Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 15:46:51
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
I imagine those would probably work best as squadrons represented by a single clix-stand with the "squadron" of models.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 15:54:01
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
aka_mythos wrote:I imagine those would probably work best as squadrons represented by a single clix-stand with the "squadron" of models.
Agreed. Kinda like Elementals and Infantry from Dark Ages.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 16:01:40
Subject: Re:Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Guard Heavy Weapon Crewman
|
This made my day!
|
Cadian 343rd Mechanised Infantry
1357th Arrakan
273rd Galatean
"Nuke 'em Rico"- CPL. "Sugar" Watkins |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 17:13:25
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
Would it be feasible to use these and make up your own game system based around something like Gothic?
Just wondering as i love the models, but don't like the idea of a simplified pace combat game :/
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 17:14:36
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
LazzurusMan wrote:Would it be feasible to use these and make up your own game system based around something like Gothic?
Just wondering as i love the models, but don't like the idea of a simplified pace combat game :/
Rebase them for use in SFB.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 17:20:02
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
How confusing is SFB first? And it looks really old... :/
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 18:00:05
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
LazzurusMan wrote:How confusing is SFB first? And it looks really old... :/
It's pretty confusing when you're first getting into it due to how in depth it is, but as with all games, it grows easier.
However, I find BFG isn't a good system for Trek due to the low amount of weapons on ships and how shields work in universe.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 18:36:07
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
LazzurusMan wrote:How confusing is SFB first? And it looks really old... :/
Star Fleet Battles deserves awards for how well organized and clear the rules are.
However, I personally don't find them fun. SFB has players go through a complex provess for each ship each turn: Ships allocate power to various systems, move in impusles that split up phases, etc.
It's interesting for it's depth and well-written... but I have no interest in playing it. A lot of games ( BFG, ACTA, etc.) use some sort of abstractions for 'special orders' to achieve similar depth with faster play. SFB laughs at this crude, childish behavior!
|
Working on someting you'll either love or hate. Hopefully to be revealed by November.
Play the games that make you happy. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 22:13:55
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Posts with Authority
South Carolina (upstate) USA
|
aka_mythos wrote:
This game has the advantage of being able to draw from the "future" timeline or the actual future as later series and movies showed it. On one hand you have Valdore, Sovereign, and Negh'Var and on the other the Future Enterprise, future Fek'lhr, and and probably a hypothetical future Valdore or something like it. Given the more free form nature of Heroclix, they'll probably have both sets.
...Random thought for ship variants, but I think it'd be appropriate for their to be both a Voyager and a Voyager with borg tech. Also the Nova class is also shown in Voyager with a "future" refit... when Captain LaForge has his cameo.
Now it would be great if they did that, Im all for variants, especially if its a proper model and not just a relabeled base. One very cool thing to see would be models for the damaged Enterprise and Reliant from Wrath of Khan. Maybe make it a nice little 2 ship set, with special rules for battle in the nebula.
Khan: THERE SHE IS!!...not so damaged as we would be led to believe...
Spock: Captain, she can still outrun and outgun us...
|
Whats my game?
Warmachine (Cygnar)
10/15mm mecha
Song of Blades & Heroes
Blackwater Gulch
X wing
Open to other games too
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/09 23:50:36
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
Mad4Minis wrote:
Now it would be great if they did that, Im all for variants, especially if its a proper model and not just a relabeled base. One very cool thing to see would be models for the damaged Enterprise and Reliant from Wrath of Khan. Maybe make it a nice little 2 ship set, with special rules for battle in the nebula.
Khan: THERE SHE IS!!...not so damaged as we would be led to believe...
Spock: Captain, she can still outrun and outgun us...
At that point, they'd pretty much have to give the Enterprise one of the heroclix flight stands.
Spock: His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/11/09 23:50:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/10 01:57:49
Subject: Heroclix Star Trek
|
 |
Posts with Authority
South Carolina (upstate) USA
|
Balance wrote:LazzurusMan wrote:How confusing is SFB first? And it looks really old... :/
Star Fleet Battles deserves awards for how well organized and clear the rules are.
However, I personally don't find them fun. SFB has players go through a complex provess for each ship each turn: Ships allocate power to various systems, move in impusles that split up phases, etc.
It's interesting for it's depth and well-written... but I have no interest in playing it. A lot of games ( BFG, ACTA, etc.) use some sort of abstractions for 'special orders' to achieve similar depth with faster play. SFB laughs at this crude, childish behavior!
Good summary. Heres my addition...32 "impulses" per turn. That means there are 32 steps in each turn. Per ship. Its an awesomly detailed simulation, but Ill have to agree that "fun" doesnt show up often during a game.
|
Whats my game?
Warmachine (Cygnar)
10/15mm mecha
Song of Blades & Heroes
Blackwater Gulch
X wing
Open to other games too
|
|
 |
 |
|