Switch Theme:

Fate of Index Units  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






as an ork player it is kind of infuriating that a lot of our HQs are index only and now will be seemingly nto for use in tournaments when our best HQ is an index only option.

10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






Does anybody actually believe GW's claim that they'll support Legends forever?

I think they'll do well to be supported beyond the end of this edition, so maybe a year or two tops.
   
Made in gb
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel






It is all as predicted. Just want to laugh at those who dismissed me when I said they'd encourage the index options less and less.
   
Made in us
Freaky Flayed One





Long Island, NY

 G00fySmiley wrote:
as an ork player it is kind of infuriating that a lot of our HQs are index only and now will be seemingly nto for use in tournaments when our best HQ is an index only option.


Hey maybe well get lucky and get that BT/Ork box set with a new HQ. Probably not, but one can dream.

DA KRIMSON KLAWZ
 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





 G00fySmiley wrote:
as an ork player it is kind of infuriating that a lot of our HQs are index only and now will be seemingly nto for use in tournaments when our best HQ is an index only option.


It's not even that. It's "a couple HQs that are more point efficient and/or safer than the codex options". The wartrike IS the new warboss on a bike despite desires to deliver the relic klaw as cheaply and easily as possible, because mathammer tells you it will efficiently hurt a knight.
   
Made in ch
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





 fraser1191 wrote:
Not Online!!! wrote:
 fraser1191 wrote:
I think this is more opening up formats for 40k.

Now you have all of the current models legal for general play but now you'll have a legends format where everything is legal.

At least GW isn't coming out saying "yeah all those index units are never gonna be supported ever again, so use them as paper weights"


In essence it's a polite way of saying screw you your models count for nothing anymore.
Doesn't make it better, especially when we get 10000000000000000 marine books


How? They said they were gonna support it forever and on a case by case basis tournaments are gonna host them. Weren't indexes not aloud to be used at tournaments before?


Not all Formats allowed them.
Additionally the community has also taken over other tournament suggestions soo yes, in Essence if you own a FW army that ends up in legends you potentially are fethed.

https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/766717.page
A Mostly Renegades and Heretics blog.
GW:"Space marines got too many options to balance, therefore we decided to legends HH units."
Players: "why?!? Now we finally got decent plastic kits and you cut them?"
Chaos marines players: "Since when are Daemonengines 30k models and why do i have NO droppods now?"
GW" MONEY.... erm i meant TOO MANY OPTIONS (to resell your army to you again by disalowing former units)! Do you want specific tyranid fighiting Primaris? Even a new sabotage lieutnant!"
Chaos players: Guess i stop playing or go to HH.  
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control





Holy Terra

 Lord Damocles wrote:
Does anybody actually believe GW's claim that they'll support Legends forever?

I think they'll do well to be supported beyond the end of this edition, so maybe a year or two tops.


Well they could release one book with all the units in and keep it as direct order online for years to come?

-~Ishagu~- 
   
Made in ch
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





 Ishagu wrote:
 Lord Damocles wrote:
Does anybody actually believe GW's claim that they'll support Legends forever?

I think they'll do well to be supported beyond the end of this edition, so maybe a year or two tops.


Well they could release one book with all the units in and keep it as direct order online for years to come?


Nope, they'll make it a gak epub with a doccument format so annoyingly stupid that you lose braincells just using it.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/08/29 17:03:13


https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/766717.page
A Mostly Renegades and Heretics blog.
GW:"Space marines got too many options to balance, therefore we decided to legends HH units."
Players: "why?!? Now we finally got decent plastic kits and you cut them?"
Chaos marines players: "Since when are Daemonengines 30k models and why do i have NO droppods now?"
GW" MONEY.... erm i meant TOO MANY OPTIONS (to resell your army to you again by disalowing former units)! Do you want specific tyranid fighiting Primaris? Even a new sabotage lieutnant!"
Chaos players: Guess i stop playing or go to HH.  
   
Made in us
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






 Ishagu wrote:
 Lord Damocles wrote:
Does anybody actually believe GW's claim that they'll support Legends forever?

I think they'll do well to be supported beyond the end of this edition, so maybe a year or two tops.


Well they could release one book with all the units in and keep it as direct order online for years to come?


honestly I see them doing it every edition. the book will sell well enough and they just set values for points, input wargear as it was and every edition tens of thousands of people will buy the book to play with their old toys. As somebody with a large collection and several models out of print or conversions for never released models... i can say i would buy that book every edition assuming nothing in my financial situation changes significantly. currently as a $40 book i would look at it as not quite an hours wage and say yea.. thats a book worth an hour of work for me.

10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
 
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

Karol wrote:
Isn't there a rule that says you can't get new rules without new models?


You can't get rules for units that don't have models.

However, you can have new rules without needing new models.

Bear in mind that Warlord Traits, Stratagems, Artefacts etc. are all rules but none are reliant on having new models.

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Been Around the Block




 Daedalus81 wrote:
 G00fySmiley wrote:
as an ork player it is kind of infuriating that a lot of our HQs are index only and now will be seemingly nto for use in tournaments when our best HQ is an index only option.


It's not even that. It's "a couple HQs that are more point efficient and/or safer than the codex options". The wartrike IS the new warboss on a bike despite desires to deliver the relic klaw as cheaply and easily as possible, because mathammer tells you it will efficiently hurt a knight.


He does not look like a Warboss, nor does he he have Warboss rules.
   
Made in ca
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon






 Lord Damocles wrote:
Does anybody actually believe GW's claim that they'll support Legends forever?

I think they'll do well to be supported beyond the end of this edition, so maybe a year or two tops.


If 9th is a cleaned up version of 8th, then it's not a big deal to do whatever minimal changes are needed to Legends to support the promise. It could be 20 years till the next total reboot.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





redboi wrote:
 Daedalus81 wrote:
 G00fySmiley wrote:
as an ork player it is kind of infuriating that a lot of our HQs are index only and now will be seemingly nto for use in tournaments when our best HQ is an index only option.


It's not even that. It's "a couple HQs that are more point efficient and/or safer than the codex options". The wartrike IS the new warboss on a bike despite desires to deliver the relic klaw as cheaply and easily as possible, because mathammer tells you it will efficiently hurt a knight.


He does not look like a Warboss


Quite debatable when this guy is a warboss:
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/Ork-Warboss-with-Big-Choppa

nor does he he have Warboss rules.


So, use the Warboss on foot. In a horde melee army that gets reroll any dice for charging adding infantry advance and charge bubble to a 14" move model up ends making it far too easy to just push a giant blob of models into someone's face. Or, if your goal is to have a low-effort way to deliver S12 rerollable wound attacks to a knight more easily than a smash captain.

Let's face it. If the wartrike had the relic klaw this wouldn't even be a conversation.
   
Made in fi
Courageous Space Marine Captain






I think it is a good thing that they have a solid plan for legacy models, and I hope and believe that they will keep this working trough edition changes.

Ultimately your models will still be usable. Of course there is a huge segment of people who think that playing with toy soldiers is super serious business, and random games in a local store must follow the strictest possible tournament standards and thus will refuse to use these perfectly valid rules. I also expect at least half of those people will complain about units being removed, whilst in reality they have just been moved into Legends. Oh well, that's really not GWs fault.

A big question is what will happen to a relatively recent plastic units that still do not have a proper codex. Assassins, SoS, the Inquisition (well, Greyfax...) I really think they should make a dedicated 'Imperial Agents' book in which these could go. They could also put various Killteam and BSF stuff in there. Rogue Traders, Navigators etc. It doesn't need to be a proper army, just write the rules so that you can easily spice up your Imperial army with those units without losing your army boni.

   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut







 Daedalus81 wrote:
Karol wrote:

Cool, I didn't know that. Everyone keep scaring me with Grey knight being given no new rules anymore.


I don't think you need to be scared. Grey Knights occupy a very specific place in the lore. That GW has said in no uncertain terms that GK won't be Primaris'd, but that doesn't mean they're going away. It might even mean people worried about old marines going away might also be overblown.

Add onto that Inquisition getting the nod for Psychic Awakening makes me very unconcerned for the future of GK.


Inquisition didn't get a nod on the Psychic Awakening graphic (unless they've redone it for a third time) - Deathwatch, Grey Knights and Sisters of Battle all did.

Which means, Karol, you'll see new rules for something relating to Grey Knights during that cycle of books. I've no idea what, mind you, but something.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/08/29 18:02:14


2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in ru
Screaming Shining Spear




Russia, Moscow

 Crimson wrote:
Of course there is a huge segment of people who think that playing with toy soldiers is super serious business

People don't universally follow MP rules because they're seriously serious, they do it because these rules give at least a semblance and hope of balance and fairness and a chance for their army to get fixed in the future and stay relevant.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/08/29 18:06:34


 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




I think the more ironic issues with Legends is it is going to drive people to Competitive play.

Some model combo in it is going to be stupid broken. Maybe just Castellan with Raven Strat, or maybe some new ruling that affects something and makes them broken.

And then they have no path to fix it.

And then people hate playing it, and want to not play it, and ohh over here is Competitive play where Jimmy doesn't get to play stupid no fun Whatever it is.


   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





 Dysartes wrote:


Inquisition didn't get a nod on the Psychic Awakening graphic (unless they've redone it for a third time) - Deathwatch, Grey Knights and Sisters of Battle all did.

Which means, Karol, you'll see new rules for something relating to Grey Knights during that cycle of books. I've no idea what, mind you, but something.


*Shrug* - the character in the video is an ordo xenos inquisitor.
   
Made in fi
Calculating Commissar







 Lord Damocles wrote:
Does anybody actually believe GW's claim that they'll support Legends forever?

I think they'll do well to be supported beyond the end of this edition, so maybe a year or two tops.

I never believe GW marketing speak. Legends will only last for a year or two, or until 9th edition, whichever comes sooner.

 lolman1c wrote:
It is all as predicted. Just want to laugh at those who dismissed me when I said they'd encourage the index options less and less.

Well, it's a good thing you haven't allowed that bitterness to fester or anything.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/08/29 18:41:39


The supply does not get to make the demands. 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





 lolman1c wrote:
It is all as predicted. Just want to laugh at those who dismissed me when I said they'd encourage the index options less and less.


The community was doing that just fine on its own.
   
Made in gb
Horrific Hive Tyrant





 Agamemnon2 wrote:
 Lord Damocles wrote:
Does anybody actually believe GW's claim that they'll support Legends forever?

I think they'll do well to be supported beyond the end of this edition, so maybe a year or two tops.

I never believe GW marketing speak. Legends will only last for a year or two, or until 9th edition, whichever comes sooner.


Well, I expect them to be around for a long time. As Warscroll compendium style pdfs that no one uses because they're awful in game.
   
Made in us
Pious Palatine




 Dysartes wrote:
 Daedalus81 wrote:
Karol wrote:

Cool, I didn't know that. Everyone keep scaring me with Grey knight being given no new rules anymore.


I don't think you need to be scared. Grey Knights occupy a very specific place in the lore. That GW has said in no uncertain terms that GK won't be Primaris'd, but that doesn't mean they're going away. It might even mean people worried about old marines going away might also be overblown.

Add onto that Inquisition getting the nod for Psychic Awakening makes me very unconcerned for the future of GK.


Inquisition didn't get a nod on the Psychic Awakening graphic (unless they've redone it for a third time) - Deathwatch, Grey Knights and Sisters of Battle all did.

Which means, Karol, you'll see new rules for something relating to Grey Knights during that cycle of books. I've no idea what, mind you, but something.


Sister did not get a nod in PA. Neither did SW.


 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





ERJAK wrote:


Sister did not get a nod in PA. Neither did SW.


SW seems like just as graphic goof.
   
Made in pl
Fixture of Dakka




 vipoid wrote:
Karol wrote:
Isn't there a rule that says you can't get new rules without new models?


You can't get rules for units that don't have models.

However, you can have new rules without needing new models.

Bear in mind that Warlord Traits, Stratagems, Artefacts etc. are all rules but none are reliant on having new models.

I guess Grey Knight are special then, because we don't have a brother captin, librarian or chapter master, but we do have rules for them.


Which means, Karol, you'll see new rules for something relating to Grey Knights during that cycle of books. I've no idea what, mind you, but something.

Well as long as is not going to be nerfs, it is going to be interesting to get new stuff.

If you have to kill, then kill in the best manner. If you slaughter, then slaughter in the best manner. Let one of you sharpen his knife so his animal feels no pain. 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




 Daedalus81 wrote:
ERJAK wrote:


Sister did not get a nod in PA. Neither did SW.


SW seems like just as graphic goof.


They pulled and fixed the image to include the folks they left out.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Karol wrote:

I guess Grey Knight are special then, because we don't have a brother captin, librarian or chapter master, but we do have rules for them.


You may want to tell GW that, because they're currently selling all three on their webstore.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2019/08/29 19:13:15


 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Sterling191 wrote:


You may want to tell GW that, because they're currently selling all three on their webstore.


So they did - good stuff.
   
Made in pl
Fixture of Dakka




You may want to tell GW that, because they're currently selling all three on their webstore.

they are selling them, but those are resin models. And they no longer make new ones fo those. And the articles says that units GW no longer makes,nothing about no longer sells, are going to be moved to legend. Stores that aren't GW can't order the resin models, at least my store can't, and the polish GW store has them on other only, as they don't have them on site.

If you have to kill, then kill in the best manner. If you slaughter, then slaughter in the best manner. Let one of you sharpen his knife so his animal feels no pain. 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Karol wrote:
You may want to tell GW that, because they're currently selling all three on their webstore.

they are selling them, but those are resin models. And they no longer make new ones fo those. And the articles says that units GW no longer makes,nothing about no longer sells, are going to be moved to legend. Stores that aren't GW can't order the resin models, at least my store can't, and the polish GW store has them on other only, as they don't have them on site.

If you don't count Resin (or even older Metals), they don't "make" half the Eldar line.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Karol wrote:

they are selling them, but those are resin models. And they no longer make new ones fo those. And the articles says that units GW no longer makes,nothing about no longer sells, are going to be moved to legend. Stores that aren't GW can't order the resin models, at least my store can't, and the polish GW store has them on other only, as they don't have them on site.


Thats not even remotely an accurate understanding of how they're doing the 40K Legends.
   
Made in us
Been Around the Block




 Daedalus81 wrote:
redboi wrote:
 Daedalus81 wrote:
 G00fySmiley wrote:
as an ork player it is kind of infuriating that a lot of our HQs are index only and now will be seemingly nto for use in tournaments when our best HQ is an index only option.


It's not even that. It's "a couple HQs that are more point efficient and/or safer than the codex options". The wartrike IS the new warboss on a bike despite desires to deliver the relic klaw as cheaply and easily as possible, because mathammer tells you it will efficiently hurt a knight.


He does not look like a Warboss


Quite debatable when this guy is a warboss:
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/Ork-Warboss-with-Big-Choppa

nor does he he have Warboss rules.


So, use the Warboss on foot. In a horde melee army that gets reroll any dice for charging adding infantry advance and charge bubble to a 14" move model up ends making it far too easy to just push a giant blob of models into someone's face. Or, if your goal is to have a low-effort way to deliver S12 rerollable wound attacks to a knight more easily than a smash captain.

Let's face it. If the wartrike had the relic klaw this wouldn't even be a conversation.

He doesn't look like a proper warboss anymore either There is a reason everyone converts theirs. You must have missed the part where ork players are always asking for a warboss kit. But the wartriker is even smaller than him. He's more like a nob with a shrunken head.

IDK why you are trying to make it controversial to want a biker boss. It's been a pretty standard classic option forever. Don't let him take a relic claw IDGAF. If that was the only issue I can already take a warboss on foot and jump/DS him and have 95% the same effect.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: