Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Dude, I don't know what to tell you. You just can't stop yourself from talking about third-party stuff in places that it's been declared off-topic...including here. The issue isn't with anyone else but you at this point. Especially here where we have other threads that you can talk about that stuff to your heart's content.

You can easily talk up 3rd party stuff all over the place; some places just want to stick to the official plastic models. Not everyone wants 3rd party; not everyone wants a 3d printer - heck some people even have touch allergies to the resins (rare but happens).


The 3rd party thread here needs more love and attention anyway

 gorgon wrote:
Dude, I don't know what to tell you. You just can't stop yourself from talking about third-party stuff in places that it's been declared off-topic...including here. The issue isn't with anyone else but you at this point. Especially here where we have other threads that you can talk about that stuff to your heart's content.

Actually the admin already apologized and put the comment back, but I guess we found the kind of person reporting.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 Overread wrote:
You can easily talk up 3rd party stuff all over the place; some places just want to stick to the official plastic models. Not everyone wants 3rd party; not everyone wants a 3d printer - heck some people even have touch allergies to the resins (rare but happens).


The 3rd party thread here needs more love and attention anyway

It's not against the rules in that group, that's the sillyness, literally ever second photo posted either has a battle bling bit or includes grimdark terrain.

I'll remind you that like a page ago we were right back to wishlisting epic 40k like that's the topic with no enforcement as if someone's aspirations for future possible purchases of things yet proven to exist is somehow of more objective value than third party news, which has kept the game going the last 2 years. It's no secret there have been a whole 2 "official" at releases this year. That absence gets noticed regardless of what tends to fill it.


As far as the weapons, I actually need to see the rules in their entirety before even gracing a third party with my patronage. Have to wait till they're released just to see the cards. The dissapointment wasn't jus the weapon models, it was the release all together. It's the second release this year and they still need to hold information back for 2 weapons, it's exactly not state secrets

ingtaer wrote:To answer the question as to what can be posted in this thread, Rule #2 is stay on topic. The topic is GW's AT releases. Not 3rd party releases, if you want to post about other companies AT compatible releases there is a separate thread for that, if you wish to discuss other aspects of the game then there is a whole separate sub forum for that. If you don't have anything to post about N&R for AT then simply to do not post in this thread. Is that clear enough?

Crablezworth wrote:

 gorgon wrote:
Dude, I don't know what to tell you. You just can't stop yourself from talking about third-party stuff in places that it's been declared off-topic...including here. The issue isn't with anyone else but you at this point. Especially here where we have other threads that you can talk about that stuff to your heart's content.

Actually the admin already apologized and put the comment back, but I guess we found the kind of person reporting.

Still there for me…

Well, a new weapon is always nice. I’ll, probably get one of each ‘class’, but Iwas hoping for something in plastic…. like Great Gargant!

 ImAGeek wrote:

ingtaer wrote:To answer the question as to what can be posted in this thread, Rule #2 is stay on topic. The topic is GW's AT releases. Not 3rd party releases, if you want to post about other companies AT compatible releases there is a separate thread for that, if you wish to discuss other aspects of the game then there is a whole separate sub forum for that. If you don't have anything to post about N&R for AT then simply to do not post in this thread. Is that clear enough?

Crablezworth wrote:

 gorgon wrote:
Dude, I don't know what to tell you. You just can't stop yourself from talking about third-party stuff in places that it's been declared off-topic...including here. The issue isn't with anyone else but you at this point. Especially here where we have other threads that you can talk about that stuff to your heart's content.

Actually the admin already apologized and put the comment back, but I guess we found the kind of person reporting.

Still there for me…

2018 group


Automatically Appended Next Post:

MarkNorfolk wrote:
Well, a new weapon is always nice. I’ll, probably get one of each ‘class’, but Iwas hoping for something in plastic…. like Great Gargant!

Ya scale 5 or 7 plastic kit would have most welcome.

Yup, forgeworld release as expected, but not a bad release. At least the game is still alive...

Wish there was a warbringer carapace version, but I will probably do the same as volkite- 3 warhound and 2 of the others. And then throw them in my pile of shame titanicus section.

 MajorWesJanson wrote:
Wish there was a warbringer carapace version, but I will probably do the same as volkite- 3 warhound and 2 of the others. And then throw them in my pile of shame titanicus section.

More warbringer weapons would be quite welcome. The speedbump of the last one was it not coming with a mount/carousel meaning anyone buying it after building their titan were sorta out of luck, battle bling solved that, which may or may not be why fw hasn't released any others.

https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/210/756954.page

3rd party items removed - post these in the other thread.

Like all the very very on topic comments kept about wish listing epic or xenos. Make sure to keep 4 random pictures of cosplay tho , they're all critical reasons for people to check this thread for official tm udpates... somehow...

Bit surprised the Dominus is abscent from both Horus Heresy and Titanicus. In the fluff was it a knight that only existed during the later 40K era?

SamusDrake wrote:
Bit surprised the Dominus is abscent from both Horus Heresy and Titanicus. In the fluff was it a knight that only existed during the later 40K era?

Going by the 8th ed Codex, I don't think so - there's nothing about when they were introduced in the unit entries for the Castellan or Valiant, and the timeline section has the first entry referencing a Castellan in the M33-M40 section (in the Daemon World entry). Nothing in the timeline entry mentions it as being the first time they saw the field, though.

I see. Cheers Dysartes.

Dominus had pdf rules last edition didn't it?

Bit of searching and found this...

https://www.warhammer-community.com/2019/01/14/14th-jan-the-horus-heresy-new-imperial-knights-rulesgw-homepage-post-1/

...cheeky sods! C'mon GW - cough up! Wheres our bleedin' Dominus eh? Why, the hunchback will have something to say about this!

What's additionally odd is the release of a HH-branded pair of Armiger boxes - but I don't see a unit entry for them in the image of the Mechanicus book contents page on GW.com - can anyone with the book confirm if they're actually in there, maybe in an appendix?

 Dysartes wrote:
What's additionally odd is the release of a HH-branded pair of Armiger boxes - but I don't see a unit entry for them in the image of the Mechanicus book contents page on GW.com - can anyone with the book confirm if they're actually in there, maybe in an appendix?

Yeah they’re in the Knight Households army list. That image only shows the Taghmata list; the Knights and Titans are separate armies.

Weird that they don't call the unit entries out for that army list, then - are the Dominus Knights (Castellan and Valiant) in there too?

 Dysartes wrote:
Weird that they don't call the unit entries out for that army list, then - are the Dominus Knights (Castellan and Valiant) in there too?

Only seen the youtube review by Ash over at GMG, but the Dominus is the only missing knight from the line up. The Armigers are definitely in there as they're the only troop choice for the Knights to take.

I'm assuming that there will be a Heresy-packaged Dominus kit later( with era-specific transfers ), and maybe along with the model for Titanicus as a double-whammy, perhaps. That would be pretty cool.

 Dysartes wrote:
Weird that they don't call the unit entries out for that army list, then - are the Dominus Knights (Castellan and Valiant) in there too?

Nope, sorry.

Adeptus Titanicus Matched Play Guide

This new book is designed for anyone interested in playing Adeptus Titanicus tournaments. It features six deployment maps, five of which are brand new, and a host of new Primary and Secondary Objectives for Titan Legios and Knight Households in matched play games. There’s also advice for running your own tournament, rules for doubles and narrative events, and rules references for weapons, Titan traits, orders, and psychic powers.

Plus the Graviton weapons are going up for pre-order.

Sunday Preview – Kill Team Expands, Middle-earth™ Heroes Return, and New Hobby Tools

About bloody time.

Unless they've updated the House rules I'm not sure what they can do for matched play, as its solid enough as it is on the Titan side of things. It'll be interesting to see what the reviews have to say.

Nice news. Did someone ever attended an AT tournament?

Sadly not, but I'd eat you all alive if I did!

Johanxp wrote:
Nice news. Did someone ever attended an AT tournament?

For a pretty informal definition of tournament, I sort of have? I went to the NOVA open AT event, which was an escalation sort of deal of 3 games. Not quite a tournament, though.

A. I hope this doesn't mean GW is going to try to make Titanicus more of a competitive game

B. If there's no core rules in this, it could still be used in a future Titanicus 2.0 that I'm expecting them to try at some point

C. I'm perpetually amazed that GW is pushing out more books in a time when there's a global paper shortage.

While I can certainly appreciate that the tourney book is not going to be for everyone, I see enough tourney announcements for UK events that is going to be a boon for some.

The Graviton weapons will of course depend on the stats they attach to them, but they look decent.

Nice. Not expected that book, but if it has some new ways to play, why not. Though, it'll have to work hard to beat the Open Engine War pack.

Eh, give me new plastic or leave me alone.

So how do we call these new weapons, ruinator, runinator or runiator? It's spelled differently each time they use it. Quality GW writing again

MoD_Legion wrote:
So how do we call these new weapons, ruinator, runinator or runiator? It's spelled differently each time they use it. Quality GW writing again

Oh! Can't belive this....