| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 13:44:12
Subject: Re:40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
The dark hollows of Kentucky
|
Dudeface wrote:the_scotsman wrote: bullyboy wrote:I am curious what the new terrain rules and what "cover" means in 9th. The harlequin release has an ability for a Shadowseer to give "cover" to units within 6" of her. Since most harlequins (barring vehicles and skyweavers) only have a 6+ save and a 4+ invuln, it's a pretty useless bonus.....unless "cover" does something differently in 9th
Yep. I just hope they don't tie EVERYTHING up into cover or armies and units that have "ignore cover" may wind up being a liiiiiittle bit bonkers.
Well given it's been the booby prize faction bonus of the edition so far I'd not be against it being worth something now.
Um, you have seen the Word Bearers and Night Lords faction rules haven't you?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 14:39:47
Subject: Re:40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
Gadzilla666 wrote:Dudeface wrote:the_scotsman wrote: bullyboy wrote:I am curious what the new terrain rules and what "cover" means in 9th. The harlequin release has an ability for a Shadowseer to give "cover" to units within 6" of her. Since most harlequins (barring vehicles and skyweavers) only have a 6+ save and a 4+ invuln, it's a pretty useless bonus.....unless "cover" does something differently in 9th
Yep. I just hope they don't tie EVERYTHING up into cover or armies and units that have "ignore cover" may wind up being a liiiiiittle bit bonkers.
Well given it's been the booby prize faction bonus of the edition so far I'd not be against it being worth something now.
Um, you have seen the Word Bearers and Night Lords faction rules haven't you?
Oh they do compete for bottom of the barrel don't worry. But at least they probably kick in more often even if actually as useless.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 14:41:27
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
New Box art:
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 14:44:23
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
Eh. Why in the world is it mostly dead white space?
And the Marine has an oddly dinky head, and is oddly posed- like he's going to be sweeping Necron Lilliputians
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/06/08 14:46:51
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 14:46:08
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Pile of Necron Spare Parts
|
Voss wrote:Eh. Why in the world is it mostly dead white space?
Its really washed out here, there is actually detail in it Screaming faces in alcoves in fact.
Edit for spelling
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/06/08 14:46:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 14:48:01
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Voss wrote:Eh. Why in the world is it mostly dead white space?
Probably so there is room on the box for any logos and the like.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
So according to Stu, 9th ed work started in late 2018, which means they spent quite some time working on this new edition.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Core rulebook art:
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Better box image from WHC:
No washed out details like on the steam.
|
|
This message was edited 5 times. Last update was at 2020/06/08 15:39:14
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 15:59:59
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Stu can say all he wants but it's a lie and we know it just based on them saying the last few Awakening books were written with 9th in mind.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 16:07:07
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Stu can say all he wants but it's a lie and we know it just based on them saying the last few Awakening books were written with 9th in mind.
Eh? Started work doesn’t equal finished. They started on 9th late 2018, I.e. 18 months ago. The last few awakening books can be written with 9th in mind based on the progress they’d made in that time. In no way are these 2 statements contradictory.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 16:15:26
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Was there any rules news in today’s stream or was it just the reveal of the box art?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/06/08 16:15:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 16:19:52
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Noise Marine Terminator with Sonic Blaster
Australia
|
Aash wrote:Was there any rules news in today’s stream or was it just the reveal of the box art?
Just art, back to rules tomorrow
|
The Circle of Iniquity
The Fourth Seal
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 16:44:54
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Aash wrote:Was there any rules news in today’s stream or was it just the reveal of the box art?
I’m afraid there’s 24 hours of argument about pixel placement and colouration ahead of us
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 16:51:19
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
MaxT wrote:Aash wrote:Was there any rules news in today’s stream or was it just the reveal of the box art?
I’m afraid there’s 24 hours of argument about pixel placement and colouration ahead of us
There seemed to be some color correction on the stream version that washed out the background.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 17:19:23
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
So 40K Today was about nothing?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 17:21:24
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Very disappointing, waiting over the weekend for the next reveal and it turns out there isn’t one. Hopefully tomorrow’s is something interesting.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 17:28:23
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
They had one fewer guest than usual, so it may have been filler to cover for the intended content being unavailable. The various technical glitches (e.g. the slide show being out of order), lack of the usual promo posts on Facebook and Twitter and slightly delayed start support that hypothesis.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/06/08 17:29:04
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 17:43:16
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
No new rules content, but hearing about a more unified art direction that leans more towards the feel of Blanche's work is nice.
Has a lot of the quality of the art in 6th and 7th I liked.
Hearing the timeline on 9th gives me some hope that they really diales it in like they claim they did.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 18:10:18
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Mighty Vampire Count
|
I like the box image but not the cover, Abaddon does not look good.
|
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page
A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 18:50:27
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
MaxT wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Stu can say all he wants but it's a lie and we know it just based on them saying the last few Awakening books were written with 9th in mind.
Eh? Started work doesn’t equal finished. They started on 9th late 2018, I.e. 18 months ago. The last few awakening books can be written with 9th in mind based on the progress they’d made in that time. In no way are these 2 statements contradictory.
If that were the case you'd find the AdMech points pretty low with an Intercessor compared to the Calvary or flying guys, so yes they're lying through their teeth.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 19:13:30
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:MaxT wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Stu can say all he wants but it's a lie and we know it just based on them saying the last few Awakening books were written with 9th in mind.
Eh? Started work doesn’t equal finished. They started on 9th late 2018, I.e. 18 months ago. The last few awakening books can be written with 9th in mind based on the progress they’d made in that time. In no way are these 2 statements contradictory.
If that were the case you'd find the AdMech points pretty low with an Intercessor compared to the Calvary or flying guys, so yes they're lying through their teeth.
Different editions with different points costs. 9th will be messing with points quite a bit so I wouldn't be surprised to see some of that addressed.
Also the timeline fits with what we know of their regular dev time, so I fail to see how they could be lying here.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/06/08 19:40:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 20:54:52
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:MaxT wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Stu can say all he wants but it's a lie and we know it just based on them saying the last few Awakening books were written with 9th in mind.
Eh? Started work doesn’t equal finished. They started on 9th late 2018, I.e. 18 months ago. The last few awakening books can be written with 9th in mind based on the progress they’d made in that time. In no way are these 2 statements contradictory.
If that were the case you'd find the AdMech points pretty low with an Intercessor compared to the Calvary or flying guys, so yes they're lying through their teeth.
or they pointed the thing for 8th edition because they're adjusting the points for everything when 9th edition hits.
do you ever get tired of being so relentless negative? maybe you should go find a game you actually enjoy? all this hate and bile can't be good for you
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/06/08 20:55:14
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/08 21:08:23
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:MaxT wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Stu can say all he wants but it's a lie and we know it just based on them saying the last few Awakening books were written with 9th in mind.
Eh? Started work doesn’t equal finished. They started on 9th late 2018, I.e. 18 months ago. The last few awakening books can be written with 9th in mind based on the progress they’d made in that time. In no way are these 2 statements contradictory.
If that were the case you'd find the AdMech points pretty low with an Intercessor compared to the Calvary or flying guys, so yes they're lying through their teeth.
Why? Points are redone for all. Points in book can't be same for both and remember book was made to work with 8ted as well.
Just because rules work w/9th ed in mind doesn't mean points have to be same. That would make them overpriced for 8th
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 00:00:20
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
So, is this likely to Dark Imperium pricing, or Necromunda Dark Uprising pricing?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 00:02:50
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
argonak wrote:So, is this likely to Dark Imperium pricing, or Necromunda Dark Uprising pricing?
We don't know how much it'll cost, but we all hope it won't be Blood of the Pheonix pricing.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 00:36:04
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
argonak wrote:So, is this likely to Dark Imperium pricing, or Necromunda Dark Uprising pricing?
I have a gut feeling it'll be about 200USD
|
<Dynasty> ~10500pts
War Coven of the Coruscating Gaze ~3000pts
Thrice-Damned Plague Corps ~3250pts
Admech (TBN) ~3500pts +30k Bots and Ulator
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 00:45:23
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'm going to say 250$ USD, just tossing that out there.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 00:52:04
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Whatever the dollar equivalent of £120 is.
Due to the newsletter prize thing?
When is that closing date?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 00:55:45
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
The best State-Texas
|
Yeah, this lines up with the price "leaks" so far.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/06/09 00:56:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 01:16:04
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
ClockworkZion wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:MaxT wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Stu can say all he wants but it's a lie and we know it just based on them saying the last few Awakening books were written with 9th in mind.
Eh? Started work doesn’t equal finished. They started on 9th late 2018, I.e. 18 months ago. The last few awakening books can be written with 9th in mind based on the progress they’d made in that time. In no way are these 2 statements contradictory.
If that were the case you'd find the AdMech points pretty low with an Intercessor compared to the Calvary or flying guys, so yes they're lying through their teeth.
Different editions with different points costs. 9th will be messing with points quite a bit so I wouldn't be surprised to see some of that addressed.
Also the timeline fits with what we know of their regular dev time, so I fail to see how they could be lying here.
They could've messed with those points with the newest Awakening books then instead of what they're attempting in order to make it a partly wasted purchase. It's GW quickly invalidating printed material as per usual for the last couple of editions.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 01:17:33
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Yeah, because if the 120GBP prize they had is the actual price, which seems highly likely to me, then the conversion is about 152USD, then give GW they're Obligatory Price Increase( tm), then I figure 200 is a safe bet
|
<Dynasty> ~10500pts
War Coven of the Coruscating Gaze ~3000pts
Thrice-Damned Plague Corps ~3250pts
Admech (TBN) ~3500pts +30k Bots and Ulator
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/06/09 01:32:27
Subject: 40k preview, May 23 - 9th edition, new Necrons, Marines
|
 |
Thrall Wizard of Tzeentch
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:MaxT wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Stu can say all he wants but it's a lie and we know it just based on them saying the last few Awakening books were written with 9th in mind.
Eh? Started work doesn’t equal finished. They started on 9th late 2018, I.e. 18 months ago. The last few awakening books can be written with 9th in mind based on the progress they’d made in that time. In no way are these 2 statements contradictory.
If that were the case you'd find the AdMech points pretty low with an Intercessor compared to the Calvary or flying guys, so yes they're lying through their teeth.
Can you show us on the Primaris Lieutenant where GW touched you?  Honestly, try to relax, it's just a game.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|