Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Racerguy180 wrote:
Isn't it over-priced...just like their plastic?

It absolutely isn't compared to so many other places in the UK. Hell compared to where I travel to alot for work (Bristol, london) the prices there are a steal!

The food.

The models are a different story.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 lord_blackfang wrote:
As more fuel to the fire, here's a 110k subs influencer saying the Legacies pdf was originally 7 pages before the damage control protocols were enacted.

https://www.youtube.com/live/stpD9hr6mks?si=Ew5fCWBUMSPrXubp&t=4815

Im fairly sure he was confusing the Errata which is 7 pages, there is no way GW can do all 18 legions in 7 pages.

As much as people want to crap all over GW for this, I don't think that was ever the plan to have it be that small.

Not Online!!! wrote:
I mean at this stage with all the sales and with your point torwards winters it's pretty conclusivly underselling.

Saying that at this stage it's conclusive?

There’s far too many unknowns.

The information we have is from six to ten single sources.

We’ve no idea. And never will. We don’t know. And we’ll never know.

Sales could be very few. Could be loads. But? We Do Not Know.

If we ever get that information? I’ll happily admit I’m wrong on these things, if and/or when better and greater information is available. Which we can never get. Ever. From anyone.

It might very well be a dud. I don’t, and haven’t, ruled that out. But given we’re necessarily dealing with extremely limited factual information? I don’t know and won’t pretend to know what the truth of the matter is. If more information comes out? I could change my tune. If more information doesn't come out? I may not. I’m happy to admit I’m wrong on these things, if and/or when better and greater information is available. Which it can never be.

 Gert wrote:
Just something to point out in the further hilarity that is the truly awful editing on HH3 books, multiple examples of Destroyer iconography are shown in the Legion colour palettes in the Core Rules.

Event better, the fluff on at least one Legion-specific unit says "a variant of the regular Destroyers used by other Legions..."

 Altruizine wrote:

Not Online!!! wrote:
I mean at this stage with all the sales and with your point torwards winters it's pretty conclusivly underselling.

Saying that at this stage it's conclusive?

There’s far too many unknowns.

The information we have is from six to ten single sources.

We’ve no idea. And never will. We don’t know. And we’ll never know.

Sales could be very few. Could be loads. But? We Do Not Know.

If we ever get that information? I’ll happily admit I’m wrong on these things, if and/or when better and greater information is available. Which we can never get. Ever. From anyone.

It might very well be a dud. I don’t, and haven’t, ruled that out. But given we’re necessarily dealing with extremely limited factual information? I don’t know and won’t pretend to know what the truth of the matter is. If more information comes out? I could change my tune. If more information doesn't come out? I may not. I’m happy to admit I’m wrong on these things, if and/or when better and greater information is available. Which it can never be.

Ok let's see, Flash sales with massive discounts? Check.
All over? Yup.
PDF for legacy that was 7 pages and had to be increased in size because GW fethed up in their rules department? Check.

You know what. You do you, but at this stage this looks, smells and feels like a dumpster fire and gw panicking. Doubly so because there also was the rumour that GW forced 3rd parties that wanted to be in the preorder to buy more boxes aswell.



Automatically Appended Next Post:

 lord_blackfang wrote:

 Gert wrote:
Just something to point out in the further hilarity that is the truly awful editing on HH3 books, multiple examples of Destroyer iconography are shown in the Legion colour palettes in the Core Rules.

Event better, the fluff on at least one Legion-specific unit says "a variant of the regular Destroyers used by other Legions..."

Listen, you lot complain about verbiage, but the more fundamental pictures (3 legged sally) already painted a ... picture that they didn't give a gak in order to meet the arbitrary "3 year livecycle"

Buy now this very much looks like GW tried a absolute minimum effort release and hoped that "people buy new models no matter what" makes it the best release ever

Half the rulebook looks like to be AI written
Pictures have obvious errors and units that are cut being shown means they saved on the editors
a planned update that was supposed to keep the low amount of people who won't buy in otherwise happy isn't there because it needed to be expanded as much more people as expected didn't like it

this is now the 2nd HH themed release that went wrong after LI, which indicates that this department isn't doing very well with either not enough people to get the work done, the management try to force strategies on them that don't work and/or they run out of ideas on how to meet the target set for the department and just tried to replicate 40k because this game sells

Too many SNAFUs surrounding this release. While there is a 'not irredeemable' game under all that text, the fact fact that there is all that text, the art errors, the cut units (plus the delay to the Legacy PDF) and the mishandled marketing (due to the misjudgment of the typical HH player) have sullied the product.

While the LI delay was, I think, an editing issue, this seems more 'he team' as a whole, which means, really, the Team Leader, whoever that is. Trouble is, it'll be years before lessons learned (if any) become apparent.

 Altruizine wrote:

Not Online!!! wrote:
I mean at this stage with all the sales and with your point torwards winters it's pretty conclusivly underselling.

Saying that at this stage it's conclusive?

There’s far too many unknowns.

The information we have is from six to ten single sources.

We’ve no idea. And never will. We don’t know. And we’ll never know.

We will almost certainly find out something from next year's annual report. This year discusses Skaventide not selling as well as expected as it had an impact on GW's warehousing costs.

The annual summer boxed game release is quite a big chunk of GW's revenue, it generally has enough second order impacts on the company you can tell how it sold.

https://www.warhammer-community.com/en-gb/articles/dpjkoxo7/saturnine-terminator-construction-advice-how-to-get-the-most-out-of-your-new-tactical-dreadnought-armour/



Could mean literally anything. We just don't have the necessary information to draw any conclusions. It certainly does NOT indicate that the Legacies document was scope-exploded in a panic. My mind remains open to all possibilities.

 Altruizine wrote:

Not Online!!! wrote:
I mean at this stage with all the sales and with your point torwards winters it's pretty conclusivly underselling.

Saying that at this stage it's conclusive?

There’s far too many unknowns.

The information we have is from six to ten single sources.

We’ve no idea. And never will. We don’t know. And we’ll never know.

Sales could be very few. Could be loads. But? We Do Not Know.

If we ever get that information? I’ll happily admit I’m wrong on these things, if and/or when better and greater information is available. Which we can never get. Ever. From anyone.

It might very well be a dud. I don’t, and haven’t, ruled that out. But given we’re necessarily dealing with extremely limited factual information? I don’t know and won’t pretend to know what the truth of the matter is. If more information comes out? I could change my tune. If more information doesn't come out? I may not. I’m happy to admit I’m wrong on these things, if and/or when better and greater information is available. Which it can never be.

This may have whooshed many here, but I got what you were doing and had a good laugh.

Brilliant

 Altruizine wrote:
Could mean literally anything. We just don't have the necessary information to draw any conclusions. It certainly does NOT indicate that the Legacies document was scope-exploded in a panic. My mind remains open to all possibilities.

Yes. We certainly can't draw any conclusions until some arbitrary future time when it is entirely too late, so why even think about it

 Lord Damocles wrote:

 Altruizine wrote:
Could mean literally anything. We just don't have the necessary information to draw any conclusions. It certainly does NOT indicate that the Legacies document was scope-exploded in a panic. My mind remains open to all possibilities.

Yes. We certainly can't draw any conclusions until some arbitrary future time when it is entirely too late, so why even think about it

To late for what? To write it down in the book of grudges while the details are fresh in memory?

We *might* know when HH 4.0 drops - and customization is back on day 1?

Or, if HH 4.0 never drops, I guess we'll know then too...?

 Fayric wrote:

 Lord Damocles wrote:

 Altruizine wrote:
Could mean literally anything. We just don't have the necessary information to draw any conclusions. It certainly does NOT indicate that the Legacies document was scope-exploded in a panic. My mind remains open to all possibilities.

Yes. We certainly can't draw any conclusions until some arbitrary future time when it is entirely too late, so why even think about it

To late for what? To write it down in the book of grudges while the details are fresh in memory?

Phase 6 WaitAndSeeism: Why are we still talking about this? Just Wait And See if next edition fixes it.

 Altruizine wrote:

Not Online!!! wrote:
I mean at this stage with all the sales and with your point torwards winters it's pretty conclusivly underselling.

Saying that at this stage it's conclusive?

There’s far too many unknowns.

The information we have is from six to ten single sources.

We’ve no idea. And never will. We don’t know. And we’ll never know.

Sales could be very few. Could be loads. But? We Do Not Know.

If we ever get that information? I’ll happily admit I’m wrong on these things, if and/or when better and greater information is available. Which we can never get. Ever. From anyone.

It might very well be a dud. I don’t, and haven’t, ruled that out. But given we’re necessarily dealing with extremely limited factual information? I don’t know and won’t pretend to know what the truth of the matter is. If more information comes out? I could change my tune. If more information doesn't come out? I may not. I’m happy to admit I’m wrong on these things, if and/or when better and greater information is available. Which it can never be.

I mean dude, at some point this just starts sounding like the people who try to debate atheists using Pascal's Wager. Can we know in the way you're talking about? Probably never, but at some point we really do have to just trust our lying eyes you know.

EDIT: Oh dear, have I been rooked? Gulled? Duped? I keep walking into stuff recently, I'm going to need stitches eventually.

 Gir Spirit Bane wrote:

Im fairly sure he was confusing the Errata which is 7 pages, there is no way GW can do all 18 legions in 7 pages.

As much as people want to crap all over GW for this, I don't think that was ever the plan to have it be that small.

Nah, that tracks with the amount of effort the rules portion of this project appears to be getting.