Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

TheSinheizer wrote:


And I have a huge fantasy of getting frisky on top of a GWS table... (in the name of the Emperor!)

Well, that's one way of making a slaanesh themed table I guess 0_o

TheSinheizer wrote:I can't hold it in any longer...

It excites me (in more ways than one), when my boyfriend talks 40k with me.
And I have a huge fantasy of getting frisky on top of a GWS table... (in the name of the Emperor!)

*runs*




- Your myth-busting heretic.

/ Females who love 40k, and it's lovely fellow gamers.
I know I complained a little earlier, but really, for the most part, this hobby is crammed full of incredibly sweet, incredibly intelligent, wonderful people.

Sorry, my board is made of polystyrene and foamboard. It might get broken!

Still, it is good to know there are females in The Hobby (u mad haters?) who would describe us nerdy man-children as lovely. You've made my day!

SilverMK2 wrote:

thakabalpuphorsefishguy wrote:[But my point still stands, and I simply felt like airing out my frustrations with the "im every woman," "We are strong" liberal feminatzi movement. And the line of tripe they force upon culture as a whole. And here is why, for those of you who want a little personal story.
I was lucky enough to have a mother who stayed at home and raised me and my two sisters. And to sit and watch the nasty self righteous whitches denigrate my mother as a "backwards regretionist" loser to lazy and or stupid to work like "real women" should, makes me want to puke.

There are fringe nutters in every group. The entire point of feminism is equality; in society, employment, rights, etc, not that women should become a CEO at the age of 25, make her first trillion at the age of 26, fund genetic research to "cure the male problem" by age 28, and then rule over a world without men at the age of 30

There are certain physiological differences between men and women, but the difference between average people of different sexes is essentially meaningless in modern society. Dump them into the jungle and most men and women from middle America would be dead within a week, regardless of how "genetically superior their gender is when it comes to hunting", or whatever tired trope it is that you want to wheel out to "demonstrate" that one sex is better than the other. In the grand scheme of things, there is no difference between men and women.

Well the size and body composition things are actually facts, but I do agree that there is nothing that makes men exclusively good at hunting. Sorta of like how female wolves are better at tracking prey, and male wolves are better at taking down big game (bison, moose etc.)

Saying there is no difference is ignorant, but it is not as black and white as that other individual (who shall remain nameless) sees it.

One point he did raise that is interesting though, is the whole feminazi thing. It IS starting to get slightly out of hand, with women maintaining their special rights while gaining those of men, and getting paid equally at certain physical labour jobs where they accomplish less.

just my two cents

I have no idea what is going on in this thread anymore, but I think I might like it.

Je suis2 au hazard wrote:One point he did raise that is interesting though, is the whole feminazi thing. It IS starting to get slightly out of hand, with women maintaining their special rights while gaining those of men, and getting paid equally at certain physical labour jobs where they accomplish less.

It's getting terribly out of hand, to the extent where there is so much emphasis placed on women to the detriment of their male counterparts, especially regarding matters such as male legal rights, and care / attention brought to domestic violence from women against men. In honesty, I believe it is actually much easier for women to secure jobs than men. But that's another topic for another time. In short: Humanism FTW.

TheSinheizer wrote:

Je suis2 au hazard wrote:One point he did raise that is interesting though, is the whole feminazi thing. It IS starting to get slightly out of hand, with women maintaining their special rights while gaining those of men, and getting paid equally at certain physical labour jobs where they accomplish less.

It's getting terribly out of hand, to the extent where there is so much emphasis placed on women to the detriment of their male counterparts, especially regarding matters such as male legal rights, and care / attention brought to domestic violence from women against men. In honesty, I believe it is actually much easier for women to secure jobs than men. But that's another topic for another time. In short: Humanism FTW.

Well there are advantages and disadvantages given to both, with males getting social advantages in the workplace, and women getting legal advantages.

The male advantages was, I read in an article the other day, that women are seen as less likable the more power they have, cowing them (subconsciously) from rising through the ranks in the workplace.

Female advantages (atleast in my native province of Ontario) include being guaranteed positions, even when they don't earn them (there is actually a law in ontario [Toronto only maybe? dunno] that says every business needs at least one female on the management team...what the hell? The most accomplished man in the world could be replaced by a blonde airhead) and being paid equally in work sectors where they generally don't accomplish nearly as much as men...heavy lifting-related jobs, for example.

Either way, if the feminists get any more hardcore than they are now, action will become necessary, but at the moment it isn't TOO wild.

And by action I do NOT mean the Montreal Massacre, I mean petitioning the governement for the masculist agenda.

Harriticus wrote:Hopeless cause this hobby and ladies will never go together no matter what you do

Soccerlfb6 wrote:...all girls want is money...u spend a ton on this hobby...itll piss em off and c it as a waste...end of story ur money goes to them not models..

TedNugent wrote:

Soccerlfb6 wrote:...all girls want is money...u spend a ton on this hobby...itll piss em off and c it as a waste...end of story ur money goes to them not models..

Exactly. Women like diamonds and shiz.

Misogynistic attitudes like this really don't help.