Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2017/03/16 17:10:52
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Pacific wrote: Interesting if BFG is coming back. But, game design has moved on a bit since that first came out - it will have to be something special indeed to give Star Wars Armada a run for its money, in my view.
Likely to be same as BB and Notcromunda and almost exact port which is a double edged sword as it will get the crusties coming back and a spike in sales and interest just lime BB. However the recent BB league anecdotally has killed BB in my area at 2 stores and the local club as nothing shows up the many issues of it's 20yr old rule st than league play as if you play 1 game a week it is fun any more that that is tedious(you literally in many cases may as well just roll off before the game and call the highest roll the winner and save yourself a couple of hours you will never get back).
BFG is the same it was fun a decade ago now not so much, hell Firestorm Armarda is a better game and DFC and SWA are even better, also people will not play SWA because of the price so not sure how well a FW priced game is going to go down.
Your last point is especially laughable and comical, because not only the 7th ed Valkyrie shown dumber things (like being able to throw the troopers without parachutes out of its hatches, no harm done) - Irbis
2017/03/16 17:25:36
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
BFG is the same it was fun a decade ago now not so much, hell Firestorm Armarda is a better game and DFC and SWA are even better, also people will not play SWA because of the price so not sure how well a FW priced game is going to go down.
Eh, they've only got to beat the value of the SW Armada starter set to get someone interested. And if it really is a mirror side situation, then you have the choice of splitting the box, or doubling your forces at will. With how fleet games hook you, the starter should be a deep loss leader. Then you'll fork out for the 60 dollar battleship, and the other one, and the cool ordnance markers... and then you're too deep to back out.
Klawz-Ramming is a subset of citrus fruit?
Gwar- "And everyone wants a bigger Spleen!"
Mercurial wrote:
I admire your aplomb and instate you as Baron of the Seas and Lord Marshall of Privateers.
Orkeosaurus wrote:Star Trek also said we'd have X-Wings by now. We all see how that prediction turned out.
Orkeosaurus, on homophobia, the nature of homosexuality, and the greatness of George Takei.
English doesn't borrow from other languages. It follows them down dark alleyways and mugs them for loose grammar.
2017/03/16 17:53:36
Subject: Re:GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Praying and hoping my BFG fleet will still be usable in this. I love my imperial navy.
Also, perhaps the HHBFG is the obvious choice to start with and they could do different periods of time and that way introduce new fleets and so on, such as we saw with the various Battletech books and advancing timelines affecting different forces.
2017/03/16 17:54:08
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Any enthusiasm I might have had for a returned BFG is utterly smothered by the news they're AoS'ing Mordheim.
Fantastic. As if it wasn't already hard enough to recruit new players, now classic Mordheim will be completely killed off. Honestly I can't even muster up the energy to be annoyed any more, it's just depressing.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal
2017/03/16 17:57:08
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Yodhrin wrote: Any enthusiasm I might have had for a returned BFG is utterly smothered by the news they're AoS'ing Mordheim.
Fantastic. As if it wasn't already hard enough to recruit new players, now classic Mordheim will be completely killed off. Honestly I can't even muster up the energy to be annoyed any more, it's just depressing.
Easy there... It was a 'probably' so nothing's set in stone, remember Blood Bowl was released completely ignoring AoS.
2017/03/16 18:05:02
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Yodhrin wrote: Any enthusiasm I might have had for a returned BFG is utterly smothered by the news they're AoS'ing Mordheim.
Fantastic. As if it wasn't already hard enough to recruit new players, now classic Mordheim will be completely killed off. Honestly I can't even muster up the energy to be annoyed any more, it's just depressing.
Easy there... It was a 'probably' so nothing's set in stone, remember Blood Bowl was released completely ignoring AoS.
Its worth mentioning that BB was always in its own bizzarro Old World universe.
Like you say, nothing's set in stone, but I personally think it will be set in Age of Sigmar. If they are paying any attention to social media, and I think they do, they'll see a fairly active AoS28 Facebook page as well as a pretty widespread fan-made ruleset called Hinterlands for small skirmishes.
An AoS'd Mordheim boxed set has a market ready and waiting.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/16 18:27:41
"Sometimes the only victory possible is to keep your opponent from winning." - The Emperor, from The Outcast Dead.
"Tell your gods we are coming for them, and that their realms will burn as ours did." -Thostos Bladestorm
2017/03/16 18:35:36
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Yodhrin wrote: Any enthusiasm I might have had for a returned BFG is utterly smothered by the news they're AoS'ing Mordheim.
Fantastic. As if it wasn't already hard enough to recruit new players, now classic Mordheim will be completely killed off. Honestly I can't even muster up the energy to be annoyed any more, it's just depressing.
Okay 1) It's not mordheim, the people who say it is are jumping to conclusion based on evidence to the contrary. It says it's intended for competitive and organized play, that's pretty much the opposite of Mordheim. The rumor started because people don't pay attention. 2) Mordheim has been dead for a long time, you still play it and have fun with it and that's great but it's totally a weekend at bernie's type situation. 3) AoS mordhiem would be awesome and I hope we do eventually get it but Shadowspire 99% isn't it.
2017/03/16 19:10:34
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Yodhrin wrote: Any enthusiasm I might have had for a returned BFG is utterly smothered by the news they're AoS'ing Mordheim.
Fantastic. As if it wasn't already hard enough to recruit new players, now classic Mordheim will be completely killed off. Honestly I can't even muster up the energy to be annoyed any more, it's just depressing.
We know zero, zip and nothing at all about the gameplay of Shadespire. People talking about it being Mordheim are just grabbing guesses out of their asses. The ONLY thing we know is that it's intended for competitive play. Could be a card game for all we know (well, actually we know it will have miniatures).
2017/03/16 19:13:33
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
zedmeister wrote: BFG is one of my regular game systems and the prospect of new ships, players and the heresy? Yes please!
Absolutely, but while the individual fleets, especially the latter xenos ones, need a serious reworking, the original rules are, to my mind, the best tabletop wargame ever written.
2017/03/16 19:47:16
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Yodhrin wrote: Any enthusiasm I might have had for a returned BFG is utterly smothered by the news they're AoS'ing Mordheim.
Fantastic. As if it wasn't already hard enough to recruit new players, now classic Mordheim will be completely killed off. Honestly I can't even muster up the energy to be annoyed any more, it's just depressing.
We know zero, zip and nothing at all about the gameplay of Shadespire. People talking about it being Mordheim are just grabbing guesses out of their asses. The ONLY thing we know is that it's intended for competitive play. Could be a card game for all we know (well, actually we know it will have miniatures).
I believe the rumor on this thread said that's two different things, Shade Spire this year with AoS-Mordheim next year.
If the HoS artwork is anything to go by then even if it's set in a AoS city (fingers crossed for the Phoenicium) it'll still have a Old World touch to it so the Old Guard can play it in the Old World.
2017/03/16 19:53:59
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
I want BFG because BFG was an amazing Naval game, which paid dividends when you applied classic, Napoleonic fleet tactics (capping the T, Ackbar Slash etc). It wasn't a game of 'ship to ship' combat, but one where you had to wield your fleet as a single weapon. And it was ace.
Granted, I was never that great at pulling off the tactics and strategies, but I still enjoyed trying. Launching seemingly wild volleys of torpedoes to dissuade his Frigates and Destroyers from a certain course? Beautiful. A single Ship of the Line blobbing its orders, throwing the rest of your strategy into chaos? bliss.
Yes, Armada has come along. And that's a game I've never played myself, so I shan't comment less I show only the ignorance I know is already there. But round my way, it's not really played.
A group did try it, but didn't keep it up, going back to X-Wing. But that's also the group who still play BFG now and again, and indeed only gave Armada a whirl because newbies couldn't easily buy a BFG fleet (have you seen the eBay prices?? I sold a Battleship on there for around £70, when I paid maybe £20....)
Whether there's been general advancements or not cannot and will not detract from BFG being a very well regarded gaming classic - with a good number of fans. It's also a gaming monicker associated with a successful and well regarded PC version - if you like, that game has kept the light burning, not only for long term fans, but newcomers looking for a satisfying fleet engagement game.
Me? I'm very interested to see what FW do with it. The basic system is pretty solid (especially your firepower being affected by the opponent's facing), and I suspect any FAQs released during the game's original run will be incorporated into the main rule book.
Fed up of Scalpers? But still want your Exclusives? Why not join us?
I've seen some good arguments but I think it mostly comes down to fanbases wanting to condemn companies cashing in on nostalgia. (Pretty sure 80% of the entertainment industry would implode if they did stop)
2017/03/16 20:09:38
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
I like modern games. Mantic is doing great work. X-wing is fantastic. Nostalgia is bad. I hate Space Hulk and BB.
BFG is a good game. Played it again recently. Firestorm Armada is a bad game. DFC is obviously good as it's BFG 2.0 and doesn't even hide the fact. SW Armada seems unplayable to me. A slightly updated BFG with oodles of plastic 40k ships would be sweet.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/16 20:09:53
The old meta is dead and the new meta struggles to be born. Now is the time of munchkins.
2017/03/16 20:16:11
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
BFG did not do too well with the xeno fleets, but in honesty as good as Imperial vs Chaos was, I think the game was even better with Imperial vs Imperial or Chaos vs Chaos. It becomes much more chess like having two similar forces, as we will probably see with Heresy.
Coenus Scaldingus wrote: In my day, you didn't recognize the greatest heroes of humanity because they had to ride the biggest creatures or be massive in size themselves. No, they had the most magnificent facial hair! If it was good enough for Kurt Helborg and Ludwig Schwarzhelm, it should be good enough for anyone!
2017/03/16 20:17:07
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
lord_blackfang wrote: I like modern games. Mantic is doing great work. X-wing is fantastic. Nostalgia is bad. I hate Space Hulk and BB.
BFG is a good game. Played it again recently. Firestorm Armada is a bad game. DFC is obviously good as it's BFG 2.0 and doesn't even hide the fact. SW Armada seems unplayable to me. A slightly updated BFG with oodles of plastic 40k ships would be sweet.
But these are just opinions. When people trot out stuff like "modern" gaming has moved on its as if they think gaming has objectively improved, which is obviously untrue.
There is nothing measurably better about something like X-wing over something like Necromunda for example.
2017/03/16 21:41:46
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
New BFG? Well gak, guess the clock is ticking for me to finish my homebrew ruleset before it's completely obsolete... (assuming GW doesn't totally drop the ball here).
Hope the new stuff is same scale as the older models at least.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/16 21:42:00
lord_blackfang wrote: I like modern games. Mantic is doing great work. X-wing is fantastic. Nostalgia is bad. I hate Space Hulk and BB.
BFG is a good game. Played it again recently.
I play it regularly and it still rocks. We also play X-Wing which is great too but really we all think BFG is a more tactical game.
And yes, BFG works best Imperium vs Chaos. Xenos fleets tend to work weird/unbalanced.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Xca|iber wrote: New BFG? Well gak, guess the clock is ticking for me to finish my homebrew ruleset before it's completely obsolete... (assuming GW doesn't totally drop the ball here).
Though, I hope they don't "streamline" the game as they intended at some point (gunnery tables replaced with generic 4+ hits...).
Also I don't want to see class of Super-Titan-Battleships...
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/16 22:23:49
Mr Vetock, give back my Multi-tracker!
2017/03/16 23:11:11
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Yodhrin wrote: Any enthusiasm I might have had for a returned BFG is utterly smothered by the news they're AoS'ing Mordheim.
Fantastic. As if it wasn't already hard enough to recruit new players, now classic Mordheim will be completely killed off. Honestly I can't even muster up the energy to be annoyed any more, it's just depressing.
I wouldn't mind either old world or AoS mordheim, there could be plenty of interesting things to deal with in the high fantasy AoS.
2017/03/16 23:46:39
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Just to be clear. Hastings said he is not sure if the new mordheim thing will be aos or old world. If it is coming from the main studio, it will probably be an aos game. If it is specialist games they may well set it in the old world. He also made it clear that Shadespire is not the new mordheim. If the rumour engine guess is correct, that game will be played on tiles.
2017/03/17 00:14:57
Subject: GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.
Galas wrote: Well, Bloodbowl was a success even with the Mantic sci-fi one and Guild Ball.
But yes. Beating Star Wars its a thing that I think GW can't acomplish.
They COULD, but that would take a massive cross sell across several media and spending money advertizing it and promoting it EVERYWHERE, and GW isn't even willing to do that with their flagship titles.
Galas wrote: Well, Bloodbowl was a success even with the Mantic sci-fi one and Guild Ball.
But yes. Beating Star Wars its a thing that I think GW can't acomplish.
They COULD, but that would take a massive cross sell across several media and spending money advertizing it and promoting it EVERYWHERE, and GW isn't even willing to do that with their flagship titles.
Maybe thats not a great idea afterall...
Now being serious. Can you imagine what can Warhammer become (or its became?) if GW put money in advertising and try to make it a Mainstream thing? Like. Marvel Movie-Universe. Deadpool and Logan are the proof that things can be a commercial succes with more than a Teen rating.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/17 00:27:21
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote: Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
2017/03/17 00:29:27
Subject: Re:GW RUMOURS. Battlefleet Heresy and 'Mordheim' coming from GW.