Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
That animation looks amazing. It would be really hard for anything to look that great. I saw the live action trailer before and wanted to see the movie. Excited for it to eventually come out in theaters.
These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
The animation looks terrific. I wonder about the movie. I thought the first one was great but the next 2 were terrible, and I think Jordan Peele has been a little hit and miss with his projects - Get Out was great but Us was kinda bleh.
Someone in the original thread for this said the themes of the movie would be gentrification and police brutality, and that sure looks like it was true after all. It will be topical if nothing else.
lord_blackfang wrote: Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote: The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
Ouze wrote: The animation looks terrific. I wonder about the movie. I thought the first one was great but the next 2 were terrible, and I think Jordan Peele has been a little hit and miss with his projects - Get Out was great but Us was kinda bleh.
Someone in the original thread for this said the themes of the movie would be gentrification and police brutality, and that sure looks like it was true after all. It will be topical if nothing else.
I feel like the issues with us was not in the cinematography or the scenes or the acting and such. But the background premise for the film. Bonus, this movie is a modern day sequel to the original. So it already has a solid background to build the story off of. If Peele can put the rest of his solid directoral skills to work over that foundation it should be good.
But, like you, I feel like his wholly original works are going to be real hit or miss.
These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
I found Us to be pretty good, but it felt like a social commentary with a thin veneer of plot, as opposed to a story with an underlying message or lesson.
I really like the original Candyman, and am similarly happy the this is a sequel rather than a reboot. The cinematic trailer doesn't do the film any favours though; the bit in the women's toilet looked particularly bad IMO.
I liked Get Out. Haven’t seen Us. I don’t know how much he may have been involved in the recent Twilight Zone beyond hosting, but I only watched the first few episodes of that before I stopped because it was quite boring and predictable and took forever to come to the obvious conclusion.
Elbows wrote: Ah, it's Peele? Shame then, I'll probably pass. I enjoyed Get Out (not as much as some people, but it was well done)...and really didn't like Us at all. I feel he's been diving harder into politcal commentary, etc. etc. and that's not what I bother with when it comes to film. Politics and discussion of such is so suffocating and overbearing I've just skipped any movie that advertises itself as such.
To be fair, Candyman has always had a bit of a political message. It's not like Ghost of Mars or some vampire flick where there is just a monster. Candyman has always been about the mistreatment of blacks by whites and this particular ghosts revenge for such. You can't have a good Candyman movie without it.
These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
Constantly commenting that you only enjoy movies free of any political themes or angles is basically virtue signaling that you are fine with the status quo, which is a political choice in and of itself. That's fine, it obviously works for some people, but don't pretend that frequently pointing out your aversion to those messages isn't a message of your own.
Sometimes a monster movie is just a monster movie, but as Lance correctly points out, the original movie is about a black guy who gets lynched by whites for the crime of loving a white woman (sorry, 1992 spoilers). So, this isn't exactly a turn into new territory for the franchise; this is exactly where it started.
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2020/06/22 05:07:09
lord_blackfang wrote: Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote: The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock