Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Melissia wrote:

Platuan4th wrote:Sorry Melissia, but you're a bit off on this one.

No I'm not. "B****es be crazy" is referring to all women.

Yes, because everyone in this thread has posted that or agrees with that.

You are way off on this by applying what 2 posters have said(most likely jokingly) to what everyone is saying .

Seriously, get down off your high horse.

Or, in case the highly reasonable and perfectly logical thought never crossed your mind, maybe I'm referring to the two specific posts that I mentioned?

Well that wasn't nice at all!

Commisar Wolfie wrote:Because speaking terms leaves the possibility for booty calls

this.

Melissia wrote:Or, in case the highly reasonable and perfectly logical thought never crossed your mind, maybe I'm referring to the two specific posts that I mentioned?

Melissia wrote:Apparently all girlfriends who break up with guys are crazy, and you should only ever listen to his point of view, because hers isn't important.

This is probably the part that was is drawing the most criticism.

Your point of view, as has been pointed out earlier in the thread, doesn't mean a damn once the furniture starts flying.

Howard A Treesong wrote:

Monster Rain wrote:Automatically Appended Next Post:

Howard A Treesong wrote:Well how deliberate was it? Did she flip the table or did it just break under her hitting it?

Why does it matter?

Someone is still destroying furniture. Does the manner in which the table was broken really have that much bearing on the issue.

Well in seriousness, yes it does, if that wasn't her explicit intention.

If it happened that she accidentally flipped over the table I can see your point.

Manchu wrote:In what circumstances is destroying someone else's things, especially something that they have put a lot of time and effort and money into, not psycho?

Further, understanding a psycho doesn't mean they are still not psycho. Even if not psycho, if she's at that point those two are not a good fit and need to move along.

Vladsimpaler wrote:
Also, you people who say "if she's hot, I'd let it pass" are just as bad and you guys are the ones that allow women to go cheat on you with 5 other guys and then come home and say "I have a headache" when you want to have sex. Way to look out for yourselves. I don't care who the girl is, if she messes up my crap, she's gone.

Totally man, that blokes post made me want to vomit.

Why do men swallow this BS? "Never ever ever hit a woman ever, go get counselling if she attacks you, I mean, you must have deserved it really"

How about, its 2011, women and men are equal so a fair deal is, I wont hit my missus when we argue, and in return she doesn't get a free pass to try and beat me up?

Ive regaled my missus with many of my amusing yarns about chinning women, and considering how many aggressive militant drunken wimmin live in the UK ive got plenty.

We've lived together for two years, more or less happily, but occasionally when she has freaked she has told me after the fact "I was so angry I would have hit you, but I know you would hit me back so I never do"

So the sensible, fair "dont hit me and I wont hit you" approach tends to work for mutual harmony!

If you constantly tell your missus that no matter what she does ever then you wont raise a glove and its probably your fault anyways, your asking for trouble and I hope she pops a glass in your cheek and you need 40 stitches.

You loser.

Howard A Treesong wrote:

Monster Rain wrote:Automatically Appended Next Post:

Howard A Treesong wrote:Well how deliberate was it? Did she flip the table or did it just break under her hitting it?

Why does it matter?

Someone is still destroying furniture. Does the manner in which the table was broken really have that much bearing on the issue.

Well in seriousness, yes it does, if that wasn't her explicit intention.

No that just means she's an idiot. Punching glass is not a sign of intelligence. Bad breeding material, won't someone think of the (mouthbreathing) children?

Intelligence doesn't really factor much into rage. I doubt an intelligent person would want to punch their wall, either. But get one mad enough, and they very well could put a hole there.

Melissia wrote:Intelligence doesn't really factor much into rage. I doubt an intelligent person would want to punch their wall, either. But get one mad enough, and they very well could put a hole there.

Believe it or not, most people don't experience rages where they are unable to stop themselves from punching or destroying inanimate objects.

The type of person that does do these things needs therapy and possibly medication.

Troy wrote:No that just means she's an idiot. Punching glass is not a sign of intelligence. Bad breeding material, won't someone think of the (mouthbreathing) children?

Well yeah, by "accident" I mean by means of a clumsy or unintentional action.

If you punch something in a rage and break it, you are a lunatic.

Melissia wrote:Intelligence doesn't really factor much into rage. I doubt an intelligent person would want to punch their wall, either. But get one mad enough, and they very well could put a hole there.

Even more people to run away from.

@Monster Rain: True -- folks often make the mistake of believing in "blind rage." Don't worry, however, the court will impute intentionality even if you chose not to believe in it!

Melissia wrote:

Mr. DK wrote:Beachez be crazy.

Ugh.

I know the thread's practically asking for misogynistic comments like this and that dumb image macro above it, but come on...
Apparently all girlfriends who break up with guys are crazy, and you should only ever listen to his point of view, because hers isn't important.

Hers is too. However, there are many occasions it doesnt make any sense. Probably, she doesnt like his hobby. She doesnt respect it. However, he has to respect her hobby.

Now, everyone knows women think different then men, and many of them are more slefish then men. This is not to insult you nor any other female human (if you can call women 'human' at all.. ), but something that is fairly clear.
That cleared up by the wise, old thenoobbomb, we can go further

If you would like to say anything to me, please call me 'honoured lord thenoobbomb, the wise one'

One of the smartest kids at my school punched through a wall once.

Now thats cool, coolyo.

Thanks. I just thought I should throw that out there because we were talking about smart people not punching through walls.

thenoobbomb wrote:Now, everyone knows women [...] are more slefish then men.

No.

Seriously, no. Just stop.

mattyrm wrote:So the sensible, fair "dont hit me and I wont hit you" approach tends to work for mutual harmony!

Every social interaction between men involves at some level the knowledge that physical violence could result. I've met a lot of women who never even considered this -- until they got hit by a man. I'm not just talking about a man hitting a woman who is talking a lot of gak to him but also the case where a woman will hit or otherwise batter a man and get hit, etc, in response. They were absolutely shocked that such a thing could happen -- whereas, like I said, for us men we always have that in the back of our heads.

coolyo294 wrote:Thanks. I just thought I should throw that out there because we were talking about smart people not punching through walls.

Smart doesn't necessarily equate to good dating material.

coolyo294 wrote:One of the smartest kids at my school punched through a wall once.

Was it inside the school? I'm asking because every school I attended had CMU walls. Very little drywall.

Melissia wrote:

thenoobbomb wrote:Now, everyone knows women [...] are more slefish then men.

No.

Seriously, no. Just stop.

Shot Down.

@Nerivant: No, it was at his house because he didn't want to go to church.

Troy wrote:

coolyo294 wrote:Thanks. I just thought I should throw that out there because we were talking about smart people not punching through walls.

Smart doesn't necessarily equate to good dating material.

Smart could mean a lot of things, like "performs well in standardized tests." It could also not mean a lot of things, like "emotionally mature and able to interact socially."

coolyo294 wrote:@Nerivant: No, it was at his house because he didn't want to go to church.

We have a saying down here. It's "yer gonna worshup the good Lord or imma belt ya inta next week."

Rage can come from funny places, sometimes.

Melissia wrote:

thenoobbomb wrote:Now, everyone knows women [...] are more slefish then men.

No.

Seriously, no. Just stop.

Lets start the war of the worlds against Melissia! Forgive me.

Now, Im not meaning that ALL women are, but many are. For instance, if they have 'their period' they will get in rage against men. I know, it isnt nice, but hey, why is it our fault?
However, that is it from me.

Tell me, how do women see men? Im interrested, I think like a man (how you can see that is your choice )

coolyo294 wrote:@Nerivant: No, it was at his house because he didn't want to go to church.

Then what happened?

Seriously though, being smart doesn't preclude being a lunatic.

Ever hear of Rodney Alcala?

He broke his wrist.

How undignified.

coolyo294 wrote:He broke his wrist.

Always check for studs before punching a wall in a show of anger and manliness.

It was pretty funny and we got to make fun of him for a while.