| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 05:41:19
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Bounding Dark Angels Assault Marine
|
I've seen in various places references to the "current" generation of marines not being as good as the ones in the heresy era due to the geneseed being less pure or similar.
Is this commonly written about an excepted as canon?
Is it offset against the fact that the 40k marine has better wargear than the 30k marine?
If it is true, then why don't Chaos marines from the heresy absolutely hammer loyalist ones, given a) they are better marines b) they have the added benefits of chaos gifts.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 05:55:03
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Stalwart Space Marine
Squamish BC
|
I figure that there is a slight decay, but slightly improved training and wargear makes it all moot.
|
Nearly 3k and Counting
1400
 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 09:28:33
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
40k marines are better then 30k marines.
The answer is simple - there are not many of them like in the Heresy era.
Fewer number means better training can be given to all, since they don't rely on numbers but on actions of a single Marine.
And technology is slightly better then 10.000 years ago.
|
For Emperor and Imperium!!!!
None shall stand against the Crusade of the Righteous!!!
Kanluwen wrote: "I like the Tau. I just don't like people misconstruing things to say that it means that they're somehow a huge galactic threat. They're not. They're a threat to the Imperium of Man like sharks are a threat to the US Army."
"Pain is temporary, honor is forever"
Emperor of Mankind:
"The day I have a sit-down with a pansy elf, magic mushroom, or commie frog is the day I put a bolt shell in my head."
in your name it shall be done"
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/2SSSR2
Viersche wrote:
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:
the Emperor might be the greatest psyker that ever lived, but he doesn't have the specialized training that a Grey Knight has. Also he doesn't have a Grey Knight's unshakable faith in the Emperor.
The Emperor doesn't have a GKs unshakable faith in the Emperor which is....basically himself?
Ronin wrote:
"Brother Coa (and the OP Tadashi) is like, the biggest IoM fanboy I can think of here. It's like he IS from the Imperium, sent back in time and across dimensions."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 12:07:06
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
According to a comment in the Chaos codex, the current marines are worse than the 30k ones. But a Chaos Marine said that, so there's a slight possibility it may not be true.
|
Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can play the best chess in the world, but at the end of the day the pigeon will still knock all the pieces off the board and then gak all over it. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 12:26:04
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Leader of the Sept
|
Brother Coa wrote:40k marines are better then 30k marines.
The answer is simple - there are not many of them like in the Heresy era.
Fewer number means better training can be given to all, since they don't rely on numbers but on actions of a single Marine.
And technology is slightly better then 10.000 years ago.
I disagree
Fewer numbers = better training only works if you are considering a fixed training budget. Considering the effectively infinite resources poured into the great crusade I would challenge the assertion that "modern" Marines are better than their predecessors.
Technology is supposed to be pretty stagnant and therefore in 40k there are fewer examples of the really good equipment from the past. The fluff, especially the more recent fluff, tends to harp on about how the loss of forge worlds means massive looses of data that cannot be recoverd, while significant new advancement in science and technology just doesn't happen because those that try to do it tend to get done as heretics agains the omnissiah
|
Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!
Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 12:29:55
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
Aren't there more marines in 40k than 30k anyway? Fewer per chapter, sure, but there's a lot of chapters.
|
Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can play the best chess in the world, but at the end of the day the pigeon will still knock all the pieces off the board and then gak all over it. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 13:30:07
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Durza wrote:Aren't there more marines in 40k than 30k anyway? Fewer per chapter, sure, but there's a lot of chapters.
Now we have 1.000.000 marines, maybe some few hundred more,less. And unknown number of Chaos Marines ( but they probably have the same number or slightly outnumber Imperial Astartes, I can't know for sure ). Ultramrines during HH had around 200.000 to 600.000 Marines. And were were other 17 Legions?
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Flinty wrote:
Fewer numbers = better training only works if you are considering a fixed training budget. Considering the effectively infinite resources poured into the great crusade I would challenge the assertion that "modern" Marines are better than their predecessors.
Working in smaller groups mens use of better strategy then horde swarming. And they now have codex Astartes to follow. I call that better training.
Technology is supposed to be pretty stagnant and therefore in 40k there are fewer examples of the really good equipment from the past. The fluff, especially the more recent fluff, tends to harp on about how the loss of forge worlds means massive looses of data that cannot be recoverd, while significant new advancement in science and technology just doesn't happen because those that try to do it tend to get done as heretics agains the omnissiah
Take the marines for example. Standard power armor in heresy time was mark 4 - 6 and 7 was rarely used being just out of production. Marines in 41' st millennium usually use mark 7 and new Mark 8 is being introduced into the chapters. And whiel most Chaos equipment is 10.000 years old Astartes equipment is new and upgraded sometimes.
And don't mistaken Mechanicus for their cult, they occasionally invent new things as well as Astartes. Take Land Raider Crusader for example - it's being invented by Black Templars.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/10/25 13:34:41
For Emperor and Imperium!!!!
None shall stand against the Crusade of the Righteous!!!
Kanluwen wrote: "I like the Tau. I just don't like people misconstruing things to say that it means that they're somehow a huge galactic threat. They're not. They're a threat to the Imperium of Man like sharks are a threat to the US Army."
"Pain is temporary, honor is forever"
Emperor of Mankind:
"The day I have a sit-down with a pansy elf, magic mushroom, or commie frog is the day I put a bolt shell in my head."
in your name it shall be done"
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/2SSSR2
Viersche wrote:
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:
the Emperor might be the greatest psyker that ever lived, but he doesn't have the specialized training that a Grey Knight has. Also he doesn't have a Grey Knight's unshakable faith in the Emperor.
The Emperor doesn't have a GKs unshakable faith in the Emperor which is....basically himself?
Ronin wrote:
"Brother Coa (and the OP Tadashi) is like, the biggest IoM fanboy I can think of here. It's like he IS from the Imperium, sent back in time and across dimensions."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 14:07:05
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Invented is a rather strong word to use for the Land Raider variations. All they really did was swap out some weapons and stick some claymores on the front.
Considering that they haven't been able to invent a non-exploding plasma weapon, I think considering Imperial technology stagnant is a pretty good call.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 14:22:56
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Correct, the Mechanicus invents and upgrades things all the time.
It just has a very long and stringent testing period before widespread adoption most of the time.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 14:36:58
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan
|
daveNYC wrote:Considering that they haven't been able to invent a non-exploding plasma weapon, I think considering Imperial technology stagnant is a pretty good call.
They have, they just don't bother with them as they're weaker than the current plasma weapons. Automatically Appended Next Post: daveNYC wrote:Considering that they haven't been able to invent a non-exploding plasma weapon, I think considering Imperial technology stagnant is a pretty good call.
They have, they just don't bother with them as they're weaker than the current plasma weapons.
Brother Coa wrote:Durza wrote:Aren't there more marines in 40k than 30k anyway? Fewer per chapter, sure, but there's a lot of chapters.
Now we have 1.000.000 marines, maybe some few hundred more,less. And unknown number of Chaos Marines ( but they probably have the same number or slightly outnumber Imperial Astartes, I can't know for sure ). Ultramrines during HH had around 200.000 to 600.000 Marines. And were were other 17 Legions?
Source on this? I can't remember reading about that sort of massive Legions anywhere.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/10/25 14:39:42
For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 16:23:57
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
I was to understand that Chaos Marines (at least the ones that WERE 30k marines) believe they're better, and loyalist marines believe that to be so much bull hockey. Honestly, differences in training, numbers, technology, the presence or absence of warp induced mutation, the wind current, and so many other factors, makes it damn near impossible to claim one version of Marine or the other to be 'superior.' If there is a clear-cut division of quality, the margin is so slim as to be easily negatable.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 17:01:03
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Aren't the things in the "old days" always better? Most of the traitor legionaires are old farts and may favor this view upon the present. Generally the marines lost the balance the Legions provided as unified force of 20 Legio's. This 'weakens' the astartes. In quality and training the present is better since the Legions had to speed up recrutement to replenish the great losses in the great crusade. The training and selection process was improved after the heresy and smaller units ( chapters ) didn't need to take anyone but could be picky. The major loss was the loss of trust amongst brothers. The marines themselves are still not a monolithic block of clones but altered humans and have the same chance on fail or greatness as it was during the last 10.000 years.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/10/25 17:02:11
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 17:23:33
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
Brother Coa wrote:Durza wrote:Aren't there more marines in 40k than 30k anyway? Fewer per chapter, sure, but there's a lot of chapters.
Now we have 1.000.000 marines, maybe some few hundred more,less. And unknown number of Chaos Marines ( but they probably have the same number or slightly outnumber Imperial Astartes, I can't know for sure ). Ultramrines during HH had around 200.000 to 600.000 Marines. And were were other 17 Legions?
Of which many were either crippled by extensive campaigns or small to begin with.
Flinty wrote:
Fewer numbers = better training only works if you are considering a fixed training budget. Considering the effectively infinite resources poured into the great crusade I would challenge the assertion that "modern" Marines are better than their predecessors.
Working in smaller groups mens use of better strategy then horde swarming. And they now have codex Astartes to follow. I call that better training.
Where is there any indication of Marines ever using horde swarming before the Heresy? They used the same tactics as they do now.
Technology is supposed to be pretty stagnant and therefore in 40k there are fewer examples of the really good equipment from the past. The fluff, especially the more recent fluff, tends to harp on about how the loss of forge worlds means massive looses of data that cannot be recoverd, while significant new advancement in science and technology just doesn't happen because those that try to do it tend to get done as heretics agains the omnissiah
Take the marines for example. Standard power armor in heresy time was mark 4 - 6 and 7 was rarely used being just out of production. Marines in 41' st millennium usually use mark 7 and new Mark 8 is being introduced into the chapters. And whiel most Chaos equipment is 10.000 years old Astartes equipment is new and upgraded sometimes.
And don't mistaken Mechanicus for their cult, they occasionally invent new things as well as Astartes. Take Land Raider Crusader for example - it's being invented by Black Templars.
Being invented by the Black Templars was the only thing that stopped it and its inventors being deemed heretics.
|
Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can play the best chess in the world, but at the end of the day the pigeon will still knock all the pieces off the board and then gak all over it. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 17:56:42
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
AlmightyWalrus wrote:
Source on this? I can't remember reading about that sort of massive Legions anywhere.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/385002.page
|
For Emperor and Imperium!!!!
None shall stand against the Crusade of the Righteous!!!
Kanluwen wrote: "I like the Tau. I just don't like people misconstruing things to say that it means that they're somehow a huge galactic threat. They're not. They're a threat to the Imperium of Man like sharks are a threat to the US Army."
"Pain is temporary, honor is forever"
Emperor of Mankind:
"The day I have a sit-down with a pansy elf, magic mushroom, or commie frog is the day I put a bolt shell in my head."
in your name it shall be done"
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/2SSSR2
Viersche wrote:
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:
the Emperor might be the greatest psyker that ever lived, but he doesn't have the specialized training that a Grey Knight has. Also he doesn't have a Grey Knight's unshakable faith in the Emperor.
The Emperor doesn't have a GKs unshakable faith in the Emperor which is....basically himself?
Ronin wrote:
"Brother Coa (and the OP Tadashi) is like, the biggest IoM fanboy I can think of here. It's like he IS from the Imperium, sent back in time and across dimensions."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:00:00
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Long-Range Land Speeder Pilot
|
I think that it might have had more to do with numbers. In 30k a grand company (~1000 marines) would probably attack a particular area of a planet.
|
Space Marines, Orks, Imperial Guard, Chaos, Tau, Necrons, Germans (LW), Protectorate of Menoth
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:06:11
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Durza wrote:
Where is there any indication of Marines ever using horde swarming before the Heresy? They used the same tactics as they do now.
Tere are lot of examples, like Horus attaking an Ork Empire. He just rushed his entire Legion and break them, he teleported himself with Terminators at the Ork Warboss main base. Only he and Abbadon l;eft alive while his Legion swarmed the Orks outside.
At Istvaan V 3 Loyal legions rush Traitor one lines before they fall back.
World Eaters loved to orbital droped onto the planet, kill the defence force ass soon as possible and then move away.
My point is Astartes used Guard like tactics in the time of Great Crusade because they have 10.000, 20.000, up to 100.000 marines in Legion. 41' st millennium Astartes use Hit and Run tactics because they are only 1000 of them in a single chapter.
|
For Emperor and Imperium!!!!
None shall stand against the Crusade of the Righteous!!!
Kanluwen wrote: "I like the Tau. I just don't like people misconstruing things to say that it means that they're somehow a huge galactic threat. They're not. They're a threat to the Imperium of Man like sharks are a threat to the US Army."
"Pain is temporary, honor is forever"
Emperor of Mankind:
"The day I have a sit-down with a pansy elf, magic mushroom, or commie frog is the day I put a bolt shell in my head."
in your name it shall be done"
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/2SSSR2
Viersche wrote:
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:
the Emperor might be the greatest psyker that ever lived, but he doesn't have the specialized training that a Grey Knight has. Also he doesn't have a Grey Knight's unshakable faith in the Emperor.
The Emperor doesn't have a GKs unshakable faith in the Emperor which is....basically himself?
Ronin wrote:
"Brother Coa (and the OP Tadashi) is like, the biggest IoM fanboy I can think of here. It's like he IS from the Imperium, sent back in time and across dimensions."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:13:34
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
All that 'proves' is that the Ultramarines were big, and other legions were small.
Brother Coa wrote:Durza wrote:
Where is there any indication of Marines ever using horde swarming before the Heresy? They used the same tactics as they do now.
Tere are lot of examples, like Horus attaking an Ork Empire. He just rushed his entire Legion and break them, he teleported himself with Terminators at the Ork Warboss main base. Only he and Abbadon l;eft alive while his Legion swarmed the Orks outside.
At Istvaan V 3 Loyal legions rush Traitor one lines before they fall back.
World Eaters loved to orbital droped onto the planet, kill the defence force ass soon as possible and then move away.
My point is Astartes used Guard like tactics in the time of Great Crusade because they have 10.000, 20.000, up to 100.000 marines in Legion. 41' st millennium Astartes use Hit and Run tactics because they are only 1000 of them in a single chapter.
No, they had up to 10'000. Only the Ultramarines broke this standard, and most were far below it before the Heresy.
Istvaan was during the Heresy, rendering it invalid as a reply to my point, but it was a special case, using blitz tactics. That's different to swarming them anyway.
|
Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can play the best chess in the world, but at the end of the day the pigeon will still knock all the pieces off the board and then gak all over it. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:14:51
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan
|
Durza wrote:
Being invented by the Black Templars was the only thing that stopped it and its inventors being deemed heretics.
Technically I'd say it's because they found the STC data for it...
|
For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:36:22
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
AlmightyWalrus wrote:Durza wrote:
Being invented by the Black Templars was the only thing that stopped it and its inventors being deemed heretics.
Technically I'd say it's because they found the STC data for it...
STC smesh TC... that doesn't really work... regardless, Iron Men STCs are heretical. So if the Mechanicum decided that one was heretical, they would've tried to destroy it.
|
Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can play the best chess in the world, but at the end of the day the pigeon will still knock all the pieces off the board and then gak all over it. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:45:58
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
AlmightyWalrus wrote:Durza wrote:
Being invented by the Black Templars was the only thing that stopped it and its inventors being deemed heretics.
Technically I'd say it's because they found the STC data for it...
Technically the ad mech had it on the test runs already and everyone and his dog had a copy of the design so it wasn't possible to deny its existance and function.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:47:12
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan
|
1hadhq wrote:AlmightyWalrus wrote:Durza wrote:
Being invented by the Black Templars was the only thing that stopped it and its inventors being deemed heretics.
Technically I'd say it's because they found the STC data for it...
Technically the ad mech had it on the test runs already and everyone and his dog had a copy of the design so it wasn't possible to deny its existance and function.
After the Templars found it and spread it, yes.
|
For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:54:51
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Leader of the Sept
|
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Flinty wrote:
Fewer numbers = better training only works if you are considering a fixed training budget. Considering the effectively infinite resources poured into the great crusade I would challenge the assertion that "modern" Marines are better than their predecessors.
Working in smaller groups mens use of better strategy then horde swarming. And they now have codex Astartes to follow. I call that better training.
Or you just have more smaller groups
Codex Astartes is only a guideline anyway
|
Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!
Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 18:59:24
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Beaver Dam, WI
|
The 30K legions were more motivated and less dogmatic in their execution of the tasks at hand. However on a one for one basis, I think there is little or no difference between a 30k and a 40k marine. They are still genetically manipulated "monsters" that would make anyone in the imperium quake in their boots to have on their wrong side.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 19:46:19
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
|
The Astartes of 30K were more "human". They were either raised on Terra before being turned into Space Marines, or they were compatriots of the Primarchs on their home planets. They were either raised or introduced to the Imperial Truth, rather than the Imperial Creed, so the indoctrination was far less severe.
I'm not sure if that makes them better or worse at war.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 20:17:51
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
40K Marines are better than 30K Marines. Back in the day they let anybody in. The goal was to make as many marines as possible. Theory was they're still so much better than the army anyway what does it matter? Pretty sure nothing bad wil happen. Then something really bad happened.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 20:55:40
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Omegus wrote:
I'm not sure if that makes them better or worse at war.
It all depends.
Look at Ultramarines and Emperor's Children civility.
Then look at Night Lords and World Eaters barbarity.
|
For Emperor and Imperium!!!!
None shall stand against the Crusade of the Righteous!!!
Kanluwen wrote: "I like the Tau. I just don't like people misconstruing things to say that it means that they're somehow a huge galactic threat. They're not. They're a threat to the Imperium of Man like sharks are a threat to the US Army."
"Pain is temporary, honor is forever"
Emperor of Mankind:
"The day I have a sit-down with a pansy elf, magic mushroom, or commie frog is the day I put a bolt shell in my head."
in your name it shall be done"
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/2SSSR2
Viersche wrote:
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:
the Emperor might be the greatest psyker that ever lived, but he doesn't have the specialized training that a Grey Knight has. Also he doesn't have a Grey Knight's unshakable faith in the Emperor.
The Emperor doesn't have a GKs unshakable faith in the Emperor which is....basically himself?
Ronin wrote:
"Brother Coa (and the OP Tadashi) is like, the biggest IoM fanboy I can think of here. It's like he IS from the Imperium, sent back in time and across dimensions."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 21:05:55
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
KamikazeCanuck wrote:40K Marines are better than 30K Marines. Back in the day they let anybody in. The goal was to make as many marines as possible. Theory was they're still so much better than the army anyway what does it matter? Pretty sure nothing bad wil happen. Then something really bad happened.
They didn't let anyone in. There were still trials, the Nigh Lords and Dark Angels had them.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 21:07:17
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
HIDING IN THE METAL BAWKSES!!
|
Legion was a better organization than Chapters.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 21:16:08
Subject: Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It's not better, it's simply different. Legions were better for the Great Crusade, the Chapters are better for the defense that followed.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/25 21:27:30
Subject: Re:Are 40k marines not as good as 30k marines?
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
I feel like they shouldmove the story forward on the marines and say the High Lords decided it was time to make a massive founding and when marine crazy.
They make like a few million marines (say it was necissary for all the current threats) and use this as a way to explain the massive number of marine armies we see in gaming stores.
They don't need to make a real big deal out of it. All the main chapters could send 100 marines to go lead a new chapter and thus we have such a wide range of marines we actually see in the real world.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|