Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:31:39
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Spoletta wrote:By the way, marines are also getting the HQ limitations.
Max 1 cap and 2 Lt per detachment.
Guess that they are coming for everyone then.
That sounds awful. Not everyone has the range of HQ's marines have. At this stage I'm down to 2 options I can use outside legends. (In terms of models I have not overall although some are in a worse place than Eldar).
|
tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:31:40
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Karol wrote:I wonder if it is going to work on those new primaris tanks. Quad mini bolters and two miniguns could give a lot of 6s rolled.
In the case of the miniguns, are they Bolt weapons? I didn't think the Gatling Cannon weapons were, but I may not be up-to-date on that.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:34:45
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
pm713 wrote:Spoletta wrote:By the way, marines are also getting the HQ limitations.
Max 1 cap and 2 Lt per detachment.
Guess that they are coming for everyone then.
That sounds awful. Not everyone has the range of HQ's marines have. At this stage I'm down to 2 options I can use outside legends. (In terms of models I have not overall although some are in a worse place than Eldar).
There are some new HQs coming it looks like. One of them is definitely Drukhari--either Lelith Hesperax or a new Wych character.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:35:12
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Dysartes wrote:Karol wrote:I wonder if it is going to work on those new primaris tanks. Quad mini bolters and two miniguns could give a lot of 6s rolled.
In the case of the miniguns, are they Bolt weapons? I didn't think the Gatling Cannon weapons were, but I may not be up-to-date on that.
They are not.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:36:17
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
pm713 wrote:Spoletta wrote:By the way, marines are also getting the HQ limitations.
Max 1 cap and 2 Lt per detachment.
Guess that they are coming for everyone then.
That sounds awful. Not everyone has the range of HQ's marines have. At this stage I'm down to 2 options I can use outside legends. (In terms of models I have not overall although some are in a worse place than Eldar).
We don't know which limitations are going to be placed.
They are not following 100% the fluff, or chaplains and librarians would also likely get a limitation.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:39:17
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Kanluwen wrote:pm713 wrote:Spoletta wrote:By the way, marines are also getting the HQ limitations.
Max 1 cap and 2 Lt per detachment.
Guess that they are coming for everyone then.
That sounds awful. Not everyone has the range of HQ's marines have. At this stage I'm down to 2 options I can use outside legends. (In terms of models I have not overall although some are in a worse place than Eldar).
There are some new HQs coming it looks like. One of them is definitely Drukhari--either Lelith Hesperax or a new Wych character.
Oh, good I can be forced to take characters or finally get something that GW cut out for no reason.
|
tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:40:59
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
By "a new Wych character", I'm meaning a potential new type.
The video that GW dropped today showed off a Palatine for the Sororitas in full, and teased Ork, Drukhari, Skitarii, and Death Guard character models.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:41:12
Subject: Re:New marine CTs
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
The dark hollows of Kentucky
|
Kanluwen wrote: Gadzilla666 wrote: So Raven Guard get -1 to be hit and +1 to their armour save outside of 18 even when out in the open? Alpha Legion eat your heart out.
Great to see that loyalists are getting another round of updated chapter tactics while csm continue to be stuck with our outdated ones. Sorry, just had to add a little  . 
And it can be removed by someone having "ignores the effects of cover" on their weapon or unit...plus the Dense Terrain bonus only applies to Infantry keyworded units.
Right, so totally useless against IF, Iron Warriors, Noise Marines, and a few other random things. Guess Alpha Legion should be glad they get the -1 to be hit on their dreadnoughts and bikers. I don't really mind, I don't play Alpha Legion, and that shouldn't have been their legion trait in the first place. They never were the sneaky legion that got bonuses to cover saves and stealth in previous editions, that was The Eighth.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 16:42:53
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Kanluwen wrote:By "a new Wych character", I'm meaning a potential new type.
The video that GW dropped today showed off a Palatine for the Sororitas in full, and teased Ork, Drukhari, Skitarii, and Death Guard character models.
Surprisingly that could turn out to be decent. Although I'm not going to start praising GW for it.
|
tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 17:11:43
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
The Adeptus Mechanicus character looked like some kind of skitarii HQ.
|
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 17:18:17
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Kanluwen wrote:By "a new Wych character", I'm meaning a potential new type.
The video that GW dropped today showed off a Palatine for the Sororitas in full, and teased Ork, Drukhari, Skitarii, and Death Guard character models.
The "Wych" character has all the hallmarks of Lelith Hesperax, a finecast model. I expect it is her in plastic.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 17:28:48
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
alextroy wrote: Kanluwen wrote:By "a new Wych character", I'm meaning a potential new type.
The video that GW dropped today showed off a Palatine for the Sororitas in full, and teased Ork, Drukhari, Skitarii, and Death Guard character models.
The "Wych" character has all the hallmarks of Lelith Hesperax, a finecast model. I expect it is her in plastic.
Other than all the armor and clothing, I'd agree.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 17:32:10
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Kanluwen wrote: alextroy wrote: Kanluwen wrote:By "a new Wych character", I'm meaning a potential new type.
The video that GW dropped today showed off a Palatine for the Sororitas in full, and teased Ork, Drukhari, Skitarii, and Death Guard character models.
The "Wych" character has all the hallmarks of Lelith Hesperax, a finecast model. I expect it is her in plastic.
Other than all the armor and clothing, I'd agree.
I can still see that being Lelith, it's not like they wouldn't make an armoured Lelith. If everyone can jump rocks nothing is impossible..
|
tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 17:32:30
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
Kanluwen wrote:pm713 wrote:Spoletta wrote:By the way, marines are also getting the HQ limitations.
Max 1 cap and 2 Lt per detachment.
Guess that they are coming for everyone then.
That sounds awful. Not everyone has the range of HQ's marines have. At this stage I'm down to 2 options I can use outside legends. (In terms of models I have not overall although some are in a worse place than Eldar).
There are some new HQs coming it looks like. One of them is definitely Drukhari--either Lelith Hesperax or a new Wych character.
There's not really any reason to think this will apply to other armies. Everyone moaned about endless marine rerolls, this is likely just a thing to combat that specifically.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 17:33:52
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Annandale, VA
|
ERJAK wrote:There's not really any reason to think this will apply to other armies. Everyone moaned about endless marine rerolls, this is likely just a thing to combat that specifically.
I should hope that's not the idea, because it's not much of a solution. It's not like people were bringing multiple Chapter Masters in the first place.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 17:56:30
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Galas wrote:The Adeptus Mechanicus character looked like some kind of skitarii HQ.
That was my gut reaction to what we saw in the video, too.
Speaking of Death Guard characters, I wonder when SMH series 3 will get a release over here...
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:02:49
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
catbarf wrote:ERJAK wrote:There's not really any reason to think this will apply to other armies. Everyone moaned about endless marine rerolls, this is likely just a thing to combat that specifically.
I should hope that's not the idea, because it's not much of a solution. It's not like people were bringing multiple Chapter Masters in the first place.
I didn't say it was a good solution.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:07:04
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
pm713 wrote: Kanluwen wrote: alextroy wrote: Kanluwen wrote:By "a new Wych character", I'm meaning a potential new type.
The video that GW dropped today showed off a Palatine for the Sororitas in full, and teased Ork, Drukhari, Skitarii, and Death Guard character models.
The "Wych" character has all the hallmarks of Lelith Hesperax, a finecast model. I expect it is her in plastic.
Other than all the armor and clothing, I'd agree.
I can still see that being Lelith, it's not like they wouldn't make an armoured Lelith. If everyone can jump rocks nothing is impossible..
I did a slow pass on the video and noted: Small blade in hand; Super long hair; No shoes; Slightly less clothes than the average Wych. I'll be shocked if it isn't Lelith since she needs to get out of Finecast. I would be pleasantly surprised if we got a dual build kit like Dark Angels Master Lazarus, but I'm not holding my breath.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:20:03
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Waaagh! Ork Warboss
Italy
|
Spoletta wrote:By the way, marines are also getting the HQ limitations.
Max 1 cap and 2 Lt per detachment.
Guess that they are coming for everyone then.
With the new detachments system it's no issue at all. Of all the 9th lists I've tried so far and all the list that I've just only though to play not a single one of them had 2 HQs of the same kind.
So all SM are getting a single book: is it going to be heavy like a bible with a thousand of pages (and a thousand of euro in cost) or every chapters just got a few pages with lots of options that just vanish? I mean, background pages aside, strategems for SW only between 8th codex and PA are 30+, most of them not shared with other chapters. Lots of unique units, traits, psyhic powers, relics, etc as well.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/07/25 18:23:41
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:25:03
Subject: Re:New marine CTs
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Seems like it's very much a solution to fluff issues that doesn't impact crunch as much as GW hope.
Atleast the chapter tactics haven't been made even more OP.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:26:31
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The book will have only the generic stuff and you keep using your old supplements with it.
In time, they will release new supplements.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:27:51
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Spoletta wrote:By the way, marines are also getting the HQ limitations.
Max 1 cap and 2 Lt per detachment.
Guess that they are coming for everyone then.
I like it. Felt odd to have multiple Captains in one detachment.
|
They/them
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:29:52
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
Dark Angels: 1) +1 to hit if the unit did not move in this turn and 2) something about Combat Attrition that I can't read, sorry.
is that really a thing? Seems a bit strong.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:30:17
Subject: Re:New marine CTs
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought
|
Gadzilla666 wrote: Kanluwen wrote: Gadzilla666 wrote: So Raven Guard get -1 to be hit and +1 to their armour save outside of 18 even when out in the open? Alpha Legion eat your heart out.
Great to see that loyalists are getting another round of updated chapter tactics while csm continue to be stuck with our outdated ones. Sorry, just had to add a little  . 
And it can be removed by someone having "ignores the effects of cover" on their weapon or unit...plus the Dense Terrain bonus only applies to Infantry keyworded units.
Right, so totally useless against IF, Iron Warriors, Noise Marines, and a few other random things. Guess Alpha Legion should be glad they get the -1 to be hit on their dreadnoughts and bikers. I don't really mind, I don't play Alpha Legion, and that shouldn't have been their legion trait in the first place. They never were the sneaky legion that got bonuses to cover saves and stealth in previous editions, that was The Eighth.
No, the new ignore cover is Ignore Light Cover so RG (and probably AL at some point) will still get the -1 to hit bonus for Dense Cover, just no + to save.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:31:56
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Waaagh! Ork Warboss
Italy
|
Spoletta wrote:The book will have only the generic stuff and you keep using your old supplements with it.
In time, they will release new supplements.
There's a lot of stuff on the 8th codex though, with a single book it is very likely that I'll lose a significant amount of options.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:41:04
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
nekooni wrote:Dark Angels: 1) +1 to hit if the unit did not move in this turn and 2) something about Combat Attrition that I can't read, sorry.
is that really a thing? Seems a bit strong.
Might be reroll 1's which is what they have now maybe? +1 would be quicker though.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:42:53
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
Dudeface wrote:nekooni wrote:Dark Angels: 1) +1 to hit if the unit did not move in this turn and 2) something about Combat Attrition that I can't read, sorry.
is that really a thing? Seems a bit strong.
Might be reroll 1's which is what they have now maybe? +1 would be quicker though.
well, and much stronger, considering that'd stack with a captain for basically full rerolls.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:45:47
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter
|
Yikes. We just got through not-fixing the fallout from supplements and they're already going at it.
This looks pretty gross. Raven Guard particularly, though IF & DA also deserve special mention.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/07/25 18:49:40
Guardsmen, hear me! Cadia may lie in ruin, but her proud people do not! For each brother and sister who gave their lives to Him as martyrs, we will reap a vengeance fiftyfold! Cadia may be no more, but will never be forgotten; our foes shall tremble in fear at the name, for their doom shall come from the barrels of Cadian guns, fired by Cadian hands! Forward, for vengeance and retribution, in His name and the names of our fallen comrades! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:46:26
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
nekooni wrote:Dudeface wrote:nekooni wrote:Dark Angels: 1) +1 to hit if the unit did not move in this turn and 2) something about Combat Attrition that I can't read, sorry.
is that really a thing? Seems a bit strong.
Might be reroll 1's which is what they have now maybe? +1 would be quicker though.
well, and much stronger, considering that'd stack with a captain for basically full rerolls.
It would but given the new terrain rules and importance of moving to objectives it might not kick in that often.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/07/25 18:52:57
Subject: New marine CTs
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
Dudeface wrote:nekooni wrote:Dudeface wrote:nekooni wrote:Dark Angels: 1) +1 to hit if the unit did not move in this turn and 2) something about Combat Attrition that I can't read, sorry.
is that really a thing? Seems a bit strong.
Might be reroll 1's which is what they have now maybe? +1 would be quicker though.
well, and much stronger, considering that'd stack with a captain for basically full rerolls.
It would but given the new terrain rules and importance of moving to objectives it might not kick in that often.
Yeah, but what you move is the capturing units that don't have that much firepower. You'll still have your Predators and such sitting elsewhere (eg your deployment zone) with a fire corridor pointing at an objective. If you're getting constantly shot off of the objectives you'll lose the primary objective for sure, it's not like killing something is no longer part of the game.
Inquisitor Lord Katherine wrote:Yikes. We just got through not-fixing the fallout from supplements and they're already going at it.
This looks pretty gross. Raven Guard particularly, though IF & DA also deserve special mention.
IF has to be a mistake from the transcript. Why would CF be 1 extra hit and IF 2?
RG and DA though...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/25 18:55:26
|
|
 |
 |
|