Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2017/11/11 01:06:37
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
broxus wrote:In other game systems if you have first turn everything just counts as moving. This results in a -1 penalty for many units (normally the big damage units)
This would be awesome. Currently, even the roll-off is bad, as the winner of the roll-off still has a huge advantage.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 01:09:05
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Oooh!
via sources on Faeit 212
Oh... Nevermind.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 03:37:48
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
I'm just miffed that there are no leaked changes to Grey Knights, who are currently stuck with the least interesting and least competitive codex thus far.
|
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment. |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 04:26:12
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
I am really hoping for a Chapter/Legion/Whatever trait for all of the armies that don't have them. Just one each. Basically, I want the armies to be on par with each other, even if codex armies have more choices.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 06:41:23
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
greyknight12 wrote:I'm just miffed that there are no leaked changes to Grey Knights, who are currently stuck with the least interesting and least competitive codex thus far.
AdMech says hi, but...
Terminators going up in price was super insulting. I'm also still miffed that Purifiers lost their second attack.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 06:57:01
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Ancient Space Wolves Venerable Dreadnought
|
Ghaz wrote:... while the Triumvirate of Ynnead has been reboxed to include the new rules for the Ynnari from Index: Imperium 2, meaning you won’t need to buy this book if you’re looking to field a Ynnari army with your codex in open play.
If their rules were changing, they wouldn't have went through the effort to put the index rules in the kit.
So removing the 7th edition rules that will just confuse new players and keeping the box in line with the “kit includes rules” paradigm they’ve been pursuing for years isn’t a good enough reason?
|
"Three months? I'm going to go crazy …and I'm taking you with me!"
— Vala Mal Doran |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 07:43:40
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
Karthicus wrote:I did see someone mention a GW army builder for AOS. If they would do the same for 40k that would be a fantastic tool to have at our disposal. I bet we will see it in 2018. Doesn't make sense for them to give that to AOS and not 40k.
You know how 40k has power levels as a rough balance mechanism? AoS points are like that. It's X points for Y models, all upgrades and weapon options are free (and yes, this does affect balance like you might imagine). This means an army builder is far more simple for AoS than it would be for 40k.
|
Road to Renown! It's like classic Path to Glory, but repaired, remastered, expanded! https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/778170.page
I chose an avatar I feel best represents the quality of my post history.
I try to view Warhammer as more of a toolbox with examples than fully complete games. |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 14:31:54
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Mr_Rose wrote: Ghaz wrote:... while the Triumvirate of Ynnead has been reboxed to include the new rules for the Ynnari from Index: Imperium 2, meaning you won’t need to buy this book if you’re looking to field a Ynnari army with your codex in open play.
If their rules were changing, they wouldn't have went through the effort to put the index rules in the kit.
So removing the 7th edition rules that will just confuse new players and keeping the box in line with the “kit includes rules” paradigm they’ve been pursuing for years isn’t a good enough reason?
So new players can be confused with out of date 8th edition rules instead if they change the rules in a few months? If the 8th edition index rules aren't going to be sticking around for a while, why even include them in the kit?
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 14:36:10
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
Ghaz wrote: Mr_Rose wrote: Ghaz wrote:... while the Triumvirate of Ynnead has been reboxed to include the new rules for the Ynnari from Index: Imperium 2, meaning you won’t need to buy this book if you’re looking to field a Ynnari army with your codex in open play.
If their rules were changing, they wouldn't have went through the effort to put the index rules in the kit.
So removing the 7th edition rules that will just confuse new players and keeping the box in line with the “kit includes rules” paradigm they’ve been pursuing for years isn’t a good enough reason?
So new players can be confused with out of date 8th edition rules instead if they change the rules in a few months? If the 8th edition index rules aren't going to be sticking around for a while, why even include them in the kit?
For no other reason than to give you something stupid to complain about
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 14:40:57
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
Ynnari can go away, the same way the Albion Fen beast and truthsayer did inFantasy. You came, moved the story along, now either unite the Aeldar (CW, Dark & Clown types) or go away.
|
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 15:31:50
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Lethal Lhamean
Birmingham
|
Uriels_Flame wrote:Ynnari can go away, the same way the Albion Fen beast and truthsayer did inFantasy. You came, moved the story along, now either unite the Aeldar (CW, Dark & Clown types) or go away.
I'd much rather they became a full fledged army in their own right than hodgepodge of some other armies.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 15:51:01
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Mounted Kroot Tracker
|
I wonder whether the Dark Eldar and Harlequin webway strike stratagems can be used in addition to the Craftworlds one or whether the entire army can only use it once. It might be fun to see an army of mixed jetbikes explode out of reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 16:03:37
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Thrall Wizard of Tzeentch
|
Nogil wrote:
Thousand Sons
Warlord Trait- re-roll deny witch tests
Relic- rolling doubles for psychic tests means the opponent may not resist with deny the witch or negate it by any means.
Psychic Power- warp charge of 7. Select an enemy unit within 18" and roll 9 dice. The unit suffers mortal wounds on each roll of a 6
Stratagems
1CP If within 6" of at least 2 other friendly TS psykers, you can add 2 to your psychic test.
This is... dissappointing. Very so...
I hope this is not true. Warlord trait re-roll "deny the witch"? Maybe re-rolling psychic test for this army, but "deny the witch"? Why?
The psychic power is basically useless unless you have wildy good luck... In 6 dice the average is to get one 6. In 9 dice it would be 1.something or being really generous, 2. And with 7 warp charge is not really very easy... Comparing that with Smite that can make 1D3 mortal wounds, with difficulty 5, i really don't see the point for this power. Sure, with veeeery good luck you can have 9 mortal wounds... but with bad dice rolls you can do nothing. Much better the basic smite. If these are the kind of psychic powers we can expect for the "masters of the warp", well... And then in the same rumour we have the Harlequins, for 1 CP gaining a 3++ after advancing.
Very dissappointing... So i really hope this is not true.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 17:34:47
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
JimOnMars wrote:broxus wrote:In other game systems if you have first turn everything just counts as moving. This results in a -1 penalty for many units (normally the big damage units)
This would be awesome. Currently, even the roll-off is bad, as the winner of the roll-off still has a huge advantage.
Honestly I think the return of night fighting (or Acid Rain in the open play cards) would go a long way to mitigate first turn advantage.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 17:46:55
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Mighty Vampire Count
|
Warpspy wrote:Nogil wrote:
Thousand Sons
Warlord Trait- re-roll deny witch tests
Relic- rolling doubles for psychic tests means the opponent may not resist with deny the witch or negate it by any means.
Psychic Power- warp charge of 7. Select an enemy unit within 18" and roll 9 dice. The unit suffers mortal wounds on each roll of a 6
Stratagems
1CP If within 6" of at least 2 other friendly TS psykers, you can add 2 to your psychic test.
This is... dissappointing. Very so...
I hope this is not true. Warlord trait re-roll "deny the witch"? Maybe re-rolling psychic test for this army, but "deny the witch"? Why?
The psychic power is basically useless unless you have wildy good luck... In 6 dice the average is to get one 6. In 9 dice it would be 1.something or being really generous, 2. And with 7 warp charge is not really very easy... Comparing that with Smite that can make 1D3 mortal wounds, with difficulty 5, i really don't see the point for this power. Sure, with veeeery good luck you can have 9 mortal wounds... but with bad dice rolls you can do nothing. Much better the basic smite. If these are the kind of psychic powers we can expect for the "masters of the warp", well... And then in the same rumour we have the Harlequins, for 1 CP gaining a 3++ after advancing.
Very dissappointing... So i really hope this is not true.
I wonder how the relic interacts with Sisters of Silence etc?
|
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page
A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 17:50:04
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
Warpspy wrote:Nogil wrote:
Thousand Sons
Warlord Trait- re-roll deny witch tests
Relic- rolling doubles for psychic tests means the opponent may not resist with deny the witch or negate it by any means.
Psychic Power- warp charge of 7. Select an enemy unit within 18" and roll 9 dice. The unit suffers mortal wounds on each roll of a 6
Stratagems
1CP If within 6" of at least 2 other friendly TS psykers, you can add 2 to your psychic test.
This is... dissappointing. Very so...
I hope this is not true. Warlord trait re-roll "deny the witch"? Maybe re-rolling psychic test for this army, but "deny the witch"? Why?
The psychic power is basically useless unless you have wildy good luck... In 6 dice the average is to get one 6. In 9 dice it would be 1.something or being really generous, 2. And with 7 warp charge is not really very easy... Comparing that with Smite that can make 1D3 mortal wounds, with difficulty 5, i really don't see the point for this power. Sure, with veeeery good luck you can have 9 mortal wounds... but with bad dice rolls you can do nothing. Much better the basic smite. If these are the kind of psychic powers we can expect for the "masters of the warp", well... And then in the same rumour we have the Harlequins, for 1 CP gaining a 3++ after advancing.
Very dissappointing... So i really hope this is not true.
While I agree the power is lackluster, the main advantage over smite is picking a target rather than only hitting the closest.
|
Road to Renown! It's like classic Path to Glory, but repaired, remastered, expanded! https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/778170.page
I chose an avatar I feel best represents the quality of my post history.
I try to view Warhammer as more of a toolbox with examples than fully complete games. |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 19:03:38
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Power-Hungry Cultist of Tzeentch
Portsmouth, UK
|
NinthMusketeer wrote: Warpspy wrote:Nogil wrote:
Thousand Sons
Warlord Trait- re-roll deny witch tests
Relic- rolling doubles for psychic tests means the opponent may not resist with deny the witch or negate it by any means.
Psychic Power- warp charge of 7. Select an enemy unit within 18" and roll 9 dice. The unit suffers mortal wounds on each roll of a 6
Stratagems
1CP If within 6" of at least 2 other friendly TS psykers, you can add 2 to your psychic test.
This is... dissappointing. Very so...
I hope this is not true. Warlord trait re-roll "deny the witch"? Maybe re-rolling psychic test for this army, but "deny the witch"? Why?
The psychic power is basically useless unless you have wildy good luck... In 6 dice the average is to get one 6. In 9 dice it would be 1.something or being really generous, 2. And with 7 warp charge is not really very easy... Comparing that with Smite that can make 1D3 mortal wounds, with difficulty 5, i really don't see the point for this power. Sure, with veeeery good luck you can have 9 mortal wounds... but with bad dice rolls you can do nothing. Much better the basic smite. If these are the kind of psychic powers we can expect for the "masters of the warp", well... And then in the same rumour we have the Harlequins, for 1 CP gaining a 3++ after advancing.
Very dissappointing... So i really hope this is not true.
While I agree the power is lackluster, the main advantage over smite is picking a target rather than only hitting the closest.
We have Infernal Gaze (less Warp charge, on average does the same damage as the new power) and Gift of Chaos (cheaper, but much shorter ranged and they have to pass a toughness test, but does more damage). Not sure why you'd use the new power, unless Aspiring Sorcerers can use it instead of Smite? Even then...
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 19:08:26
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Camundongo wrote:We have Infernal Gaze (less Warp charge, on average does the same damage as the new power) and Gift of Chaos (cheaper, but much shorter ranged and they have to pass a toughness test, but does more damage). Not sure why you'd use the new power, unless Aspiring Sorcerers can use it instead of Smite? Even then...
Chances are we won't have Infernal Gaze or Gift of Chaos when the new list rolls around. Or more importantly, we won't have Warptime or Prescience either... it'll be difficult for them to even break even with the CSM list.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 19:28:03
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Warpspy wrote:Nogil wrote:
Thousand Sons
Warlord Trait- re-roll deny witch tests
Relic- rolling doubles for psychic tests means the opponent may not resist with deny the witch or negate it by any means.
Psychic Power- warp charge of 7. Select an enemy unit within 18" and roll 9 dice. The unit suffers mortal wounds on each roll of a 6
Stratagems
1CP If within 6" of at least 2 other friendly TS psykers, you can add 2 to your psychic test.
This is... dissappointing. Very so...
I hope this is not true. Warlord trait re-roll "deny the witch"? Maybe re-rolling psychic test for this army, but "deny the witch"? Why?
The psychic power is basically useless unless you have wildy good luck... In 6 dice the average is to get one 6. In 9 dice it would be 1.something or being really generous, 2. And with 7 warp charge is not really very easy... Comparing that with Smite that can make 1D3 mortal wounds, with difficulty 5, i really don't see the point for this power. Sure, with veeeery good luck you can have 9 mortal wounds... but with bad dice rolls you can do nothing. Much better the basic smite. If these are the kind of psychic powers we can expect for the "masters of the warp", well... And then in the same rumour we have the Harlequins, for 1 CP gaining a 3++ after advancing.
Very dissappointing... So i really hope this is not true.
but is it re-roll YOUR deny the witch (pretty Meh) or force your opponent to reroll their deny the witch if you choose (pretty good since it would make it a lot harder for them to block your stronger powers)
|
|
|
|
|
2017/11/11 19:45:32
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
Camundongo wrote: NinthMusketeer wrote: Warpspy wrote:Nogil wrote:
Thousand Sons
Warlord Trait- re-roll deny witch tests
Relic- rolling doubles for psychic tests means the opponent may not resist with deny the witch or negate it by any means.
Psychic Power- warp charge of 7. Select an enemy unit within 18" and roll 9 dice. The unit suffers mortal wounds on each roll of a 6
Stratagems
1CP If within 6" of at least 2 other friendly TS psykers, you can add 2 to your psychic test.
This is... dissappointing. Very so...
I hope this is not true. Warlord trait re-roll "deny the witch"? Maybe re-rolling psychic test for this army, but "deny the witch"? Why?
The psychic power is basically useless unless you have wildy good luck... In 6 dice the average is to get one 6. In 9 dice it would be 1.something or being really generous, 2. And with 7 warp charge is not really very easy... Comparing that with Smite that can make 1D3 mortal wounds, with difficulty 5, i really don't see the point for this power. Sure, with veeeery good luck you can have 9 mortal wounds... but with bad dice rolls you can do nothing. Much better the basic smite. If these are the kind of psychic powers we can expect for the "masters of the warp", well... And then in the same rumour we have the Harlequins, for 1 CP gaining a 3++ after advancing.
Very dissappointing... So i really hope this is not true.
While I agree the power is lackluster, the main advantage over smite is picking a target rather than only hitting the closest.
We have Infernal Gaze (less Warp charge, on average does the same damage as the new power) and Gift of Chaos (cheaper, but much shorter ranged and they have to pass a toughness test, but does more damage). Not sure why you'd use the new power, unless Aspiring Sorcerers can use it instead of Smite? Even then...
Like I said, that doesn't make it at all good but there is at least some reason to use it over smite if those are the two options. In a TS army its also entirely possible that the two powers you mentioned were already used in the same phase and accordingly can't be used again until the next turn.
|
Road to Renown! It's like classic Path to Glory, but repaired, remastered, expanded! https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/778170.page
I chose an avatar I feel best represents the quality of my post history.
I try to view Warhammer as more of a toolbox with examples than fully complete games. |
|
|
|
2017/11/11 21:43:06
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
Imateria wrote: Uriels_Flame wrote:Ynnari can go away, the same way the Albion Fen beast and truthsayer did inFantasy. You came, moved the story along, now either unite the Aeldar (CW, Dark & Clown types) or go away.
I'd much rather they became a full fledged army in their own right than hodgepodge of some other armies.
It would be better IMHO for them to be like Imperial Guard Storm Troopers and Auxiliary. A "out of faction" choice, that still allows you to count as a single faction. The don't benefit from your craft world abilities, but don't stop you from taking them if in the same detachment.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/11/11 21:43:15
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 15:35:30
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
When does this codex thing with updated rules and FAQ come out?
|
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 15:54:11
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 15:59:25
Subject: Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Lockark wrote: Imateria wrote: Uriels_Flame wrote:Ynnari can go away, the same way the Albion Fen beast and truthsayer did inFantasy. You came, moved the story along, now either unite the Aeldar (CW, Dark & Clown types) or go away.
I'd much rather they became a full fledged army in their own right than hodgepodge of some other armies. It would be better IMHO for them to be like Imperial Guard Storm Troopers and Auxiliary. A "out of faction" choice, that still allows you to count as a single faction. The don't benefit from your craft world abilities, but don't stop you from taking them if in the same detachment.
The problem with this is that there is another part to that: Militarum Tempestus units taken as part of, say, a Catachan Detachment? They don't benefit from the Catachan rules nor do they prevent the Catachans from benefitting from theirs... but they also do not get their own benefits. Scions do actually have their own Regimental rules(Stormtroopers: models shooting at half range or less can make an extra shot for each hit roll of 6+ that they make) that they don't get for being part of another Regimental detachment. So if Ynnari were given that setup, they shouldn't get their special perks in a Craftworld Detachment. At all.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/11/12 16:00:02
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 16:31:34
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Damsel of the Lady
|
greyknight12 wrote:I'm just miffed that there are no leaked changes to Grey Knights, who are currently stuck with the least interesting and least competitive codex thus far.
You and me both, brother.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 16:51:37
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Audustum wrote: greyknight12 wrote:I'm just miffed that there are no leaked changes to Grey Knights, who are currently stuck with the least interesting and least competitive codex thus far.
You and me both, brother.
I wouldn't read much into it one way or the other. It's highly unlikely that these are in fact real changes.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 18:14:31
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
Kanluwen wrote:Audustum wrote: greyknight12 wrote:I'm just miffed that there are no leaked changes to Grey Knights, who are currently stuck with the least interesting and least competitive codex thus far.
You and me both, brother.
I wouldn't read much into it one way or the other. It's highly unlikely that these are in fact real changes.
Agreed. Technically, none of factions got leaks...only rumors.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 18:23:48
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
JimOnMars wrote: Kanluwen wrote:Audustum wrote: greyknight12 wrote:I'm just miffed that there are no leaked changes to Grey Knights, who are currently stuck with the least interesting and least competitive codex thus far.
You and me both, brother.
I wouldn't read much into it one way or the other. It's highly unlikely that these are in fact real changes.
Agreed. Technically, none of factions got leaks...only rumors.
And really, from the way it's being presented all of the "rumors" are the only thing that each faction gets. Which is...questionable at best. My Wanderers in AoS saw a full table of Command Traits, 6 Relics, and then some new special rules to bring them roughly to parity with those armies which had full army books.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 18:47:13
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
Kanluwen wrote: JimOnMars wrote: Kanluwen wrote:Audustum wrote: greyknight12 wrote:I'm just miffed that there are no leaked changes to Grey Knights, who are currently stuck with the least interesting and least competitive codex thus far.
You and me both, brother.
I wouldn't read much into it one way or the other. It's highly unlikely that these are in fact real changes.
Agreed. Technically, none of factions got leaks...only rumors.
And really, from the way it's being presented all of the "rumors" are the only thing that each faction gets. Which is...questionable at best. My Wanderers in AoS saw a full table of Command Traits, 6 Relics, and then some new special rules to bring them roughly to parity with those armies which had full army books.
I don't think we're going to get full parity anyway. If we did, why would anyone bother to buy the codex?
Like it or not, it's obvious that the indexes were deliberately weakened relative to the codexes to make sure people bought both. I don't see CA breaking that trend. I just means we get to buy three things instead of two.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/12 19:25:30
Subject: Re:Rumored point changes in Chapter approved 2017
|
|
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
JimOnMars wrote:I don't think we're going to get full parity anyway. If we did, why would anyone bother to buy the codex?
Because you don't have option if we want to play tournaments? Players are excelent at self-policying themselves into following GW's dictations even stricter than GW is trying and now even GW is "latest only" for pretty much first time.
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
|
|