ShumaGorath wrote:But keep hitting that horse. Its endearing.
You live in a complete fething fantasy land Shummy.
They make rules to sell models. They're a model company. End of story. They're a company that sell models, so they'll do that and only that until they can't do that any longer. It's not a conpiracy.
You seem to be the only person here denying that. They also make loads of mistakes - as we've seen time and time agian - so if the rules suck (or aren't as good as something else) it's probably because they think the rules are good, or even that they think the 'ooh shiny' effect will work regardless of what they write.
And half of those units are your opinion. Spawn and Possessed, yes. Thunderfire Cannon? It's been debated. Skyray and Sniper Scouts aren't bad units in and of themselves, they just compete with Railguns, and Tau need Railguns more than they need more anti-infantry firepower.
And listing Wraiths and Pariahs? Come on now. You are really grasping at those straws.
Every model in the Necron range was new when they came out. Every single one. And they'll be buffed come the next Codex, because
GW designs rules with a pendulum effect (something else you see to deny).
Anyway, I've danced this dance enough times with you Shummy. You can now thrrow in some more ad hominems in your 'rebuttal', attempt to trivialise my points with the 'dead horse' comment (much easier to debate someone when you just ignore their arguments - you and
DD are wonderful at that). Hell, even make reference to 'Facepalm' as that seems to be
so popular and clever at the moment (and it's another neat trick for getting out of any real argument). I don't care. I'm done arguing with you over this. You can deny reality all you like, but
GW are a miniature company first, rules company last. Don't like that fact, then piss off.
BYE