Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

He left about an hour ago.

Medium of Death wrote:Why won't you die!

Back on topic. Wimminz: how do they work?

Lol. Dakka Dakka has to be the best website of all time as they are so random its hilariously accurate.

Anyway i killed a crocodile with my bare hands and apparently women don't find that attractive.


I completely agree with motivational poster above.

They're not into charitable folk either.

And yet more insight...

I thought I knew stupid, and then I saw those two macros.

Melodrama aside, claiming that men are absurdly simple is rather insulting to the masculine gender. So no man has any depth to his character? Pardon my misuse of the phrase, but bollocks to that.


edit: As a side note, let's not post these moronic and sexist image macros, my report finger isn't itchy anymore so there's no point of tempting it.

Melissia wrote:I thought I knew stupid, and then I saw those two macros.

Melodrama aside, claiming that men are absurdly simple is rather insulting to the masculine gender. So no man has any depth to his character? Pardon my misuse of the phrase, but bollocks to that.


edit: As a side note, let's not post these moronic and sexist image macros, my report finger isn't itchy anymore so there's no point of tempting it.

Actually its kinda of right. men are dull and boring alot. They are either a jock, nerd, or an iduiot, or intelliegent, or all 4

I have depth to my character, it's just that a lot of people who know me can't dive that deep; they just prefer to float on the surface and paddle around in the shallows of my being.

Asherian Command wrote:Actually its kinda of right. men are dull and boring alot. They are either a jock, nerd, or an iduiot, or intelliegent, or all 4

As opposed to women who fit into very similar categories? Cheerleaders, nerds, party girls, dedicated career women... if you want to toss labels around, one can do that for either gender.

No, the assumption is assuredly wrong.

Melissia wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:Actually its kinda of right. men are dull and boring alot. They are either a jock, nerd, or an iduiot, or intelliegent, or all 4

As opposed to women who fit into very similar categories? Cheerleaders, nerds, party girls, dedicated career women... if you want to toss labels around, one can do that for either gender.

No, the assumption is assuredly wrong.

Damn it. I am usually right!
But yeah thats true. Sorry Melissia its not like Women don't do the same to themselves -.-

Melissia wrote:I thought I knew stupid, and then I saw those two macros.

Melodrama aside, claiming that men are absurdly simple is rather insulting to the masculine gender. So no man has any depth to his character? Pardon my misuse of the phrase, but bollocks to that.


edit: As a side note, let's not post these moronic and sexist image macros, my report finger isn't itchy anymore so there's no point of tempting it.

Oh FFS, I would have assumed that most people would see the simple humour in the posts and not take them entirely at face value,believe me ...I don't see things in such simplified terms and was merely having a bit of fun.

However...if you honestly believe that a simple picture is some how indicative of some deeper misogynistic intent,then by all means let your itchy finger be your guide.

Asherian Command wrote:

Melissia wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:Actually its kinda of right. men are dull and boring alot. They are either a jock, nerd, or an iduiot, or intelliegent, or all 4

As opposed to women who fit into very similar categories? Cheerleaders, nerds, party girls, dedicated career women... if you want to toss labels around, one can do that for either gender.

No, the assumption is assuredly wrong.

Damn it. I am usually right!

Except around women, because they're always right even when they're wrong.

Some jokes are best not made. I mean, if I told all the jokes I wanted to, I'd probably be banned from this forum again.

Melissia wrote:Some jokes are best not made. I mean, if I told all the jokes I wanted to, I'd probably be banned from this forum again.

Perhaps so,and ...if you were offended in any way,I apologize... as that was in no way my intentions.

I'm not offended, just annoyed. Kinda like I'm annoyed at my kitten when he hides under my bed in the morning then attacks my heels when I get down. Sure, it's cute (the image macros I mean), but it's still annoying.

I personally think that these stereotypes come about not because men actually have less depth, but because in general, we are more reserved. Society sez that men shouldn't cry and sob our story out, whereas if a girl needs to weep her story out to her friends in public, that's fine. I know that I, personally, am very reserved and, well, shy. The longer you hang out with me, the better you'll get to know me. I know some girls who, once initial contact is made, will feel just fine telling you their life story, and are very open about themselves. That is not the case with me.

Actually it's more to do with the assumption that men think with their penis (thus the on/off switch).

Cheesecat wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:

Melissia wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:Actually its kinda of right. men are dull and boring alot. They are either a jock, nerd, or an iduiot, or intelliegent, or all 4

As opposed to women who fit into very similar categories? Cheerleaders, nerds, party girls, dedicated career women... if you want to toss labels around, one can do that for either gender.

No, the assumption is assuredly wrong.

Damn it. I am usually right!

Except around women, because they're always right even when they're wrong.

Sounds like my Mum and my Brother. But you know what I don't want to be sexist. But Girls in my opinion just drive me insane sometimes. They just always want to ignore the fact that there are some people who are not trying to do anything, yet the girls suspect they are terriosts lol.

Most people keep their brains between their legs.

I swear, the gays have it easy. They don't have to decipher what, at times, feels like a secret code.

Fafnir wrote:Most people keep their brains between their legs.

I swear, the gays have it easy. They don't have to decipher what, at times, feels like a secret code.

I find that quite offensive...


...what about bisexuals?

Asherian Command wrote:

Cheesecat wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:

Melissia wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:Actually its kinda of right. men are dull and boring alot. They are either a jock, nerd, or an iduiot, or intelliegent, or all 4

As opposed to women who fit into very similar categories? Cheerleaders, nerds, party girls, dedicated career women... if you want to toss labels around, one can do that for either gender.

No, the assumption is assuredly wrong.

Damn it. I am usually right!

Except around women, because they're always right even when they're wrong.

Sounds like my Mum and my Brother. But you know what I don't want to be sexist. But Girls in my opinion just drive me insane sometimes. They just always want to ignore the fact that there are some people who are not trying to do anything, yet the girls suspect they are terriosts lol.

Terrorist?...is this a common assumption these days?
Admittedly I've been "out of circulation" for some time...but I don't recall myself or anyone I've know being accused of being a terrorist,an donkey-cave perhaps,but never a terrorist.

Donkey cave?...how..quaint.

FITZZ wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:

Cheesecat wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:

Melissia wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:Actually its kinda of right. men are dull and boring alot. They are either a jock, nerd, or an iduiot, or intelliegent, or all 4

As opposed to women who fit into very similar categories? Cheerleaders, nerds, party girls, dedicated career women... if you want to toss labels around, one can do that for either gender.

No, the assumption is assuredly wrong.

Damn it. I am usually right!

Except around women, because they're always right even when they're wrong.

Sounds like my Mum and my Brother. But you know what I don't want to be sexist. But Girls in my opinion just drive me insane sometimes. They just always want to ignore the fact that there are some people who are not trying to do anything, yet the girls suspect they are terriosts lol.

Terrorist?...is this a common assumption these days?
Admittedly I've been "out of circulation" for some time...but I don't recall myself or anyone I've know being accused of being a terrorist,an donkey-cave perhaps,but never a terrorist.

I've been accused of being a hardline stalker before, but but I doubt i'm terrorist material to most people.

If only people took the time to get to know me... Ha! Who am I kidding, I can't understand why I actually believed people would get to know me before they judged me.

But...being judged before someone gets to know you is fairly commonplace.

We all make assumptions based on what we see and perceive from another person to some degree or another,even if it's unintentional.

If you go on a job interview,you a partialy judged by your appearance,and the same is true in the "Romantic world."

Is that necessarily "Fair"...probably not,but...it's true.

If only I were around in the 70's. I got a pretty cool David Bowie thing going on.

I've been accused of being a terrorist before, but I tend to ignore the people who comment on cnn news posts regardless. Blog commenters are pretty stupid on average too.

Melissia wrote: Blog commenters are pretty stupid on average too.

Are you refering to the incessant game of 'first lol'?

Fafnir wrote:Most people keep their brains between their legs.

I swear, the gays have it easy. They don't have to decipher what, at times, feels like a secret code.

Still the claim that guys are simple is absurd, if that was the case it would be a hell of a lot simpler to pick somebody up.

Fafnir wrote:If only I were around in the 70's. I got a pretty cool David Bowie thing going on.

I was around in the 70's,although I was much more interested in playing with my GI Joes and Star Wars figures then I was in trying to meet girls.
I "Blossomed" in the 80's,and thanks to my uber spiffy mohawk hairstyle and the fact that I was in a band, girls were just always around....

...Sometimes I think life was easier when I was crawling around in the dirt playing with my GI Joes.

Tim the Biovore wrote:

Melissia wrote: Blog commenters are pretty stupid on average too.

Are you refering to the incessant game of 'first lol'?

No, but thanks for reminding me of THAT, too.

Me: Hey when I get home me and you should go out one night.
Her: Yeah, I'd like that!
(the "date" came around and turns out to be me, her, and three of her friends...)
Me: um... not what I had in mind.
Her: What do you mean?
Me: I thought you understood I was asking you out, ya know, on a date.
Her: Oh, I had no idea. No let's just stay friends.

OK! Lesson learned: When asking a girl out SPECIFICALLY say these words ~ I would like to take you out for an evening of socializing and such so that we may further our relationship more than just friends because I have feelings of affection for you. More than just friends. Therefore reiterating how I feel for you. This also implies that it will be just me and you. That means it is a social function between 2 people. In this case, 1 male (that's me) and 1 female (that's you). This does NOT mean bring more than what I have just said.

There's no way they can misinterpret that!