Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Black Corsair wrote:JAJAJAJ!!! great! the Fantasy Chaos Monkeys or armored Hunchbacks as we called them here!! awfully ugly... but they were the first multi-part kit GW did... i'm wrong?

Of the current style of regiment boxes starting around 1998 they were. The first multi-part skeletons and Marines came well before these though.

Saintspirit wrote:I'm quite surprised no one has posted Malekith and Morathi yet.
Heck, almost all the DE sorcerers look bad.

Malekith is bad. The dragon doesn't help, imo.

But the only problem that I have with the mounted Morathi model is the horrible fit of all the various parts. I like the figure itself. I also like the other Dark Elf sorceress models - particularly the two new ones. Though of course someone needs to smack GW regarding the fact that there are now TWO sorceress models mounted on Cold Ones (and therefore subject to Stupidity tests) and none mounted on Dark Steeds (which not only avoid Stupidity, but also move faster). For some inexplicable reason, GW decided to ignore the way that everyone runs a mounted sorceress and instead use the method that no one uses.

Beastmen

General Seric wrote:
this dragon from the collectors range is pretty ugly too:
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat500025a&prodId=prod1140115

I thought it was some dodgy Toys 'r' Us toy at first. Embarrassing for GW haha.

josefbugman wrote:Beastmen

Oh! You did NOT just say that!
Or what, do you mean pumba? Then I can agree with you.

Saintspirit wrote:

josefbugman wrote:Beastmen

Oh! You did NOT just say that!
Or what, do you mean pumba? Then I can agree with you.

i think he means the old range of metal beastmen.... especially the ungors....

Oh yeah, they were indeed quite ugly. Though I don't mind the old ungors, more likely the old minos and characters.

A lot of these models I like. I guess I have poor taste. Though I have to agree with the DE slaves. Terrible.