Switch Theme:

Imperial Armor - for and against  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor






Gathering the Informations.

 Infantryman wrote:
 cuda1179 wrote:
I had two Griffins I purchased when I first started playing back in 2000. They were the metal/plastic hybrid GW kits. A number of years later someone claimed I was using Griffons "to win" because of their slightly OP FW rules, and that I wasn't even using an "official" model. Apparently they didn't know about Griffons being a GW box kit originally. I know that the FW rules were overpowered a bit, but I think the perception of it was worse than it was.


Whatever happened to Griffons, anyways? Not in FW, not in Codex. Where they in 7th?

They were in FW for 7th, but since they've been discontinued for some time...I didn't expect to see them come back.

 Kanluwen wrote:


They're Heavy Bolter Tarantulas, mind you.


They any good? They have cool models but I never could figure why one would field a stationary item like that.

They're cheap ways to flesh out a FOC at low points without being a dick. They're also kind of fluffy for a regiment that's specialized in cityfights and things of that nature, since Tarantulas can be kicked out of Valkyries and 'seeded' in advance of the various firebases and the like.

I enjoyed mine. Once I figured out they were <Regiment> though, it got a bit funnier since they could be Cadian Tarantulas and get rerolling Hit Rolls of 1s if they stayed stationary...which, since they're Immobile, is pretty easy to achieve.
   
Made in us
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot






Maryland, USA

Ah, didn't know about the Valk bit - might pick a couple of these up...

Codex: Soyuzki - A fluffy guidebook to my Astra Militarum subfaction. Now version 0.6!
Another way would be to simply slide the landraider sideways like a big slowed hovercraft full of eels. -pismakron
Sometimes a little murder is necessary in this hobby. -necrontyrOG

Out-of-the-loop from November 2010 - November 2017 so please excuse my ignorance!
 
   
Made in us
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor






Gathering the Informations.

 Infantryman wrote:
Ah, didn't know about the Valk bit - might pick a couple of these up...

Bear in mind that's fluff related stuff...no rules related to it at the moment.
   
Made in fi
Locked in the Tower of Amareo





 Iron_Captain wrote:
That said, I think we should ban all miniatures. Evidently, GW has no idea how to balance, so we can't endanger balance by allowing their miniatures at tournaments. Tournament games should now be settled by the players without the intervention of miniatures. Players will now be able to defeat one another through Greco-Roman wrestling. Use of external weapons not allowed. Going naked and slicking your body up with oil is optional but recommended for the sake of historical accuracy (aka the fluff) and balance.


You are joking but 8th ed actually is moving game toward where actual models on table is less and less important so apart from wrestling thing things are already headed that way!

2024 painted/bought: 109/109 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: