Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:44:19
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Hades, I'm going to try to make this as clear as possible.
SA says that you remove the models unless you have a special rule that specifically pertains to SA.
If you are putting the models on their side instead of removing them, then you are, in every possible interpretation of the word, saving them from being removed.
If you do not have a special rule that specifically says it works for SA, then it does not.
You are required by SA to remove the models from play. Then, if you'd like, you are more than welcome to take their WBB rolls and the surviving models may continue the fight with whatever enemy models they find inside your minis case, but they have already been removed from play, so they can't possibly be within 6" of another unit that is still in the game.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:45:40
Subject: Re:Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Huge Bone Giant
|
Hades wrote:
No SA never states that nothing can prevent them from being removed, it says no save or special rule can save them at this stage. removed=layed on their side for a necron model.
No. Laid on side = laid on side.
Removed is what SA makes you do.
|
"It is not the bullet with your name on it that should worry you, it's the one labeled "To whom it may concern. . ."
DQ:70S++G+++MB+I+Pwhfb06+D++A+++/aWD-R++++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:46:46
Subject: Re:Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Dracos wrote:
edit: Hades, I like how you join a thread on p.5 and then tell someone who has been reading and responding since the beginning to read the rest of the thread. Doesn't you being unaware of the ~10-15 posts I've written imply YOU didnt read the thread?
I've been here since page 2 dracos.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:47:19
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Huge Bone Giant
|
Next can we bring up nemesis force weapons, et al?
They are equally irrelevant.
|
"It is not the bullet with your name on it that should worry you, it's the one labeled "To whom it may concern. . ."
DQ:70S++G+++MB+I+Pwhfb06+D++A+++/aWD-R++++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:49:31
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Go out and buy the necron codex. I have it and i'm reading it right now. It says that removing models and laying them on their side is EXACTLY the same thing. Buy the codex, read it, reread it then come back. It is just they way necrons are played.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/01 18:49:54
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:50:49
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Hades wrote:Go out and buy the necron codex. I have it and i'm reading it right now. It says that removing models and laying them on their side is EXACTLY the same thing. Buy the codex, read it, reread it then come back. It is just they way necrons are played.
And you read the Rulebook. It says Sod the Codex unless it mentions SA.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:52:06
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Huge Bone Giant
|
And, in fairness I have read all of them, and I remember a fair amount of what I read.
Oddly enough, I understand it too.
|
"It is not the bullet with your name on it that should worry you, it's the one labeled "To whom it may concern. . ."
DQ:70S++G+++MB+I+Pwhfb06+D++A+++/aWD-R++++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:52:08
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
Hades wrote:dude listen to me very carefully. The necron codex states that ANY time a necron model would be removed as a casualty, it is placed on its side and ignored for all normal game purposes, it is debris only.
I added the correction in bold.
Models removed from play due to sweeping advance are not removed as a casualty (I think).
|
Please note - terms like 'always/never' are carried with the basic understanding that there are exceptions to the rule, and therefore are used to mean generally...
"I do not play people who blatently exploit the rules to their own benefit, in any game. It is disrespectful to the game designers and other players." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:52:11
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Gwar! wrote:Hades wrote:Go out and buy the necron codex. I have it and i'm reading it right now. It says that removing models and laying them on their side is EXACTLY the same thing. Buy the codex, read it, reread it then come back. It is just they way necrons are played.
And you read the Rulebook. It says Sod the Codex unless it mentions SA.
im 100% sure it doesnt.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:52:26
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
Gwar: Why doesn't "Any time it would be removed" not include SA as well? It is used every other time (Regular casualties, other special rules ect) So why does "ANY TIME" suddenly not also mean with SA?
|
7000 pts (Not including Gauss Pylon Network)
Alpharius wrote:Meltdown at the Nuclear Over-reactor!
Run! Run! RUN!
Unit1126PLL wrote:Everything is a gunline. Khorne berzerkers have pistols? Gunline unit. Tanks can't assault? They're all, every last one, a gunline. Planes? Gunline. Motorcycles? Mobile gunline. Mono-Khorne daemons? Bloodthirster has shooting attack. Gunline. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:53:33
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Eight Ball wrote: So why does "ANY TIME" suddenly not also mean with SA?
BECAUSE SWEEPING ADVANCE SAYS SO!
God damnit, read the rulebook. It says "Unless otherwise Specified" (as in, specificity mentioned) nothing can save them.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:53:46
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Huge Bone Giant
|
Because the rule book ACTUALLY says that it does not.
|
"It is not the bullet with your name on it that should worry you, it's the one labeled "To whom it may concern. . ."
DQ:70S++G+++MB+I+Pwhfb06+D++A+++/aWD-R++++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:54:30
Subject: Re:Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Angered Reaver Arena Champion
|
Hades wrote:No SA never states that nothing can prevent them from being removed, it says no save or special rule can save them at this stage. removed=layed on their side for a necron model.
Okay I'm going to go through this extremely slowly for you to make sure you can keep up.
WBB is a special rule.
WBB generally prevents models from being removed as casualties and instead lays them on their side.
This means that WBB will directly conflict with any other rule that tells you to remove models. That means it "rescues" them by being removed by those rules that would otherwise remove them. With me so far?
When a unit is caught by an SA, they are "destroyed and removed immediately. Unless specified differently, no save or special rule can rescue them at this stage, for them the battle is over".
WBB wants to rescue them from being removed by instead laying them on their side. However, SA says that a special rule cannot rescue them at this stage unless is specifically tells you differently (as in says specifically that the special rule trumps SA).
WBB is unable to use its replacement effect because it does not have a clause to override SA.
Therefore, WBB does not work against SA.
If you can't follow that, then you are just trying to interpret the rules to achieve your own result. The rules are crystal clear here.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/01 18:56:12
Sangfroid Marines 5000 pts
Wych Cult 2000
Tau 2000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:55:02
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Yes please stop confusing "Saving" and "Removing" They are nowhere near the same terms.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:55:11
Subject: Re:Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Dracos wrote:If you can't follow that, then you are just trying to interpret the rules to achieve your own result. The rules are crystal clear here.
I would use much more colourful language.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:55:27
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
Again, sorry, I'm hung up on the "Any Time" especially with the Codex>BRB...
|
7000 pts (Not including Gauss Pylon Network)
Alpharius wrote:Meltdown at the Nuclear Over-reactor!
Run! Run! RUN!
Unit1126PLL wrote:Everything is a gunline. Khorne berzerkers have pistols? Gunline unit. Tanks can't assault? They're all, every last one, a gunline. Planes? Gunline. Motorcycles? Mobile gunline. Mono-Khorne daemons? Bloodthirster has shooting attack. Gunline. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:55:27
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Hades wrote:Yes please stop confusing "Saving" and "Removing" They are nowhere near the same terms.
No, you stop not reading. Automatically Appended Next Post: Eight Ball wrote:Again, sorry, I'm hung up on the "Any Time" especially with the Codex>BRB...
Are you deliberately being Dense? The rules for Sweeping advance say that SA overrides the codex, unless the codex says specifically otherwise.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2009/07/01 18:56:33
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:56:50
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Huge Bone Giant
|
Codex > BRB is a flawed argument.
Specific > General is the better reading.
SA demands a SPECIFIC exception.
None is written in WBB
|
"It is not the bullet with your name on it that should worry you, it's the one labeled "To whom it may concern. . ."
DQ:70S++G+++MB+I+Pwhfb06+D++A+++/aWD-R++++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 18:58:28
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Gwar! wrote:Hades wrote:Yes please stop confusing "Saving" and "Removing" They are nowhere near the same terms.
No, you stop not reading.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Eight Ball wrote:Again, sorry, I'm hung up on the "Any Time" especially with the Codex>BRB...
Are you deliberately being idiotic? The rules for Sweeping advance say that SA overrides the codex, unless the codex says specifically otherwise.
Dude look. SA says that nothing can SAVE them. You are technically removing the models. You are performing the same action because necron models are laid on their side and not removed. They are DEAD. Whether or not they are removed or laid on their side for that stage they are DEAD NECRONS. WBB saves them at a later stage.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:00:35
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
It also says "For them the battle is over". Letting them Take WBB is breaking that rule.
P.S. Dude is Still Dead in 1994
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:01:04
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
Please keep in mind that the Codex says
Anytime they are removed AS A CASUALTY
Removing that part of the text will very much limit your arguments, as (i stated this before) models removed from the table via SA doesn't state they are removed as casualties.
|
Please note - terms like 'always/never' are carried with the basic understanding that there are exceptions to the rule, and therefore are used to mean generally...
"I do not play people who blatently exploit the rules to their own benefit, in any game. It is disrespectful to the game designers and other players." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:01:34
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Gwar! wrote:P.S. Dude is Still Dead in 1994
I bloody resurrected it with WBB
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/01 19:02:24
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:01:39
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Harkainos wrote:Please keep in mind that the Codex says Anytime they are removed AS A CASUALTY Removing that part of the text will very much limit your arguments, as (i stated this before) models removed from the table via SA doesn't state they are removed as casualties. Le gasp! Selective Quoting by the side that is wrong? I'd never expect that! Automatically Appended Next Post: Hades wrote:P.S. Dude is Still Dead in 1994 I bloody resurrected it with WBB
Nope, I Sweeping Advanced it, sorry.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2009/07/01 19:02:35
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:02:30
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Angered Reaver Arena Champion
|
Hades wrote:Dude look. SA says that nothing can SAVE them. You are technically removing the models. You are performing the same action because necron models are laid on their side and not removed. They are DEAD. Whether or not they are removed or laid on their side for that stage they are DEAD NECRONS. WBB saves them at a later stage.
Wow this is the most ridiculous claim yet. Now, you are not removing them if you lay them on their side instead.If the wording just said they were destroyed, you might have more of a leg to stand on. But the SA rule state to remove the models immediately, and that no special rule can rescue them from being removed (it uses the word rescue, not save fyi).
WBB offers a replacement effect to removing models, it is NOT the SAME as removing them.
In fact, you are rescuing them from being removed immediately if you lay them on their side.
|
Sangfroid Marines 5000 pts
Wych Cult 2000
Tau 2000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:02:51
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
Gwar! wrote:It also says "For them the battle is over". Letting them Take WBB is breaking that rule.
If you're gonna use that argument, Casualties also says ""(casualties) are no longer fit to participate in the battle" so I guess you can't take WBB after getting shot down by bolters
|
7000 pts (Not including Gauss Pylon Network)
Alpharius wrote:Meltdown at the Nuclear Over-reactor!
Run! Run! RUN!
Unit1126PLL wrote:Everything is a gunline. Khorne berzerkers have pistols? Gunline unit. Tanks can't assault? They're all, every last one, a gunline. Planes? Gunline. Motorcycles? Mobile gunline. Mono-Khorne daemons? Bloodthirster has shooting attack. Gunline. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:03:44
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Hades wrote:Yes please stop confusing "Saving" and "Removing" They are nowhere near the same terms.
OK, what would saving them be in your mind? Jesus Christ manifesting on the table and absolving their sins?
SA says remove them immediately. Yes?
So, any time you do not remove them immediately, you are saving them from SA. Right? Please say I'm right on this point, because if you don't then there is absolutely nothing that will make you see how the rule actually works and there is a somewhat more intelligent rock on my lawn that I could be arguing with instead.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:04:14
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
Gwar! wrote:Harkainos wrote:Please keep in mind that the Codex says
Anytime they are removed AS A CASUALTY
Removing that part of the text will very much limit your arguments, as (i stated this before) models removed from the table via SA doesn't state they are removed as casualties. Le gasp! Selective Quoting by the side that is wrong?
I'd never expect that!
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Hades wrote:P.S. Dude is Still Dead in 1994
I bloody resurrected it with WBB
Nope, I Sweeping Advanced it, sorry.
I'm against WBB from SA.... was the selective 'quoting' incorrect. I am not reading the dex right now, as I am at work.
|
Please note - terms like 'always/never' are carried with the basic understanding that there are exceptions to the rule, and therefore are used to mean generally...
"I do not play people who blatently exploit the rules to their own benefit, in any game. It is disrespectful to the game designers and other players." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:04:16
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Eight Ball wrote:Gwar! wrote:It also says "For them the battle is over". Letting them Take WBB is breaking that rule.
If you're gonna use that argument, Casualties also says ""(casualties) are no longer fit to participate in the battle" so I guess you can't take WBB after getting shot down by bolters
Yes, but WBB works against Bolter Rounds. it doesn;t work against SA. See the difference yet?
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:05:53
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
Yeah, what part is the selective quoting, that IS the rule "A Necron that is reduced to 0 wounds, or would otherwise be removed as a casualty, is laid on it's side to show it's damaged..."
EDIT: Gwar, based on what you posted above, you wouldn't get WBB from bolters, because "(casualties) are no longer fit to participate in the battle"
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/01 19:06:31
7000 pts (Not including Gauss Pylon Network)
Alpharius wrote:Meltdown at the Nuclear Over-reactor!
Run! Run! RUN!
Unit1126PLL wrote:Everything is a gunline. Khorne berzerkers have pistols? Gunline unit. Tanks can't assault? They're all, every last one, a gunline. Planes? Gunline. Motorcycles? Mobile gunline. Mono-Khorne daemons? Bloodthirster has shooting attack. Gunline. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/01 19:06:12
Subject: Necrons and Sweeping Advance, revisited
|
 |
Angered Reaver Arena Champion
|
Eight Ball wrote:Gwar! wrote:It also says "For them the battle is over". Letting them Take WBB is breaking that rule.
If you're gonna use that argument, Casualties also says ""(casualties) are no longer fit to participate in the battle" so I guess you can't take WBB after getting shot down by bolters
This just shows that you do not have a firm grasp of interpreting the rules.
Specific over general. Those are the general rules for casualties. They apply unless there is a more specific rule
I've posted this EXACT POST already, so re-read the thread.
Generally, when models are casualties they are no longer fit to participate in battle.
More specifically, when a necron model is a casualty it can still repair itself via a SPECIAL RULE.
|
Sangfroid Marines 5000 pts
Wych Cult 2000
Tau 2000 |
|
 |
 |
|