Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/23 23:46:00
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Morally-Flexible Malleus Hearing Whispers
|
Super Ready wrote:Voss wrote:I'm trying to picture Custodes writing cheesy and vulgar little snippets about getting into a woman's underthings.
Its amusing, but difficult.
Why would Custodes contemplate a concept hypothetical?
T'would be the very model of a sonnet most heretical!
I think Flipsiders has hit the nail on the head here. They are different, sure, but you need to know sufficient lore in order to know that. The less of that lore you've been exposed to? The more they're going to just look like Super- de-Dooper-humans as opposed to just Superdooperhumans.
Modern Major General reference, I swooned. THEN A DBZA reference, and I slapped my keyboard so hard my cat fell off the desk.
You sir are the Custodian of all that is awesome tonight.
:Removes hat:
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 00:15:52
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest
|
10 Internet points to you for recognising both! ...minus 1 for not mentioning Mordin Solus in Mass Effect 2.
|
"Hard pressed on my right. My centre is yielding. Impossible to manoeuvre. Situation excellent. I am attacking." - General Ferdinand Foch |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 04:35:50
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Custodes aren't Marines. That's why they're not included. It's pretty cut and dry.
I mean, in the fluff the Custodes don't trust Marines. They exist separately from Marines, and they don't consider themselves part of that organisation at all. Neither does the Imperium at large.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 06:38:04
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Platuan4th wrote:
Except thumbs aren't fingers. Both are digits, but fingers and thumbs are classed separately from one another.
What you MEANT to say is "All fingers are digits, but not all digits are fingers".
You must be superfun at parties...
Translationsissues aside (in my language, the thumb is very much considered a finger), here's what I found when doing a quick search;
English dictionaries describe finger as meaning either one of the five digits including the thumb, or one of the four excluding the thumb
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/10/24 06:39:51
5500 pts
6500 pts
7000 pts
9000 pts
13.000 pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 08:16:26
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Banelord Titan Princeps of Khorne
Noctis Labyrinthus
|
You don't have to be convinced of it. You're simply wrong. Automatically Appended Next Post: Xenomancers wrote:
The difference between a marine and a custode is more like the difference between an AK-47 and an M16. A space marine has a more rugged construction but more or less the end product is the same except the custode is a little more a precision instrument. Realistically there is no reason why a custode would be much better than the difference between an m16 and an ak-47 but in the 40k universe a custode is a lot better than a space marine.
What the feth are you even talking about, lol?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/10/24 08:18:09
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 11:18:57
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Sure, and sisters are now slaanesh because they are female.
That’s about as large as the list of similarities between marines and custodes.
2 copy and paste vehicles and the odd imperial weapon or 2 is the only common factor between them.
Everything else about them is entirely different.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 11:53:36
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I mean, this is kind of a consequence of gravis and elite marines eating the custodes’ niche on the tabletop. Used to be an army that was full of captains, but now it’s an army full of less flexible chonky marines. Full of captains is pretty unique. Full of chonky marines is not
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 17:27:34
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Morally-Flexible Malleus Hearing Whispers
|
For me the difference is in the "story plot". God Emperor tries to unite humanity, and fight the Techno Barbarians. Creates Super warriors, named Custodes, but too much is required, needs a slightly less good but mass-producible army. Creates Thunder warriors. They are slightly less powerful then custodes, and win him the galaxy, but they are also insane and incapable of long life. So he goes back and creates the Astartes/Primarchs, which are as near to perfect as he can manage for a mass produced army. They cannot beat thunder warriors, so the Custodes have to do it. The Custodes Slaughter the entire race of Thunder Warriors, in a relatively short period of time. So basically, in order of power:
Emperor>Custodes>Primarchs>Thunder Warriors>Astartes.
Astartes are the bottom tier of the Gene bred warriors of the Emperor. Custodes are just below the Emperor. That is the difference.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 18:00:46
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
stratigo wrote:I mean, this is kind of a consequence of gravis and elite marines eating the custodes’ niche on the tabletop. Used to be an army that was full of captains, but now it’s an army full of less flexible chonky marines. Full of captains is pretty unique. Full of chonky marines is not
Custodes niche is 'not on the tabletop'
'better terminators' was something terminators needed, not a new subfaction.
'Full of captains' is simply dreadful for game balance.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/10/24 18:02:01
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 18:55:26
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Voss wrote:stratigo wrote:I mean, this is kind of a consequence of gravis and elite marines eating the custodes’ niche on the tabletop. Used to be an army that was full of captains, but now it’s an army full of less flexible chonky marines. Full of captains is pretty unique. Full of chonky marines is not
Custodes niche is 'not on the tabletop'
'better terminators' was something terminators needed, not a new subfaction.
'Full of captains' is simply dreadful for game balance.
Yes because Custodes are super unbalanced LOL
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 19:32:02
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Leader of the Sept
|
Voss wrote:Aelyn wrote:FezzikDaBullgryn wrote:I personally equate Wulfen battle Sagas to Klingon Poetry. A lot more of the Slam and a lot less of the Poetry part. Anyone want to try and re-enact a Wulfen singing?
I'd compare the Space Wolf sagas to epics like Beowulf or the Iliad, where Custodes might do something more like Shakespeare's sonnets.
I'm trying to picture Custodes writing cheesy and vulgar little snippets about getting into a woman's underthings.
Its amusing, but difficult.
And from.a personal standpoint, well.worth the effort. Fnyarr, and indeed, fnyarr.
|
Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!
Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 19:44:26
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
To the uninitiated they're both big dudes in chunky armour, not hard to see where confusion can arise.
Same with Sisters I'm guessing, a novice would be more likely to assume they're female marines than a female Imperial Guard regiment.
Power armour has a specific look, Marines greatest foe is Marines with spikes after all.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 20:05:16
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Banelord Titan Princeps of Khorne
Noctis Labyrinthus
|
FezzikDaBullgryn wrote:For me the difference is in the "story plot". God Emperor tries to unite humanity, and fight the Techno Barbarians. Creates Super warriors, named Custodes, but too much is required, needs a slightly less good but mass-producible army. Creates Thunder warriors. They are slightly less powerful then custodes, and win him the galaxy, but they are also insane and incapable of long life. So he goes back and creates the Astartes/Primarchs, which are as near to perfect as he can manage for a mass produced army. They cannot beat thunder warriors, so the Custodes have to do it. The Custodes Slaughter the entire race of Thunder Warriors, in a relatively short period of time. So basically, in order of power:
Emperor>Custodes>Primarchs>Thunder Warriors>Astartes.
Astartes are the bottom tier of the Gene bred warriors of the Emperor. Custodes are just below the Emperor. That is the difference.
A Primarch can rip a Custodian limb from limb.
And has. Angron literally tore the Emperor's bodyguards to pieces with his bare hands when he was spirited away from Nuceria, until Malcador knocked him out.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 20:49:14
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
Yeah only the best Custodes can goe toe to toe with a Primarch and at best don't die instantly. The High General of the Heresy was nearly capable of defeating some primarchs , I don't remember his name, but even then it was much more probably for him to lose.
Now, we all know Primarch power are highly inconsistent and in some novels you have 10 Space Wolves "scorting" a Primarch under Malcador orders so if they go roge basically kill him, like with Sanguinius.
Of course any Custode is much better than most primarchs at basically being emotionally and mentally stable.
|
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 21:20:19
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
kingheff wrote:To the uninitiated they're both big dudes in chunky armour, not hard to see where confusion can arise.
actuaslly it kiiiinda is
COMPLETELY differant aestetics. there's very little that would tie these guys in eneugh to think they're somehow the same type of thing beyond "guys in armor"
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 21:26:54
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Picking the plainest Marine models you can find doesn't help when Space Marines like these exist...
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 21:29:20
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Ghaz wrote:Picking the plainest Marine models you can find doesn't help when Space Marines like these exist...
Or Sanguinary Guard...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 22:05:25
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
the point still stands that there really aren't that many aestetics shared among them. notably the helmets are very very differant
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 22:29:55
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
The different aesthetics are largely just cosmetic, though. The chestplates and shoulder pads combine to make something that is very recognisably power armour, in the same curved-plate style as Marine armour. To the untrained eye, they're just Marines in pointy hats... which isn't enough to make them something distinctly different, given how many different styles of hats Marines have.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 22:53:05
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest
|
Aesthetically, let's face it, the Custodes are about as different from ordinary Marines as Grey Knights are. And while anyone versed in lore knows that Grey Knights are not exactly ordinary Space Marines... they are still Space Marines. So that's another point of reference that could easily confuse newcomers.
|
"Hard pressed on my right. My centre is yielding. Impossible to manoeuvre. Situation excellent. I am attacking." - General Ferdinand Foch |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 23:18:55
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Banelord Titan Princeps of Khorne
Noctis Labyrinthus
|
Super Ready wrote:Aesthetically, let's face it, the Custodes are about as different from ordinary Marines as Grey Knights are.
They're not. They're more-so.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 23:46:44
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
BrianDavion wrote:the point still stands that there really aren't that many aestetics shared among them. notably the helmets are very very differant
To you the difference is obvious but to the new player they don't have the point of reference to make that call. As has been stated, look at Sanguinary guard. They have a colour scheme that is very similar to Custodes, arguably make Custodes look restrained by comparison and different shaped helmets from normal marines, they share as many similarities/differences to an intercessor as a custodian guard but, fundamentally they all look like big guys in power armour. Power armour has a distinctive silhouette.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/24 23:53:12
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
kingheff wrote:BrianDavion wrote:the point still stands that there really aren't that many aestetics shared among them. notably the helmets are very very differant
To you the difference is obvious but to the new player they don't have the point of reference to make that call. As has been stated, look at Sanguinary guard. They have a colour scheme that is very similar to Custodes, arguably make Custodes look restrained by comparison and different shaped helmets from normal marines, they share as many similarities/differences to an intercessor as a custodian guard but, fundamentally they all look like big guys in power armour. Power armour has a distinctive silhouette.
except that it's no more similer then
it's segmented armor plates, a back pack. THEY'RE THE SAME THING!
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/25 00:04:12
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
BrianDavion I'm sorry. I was one of the first in this post to say that they are not the same specially rules wise but for a newy player buff dudes in power armor are totally nearly the same.
|
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/25 00:10:22
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Honestly even long term fans are going to see space marines when they see custodes.
They have the same body proportions; the same armour general shape and construction; the same weapon types (bolter); the same overall unit divisions; the same transport vehicles.
Sure their "Dreadnought" looks very different, but they still have one. Sure their armour is more ornate (and gold); but they are still basically a space marine in shape and form.
Eldar guardians are very different; they've a more lithe build; their weapons are different; their overall structure and style is different. Their shoulderpads are not twice the size of their heads etc....
Plus Custodes are listed under the Imperium so you know they are Imperial, not Chaos nor Xenos. They are Imperial guys in big thick armour just like a space marine - they are a variation of a space marine to most. Sure lore wise they are different; but at a quick visual glance they are marines.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/25 01:03:25
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Morally-Flexible Malleus Hearing Whispers
|
Angron ripping apart a Custodian has to be the dumbest thing ever. Angron was a walking talking lore break. Want proof? "IM SO ANGRY I CAN LIFE A TITAN" If Angron was maximally angry, what are three things he coulnd't do?
Yes.
Also, literally any main focus of a book is indistinguishable from a god in certain situations. A single Iron Snake moving faster than a pack of Dark Eldar can see? Angron Lifting a Titan? Ciaphas Cain defeating a Word Bearer Captain in a sword fight? Same guy defeating an Ork Warboss in a sword fight? Eisenhorn taking down a WARLORD TITAN with a Daemon? It's called Plot Armor. And the GK are the kings of it. Angron "ripping" apart a Custodian fits right in with that.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/25 01:08:51
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Overread wrote:Honestly even long term fans are going to see space marines when they see custodes.
They have the same body proportions; the same armour general shape and construction; the same weapon types (bolter); the same overall unit divisions; the same transport vehicles.
ok, shut up, and take a space marine mini and a custodes mini and go show it to your elderly mother, or your neighbor across the street. point at the boltgun and the guardian spear. ask them "is this the same weapon"? youonly know they're the same weapon since you play 40k and are told it's the same weapon.
that applies to well.. an aweful lot of things, you know these guys are supposed to be related so you look for the handful of similer things that yes is aligned. but I garentee you, your mother/neighbor or whatother person who doesn't know jack all about 40k you choose, won't know.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/10/25 01:09:44
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/25 01:14:06
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Custodes above Primarchs.
Classic Fezzik LOL.
Reminds me of when you told everyone about how the Custodes were killing Sisters of Battle during the Reign of Blood. Still don't want to either give a source for that, or recognize you were wrong?
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/25 01:21:57
Subject: On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Banelord Titan Princeps of Khorne
Noctis Labyrinthus
|
FezzikDaBullgryn wrote:Angron ripping apart a Custodian has to be the dumbest thing ever. Angron was a walking talking lore break. Want proof? "IM SO ANGRY I CAN LIFE A TITAN" If Angron was maximally angry, what are three things he coulnd't do?
Yes.
Also, literally any main focus of a book is indistinguishable from a god in certain situations. A single Iron Snake moving faster than a pack of Dark Eldar can see? Angron Lifting a Titan? Ciaphas Cain defeating a Word Bearer Captain in a sword fight? Same guy defeating an Ork Warboss in a sword fight? Eisenhorn taking down a WARLORD TITAN with a Daemon? It's called Plot Armor. And the GK are the kings of it. Angron "ripping" apart a Custodian fits right in with that.
No, Custodians are weaker than Primarchs, period. The gap between a Space Marine and a Custodian is smaller than the gap between a Custodian and a Primarch. Even Alpharius, the smallest and physically weakest Primarch, is much more powerful than any Custodian.
Don't like Black Library? I'm pretty sure that on average Valdor loses to every Primarch in the entire game in a challenge, even Lorgar. Against Horus, Fulgrim, Angron, Leman Russ, or one of the better duelists on the tabletop? He's crushed pretty much effortlessly.
And that's literally the best Custodian in the Heresy era, maybe ever.
Why not go check out how well a Custodians' statline matches up to Guilliman's, lol?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/10/25 01:29:59
Subject: Re:On the GW website and in the field manual, why are Custodes not under "Space Marines"?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Tbh, I legit thought custodes were just fancy marines at the start of 8th. ( I’d been out of the hobby since 4th) Kinda like grey knights in many ways actually. a grey knight termie is closer to a custode in looks than a tactical marine.
|
|
 |
 |
|