Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/24 14:10:17
Subject: Re:UK to block porn.
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
Super Ready wrote:Oh, dear. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you - stage 1 of the Internet's retaliation - the hacking of an anti-net-neutrality MP's website. No doubt there'll be more to come... but for now enjoy this wonderful insight into how technically inept our legislators are.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23437473
...on Tuesday it was reported by Staines's blog that the MP's site had been breached and defaced with pornographic images.
The MP tweeted: "That well known responsible campaigner @guidofawkes has been hosting a link that distributed porn via my website."
The blogger responded to say the site did not link to the images in its story - but instead showed a screen-grab of a non-pornographic segment of the hacked page.
"Confused by technology again @claire4devizes?" Staines said.
"We deliberately didn't link to your filthy website - we just took a SFW [safe for work] screenshot."
http://order-order.com/2013/07/24/poll-result-86-of-readers-say-sue-claire-perry-guido-has-instructed-lawyers-to-commence-proceedings/
that'll be a fun case then.
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/24 15:07:03
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle
|
Relapse wrote:
I'll just leave this alone, because for some reason you are way too wrapped up in hostility about the subject, twisting what I say on some points, ignoring other things I say, and angry because I teach my kids that porn is not a good thing and why I think it is. By all means, indulge yourself in watching the stuff, I'm not trying to prevent you and stand beside you against any net censorship.
There ya go, done.
No, not wrapped up in hostility or twisting or ignoring anything. I'm not angry at you for teaching your kids that you don't like porn. Teach them that, and the reasons why you hold that opinion. I'm angry about how you are blaming lack of web safety on others, and insulting others legitimate and legal choices.
You are welcome to your opinions, but please, if you want to keep your kids safe educate yourself on Internet safety.
http://www.opendns.com/parental-controls
That will keep you safe and give you full control of what happens on your computers much better than most other ways and its free.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2013/07/24 15:23:14
insaniak wrote:Sometimes, Exterminatus is the only option.
And sometimes, it's just a case of too much scotch combined with too many buttons... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/24 19:06:25
Subject: Re:UK to block porn.
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Ho-hum)
Curb stomping in the Eye of Terror!
|
Agreed...
|
Live Ork, Be Ork. or D'Ork!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/24 19:26:55
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Pretty sure this'll fail.
Silly government, you can't take down the internet.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/26 01:25:53
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Manchester UK
|
So, did he actually make the speech in the end? I've been out of the country without internet access for two weeks and I can't be bothered trawling through all 8 pages of this thread because it looks fething boring...
|
Cheesecat wrote:
I almost always agree with Albatross, I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/26 01:41:50
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Powerful Orc Big'Un
Somewhere in the steamy jungles of the south...
|
I'm seriously laughing at this. For some reason I can't stop and it wasn't even that funny!
...Yeah, I think I need to lay off the coffee...
~Tim?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/26 14:50:46
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/26 15:31:19
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
I came for the UK Black porn but stayed for the disappoint.
|
How do you promote your Hobby? - Legoburner "I run some crappy wargaming website " |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/27 20:18:14
Subject: Re:UK to block porn.
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
It's not just porn they're trying to block... Article about the below article Bigger, Wordier article It also includes Web Forums...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/27 20:18:28
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/27 20:46:08
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
The centre of a massive brood chamber, heaving and pulsating.
|
...Esoteric material? Web forums?
That's it. Cameron dies soon.
|
Squigsquasher, resident ban magnet, White Knight, and general fethwit.
buddha wrote:I've decided that these GW is dead/dying threads that pop up every-week must be followers and cultists of nurgle perpetuating the need for decay. I therefore declare that that such threads are heresy and subject to exterminatus. So says the Inquisition! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 00:42:04
Subject: Re:UK to block porn.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I'd love to believe it, but I'm loath to jump on the "OMFG IS AWFUL!" bandwagon without knowing more about the source other than claims to have had 'brief conversations' with ISPs.
|
Mandorallen turned back toward the insolently sneering baron. 'My Lord,' The great knight said distantly, 'I find thy face apelike and thy form misshapen. Thy beard, moreover, is an offence against decency, resembling more closely the scabrous fur which doth decorate the hinder portion of a mongrel dog than a proper adornment for a human face. Is it possibly that thy mother, seized by some wild lechery, did dally at some time past with a randy goat?' - Mimbrate Knight Protector Mandorallen.
Excerpt from "Seeress of Kell", Book Five of The Malloreon series by David Eddings.
My deviantART Profile - Pay No Attention To The Man Behind The Madness
"You need not fear us, unless you are a dark heart, a vile one who preys on the innocent; I promise, you can’t hide forever in the empty darkness, for we will hunt you down like the animals you are, and pull you into the very bowels of hell." Iron - Within Temptation |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 01:09:57
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
I can't stop laughing. Sorry UK looks like you aint getting any wanky minutes.
|
From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 01:20:03
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Heh... fill the streets of London with people in Guy Fawkes masks and computers to show the PMs your displeasure! Organize and rise up! For porn! and apparently just general internet use!
|
I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long
SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 01:21:21
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote:Heh... fill the streets of London with people in Guy Fawkes masks and computers to show the PMs your displeasure! Organize and rise up! For porn! and apparently just general internet use!
Mostly for the former
|
From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 01:41:29
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote:Heh... fill the streets of London with people in Guy Fawkes masks and computers to show the PMs your displeasure! Organize and rise up! For porn! and apparently just general internet use!
Like we don't 'rise up' for porn already....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 02:18:24
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Sheffield, City of University and Northern-ness
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote:Heh... fill the streets of London with people in Guy Fawkes masks and computers to show the PMs your displeasure! Organize and rise up! For porn! and apparently just general internet use!
The part that irritates me is that there is no parliamentary vote or debate for the public to try and sway via protest, it's Cameron talking to the ISPs and them introducing this stuff voluntarily, with the threat of legislation if they refuse.
They've introduced it in a way that makes public influence virtually impossible, as the only way to stop this is with your wallet by switching to a broadband provider that doesn't block porn, which is none of them, or by convincing the government to introduce a bill to prevent this sort of thing happening, which is even more unlikely.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 02:26:53
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord
|
Goliath wrote: KalashnikovMarine wrote:Heh... fill the streets of London with people in Guy Fawkes masks and computers to show the PMs your displeasure! Organize and rise up! For porn! and apparently just general internet use!
The part that irritates me is that there is no parliamentary vote or debate for the public to try and sway via protest, it's Cameron talking to the ISPs and them introducing this stuff voluntarily, with the threat of legislation if they refuse.
They've introduced it in a way that makes public influence virtually impossible, as the only way to stop this is with your wallet by switching to a broadband provider that doesn't block porn, which is none of them, or by convincing the government to introduce a bill to prevent this sort of thing happening, which is even more unlikely.
That is quite a troubling situaiton if it is true: the government is effectively taking an end-run around your rights. However, without the appropriate legislation to back up that voluntary censorship, I'd think that there is a legal case to be made that the government has infringed on your rights to free speech (even in the UK scope of it).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 08:59:38
Subject: Re:UK to block porn.
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
What even is "esoteric material?" Sucks to be Tzeentchian...
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 09:02:40
Subject: Re:UK to block porn.
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
...urrrr... I dunno
|
Avatar 720 wrote:
I'd love to believe it, but I'm loath to jump on the "OMFG IS AWFUL!" bandwagon without knowing more about the source other than claims to have had 'brief conversations' with ISPs.
Caution is certainly a good idea. That said, I think the case for this whole half-baked plan being the biggest pile of bullgak since I don't know when is already fairly solid even without the arguments made in the second article.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 10:50:32
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
Good on the UK, about time someone is taking a stand and protecting children. If your household wants access to porn, they can still have it. Plus there is always a way around these things...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 11:26:24
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
...urrrr... I dunno
|
Rippy wrote:Good on the UK, about time someone is taking a stand and protecting children. If your household wants access to porn, they can still have it. Plus there is always a way around these things...
Okay there, Helen Lovejoy.
One: It''s the principle. What is needed is not a blanket attempt at censorship - especially as this would affect more than just spank material, as detailed by the above article, but will actually censor a tonne of things, some of which are incredibly poorly defined - but more parents who actually educate their kids properly on internet safety and supervise them when they use it. Big Dave and the State are not there to do the parent's jobs for them, nor are they there to make this kind of decision without consulting the public on the matter, which seems to be what's going on.
Two: The "protecting children" argument is the biggest crock of gak ever. It's trotted out every time the government tries to put out a thing that "there's always a way around of," and it's always a barefaced lie or a half-baked, barely thought through idea that'll just end up backfiring badly.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 13:20:31
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote:Heh... fill the streets of London with people in Guy Fawkes masks and computers to show the PMs your displeasure! Organize and rise up! For porn! and apparently just general internet use!
No, Guy Fawkes codpieces.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 13:30:13
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Wight Lord with the Sword of Kings
|
Rippy wrote:Good on the UK, about time someone is taking a stand and protecting children. If your household wants access to porn, they can still have it. Plus there is always a way around these things...
They're blocking proxies too.
With a Chinese Program.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 16:03:52
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Manchester UK
|
Hey, welcome to 'the internet isn't actually public space'. Everything you do online and everywhere you go is owned by someone else, despite what Berners-Lee may or may not have intended. The idea that this is a freedom issue is childish nonsense. ISPs have a responsibility to society. They should be fulfilling it, for precisely the same reasons that adverts for dildos shouldn't appear in between cartoons on TV.
|
Cheesecat wrote:
I almost always agree with Albatross, I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 16:20:00
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Renegade Inquisitor de Marche
|
Even if this is about protecting children (Which it may or may not be) the way they are going about this is crazy.
|
Dakka Bingo! By Ouze
"You are the best at flying things"-Kanluwen
"Further proof that Purple is a fething brilliant super villain " -KingCracker
"Purp.. Im pretty sure I have a gun than can reach you...."-Nicorex
"That's not really an apocalypse. That's just Europe."-Grakmar
"almost as good as winning free cake at the tea drinking contest for an Englishman." -Reds8n
Seal up your lips and give no words but mum.
Equip, Reload. Do violence.
Watch for Gerry. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 16:29:34
Subject: Re:UK to block porn.
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
While I agree that ISPs can do what they want, the way that the government is trying to push this one past the radar is what makes it an issue for me.
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 16:40:33
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I think this is the one thing I can be asked to write a normal letter about in my entire life.
STUPID PEOPLE, ISPS SHOULDN'T HAVE TO SUCKLE YOUR CHILD BECAUSE YOU'RE TOO LAZY TO TEACH THEM ABOUT THE REAL WORLD.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 18:17:32
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
BlapBlapBlap wrote:STUPID PEOPLE, ISPS SHOULDN'T HAVE TO SUCKLE YOUR CHILD BECAUSE YOU'RE TOO LAZY TO TEACH THEM ABOUT THE REAL WORLD. Quoted for truth. Good lord, Blap. Your profile pic is terrifying if you look at it for too long.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/28 18:18:09
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 18:22:42
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord
|
Albatross wrote:Hey, welcome to 'the internet isn't actually public space'. Everything you do online and everywhere you go is owned by someone else, despite what Berners-Lee may or may not have intended. The idea that this is a freedom issue is childish nonsense. ISPs have a responsibility to society. They should be fulfilling it, for precisely the same reasons that adverts for dildos shouldn't appear in between cartoons on TV.
In North America, you can already find commercials for dildos in between cartoons. I think Trojan has been launching a campaign that includes commercials during Family Guy and American Dad
Also: unless you are being sarcastic, your statement demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of what the Internet is and how it works, on par with Ted Stevens.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/28 18:45:16
Subject: UK to block porn.
|
 |
Powerful Orc Big'Un
Somewhere in the steamy jungles of the south...
|
azazel the cat wrote:Albatross wrote:Hey, welcome to 'the internet isn't actually public space'. Everything you do online and everywhere you go is owned by someone else, despite what Berners-Lee may or may not have intended. The idea that this is a freedom issue is childish nonsense. ISPs have a responsibility to society. They should be fulfilling it, for precisely the same reasons that adverts for dildos shouldn't appear in between cartoons on TV.
In North America, you can already find commercials for dildos in between cartoons. I think Trojan has been launching a campaign that includes commercials during Family Guy and American Dad
Also: unless you are being sarcastic, your statement demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of what the Internet is and how it works, on par with Ted Stevens.
I don't think anyone considers Family Guy and American Dad to be kids' cartoons...
~Tim?
|
|
|
 |
 |
|