we're reading different articles. I'm reading from the news page I get by "swiping right" on my phone. ...
There's your problem right there. The GOP got itself into this mess by a consistent series of moves to the right and you've just continued the trend.
Lol, he meant physically swiping right... My phone has the same feature. I forget what it's called, and I'm not sure where they compile their news from, but it is a "news" brief service on at least Samsung phones (all of my Galaxy phones have had it... I just havent turned it off of this current one)
Dreadwinter wrote: I really hope you are right, but let's be honest, the only thing they love more that "states rights" is being "tough on crime." Which is the only reason the war on drugs was started.
If the war on drugs didn't have a reputation for being a case of massive spending with little results I would be much more worried. The GOP does like cutting Federal spending on everything but the military (and their paychecks) after all.
Another article from well-known lefty fake news purveyor The Economist pointing out that Trump is a dill weed gakker gak gibbon who does't have a clue what he is doing and is actively endangering the USA's strategic and military capability.
Tonight we should do a shot everytime Trump shoehorns in a nonchalant comment that congratulates himself for being awesome.
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should."
feeder wrote: Puddles and streams should be federal purview because groundwater doesn't respect state lines.
No.
Otherwise, why bother with a state government?
But jmurph is right. Y'all elected a gakstain clownshow, partially on a "Feth the environment, we need jerbs" platform. This is part of the fallout.
State sovereignty being sacrificed for massive government oversight is the left mantra, right up there with globalization. You know, the same thing that's chasing countries out of the EU now. Think Britain will be the only one?
Verviedi wrote:The issue arises when the way that a state "sees fit" is straight up wrong, or influenced by polluting corporations.
Because no federal officials or whole administrations worked in the interest of their donors. Clinton and the AHA come to mind almost immediately.
Just Tony wrote: Why not have tax payer funded tubal ligations? I think it'd be a more long term solution and be less controversial.
I think you cannot have this, simply because even with the best drafted bill for it, this will ALWAYS veer into, or be used for eugenics purposes. Now, that's not to say there's something inherently wrong with eugenics, but when a government is involved, I think it's safe to say it's used in very negative ways.
ELECTIVE socialist funded tubal ligations are eugenically driven? I simply don't have the words...
Moving goalposts much? You did not state elective in your initial comment.
I didn't think I'd have to explicitly state "not forced", but here we are. I will do my due dilligence and try to think about things from your side of the fence to make it a little more Liberal-proof as far as phrasing goes.
Verviedi wrote:Again, because state governments cannot be trusted to resist corporate influence.
Once again, feds cater to corporations just as much. If anything, sweet kickbacks from federal programs roll up some firms nicely. Solyndra comes to mind almost immediately. http://www.factcheck.org/2011/10/obamas-solyndra-problem/ You think corporations aren't getting the same kind of treatment?
Just Tony wrote: Why not have tax payer funded tubal ligations? I think it'd be a more long term solution and be less controversial.
I think you cannot have this, simply because even with the best drafted bill for it, this will ALWAYS veer into, or be used for eugenics purposes. Now, that's not to say there's something inherently wrong with eugenics, but when a government is involved, I think it's safe to say it's used in very negative ways.
ELECTIVE socialist funded tubal ligations are eugenically driven? I simply don't have the words...
Moving goalposts much? You did not state elective in your initial comment.
I didn't think I'd have to explicitly state "not forced", but here we are. I will do my due dilligence and try to think about things from your side of the fence to make it a little more Liberal-proof as far as phrasing goes.
Do you also support taxpayer-funded access to condoms, birth-control pills, IUDs, shots, NuvaRing, Sponge, vasectomies?
Republicans are lining up against President Donald Trump's proposed budget cuts to the State Department, hours before his address to Congress.
Mr Trump's 2018 budget blueprint reportedly includes a 37% spending cut for the State Department and US Agency for International Development (USAID).
He will set out to convince Congress of his proposal in his first address to a joint session on Tuesday night.
But Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said his plan was "dead on arrival".
"It's not going to happen. It would be a disaster. If you take soft power off the table then you're never going to win the war," Senator Graham said.
Topkek.
There's an inkling of a spine.
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.
New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights! The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts.
Just Tony wrote: Why not have tax payer funded tubal ligations? I think it'd be a more long term solution and be less controversial.
I think you cannot have this, simply because even with the best drafted bill for it, this will ALWAYS veer into, or be used for eugenics purposes. Now, that's not to say there's something inherently wrong with eugenics, but when a government is involved, I think it's safe to say it's used in very negative ways.
ELECTIVE socialist funded tubal ligations are eugenically driven? I simply don't have the words...
Moving goalposts much? You did not state elective in your initial comment.
I didn't think I'd have to explicitly state "not forced", but here we are. I will do my due dilligence and try to think about things from your side of the fence to make it a little more Liberal-proof as far as phrasing goes.
Do you also support taxpayer-funded access to condoms, birth-control pills, IUDs, shots, NuvaRing, Sponge, vasectomies?
If my choices are socialized birth control or socialized abortions, then easily I can swallow that pill. I'd rather those programs find their funding elsehwere, but at the same time every conception stopped is a potential abortion stopped.
Do you also support taxpayer-funded access to condoms, birth-control pills, IUDs, shots, NuvaRing, Sponge, vasectomies?
If my choices are socialized birth control or socialized abortions, then easily I can swallow that pill.
Fair enough, and good consistency.
My main concern would be towards folks who are pro state-funded tubal ligations but who oppose less permanent state-funded birth control options. In cases where tubal ligation or vasectomy are the only state-funded option, you end up with the optics of eugenics. Poor people would me more likely to seek permanent sterilization if that is the only option they have available that they can afford, while people with more resources are able to pay for their own less-permanent birth control options. So even though that may not be the intention, a program that only funds one option may end up with a "sterilize the poor" effect. That's why I asked about your stance on the other options as well.
I'd rather those programs find their funding elsehwere, but at the same time every conception stopped is a potential abortion stopped.
That's why I, and a lot of people, think that cutting off funding to organizations like Planned Parenthood would have the opposite effect. If they go away more people will end up pregnant, resulting in more abortions, resulting in more injuries when access to abortion is made harder. But yes, access to birth control reduces unwanted pregnancies, resulting in fewer instances of fetal abnormalities, and fewer cases of medical emergencies to the health of the mother.
Additionally, better funding for social safety and support programs would also have an effect on abortions. If people know that they could afford to raise another child and not have to have their family go hungry, they might be more likely to choose life. If they know that there is funding for daycare, with programs that are accessible to them, they might be more likely to choose life. If there is affordable housing available for a family, they might be more likely to choose life. People who are pro-choice like me want to see a system where abortion remains regulated and safe, but where people have the support and opportunities available to them to choose life.
Have you guys seen the Washington Post article about Trump feeling out the idea that the recent rise in antisemitism is a false flag by a cabal of Jews to make him look bad?
Do you also support taxpayer-funded access to condoms, birth-control pills, IUDs, shots, NuvaRing, Sponge, vasectomies?
If my choices are socialized birth control or socialized abortions, then easily I can swallow that pill.
Fair enough, and good consistency.
My main concern would be towards folks who are pro state-funded tubal ligations but who oppose less permanent state-funded birth control options. In cases where tubal ligation or vasectomy are the only state-funded option, you end up with the optics of eugenics. Poor people would me more likely to seek permanent sterilization if that is the only option they have available that they can afford, while people with more resources are able to pay for their own less-permanent birth control options. So even though that may not be the intention, a program that only funds one option may end up with a "sterilize the poor" effect. That's why I asked about your stance on the other options as well.
Just Tony wrote: I'd rather those programs find their funding elsehwere, but at the same time every conception stopped is a potential abortion stopped.
That's why I, and a lot of people, think that cutting off funding to organizations like Planned Parenthood would have the opposite effect. If they go away more people will end up pregnant, resulting in more abortions, resulting in more injuries when access to abortion is made harder. But yes, access to birth control reduces unwanted pregnancies, resulting in fewer instances of fetal abnormalities, and fewer cases of medical emergencies to the health of the mother.
Additionally, better funding for social safety and support programs would also have an effect on abortions. If people know that they could afford to raise another child and not have to have their family go hungry, they might be more likely to choose life. If they know that there is funding for daycare, with programs that are accessible to them, they might be more likely to choose life. If there is affordable housing available for a family, they might be more likely to choose life. People who are pro-choice like me want to see a system where abortion remains regulated and safe, but where people have the support and opportunities available to them to choose life.
And there is where you lose me. I have this problem with looking at the long term fiscally, and looking at how much it would cost for programs like that, and the domino effect I see isn't a good one. It's never the rich who wind up "sharing" all these social program bills, it's the middle class. The ppor aren't contributing, so it falls to most of the country to foot the bill. As taxes excalate to cover costs of every social program, "affordable" housing (we saw how that went down), "affordable" care (To be fair, I got to keep my plan, but my plan is Tricare.), soon more of the citizen's check vanishes to compensate. Suddenly the very people footing the bill are needing the same damn welfare programs because of tax offset. Eventually, unless somehow amended or repealed, such plans will lead to a horrifying future where your entire check is gobbled up by the government who then imparts to you what it thinks you should have. Logical progress of steps, and once again, something we've seen before. I'm much more in favor of killing income tax and placing the tax burden on consumer goods. Every time a CEO buys a Bentley it chips more into the system than a McDonalds working single mom buying a gallon of milk, and it will work out in the end far better.
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/03/01 02:58:50
Just Tony wrote: I'm much more in favor of killing income tax and placing the tax burden on consumer goods. Every time a CEO buys a Bentley it chips more into the system than a McDonalds working single mom buying a gallon of milk, and it will work out in the end far better.
You have this completely backwards. Sales taxes are (usually) regressive taxes, as the poorer you are the greater the percentage of your income you spend on purchasing things subject to sales taxes. If you want to shift the tax burden to the wealthy you want income taxes, with money from investments treated as income and subject to the same tax rates, and fewer loopholes for people with lots of money to spend on accountants to exploit. It's theoretically possible to carefully craft a sales tax that accomplishes the same goals, if you're willing to set specific tax rates for individual products (luxury cars, for example), but the result is a convoluted mess. It's much more straightforward to use income taxes instead.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/01 03:00:24
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices.
Yeah, progressive tax systems (i.e. you pay more on higher incomes, also known as what we theoretically have now) are the best way. Letting the rich keep more money doesn't stimulate the economy and never has.
Homosexuality is the #1 cause of gay marriage.
kronk wrote: Every pizza is a personal sized pizza if you try hard enough and believe in yourself.
sebster wrote: Yes, indeed. What a terrible piece of cultural imperialism it is for me to say that a country shouldn't murder its own citizens
BaronIveagh wrote: Basically they went from a carrot and stick to a smaller carrot and flanged mace.
And there is where you lose me. I have this problem with looking at the long term fiscally, and looking at how much it would cost for programs like that, and the domino effect I see isn't a good one. It's never the rich who wind up "sharing" all these social program bills, it's the middle class. The ppor aren't contributing, so it falls to most of the country to foot the bill. As taxes excalate to cover costs of every social program, "affordable" housing (we saw how that went down), "affordable" care (To be fair, I got to keep my plan, but my plan is Tricare.), soon more of the citizen's check vanishes to compensate. Suddenly the very people footing the bill are needing the same damn welfare programs because of tax offset.
Except this doesn't really happen this way in nations that offer these socialized services. They have to pay for these things either way, the only difference is if it's going to corporate overhead or government coffers, and, at least in terms of provisioning these kinds of services, the US privatized costs are outrageous for what they offer the consumer relative to the level of service and care that other nations offer from government programs at a far lower cost.
I'm much more in favor of killing income tax and placing the tax burden on consumer goods. Every time a CEO buys a Bentley it chips more into the system than a McDonalds working single mom buying a gallon of milk, and it will work out in the end far better.
Hrm, as others have noted, this is bass-ackwards in terms of placing the burden to minimize the burden on the lower and middle classes.
A CEO buys a Bentley perhaps once a year, maybe every two or three. That's a relatively rare purchase coming from disposable income from a very small market. Meanwhile the mom buying a gallon of milk is doing so once or twice a week. Their income is *far* more limited and they're having to pay that tax *far* more often. So you've shifted the tax burden in tiny increments onto a population of people who can't afford as much, and have to pay it far more often. The McDonald's mom's income has a much higher relative value and much higher economic velocity (because it's being spent very fast on basic necessities) and the taxes on sales as opposed to income means that she gets hit by the tax *way* harder than the CEO.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/01 03:35:04
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.
New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights! The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts.
Think about it this way, that single mom is spending ~80% of her income a year, the vast majority on essential items. That CEO is spending ~35% of his or her income, the vast majority on non-essential items.
Would not tipping him be pretty much expected? You are supposed to tip everything, especially at expensive places like that (you tend to get good money too).
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2017/03/01 03:52:08
Homosexuality is the #1 cause of gay marriage.
kronk wrote: Every pizza is a personal sized pizza if you try hard enough and believe in yourself.
sebster wrote: Yes, indeed. What a terrible piece of cultural imperialism it is for me to say that a country shouldn't murder its own citizens
BaronIveagh wrote: Basically they went from a carrot and stick to a smaller carrot and flanged mace.
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP'S ADDRESS TO A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS
Remarks as prepared for delivery
TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES:
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, the First Lady of the United States, and Citizens of America:
Tonight, as we mark the conclusion of our celebration of Black History Month, we are reminded of our Nation's path toward civil rights and the work that still remains. Recent threats targeting Jewish Community Centers and vandalism of Jewish cemeteries, as well as last week's shooting in Kansas City, remind us that while we may be a Nation divided on policies, we are a country that stands united in condemning hate and evil in all its forms.
Each American generation passes the torch of truth, liberty and justice --- in an unbroken chain all the way down to the present.
That torch is now in our hands. And we will use it to light up the world. I am here tonight to deliver a message of unity and strength, and it is a message deeply delivered from my heart.
A new chapter of American Greatness is now beginning.
A new national pride is sweeping across our Nation.
And a new surge of optimism is placing impossible dreams firmly within our grasp.
What we are witnessing today is the Renewal of the American Spirit.
Our allies will find that America is once again ready to lead.
All the nations of the world -- friend or foe -- will find that America is strong, America is proud, and America is free.
In 9 years, the United States will celebrate the 250th anniversary of our founding -- 250 years since the day we declared our Independence.
It will be one of the great milestones in the history of the world.
But what will America look like as we reach our 250th year? What kind of country will we leave for our children?
I will not allow the mistakes of recent decades past to define the course of our future.
For too long, we've watched our middle class shrink as we've exported our jobs and wealth to foreign countries.
We've financed and built one global project after another, but ignored the fates of our children in the inner cities of Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit -- and so many other places throughout our land.
We've defended the borders of other nations, while leaving our own borders wide open, for anyone to cross -- and for drugs to pour in at a now unprecedented rate.
And we've spent trillions of dollars overseas, while our infrastructure at home has so badly crumbled.
Then, in 2016, the earth shifted beneath our feet. The rebellion started as a quiet protest, spoken by families of all colors and creeds --- families who just wanted a fair shot for their children, and a fair hearing for their concerns.
But then the quiet voices became a loud chorus -- as thousands of citizens now spoke out together, from cities small and large, all across our country.
Finally, the chorus became an earthquake -- and the people turned out by the tens of millions, and they were all united by one very simple, but crucial demand, that America must put its own citizens first ... because only then, can we truly MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
Dying industries will come roaring back to life. Heroic veterans will get the care they so desperately need.
Our military will be given the resources its brave warriors so richly deserve.
Crumbling infrastructure will be replaced with new roads, bridges, tunnels, airports and railways gleaming across our beautiful land.
Our terrible drug epidemic will slow down and ultimately, stop.
And our neglected inner cities will see a rebirth of hope, safety, and opportunity.
Above all else, we will keep our promises to the American people.
It's been a little over a month since my inauguration, and I want to take this moment to update the Nation on the progress I've made in keeping those promises.
Since my election, Ford, Fiat-Chrysler, General Motors, Sprint, Softbank, Lockheed, Intel, Walmart, and many others, have announced that they will invest billions of dollars in the United States and will create tens of thousands of new American jobs.
The stock market has gained almost three trillion dollars in value since the election on November 8th, a record. We've saved taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars by bringing down the price of the fantastic new F-35 jet fighter, and will be saving billions more dollars on contracts all across our Government. We have placed a hiring freeze on non-military and non-essential Federal workers.
We have begun to drain the swamp of government corruption by imposing a 5 year ban on lobbying by executive branch officials --- and a lifetime ban on becoming lobbyists for a foreign government.
We have undertaken a historic effort to massively reduce job‑crushing regulations, creating a deregulation task force inside of every Government agency; imposing a new rule which mandates that for every 1 new regulation, 2 old regulations must be eliminated; and stopping a regulation that threatens the future and livelihoods of our great coal miners.
We have cleared the way for the construction of the Keystone and Dakota Access Pipelines -- thereby creating tens of thousands of jobs -- and I've issued a new directive that new American pipelines be made with American steel.
We have withdrawn the United States from the job-killing Trans-Pacific Partnership.
With the help of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, we have formed a Council with our neighbors in Canada to help ensure that women entrepreneurs have access to the networks, markets and capital they need to start a business and live out their financial dreams.
To protect our citizens, I have directed the Department of Justice to form a Task Force on Reducing Violent Crime.
I have further ordered the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice, along with the Department of State and the Director of National Intelligence, to coordinate an aggressive strategy to dismantle the criminal cartels that have spread across our Nation.
We will stop the drugs from pouring into our country and poisoning our youth -- and we will expand treatment for those who have become so badly addicted.
At the same time, my Administration has answered the pleas of the American people for immigration enforcement and border security. By finally enforcing our immigration laws, we will raise wages, help the unemployed, save billions of dollars, and make our communities safer for everyone. We want all Americans to succeed --- but that can't happen in an environment of lawless chaos. We must restore integrity and the rule of law to our borders.
For that reason, we will soon begin the construction of a great wall along our southern border. It will be started ahead of schedule and, when finished, it will be a very effective weapon against drugs and crime.
As we speak, we are removing gang members, drug dealers and criminals that threaten our communities and prey on our citizens. Bad ones are going out as I speak tonight and as I have promised.
To any in Congress who do not believe we should enforce our laws, I would ask you this question: what would you say to the American family that loses their jobs, their income, or a loved one, because America refused to uphold its laws and defend its borders?
Our obligation is to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of the United States. We are also taking strong measures to protect our Nation from Radical Islamic Terrorism.
According to data provided by the Department of Justice, the vast majority of individuals convicted for terrorism-related offenses since 9/11 came here from outside of our country. We have seen the attacks at home --- from Boston to San Bernardino to the Pentagon and yes, even the World Trade Center.
We have seen the attacks in France, in Belgium, in Germany and all over the world.
It is not compassionate, but reckless, to allow uncontrolled entry from places where proper vetting cannot occur. Those given the high honor of admission to the United States should support this country and love its people and its values.
We cannot allow a beachhead of terrorism to form inside America -- we cannot allow our Nation to become a sanctuary for extremists.
That is why my Administration has been working on improved vetting procedures, and we will shortly take new steps to keep our Nation safe -- and to keep out those who would do us harm.
As promised, I directed the Department of Defense to develop a plan to demolish and destroy ISIS -- a network of lawless savages that have slaughtered Muslims and Christians, and men, women, and children of all faiths and beliefs. We will work with our allies, including our friends and allies in the Muslim world, to extinguish this vile enemy from our planet.
I have also imposed new sanctions on entities and individuals who support Iran's ballistic missile program, and reaffirmed our unbreakable alliance with the State of Israel.
Finally, I have kept my promise to appoint a Justice to the United States Supreme Court -- from my list of 20 judges -- who will defend our Constitution. I am honored to have Maureen Scalia with us in the gallery tonight. Her late, great husband, Antonin Scalia, will forever be a symbol of American justice. To fill his seat, we have chosen Judge Neil Gorsuch, a man of incredible skill, and deep devotion to the law. He was confirmed unanimously to the Court of Appeals, and I am asking the Senate to swiftly approve his nomination.
Tonight, as I outline the next steps we must take as a country, we must honestly acknowledge the circumstances we inherited.
Ninety-four million Americans are out of the labor force.
Over 43 million people are now living in poverty, and over 43 million Americans are on food stamps.
More than 1 in 5 people in their prime working years are not working.
We have the worst financial recovery in 65 years.
In the last 8 years, the past Administration has put on more new debt than nearly all other Presidents combined.
We've lost more than one-fourth of our manufacturing jobs since NAFTA was approved, and we've lost 60,000 factories since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.
Our trade deficit in goods with the world last year was nearly $800 billion dollars.
And overseas, we have inherited a series of tragic foreign policy disasters.
Solving these, and so many other pressing problems, will require us to work past the differences of party. It will require us to tap into the American spirit that has overcome every challenge throughout our long and storied history.
But to accomplish our goals at home and abroad, we must restart the engine of the American economy -- making it easier for companies to do business in the United States, and much harder for companies to leave.
Right now, American companies are taxed at one of the highest rates anywhere in the world.
My economic team is developing historic tax reform that will reduce the tax rate on our companies so they can compete and thrive anywhere and with anyone. At the same time, we will provide massive tax relief for the middle class.
We must create a level playing field for American companies and workers.
Currently, when we ship products out of America, many other countries make us pay very high tariffs and taxes -- but when foreign companies ship their products into America, we charge them almost nothing.
I just met with officials and workers from a great American company, Harley-Davidson. In fact, they proudly displayed five of their magnificent motorcycles, made in the USA, on the front lawn of the White House.
At our meeting, I asked them, how are you doing, how is business? They said that it's good. I asked them further how they are doing with other countries, mainly international sales. They told me -- without even complaining because they have been mistreated for so long that they have become used to it -- that it is very hard to do business with other countries because they tax our goods at such a high rate. They said that in one case another country taxed their motorcycles at 100 percent.
They weren't even asking for change. But I am.
I believe strongly in free trade but it also has to be FAIR TRADE.
The first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, warned that the "abandonment of the protective policy by the American Government [will] produce want and ruin among our people."
Lincoln was right -- and it is time we heeded his words. I am not going to let America and its great companies and workers, be taken advantage of anymore.
I am going to bring back millions of jobs. Protecting our workers also means reforming our system of legal immigration. The current, outdated system depresses wages for our poorest workers, and puts great pressure on taxpayers.
Nations around the world, like Canada, Australia and many others --- have a merit-based immigration system. It is a basic principle that those seeking to enter a country ought to be able to support themselves financially. Yet, in America, we do not enforce this rule, straining the very public resources that our poorest citizens rely upon. According to the National Academy of Sciences, our current immigration system costs America's taxpayers many billions of dollars a year.
Switching away from this current system of lower-skilled immigration, and instead adopting a merit-based system, will have many benefits: it will save countless dollars, raise workers' wages, and help struggling families --- including immigrant families --- enter the middle class.
I believe that real and positive immigration reform is possible, as long as we focus on the following goals: to improve jobs and wages for Americans, to strengthen our nation's security, and to restore respect for our laws.
If we are guided by the well-being of American citizens then I believe Republicans and Democrats can work together to achieve an outcome that has eluded our country for decades.
Another Republican President, Dwight D. Eisenhower, initiated the last truly great national infrastructure program --- the building of the interstate highway system. The time has come for a new program of national rebuilding.
America has spent approximately six trillion dollars in the Middle East, all this while our infrastructure at home is crumbling. With this six trillion dollars we could have rebuilt our country --- twice. And maybe even three times if we had people who had the ability to negotiate.
To launch our national rebuilding, I will be asking the Congress to approve legislation that produces a $1 trillion investment in the infrastructure of the United States -- financed through both public and private capital --- creating millions of new jobs.
This effort will be guided by two core principles: Buy American, and Hire American.
Tonight, I am also calling on this Congress to repeal and replace Obamacare with reforms that expand choice, increase access, lower costs, and at the same time, provide better Healthcare.
Mandating every American to buy government-approved health insurance was never the right solution for America. The way to make health insurance available to everyone is to lower the cost of health insurance, and that is what we will do.
Obamacare premiums nationwide have increased by double and triple digits. As an example, Arizona went up 116 percent last year alone. Governor Matt Bevin of Kentucky just said Obamacare is failing in his State -- it is unsustainable and collapsing.
One third of counties have only one insurer on the exchanges --- leaving many Americans with no choice at all.
Remember when you were told that you could keep your doctor, and keep your plan?
We now know that all of those promises have been broken.
Obamacare is collapsing --- and we must act decisively to protect all Americans. Action is not a choice --- it is a necessity.
So I am calling on all Democrats and Republicans in the Congress to work with us to save Americans from this imploding Obamacare disaster.
Here are the principles that should guide the Congress as we move to create a better healthcare system for all Americans:
First, we should ensure that Americans with pre-existing conditions have access to coverage, and that we have a stable transition for Americans currently enrolled in the healthcare exchanges.
Secondly, we should help Americans purchase their own coverage, through the use of tax credits and expanded Health Savings Accounts --- but it must be the plan they want, not the plan forced on them by the Government.
Thirdly, we should give our great State Governors the resources and flexibility they need with Medicaid to make sure no one is left out.
Fourthly, we should implement legal reforms that protect patients and doctors from unnecessary costs that drive up the price of insurance -- and work to bring down the artificially high price of drugs and bring them down immediately.
Finally, the time has come to give Americans the freedom to purchase health insurance across State lines --- creating a truly competitive national marketplace that will bring cost way down and provide far better care.
Everything that is broken in our country can be fixed. Every problem can be solved. And every hurting family can find healing, and hope.
Our citizens deserve this, and so much more --- so why not join forces to finally get it done? On this and so many other things, Democrats and Republicans should get together and unite for the good of our country, and for the good of the American people.
My administration wants to work with members in both parties to make childcare accessible and affordable, to help ensure new parents have paid family leave, to invest in women's health, and to promote clean air and clear water, and to rebuild our military and our infrastructure.
True love for our people requires us to find common ground, to advance the common good, and to cooperate on behalf of every American child who deserves a brighter future.
An incredible young woman is with us this evening who should serve as an inspiration to us all.
Today is Rare Disease day, and joining us in the gallery is a Rare Disease Survivor, Megan Crowley. Megan was diagnosed with Pompe Disease, a rare and serious illness, when she was 15 months old. She was not expected to live past 5.
On receiving this news, Megan's dad, John, fought with everything he had to save the life of his precious child. He founded a company to look for a cure, and helped develop the drug that saved Megan's life. Today she is 20 years old -- and a sophomore at Notre Dame.
Megan's story is about the unbounded power of a father's love for a daughter.
But our slow and burdensome approval process at the Food and Drug Administration keeps too many advances, like the one that saved Megan's life, from reaching those in need.
If we slash the restraints, not just at the FDA but across our Government, then we will be blessed with far more miracles like Megan.
In fact, our children will grow up in a Nation of miracles.
But to achieve this future, we must enrich the mind --- and the souls --- of every American child.
Education is the civil rights issue of our time.
I am calling upon Members of both parties to pass an education bill that funds school choice for disadvantaged youth, including millions of African-American and Latino children. These families should be free to choose the public, private, charter, magnet, religious or home school that is right for them.
Joining us tonight in the gallery is a remarkable woman, Denisha Merriweather. As a young girl, Denisha struggled in school and failed third grade twice. But then she was able to enroll in a private center for learning, with the help of a tax credit scholarship program. Today, she is the first in her family to graduate, not just from high school, but from college. Later this year she will get her masters degree in social work.
We want all children to be able to break the cycle of poverty just like Denisha.
But to break the cycle of poverty, we must also break the cycle of violence.
The murder rate in 2015 experienced its largest single-year increase in nearly half a century.
In Chicago, more than 4,000 people were shot last year alone --- and the murder rate so far this year has been even higher.
This is not acceptable in our society.
Every American child should be able to grow up in a safe community, to attend a great school, and to have access to a high-paying job.
But to create this future, we must work with --- not against --- the men and women of law enforcement.
We must build bridges of cooperation and trust --- not drive the wedge of disunity and division.
Police and sheriffs are members of our community. They are friends and neighbors, they are mothers and fathers, sons and daughters -- and they leave behind loved ones every day who worry whether or not they'll come home safe and sound.
We must support the incredible men and women of law enforcement.
And we must support the victims of crime.
I have ordered the Department of Homeland Security to create an office to serve American Victims. The office is called VOICE --- Victims Of Immigration Crime Engagement. We are providing a voice to those who have been ignored by our media, and silenced by special interests.
Joining us in the audience tonight are four very brave Americans whose government failed them.
Their names are Jamiel Shaw, Susan Oliver, Jenna Oliver, and Jessica Davis.
Jamiel's 17-year-old son was viciously murdered by an illegal immigrant gang member, who had just been released from prison. Jamiel Shaw Jr. was an incredible young man, with unlimited potential who was getting ready to go to college where he would have excelled as a great quarterback. But he never got the chance. His father, who is in the audience tonight, has become a good friend of mine.
Also with us are Susan Oliver and Jessica Davis. Their husbands --- Deputy Sheriff Danny Oliver and Detective Michael Davis --- were slain in the line of duty in California. They were pillars of their community. These brave men were viciously gunned down by an illegal immigrant with a criminal record and two prior deportations.
Sitting with Susan is her daughter, Jenna. Jenna: I want you to know that your father was a hero, and that tonight you have the love of an entire country supporting you and praying for you.
To Jamiel, Jenna, Susan and Jessica: I want you to know --- we will never stop fighting for justice. Your loved ones will never be forgotten, we will always honor their memory.
Finally, to keep America Safe we must provide the men and women of the United States military with the tools they need to prevent war and --- if they must --- to fight and to win.
I am sending the Congress a budget that rebuilds the military, eliminates the Defense sequester, and calls for one of the largest increases in national defense spending in American history.
My budget will also increase funding for our veterans.
Our veterans have delivered for this Nation --- and now we must deliver for them.
The challenges we face as a Nation are great. But our people are even greater.
And none are greater or braver than those who fight for America in uniform.
We are blessed to be joined tonight by Carryn Owens, the widow of a U.S. Navy Special Operator, Senior Chief William "Ryan" Owens. Ryan died as he lived: a warrior, and a hero --- battling against terrorism and securing our Nation.
I just spoke to General Mattis, who reconfirmed that, and I quote, "Ryan was a part of a highly successful raid that generated large amounts of vital intelligence that will lead to many more victories in the future against our enemies." Ryan's legacy is etched into eternity. For as the Bible teaches us, there is no greater act of love than to lay down one's life for one's friends. Ryan laid down his life for his friends, for his country, and for our freedom --- we will never forget him.
To those allies who wonder what kind of friend America will be, look no further than the heroes who wear our uniform.
Our foreign policy calls for a direct, robust and meaningful engagement with the world. It is American leadership based on vital security interests that we share with our allies across the globe.
We strongly support NATO, an alliance forged through the bonds of two World Wars that dethroned fascism, and a Cold War that defeated communism.
But our partners must meet their financial obligations.
And now, based on our very strong and frank discussions, they are beginning to do just that.
We expect our partners, whether in NATO, in the Middle East, or the Pacific --- to take a direct and meaningful role in both strategic and military operations, and pay their fair share of the cost.
We will respect historic institutions, but we will also respect the sovereign rights of nations.
Free nations are the best vehicle for expressing the will of the people --- and America respects the right of all nations to chart their own path. My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America. But we know that America is better off, when there is less conflict -- not more.
We must learn from the mistakes of the past --- we have seen the war and destruction that have raged across our world.
The only long-term solution for these humanitarian disasters is to create the conditions where displaced persons can safely return home and begin the long process of rebuilding.
America is willing to find new friends, and to forge new partnerships, where shared interests align. We want harmony and stability, not war and conflict.
We want peace, wherever peace can be found. America is friends today with former enemies. Some of our closest allies, decades ago, fought on the opposite side of these World Wars. This history should give us all faith in the possibilities for a better world.
Hopefully, the 250th year for America will see a world that is more peaceful, more just and more free.
On our 100th anniversary, in 1876, citizens from across our Nation came to Philadelphia to celebrate America's centennial. At that celebration, the country's builders and artists and inventors showed off their creations.
Alexander Graham Bell displayed his telephone for the first time.
Remington unveiled the first typewriter. An early attempt was made at electric light.
Thomas Edison showed an automatic telegraph and an electric pen.
Imagine the wonders our country could know in America's 250th year.
Think of the marvels we can achieve if we simply set free the dreams of our people.
Cures to illnesses that have always plagued us are not too much to hope.
American footprints on distant worlds are not too big a dream.
Millions lifted from welfare to work is not too much to expect.
And streets where mothers are safe from fear -- schools where children learn in peace -- and jobs where Americans prosper and grow -- are not too much to ask.
When we have all of this, we will have made America greater than ever before. For all Americans.
This is our vision. This is our mission.
But we can only get there together.
We are one people, with one destiny.
We all bleed the same blood.
We all salute the same flag.
And we are all made by the same God.
And when we fulfill this vision; when we celebrate our 250 years of glorious freedom, we will look back on tonight as when this new chapter of American Greatness began.
The time for small thinking is over. The time for trivial fights is behind us.
We just need the courage to share the dreams that fill our hearts.
The bravery to express the hopes that stir our souls.
And the confidence to turn those hopes and dreams to action.
From now on, America will be empowered by our aspirations, not burdened by our fears ---
inspired by the future, not bound by the failures of the past ---
and guided by our vision, not blinded by our doubts.
I am asking all citizens to embrace this Renewal of the American Spirit. I am asking all members of Congress to join me in dreaming big, and bold and daring things for our country. And I am asking everyone watching tonight to seize this moment and --
Believe in yourselves.
Believe in your future.
And believe, once more, in America.
Thank you, God bless you, and God Bless these United States.
Pretty decent speech...
I'll try to catch a video to see it in action to see how he delivers....
Dreadwinter wrote: I really hope you are right, but let's be honest, the only thing they love more that "states rights" is being "tough on crime." Which is the only reason the war on drugs was started.
If the war on drugs didn't have a reputation for being a case of massive spending with little results I would be much more worried. The GOP does like cutting Federal spending on everything but the military (and their paychecks) after all.
Well, that would make them look weak on crime. Since this administration is pushing for more privatized prisons, I doubt that is the road they are going to take. My guess is they are about to double down on the war on drugs, hard.
Trump says we need to start winning wars again, why not start with one of the biggest failures.
Wait wait wait, the guy tipped the busboy and be seems like a "normal bloke"? How many busboys have you tipped and when did this become the custom?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/01 05:25:55
Good speech tonight. Funny thing with speeches, anybody can read a prepared text from a teleprompter. Sincerely saying we need to come together whilst insulting and bashing anybody, i.e. Intelligence Agencies, Press, McCain, etc. that ruffles his tender parts doesn't ring a sincere conciliatory tone. Time to walk the walk, Mr. President...or will it just be talk the talk when a teleprompter is available.
whembly wrote: Generally, it's not expected to tip anyone other than the waiters.
You've obviously never been to a really expensive place, they tip fething everyone.
source: have worked at fancy place in multiple roles. Good money too, on a big night like a banquet or something, you can take home ~$2-300. Although that's while getting paid next to nothing and working until 12, so it evens out in the end.
Besides, he's a rich fether. I don't give him any props for it. And it doesn't exactly excuse his assholishness, general horribleness, sexism, Islamophobia, racism, horrid ideals, constant lying, ect.
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/03/01 05:33:15
Homosexuality is the #1 cause of gay marriage.
kronk wrote: Every pizza is a personal sized pizza if you try hard enough and believe in yourself.
sebster wrote: Yes, indeed. What a terrible piece of cultural imperialism it is for me to say that a country shouldn't murder its own citizens
BaronIveagh wrote: Basically they went from a carrot and stick to a smaller carrot and flanged mace.
Rosebuddy wrote: This is why Democrats lose elections. Condescension towards people who simply want an economic policy that benefits rather than harms them is not exactly engaging. Losing faith in the Democratic Party because of their unwillingness to stand up to the police state, to economic exploitation, the misery of collapsing schools and lack of healthcare and their general incompetence is perfectly rational, not the result of childish expectations.
You've missed the point entirely. To explain it again look at the 2008 election. 69 million voters turned out to vote for Obama. That's 10 million more than Kerry got 4 years before. It's 5 million more than Clinton got eight years later. It's 3.5 million more than Obama himself got four years later.
Obama offered nothing outside of the ordinary, mainstream Democratic platform. His policy proposals were no different to what Gore or Kerry had offered before him, and Clinton changed very little 8 years later. So it's impossible to argue that somehow suddenly lots of people who voted Obama in 2008 were suddenly upset by Clinton's economic policies - they're the same damn policies.
Nor is it possible to argue that 2008 was due simply to Obama's skill as a politician. He was a charismatic speaker who maintained strong messaging throughout his campaign, but in 2006 Democrats won big in the house and senate mid terms, led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. It's basically impossible to attribute any electoral success to those two, and so the groundswell towards Democrats must have come from something else.
It becomes very obvious that the enormous result in 2008 really comes down to people getting really angry at the Bush and the Republicans who had managed a long string of feth ups (Iraq, Katrina etc), and enacted or at least attempted some incredibly unpopular policies (tax cut for the rich, medicare vouchers, private savings accounts to replace SS).
But if people got that angry about what Bush and the 2000-08 Republicans did, why wouldn't they be that upset about Trump and the current crop of Republicans? The Republicans have only gotten more extreme in the last 8 years, more committed to even more radical tax cuts and gutting of government programs. And Trump can only be even less competent and administrator than Bush. But this didn't prompt a response like 2008, simply while they were out of power the insane stuff Republicans were promising was just words.
Now that Trump is in power lots of that outrage is forming once again. Trump's opinion rating has dropped lower than any president at the same time in their presidency. Normally apolitical groups like scientists are forming plans to protest the Trump admin.
But it's all pretty pointless now, the only time that stuff really matters is on election day. And unfortunately on election day a lot of these people didn't get out and vote, because they simply forgot what it was like when the modern Republican party was in power.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/01 05:45:04
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something.
The Democrats are poorly positioned to take advantage of the outrage what with already rejecting politicians who speak to peoples' worries, having weakened local parties due to siphoning money through them for the presidential election and having lost a lot of faith by failing to defeat Donald Trump due to not campaigning properly. Clinton's response was to feth off into the woods while the real activists picked up the slack.
People don't fething forget that the Republicans hate them and want to destroy their lives, they despair at the inadequacy of the Democratic Party. It is the Democratic Party that has failed to provide for the people, not the people who have failed to give the Democratic Party its ascension to power.
Obama managed to charm people and get them excited for the first black president despite his bad policy. After eight years of trash, it isn't possible to excite people for more trash or the choice of a nastier pile of trash. People want a real alternativet. That's why Trump managed to power through the primaries and clinch the nomination, he took advantage of this by appearing to be different. All that literally Donald Trump had to do was point at the others and say "look at these clowns! yeesh!". That's the political climate that Clinton failed to understand, that the Democrats refuse to see.
They could, if they wanted to, fight tooth and nail to mobilize workers, the poor, students against the Republican assault on voting rights and utterly crush them through sheer numbers but that isn't what the Democrats are going to do because it would worry their coastal millionaire donors and the Democratic Party as a cushy career track would come to an end.
Not the fault of the USA, but I woke up this morning and got wall to wall coverage in the British media about Trump's infrastructure projects.
At first I thought there was a new bridge going to be built between Washington and London, but turns out, some roads are going to be repaired in Nebraska or something...
And another thing, we've all heard of Trump accusing Obama of causing trouble in the US government, these last few days BUT
given that Obama is now a private citizen, if Trump's saying that Obama is directing government officials against POTUS, then is Trump not accusing Obama of treason?
"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd
I'd seen an article today that estimated that Trumps travel ban has cost the US about $185 million in lost tourism already, with flight bookings from the UK to parts of the US (like Florida) being down as much as 58% year-on-year, causing a drop in hotel rates of about 30%,
And given the amount of hassle I've heard of from online/work colleagues on regular US business trips, I can certainly understand the reluctance to visit until things settle.
Herzlos wrote: I'd seen an article today that estimated that Trumps travel ban has cost the US about $185 million in lost tourism already, with flight bookings from the UK to parts of the US (like Florida) being down as much as 58% year-on-year, causing a drop in hotel rates of about 30%,
And given the amount of hassle I've heard of from online/work colleagues on regular US business trips, I can certainly understand the reluctance to visit until things settle.
US airport officials are some of the most rude, arrogant, and obnoxious people I've ever had the misfortune of meeting
"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd