Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 19:08:18
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought
|
I'm looking forward to them and wish there would be more insane stuff psyker wise. they should be cool models at minimum.
It will be interesting to see how they implement it for non pskyer factions.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 19:11:46
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
fraser1191 wrote: TheFleshIsWeak wrote:Oh good, even more buffs to a phase several races can't even participate in.
And if anyone says that Necrons, DE, Tau etc. will get their own versions of these (presumably not requiring psykers), my response is that I'll believe it when I see it.
I mean, these races are also supposed to have psychic defence in one form or other, yet in all cases it's basically nonexistent.
Korne units in AoS have endless spells soo I guess your argument is invalid?
Reread my last sentence and try again.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 19:19:08
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Whiterun
|
I hope that at least Tau get something a bit more creative than some drones. A Kroot psyker who summons ghost knarlocs or a Nicassar who creates a movable singularity or something similar.
Though it'll probably just be a bland forcefield drone or mech fixing nanoswarm.
|
Full of Power |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 19:25:25
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Overread wrote:
As for releases, well that doesn't really hold much argument toward anything. Endless Spells for factions have been coming out as GW updates Battletomes since the Stormcast Tome for 2.0. This means that every timea new 2.0 tome has come out the faction has typically got terrain and endless spells. So sure the Khorne one wasn't at launch, but nor were the Skaven or Slaanesh. There's a few 2.0 Tomes without spells (Idoneth and Daughters of Khaine), but GW can easily release them once they've got a release window for those factions.
Idoneth, Daughters of Khaine, and Nurgle were all pre-AOS2.0.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 19:37:37
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Inspiring SDF-1 Bridge Officer
|
The Necron version I could see them transforming several of the C’Tan powers to an Endless version.
But what could the Tau possibly get? Modified forms of Invoke the Elements? Micro-marker or mini-gun swarms? Battle holograms and force fields?
|
It never ends well |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 19:40:49
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
ServiceGames wrote:It simply doesn't fit in 40K. Khorne for example hates all psykers, so there'd be no one around to manifest the spells. Black Templars don't have Librarians, so there'd be no one around to manifest the spells.
Way too many issues with 40K and endless spells.
SG
maybe but dark apostles carrying out rituals that thins the viel between the warp and reality thus having some sort of impact on the battlefield is a pretty 40k thing
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Stormonu wrote:The Necron version I could see them transforming several of the C’Tan powers to an Endless version.
But what could the Tau possibly get? Modified forms of Invoke the Elements? Micro-marker or mini-gun swarms? Battle holograms and force fields?
Squatted? j/k
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2019/08/21 19:41:19
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 20:15:28
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Walking Dead Wraithlord
|
I thought everybody hated templates...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 21:48:03
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
I don't actually care about endless spells per se, I mostly just don't want GW to be fething around with the psychic phase. It never ends well.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 22:01:54
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Inspiring SDF-1 Bridge Officer
|
ERJAK wrote:I don't actually care about endless spells per se, I mostly just don't want GW to be fething around with the psychic phase. It never ends well.
Psychic phases often don’t end well for psychics already, with the Perils of the Warp and all :p
I would hope we don’t see the absurd psychic phases of 6/7E, but GW rarely learns its lesson. It’s also partly why I’m not interested in seeing this psychic invasion to the game.
|
It never ends well |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 22:17:31
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Kanluwen wrote: Overread wrote:
As for releases, well that doesn't really hold much argument toward anything. Endless Spells for factions have been coming out as GW updates Battletomes since the Stormcast Tome for 2.0. This means that every timea new 2.0 tome has come out the faction has typically got terrain and endless spells. So sure the Khorne one wasn't at launch, but nor were the Skaven or Slaanesh. There's a few 2.0 Tomes without spells (Idoneth and Daughters of Khaine), but GW can easily release them once they've got a release window for those factions.
Idoneth, Daughters of Khaine, and Nurgle were all pre-AOS2.0.
However they are all 2.0 compatible Battletomes made for that edition, just released before the edition started, so they are fully functional Tomes right now. They are unlikely to get brand new Tomes, just a model release with warscroll cards in the box and on the website.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 22:33:40
Subject: Re:[Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
While I think they are a neat idea for AoS I just don't think the idea of faction themed magic effect models really fits into 40k.
|
Thought for the day: Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
30k Ultramarines: 2000 pts
Bolt Action Germans: ~1200 pts
AOS Stormcast: Just starting.
The Empire : ~60-70 models.
1500 pts
: My Salamanders painting blog 16 Infantry and 2 Vehicles done so far! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 22:42:21
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Stubborn Prosecutor
|
I would like them for Chaos, Orks or Even Necrons, but I don't see how Tau or the Imperium would really fit the idea thematically.
Anything that moves tends to be seen as a warp beast and I can't imagine such a manifestation earning a IoM psyker anything other than a commisar's bullet.
|
Bender wrote:* Realise that despite the way people talk, this is not a professional sport played by demi gods, but rather a game of toy soldiers played by tired, inebriated human beings.
https://www.victorwardbooks.com/ Home of Dark Days series |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 22:56:09
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Lets see, do I want to pay more to buy more models so my existing models can use their powers? No, I don't think I do.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/08/21 22:56:28
iGuy91 wrote:You love the T-Rex. Its both a hero and a Villain in the first two movies. It is the "king" of dinosaurs. Its the best. You love your T-rex.
Then comes along the frakking Spinosaurus who kills the T-rex, and the movie says "LOVE THIS NOW! HE IS BETTER" But...in your heart, you love the T-rex, who shouldn't have lost to no stupid Spinosaurus. So you hate the movie. And refuse to love the Spinosaurus because it is a hamfisted attempt at taking what you loved, making it TREX +++ and trying to sell you it.
Elbows wrote:You know what's better than a psychic phase? A psychic phase which asks customers to buy more miniatures... 
the_scotsman wrote:Dae think the company behind such names as deathwatch death guard deathskullz death marks death korps deathleaper death jester might be bad at naming? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/21 22:59:15
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
ChargerIIC wrote:I would like them for Chaos, Orks or Even Necrons, but I don't see how Tau or the Imperium would really fit the idea thematically.
Anything that moves tends to be seen as a warp beast and I can't imagine such a manifestation earning a IoM psyker anything other than a commisar's bullet.
Imagine this (except as a wolf instead of a bull) as a psychic power for a Rune Priest.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 10:11:18
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
Ghaz wrote: ChargerIIC wrote:I would like them for Chaos, Orks or Even Necrons, but I don't see how Tau or the Imperium would really fit the idea thematically.
Anything that moves tends to be seen as a warp beast and I can't imagine such a manifestation earning a IoM psyker anything other than a commisar's bullet.
Imagine this (except as a wolf instead of a bull) as a psychic power for a Rune Priest.
Right. Because Space Wolves are really lacking on the whole wolf front at the moment.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 10:57:16
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
CREEEEEEEEED wrote:Lets see, do I want to pay more to buy more models so my existing models can use their powers? No, I don't think I do.
But this is a very odd point considering that its a miniatures game where the whole point, commercially, is you buying more models for your army.
GW is always going to release new models for the game which they hope you will buy into because that's sort of their business model. It's no where near as predatory as, say, Magic the Gathering where they expect you to buy a new whole edition of cards every few months and cycles out a whole edition at the same time. With 3 or 4 blocks a year like that.
The boxed sets for AoS have been very reasonable in price and you don't have to use them either; armies can be built and work great without them or with only one or two at key moments.
Personally I'd rather pay points for a model I can put on the table than pay points for things like battalions which only modify the stats of models.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 11:10:36
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
I think they work in AoS because the setting is fundamentally a high fantasy one, where such things fit in well. In 40k, psychic powers and magic are there, but a sideline. They should not be in the spotlight. I like them as an accent. Even the armies that have a strong affinity for magic still use it to supplement other aspects of the army. The might be buffs, debuffs, or the equivelent of magic guns.
But I think endless spells would swing 40k a little too far into space magic high fantasy, where the wizards a center stage, and the troopers are just sidelined as targets.
IMHO, YMMV, etc.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 11:28:28
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
|
No. God no.
I can't stand Endless Spells.
I'm having a bit of a break from AoS this year after it being my main game in 2018 - the main reason for this is Endless Spells and Faction-Specific Terrain pieces. For me, they just end up being another thing to have to buy and paint and account for when all I want to do is focus on my army itself. I'm also not the biggest fan of the "bolt on an additional system" method of expanding the games content and complexity.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/08/22 11:28:58
10,000 30K/40K Space Wolves, 6000pts 30K Iron Warriors, 3200pts Daemons of the Ruinstorm
3500pts AoS Maggotkin of Nurgle, 3000pts AoS Stormcast Eternals, 2000pts AoS Skaven
1800pts Middle-earth Rivendell, 1000pts Grey Company, 600pts Iron Hills
1800pts Middle-earth Angmar, 1100pts Moria, 1000pts Dol Guldur
Blood Bowl Skaven, Blood Bowl Orcs
Blog | Twitter | Instagram | Middle-earth SBG Hero Tracker - now on the Play Store! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 12:21:46
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Overread wrote: CREEEEEEEEED wrote:Lets see, do I want to pay more to buy more models so my existing models can use their powers? No, I don't think I do. But this is a very odd point considering that its a miniatures game where the whole point, commercially, is you buying more models for your army. GW is always going to release new models for the game which they hope you will buy into because that's sort of their business model. It's no where near as predatory as, say, Magic the Gathering where they expect you to buy a new whole edition of cards every few months and cycles out a whole edition at the same time. With 3 or 4 blocks a year like that. The boxed sets for AoS have been very reasonable in price and you don't have to use them either; armies can be built and work great without them or with only one or two at key moments. Personally I'd rather pay points for a model I can put on the table than pay points for things like battalions which only modify the stats of models.
Of course it makes financial sense for GW, they'd really be stupid not to, because it won't make anyone leave over just that. At least not enough people to matter, and I wouldn't, I'd just grumble about it and not buy the spell models. I'm not sure how battalions work in AoS, I literally just got my first models, but do you have to pay for formations? In terms of points?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/08/22 12:22:06
iGuy91 wrote:You love the T-Rex. Its both a hero and a Villain in the first two movies. It is the "king" of dinosaurs. Its the best. You love your T-rex.
Then comes along the frakking Spinosaurus who kills the T-rex, and the movie says "LOVE THIS NOW! HE IS BETTER" But...in your heart, you love the T-rex, who shouldn't have lost to no stupid Spinosaurus. So you hate the movie. And refuse to love the Spinosaurus because it is a hamfisted attempt at taking what you loved, making it TREX +++ and trying to sell you it.
Elbows wrote:You know what's better than a psychic phase? A psychic phase which asks customers to buy more miniatures... 
the_scotsman wrote:Dae think the company behind such names as deathwatch death guard deathskullz death marks death korps deathleaper death jester might be bad at naming? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 13:11:39
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The Psychic phase is bad enough at the moment without adding more crap to it. If GW want to do something with Psykers and the Psychic phase I don't think making it more lethal would be the right direction to take.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 13:28:58
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
CREEEEEEEEED wrote: I'm not sure how battalions work in AoS, I literally just got my first models, but do you have to pay for formations? In terms of points?
Battalions are like formations. You have a specified set of models that can comprise the battalion and of them there are minimum and maximum limits for each one. The battalion then gives all the units within it a bonus for being part of it and that bonus removes through the whole game no matter how much of the battalion is left alive. To get the bonus you have to pay for the whole battalion in points, this is on top of the individual model cost for each unit in the battalion.
Battalions also give you a command point as well (they upped the prices of them a while back which was basically tacking 50points or so on for the command point).
They are also deployed at the same time.
One additional bonus is that some armies have battalions hwich have an allied force within them; this can let you take more units from that allied army than you normally would with the allies rule as the battalion operates outside of the allies limitations in AoS.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 14:51:22
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I think too many people got caught up in the idea of "endless spells"
When it is broken down they are basically more like fortifications. Some thing you can buy that makes your force better, or does some effect to the enemy that goes on the table.
In reality the Haywire Mine that Incursor's have is already a 40K "endless spell". Its a model that you prepay for, that goes on the table, and has an effect under some circumstances.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 15:48:36
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Wicked Warp Spider
|
Haanz wrote:No. God no.
I can't stand Endless Spells.
I'm having a bit of a break from AoS this year after it being my main game in 2018 - the main reason for this is Endless Spells and Faction-Specific Terrain pieces. For me, they just end up being another thing to have to buy and paint and account for when all I want to do is focus on my army itself. I'm also not the biggest fan of the "bolt on an additional system" method of expanding the games content and complexity.
This PLUS the fact that many factions need actual models for their units. These spells are far from being a priority.
|
Generic characters disappearing? Elite units of your army losing options and customizations? No longer finding that motivation to convert?
Your army could suffer Post-Chapterhouse Stress Disorder (PCSD)! If you think that your army is suffering one or more of the aforementioned symptoms, call us at 789-666-1982 for a quick diagnosis! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 16:22:10
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Kaiyanwang wrote:
This PLUS the fact that many factions need actual models for their units. These spells are far from being a priority.
Good thing that the spells are literally not produced in the same places as the unit models?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 16:26:44
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Wicked Warp Spider
|
Kanluwen wrote: Kaiyanwang wrote:
This PLUS the fact that many factions need actual models for their units. These spells are far from being a priority.
Good thing that the spells are literally not produced in the same places as the unit models?
I think assume that this has zero impact on design focus or release schedule is optimistic. VERY optimistic.
|
Generic characters disappearing? Elite units of your army losing options and customizations? No longer finding that motivation to convert?
Your army could suffer Post-Chapterhouse Stress Disorder (PCSD)! If you think that your army is suffering one or more of the aforementioned symptoms, call us at 789-666-1982 for a quick diagnosis! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 16:44:27
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Ultramarine Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Endless Spells in W40K would be my ticket to quitting and going back to the Legend of the Five Rings card game.
W40K is about guns, not magic.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 17:08:48
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
oni wrote:Endless Spells in W40K would be my ticket to quitting and going back to the Legend of the Five Rings card game.
W40K is about guns, not magic.
Don't tell the Eldar.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 18:50:01
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought
|
Kanluwen wrote: oni wrote:Endless Spells in W40K would be my ticket to quitting and going back to the Legend of the Five Rings card game.
W40K is about guns, not magic.
Don't tell the Eldar.
or chaos
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 18:58:42
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Kaiyanwang wrote: Kanluwen wrote: Kaiyanwang wrote:
This PLUS the fact that many factions need actual models for their units. These spells are far from being a priority.
Good thing that the spells are literally not produced in the same places as the unit models?
I think assume that this has zero impact on design focus or release schedule is optimistic. VERY optimistic.
We've actually gotten a 'look behind the curtains' as to design focus.
The sculptors doing vehicles aren't doing infantry and the sculptors doing the Endless Spells for AOS aren't even the same ones doing scenery. There's effectively dedicated teams.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/08/22 23:34:31
Subject: [Poll]Would you be happy with Endless Spells in 40k?
|
 |
Wicked Warp Spider
|
Kanluwen wrote: Kaiyanwang wrote: Kanluwen wrote: Kaiyanwang wrote: This PLUS the fact that many factions need actual models for their units. These spells are far from being a priority.
Good thing that the spells are literally not produced in the same places as the unit models?
I think assume that this has zero impact on design focus or release schedule is optimistic. VERY optimistic.
We've actually gotten a 'look behind the curtains' as to design focus. The sculptors doing vehicles aren't doing infantry and the sculptors doing the Endless Spells for AOS aren't even the same ones doing scenery. There's effectively dedicated teams.
So they expanded the team? I was going to answer that with an expanded team they could update models and fix a lot of "holes" they have in the line, but I suppose this would not be a fair criticism, because the effort needed for one or more of these spell is not necessarily the same needed for, say, new aspect warriors. I am still a bit confused by GW's priorities, but I think this at least addresses my doubts. Nonetheless, the post I quoted above still stands.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/08/22 23:34:55
Generic characters disappearing? Elite units of your army losing options and customizations? No longer finding that motivation to convert?
Your army could suffer Post-Chapterhouse Stress Disorder (PCSD)! If you think that your army is suffering one or more of the aforementioned symptoms, call us at 789-666-1982 for a quick diagnosis! |
|
 |
 |
|