Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 16:19:59
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
I think it would be cleared to have separate thread for each codex. I keep checking this thread in hopes that there would be some Eldar news...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 16:30:37
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
I myself am waiting for Genestealer cults, sisters, and Harliquins.
We _Know_ Tau, Dark Eldar, and Necrons are coming up. Most of the stuff in here feels like a tactica debate not 'Rumors.'
|
Disclaimer - I am a Games Workshop Shareholder. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 16:33:14
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I missed out on Tau info. Usually the first post is updated with new info. So if I click on "read first unread post" and it passes a bunch of pages, no loss, I go to page one, first post. Here for the Tau it's not the case.
It's almost like the Tau don't deserve their own thread. Really surprised by this.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 16:46:52
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
AdmiralHalsey wrote:I myself am waiting for Genestealer cults, sisters, and Harliquins.
We _Know_ Tau, Dark Eldar, and Necrons are coming up. Most of the stuff in here feels like a tactica debate not 'Rumors.'
Well, it's "News & Rumors", so I guess it covers the news part. And given some 20 years of experience with the average quality of GW "rumors" that aren't confirmed kinda makes discussing them 2014-style, if there's even a tiny scrap of something we actually have from GW and thus avoids the "98%-chance-it's-clickbait-nonesense-caveat", seem a lot more attractive.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/11 16:47:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 16:48:33
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Davor wrote:I missed out on Tau info. Usually the first post is updated with new info. So if I click on "read first unread post" and it passes a bunch of pages, no loss, I go to page one, first post. Here for the Tau it's not the case. It's almost like the Tau don't deserve their own thread. Really surprised by this.
I mean this in the nicest way possible, but you understand that first posts getting updated requires a poster who actively updates the first post--or moderators to actively do it? It's fairly easy when it's an OP who pays attention to things, but the OP in this case doesn't really seem to have been active too much in this thread. They posted a thread back in January over Naftka rumors, didn't really keep it updated or even really post in it. AdmiralHalsey wrote:I myself am waiting for Genestealer cults, sisters, and Harliquins. We _Know_ Tau, Dark Eldar, and Necrons are coming up. Most of the stuff in here feels like a tactica debate not 'Rumors.'
That's how basically every Rumors thread ends up after awhile.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/03/11 16:57:29
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 16:54:57
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Savage Khorne Berserker Biker
|
A foregone conclusion. It will either be that, or a million proposed rules and subsequent debates over them.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 17:07:26
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
AdmiralHalsey wrote:I myself am waiting for Genestealer cults, sisters, and Harliquins.
We _Know_ Tau, Dark Eldar, and Necrons are coming up. Most of the stuff in here feels like a tactica debate not 'Rumors.'
That's because GW keeps a tight lid on its own rumours. So most of the time that we get any credible rumours they are getting close to a formal release so the nature of the rumours tends to end up focusing on the leaked bits of rules and on what people hope the rules will be.
This is especially the case right now because the releases are without models so there's less speculation as to what models might change or come out with a release. So its really all down to the rules.
Tau, Necron and Dark Eldar are coming - beyond that we don't know anything besides random hints at other things and guesswork. And a thread can only go around guessing for so long before the topic moves on.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 17:29:30
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Kanluwen wrote:Davor wrote:I missed out on Tau info. Usually the first post is updated with new info. So if I click on "read first unread post" and it passes a bunch of pages, no loss, I go to page one, first post. Here for the Tau it's not the case. It's almost like the Tau don't deserve their own thread. Really surprised by this.
I mean this in the nicest way possible, but you understand that first posts getting updated requires a poster who actively updates the first post--or moderators to actively do it? It's fairly easy when it's an OP who pays attention to things, but the OP in this case doesn't really seem to have been active too much in this thread. They posted a thread back in January over Naftka rumors, didn't really keep it updated or even really post in it. Fully understand. I know how much work it is. I did it a few times myself but not on Dakka. Just use to all the other codices getting their own thread with someone updating on Dakka is all. Just surprised that Tau didn't get one. Was wondering if this was the new norm for Dakka and no more individual codex rumour threads and I need to keep a closer eye on this thread.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/11 17:30:19
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 18:15:49
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2018/03/11/forgebane-pre-order-next-week/ Forgebane goes on preorder next week, followed by Codex Necrons the week after. Most importantly, the leaked Necron Dynasty rules have been confirmed.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/11 18:16:51
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 18:22:13
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Damnit. I just preordered the Tau book and now they go and do this to me?!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 18:28:16
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Ghaz wrote:https://www.warhammer-community.com/2018/03/11/forgebane-pre-order-next-week/
Forgebane goes on preorder next week, followed by Codex Necrons the week after. Most importantly, the leaked Necron Dynasty rules have been confirmed.
The dynasty rules are not bad. But we will need to see them in the context of special rules, strategems, and unit rules.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 18:58:29
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
Davor wrote: Kanluwen wrote:Davor wrote:I missed out on Tau info. Usually the first post is updated with new info. So if I click on "read first unread post" and it passes a bunch of pages, no loss, I go to page one, first post. Here for the Tau it's not the case.
It's almost like the Tau don't deserve their own thread. Really surprised by this.
I mean this in the nicest way possible, but you understand that first posts getting updated requires a poster who actively updates the first post--or moderators to actively do it?
It's fairly easy when it's an OP who pays attention to things, but the OP in this case doesn't really seem to have been active too much in this thread. They posted a thread back in January over Naftka rumors, didn't really keep it updated or even really post in it.
Fully understand. I know how much work it is. I did it a few times myself but not on Dakka. Just use to all the other codices getting their own thread with someone updating on Dakka is all. Just surprised that Tau didn't get one. Was wondering if this was the new norm for Dakka and no more individual codex rumour threads and I need to keep a closer eye on this thread. 
It’s just that this time, the OP was about a release schedule rumour, not just one codex. So as the codexes in the schedule have come out, the discussion has been about them in here.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 19:34:10
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
If Flayed Ones even get a slight price cut, the Hatred ones are gonna be nasty to ANY bubble wrap in the game.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 19:39:34
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Moscow, Russia
|
No Bone Kingdom of Drazak rules?
I am sad.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 19:41:10
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
The Awakened By Murder trait is probably the best we will get and I'm sure there's gonna be some nifty relics.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 19:45:23
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
No Empire of the Severed trait either, which is unfortunate because I like that dynasty.
Flayed ones will probably get a price cut because they are currently not worth the points. I mean, its more than a deathmark, yet has a worse save and no ranged weapon. What, GW?
-=Edit=- Removed colloquial profanity. Don't do that again. Lorek
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2018/03/11 20:57:53
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0018/03/11 19:47:17
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
No Charnovokh sadly, of course they aren't a super popular dynasty but they have a bit of fluff and a colour scheme so was hoping maybe there might be something.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 20:07:49
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Now you guys almost expect Space Marine treatment. I'll take a good codex over overly specific traits. There seems like enough for the different playstyles you might want, unless you want another -1 to hit army.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 20:54:11
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
The Awakened By Murder trait is probably the best we will get and I'm sure there's gonna be some nifty relics.
Going to assume that these Dynasty traits will apply to the whole army. I could see myself using a mix between Sautek and Mephrit quite a bit. I read on another forum that RP is functionally unchanged, so Necrons will still face the same weakness of one unit being targeted at a time to prevent RP (not confirmed as fact yet obviously)
|
"Courage and Honour. I hear you murmur these words in the mist, in their wake I hear your hearts beat harder with false conviction seeking to convince yourselves that a brave death has meaning.
There is no courage to be found here my nephews, no honour to be had. Your souls will join the trillion others in the mist shrieking uselessly to eternity, weeping for the empire you could not save.
To the unfaithful, I bring holy plagues ripe with enlightenment. To the devout, I bring the blessing of immortality through the kiss of sacred rot.
And to you, new-born sons of Gulliman, to you flesh crafted puppets of a failing Imperium I bring the holiest gift of all.... Silence."
- Mortarion, The Death Lord, The Reaper of Men, Daemon Primarch of Nurgle
5300 | 2800 | 3600 | 1600 | |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 21:15:16
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Now you guys almost expect Space Marine treatment. I'll take a good codex over overly specific traits. There seems like enough for the different playstyles you might want, unless you want another -1 to hit army.
For stuff outside of the chosen dynasties I'm mostly curious what Forge World do with their dynasty; I'd be fine if they say that you just use the most appropriate codex dynasty for Maynarkh units (read: Novokh) but if they end up putting out special rules for their armies then I'd be very interested to see what the Maynarkhs get.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 21:41:38
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Ghaz wrote:https://www.warhammer-community.com/2018/03/11/forgebane-pre-order-next-week/
Forgebane goes on preorder next week, followed by Codex Necrons the week after. Most importantly, the leaked Necron Dynasty rules have been confirmed.
Didn't really care for this, but now after seeing this link you have posted you have gotten me excited for this now.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 21:44:55
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
/tg/ anon uploading Necron datasheets, I'm sure someone will collect a folder of them when he's finished.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 21:49:54
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Ghaz wrote:https://www.warhammer-community.com/2018/03/11/forgebane-pre-order-next-week/
Forgebane goes on preorder next week, followed by Codex Necrons the week after. Most importantly, the leaked Necron Dynasty rules have been confirmed.
damn, might not be able to pre-order as I don't get paid right away
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/12 15:11:58
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
saw this on FB
Has anyone seen this image in a codex or is it new?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/12 19:10:47
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
|
Pretty sure its new.
We all knew EC is going to come eventually.
But this means they might come before WE, and that's a shocker.
|
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/12 19:26:05
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
BoomWolf wrote:But this means they might come before WE, and that's a shocker.
How?
Khorne already had a huge update, including that of most of centrepiece models and characters. EC were always more likely IMO as their update would add a lot to AoS range too...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/12 19:28:25
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Irbis wrote: BoomWolf wrote:But this means they might come before WE, and that's a shocker.
How?
Khorne already had a huge update, including that of most of centrepiece models and characters. EC were always more likely IMO as their update would add a lot to AoS range too...
Age of Sigmar Khorne and Daemons "had a huge update".
World Eaters only saw Kharn get updated. There's room for new World Eater models, a few new special units, maybe even Angron.
Very little for Emperor's Children would be applicable to the AoS range, unless you're trying to insinuate they'd do another Tzaangor styled unit?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/12 19:33:35
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
If they remade Emperor's Children they'll give a update to the Slaanesh Daemon range. Keeper of Sekrets, Fiend of Slaanesh, maybe some new heralds, etc...
Maybe even some mortal slaanesh units for AoS like they did with the Nurgle Battletome.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/12 19:33:55
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/12 20:27:02
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Galas wrote:If they remade Emperor's Children they'll give a update to the Slaanesh Daemon range. Keeper of Sekrets, Fiend of Slaanesh, maybe some new heralds, etc...
Maybe even some mortal slaanesh units for AoS like they did with the Nurgle Battletome.
I just want a better looking KoS.. With an actual SC!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/12 20:28:11
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Galas wrote:If they remade Emperor's Children they'll give a update to the Slaanesh Daemon range. Keeper of Sekrets, Fiend of Slaanesh, maybe some new heralds, etc...
Maybe even some mortal slaanesh units for AoS like they did with the Nurgle Battletome.
If they remade Emperor's Children and stuck to the pattern of Death Guard/Thousand Sons?
No Greater Daemons.
I would, for AoS, expect:
Keeper of Secrets
Fiend
Herald
Plastic Masque
A unit of 'heavy' troops
A flying unit of some kind
Some kind of big monster rider or several smaller riders
A unit of Cultist-esque troops
Out of all those releases?
The flying unit, Herald, Fiend, and maybe the Masque would transfer over to Emperor's Children--in addition to the Daemon stuff that already exists.
I'd also expect Noise Marines, some kind of debased version of the Palatines to fill a Terminator slot, a plastic Fulgrim, and a plastic Lucius. There's probably someone else who can add a few more ideas(Cultists, for example) but I'm not as familiar with EC as I used to be.
|
|
 |
 |
|