Switch Theme:

Local Tournament - No Forgeworld Units  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






Those issues are not issues with FW. Having rules and reasonable models to represent your army is just standard 40k etiquette. It's not the basis of anyone banning FW ether.

If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder 
   
Made in us
Khorne Chosen Marine Riding a Juggernaut





Ohio

Those don't look anything like what they're trying to represent. At least make a concerted effort to come close. I can't believe they let that happen.
   
Made in us
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh




We don't know if those models were used in a competitive arena (which they should not0 or a casual game (which is fine) at the LVO. Both arenas exist there but it makes a big difference, to me, as to where those models were used. If they were actually allowed to be used in the competitive event then shame on the TOs. If they were used casually then who cares?
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka







Leo_the_Rat wrote:
We don't know if those models were used in a competitive arena (which they should not0 or a casual game (which is fine) at the LVO. Both arenas exist there but it makes a big difference, to me, as to where those models were used. If they were actually allowed to be used in the competitive event then shame on the TOs. If they were used casually then who cares?


I think there's a question on how they were implemented - if these two are the only models like this, and the rest of the army is stock? Then yes, there is a problem.

If the entire army is converted into this theme, so different units can be distinguished, and (ideally) there is a sheet to explain which conversion is which? Then no problem in either space, for me.

2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in us
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought




San Jose, CA

I guess my very fluffy Salamanders wouldn't be ok. But I don't really play competitive or tourney. I do really think banning them if it's modeling for advantage or spamming anything.

If you have the model, rules (actual FW book) then no prob as GW has already stated that FW is 100%legit and my local GW store is cool w them as well.

Proxying in a tourney sounds stupid just like unpainted looks lame. I would imagine they would want FW since it increases the variety of models visually in it.

Locally (once again I play narrative/w open war) and everybody I've played against has had no problem with them. Even going as far as saying that they look nice and are part of one cohesive whole.

what you see is what you get and can be backed up by in bound print from the only legit source.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: