| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 12:07:29
Subject: Re:Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Mounted Kroot Tracker
|
unmercifulconker wrote:So I am trying to work out what I will need for a small eldar ally detachment just to get a knight.
Would I need a spiritseer dude? Are they meant to be HQ and I wonder if they are needed for the wraith guys.
I am also guessing one box of guardians should be good?
Since the Wraithknight has an actual living Eldar pilot, I would imagine it won't suffer from any Psyker proximity requirements like the Guard and Lord do.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 12:11:33
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
I can't see the spiritseer being a hq in its own right. I think it'll be a warlock upgrade again. Athough it would be nice and I'd like to be wrong - they'd just have to allow 'counts as' warlocks. What with the spiritseer being a limited run.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/22 12:40:45
Blacksails wrote:
Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 12:12:39
Subject: Re:Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
Ah thanks well lets hope so, I would rather get a farseer as it would be the first ever psychic/magic powers I have ever used in warhammer.  Its been tough sticking to the strict guidelines of Khorne and the Templars.
|
Fury from faith
Faith in fury
Numquam solus ambulabis |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 12:12:49
Subject: Re:Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Oaka wrote:
Since the Wraithknight has an actual living Eldar pilot, I would imagine it won't suffer from any Psyker proximity requirements like the Guard and Lord do.
It does? Why it is called Wraithknight then?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 12:13:45
Subject: Re:Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Crimson wrote: Oaka wrote:
Since the Wraithknight has an actual living Eldar pilot, I would imagine it won't suffer from any Psyker proximity requirements like the Guard and Lord do.
It does? Why it is called Wraithknight then?
There is a living pilot and his dead twin in a spirit stone. A little bit of everything.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 12:14:24
Subject: Re:Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Major
In a van down by the river
|
Crimson wrote: Oaka wrote:
Since the Wraithknight has an actual living Eldar pilot, I would imagine it won't suffer from any Psyker proximity requirements like the Guard and Lord do.
It does? Why it is called Wraithknight then?
Because it also requires the spiritstone of the pilot's twin to be placed in the construct, hence the Wraith aspect.
EDIT: Ninja'd!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/22 12:14:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 12:18:58
Subject: Re:Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Nimble Glade Rider
Cardiff
|
Krinsath wrote: Crimson wrote: Oaka wrote:
Since the Wraithknight has an actual living Eldar pilot, I would imagine it won't suffer from any Psyker proximity requirements like the Guard and Lord do.
It does? Why it is called Wraithknight then?
Because it also requires the spiritstone of the pilot's twin to be placed in the construct, hence the Wraith aspect.
EDIT: Ninja'd!
Also because it's made out of Wraithbone, like the Wraithguard and Wraithlord...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 12:19:38
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
NoVA
|
Wraithlords and Wraithknights sharing a slot seems pretty dumb.
I'm assuming that the Iyanden Codex will change all that...
Damn them.
|
Playing: Droids (Legion), Starks (ASOIAF), BB2
Working on: Starks (ASOIAF), Twilight Kin (KoW). Droids (Legion)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:02:46
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Ichor-Dripping Talos Monstrosity
|
Sarigar wrote: rohansoldier wrote:I really hope that you don't need this Iyanden supplement to move Wraiths around the FOC. It will be severely limit how many Wraithguard and Wraith Knights will be sold (at least to me). I don't (and I am sure many others feel the same way) want to buy another full priced book to take full advantage of my minis rules. One £30 codex is enough!
Not the Wraiths, but the Lords and or Knights. Lords and Knights appear to be in the Heavy Support slot. To get the full Wraith army, one of those two will need to be moved, which is what I think the Iyanden supplement will include.
Red Viper wrote:Wraithlords and Wraithknights sharing a slot seems pretty dumb. I'm assuming that the Iyanden Codex will change all that... Damn them.
Honestly, with how expensive everything Wraith is, unless it gets a massive drop - 30 Wraithguard is 1050pts as it is (and I doubt that number will change - might even go up), 2 Wraithlords and 1 Wraithknight is going to be about 600-700pts kitted out, then Warlocks / Spiritseers will easily bring it up to 2000 points anyway. So 60 Wraithguard (assuming 6x10), then 3 Wraithlords and 3 Wraithknights (maybe a Wraithseer), you're easily hitting 4K. It' all going to be a balance - I mean, 3x Wraithknight, 3x Wraithlord will be around 1300-1400pts, leaving space for a HQ and what.... 3-4 Wraithguard at 1500, maybe as many as 18 at 2000pts! I feel 30 Wraithguard/blades, be it squads of 3x10 or 6x5 with warlocks, a HQ (Wraithseer maybe?  ), then 2 Wraithlords and a Wraithknight is a more practical approach.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/22 13:03:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:09:48
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
It' all going to be a balance - I mean, 3x Wraithknight, 3x Wraithlord will be around 1300-1400pts, leaving space for a HQ and what.... 3-4 Wraithguard at 1500, maybe as many as 18 at 2000pts!
Fluffy, but a bit boring to play.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:15:56
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader
DC Metro
|
wuestenfux wrote:It' all going to be a balance - I mean, 3x Wraithknight, 3x Wraithlord will be around 1300-1400pts, leaving space for a HQ and what.... 3-4 Wraithguard at 1500, maybe as many as 18 at 2000pts!
Fluffy, but a bit boring to play.
I'd say it sounds like a blast to play, much like Nidzilla or the CD Flying Circus lists.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:25:18
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
DaddyWarcrimes wrote: wuestenfux wrote:It' all going to be a balance - I mean, 3x Wraithknight, 3x Wraithlord will be around 1300-1400pts, leaving space for a HQ and what.... 3-4 Wraithguard at 1500, maybe as many as 18 at 2000pts!
Fluffy, but a bit boring to play.
I'd say it sounds like a blast to play, much like Nidzilla or the CD Flying Circus lists.
The CD flying circus is definitely faster, the same holds for Nidzilla with Flyrants and Trygons.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:25:25
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
Depends on how fast and agile Wraithknights are  , cause if you consider that most other units get some sort of shoot run shoot ability then wraith - wing will feel pretty immobile with the exception of the wraithknight
|
Got milk?
All I can say about painting is that VMC tastes much better than VMA... especially black...
PM me if you are interested in Commission work.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:27:15
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Capamaru wrote:Depends on how fast and agile Wraithknights are  , cause if you consider that most other units get some sort of shoot run shoot ability then wraith - wing will feel pretty immobile with the exception of the wraithknight 
In fact, even the Riptide can advance rather fast if he uses the nova reactor.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:27:34
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Blood-Drenched Death Company Marine
|
There was some talk of Wraithknights being faster than usual in the WD battle report, but that may have been the result of one of the Eldar specific Psychic powers.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:28:37
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Redemption wrote:There was some talk of Wraithknights being faster than usual in the WD battle report, but that may have been the result of one of the Eldar specific Psychic powers.
Even this would help.
How about the Wraitseer as HQ? Will he be in the new codex?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/22 13:29:50
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:30:22
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
Well fast assaulting wraithblades  ohhh the terror
|
Got milk?
All I can say about painting is that VMC tastes much better than VMA... especially black...
PM me if you are interested in Commission work.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:52:40
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Ahhh, cenimatic psychic powers, no new jet bikes, still crappy troops, a push for no vehicles, and 100$ in books to keep playin' my Iyanden army. Oh well, no thanks GW. We'll meet back here in another ten years or so and you can take another go at it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:54:12
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
Lost in the warp while searching for a new codex
|
wuestenfux wrote: Capamaru wrote:Depends on how fast and agile Wraithknights are  , cause if you consider that most other units get some sort of shoot run shoot ability then wraith - wing will feel pretty immobile with the exception of the wraithknight 
In fact, even the Riptide can advance rather fast if he uses the nova reactor.
Awesome! What other rules have you found in the Eldar codex that you must hold in your hand seeing how you know that the WK doesnt have any options or inbuilt wargear that least it move fast?
|
I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time.
15k
10k |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 13:55:34
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Mr.Church13 wrote:Ahhh, cenimatic psychic powers, no new jet bikes, still crappy troops, a push for no vehicles, and 100$ in books to keep playin' my Iyanden army. Oh well, no thanks GW. We'll meet back here in another ten years or so and you can take another go at it.
That's a pessimistic view of the new codex. Kelly is not the best codex writer. We'll see.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:15:51
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
wuestenfux wrote:Mr.Church13 wrote:Ahhh, cenimatic psychic powers, no new jet bikes, still crappy troops, a push for no vehicles, and 100$ in books to keep playin' my Iyanden army. Oh well, no thanks GW. We'll meet back here in another ten years or so and you can take another go at it.
That's a pessimistic view of the new codex. Kelly is not the best codex writer. We'll see.
Really hope you are wrong on the Kelly part cause if this eldar codex sucks and because 6th will be here a long time I might even sell my Eldar and linger to GK and Chaos.
|
Got milk?
All I can say about painting is that VMC tastes much better than VMA... especially black...
PM me if you are interested in Commission work.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:17:44
Subject: Re:Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
Oregon
|
With almost no information except some of the following:
A sniper rifle with 120" range exists
the wraithknight has the ability to fire six S6 AP2 small blasts
the flyer has access to aspect warrior pilots, two brightlances and a pulse laser
I think its safe to say the codex won't be a complete failure.
Not to say it wont be without problems.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:18:03
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Capamaru wrote: wuestenfux wrote:Mr.Church13 wrote:Ahhh, cenimatic psychic powers, no new jet bikes, still crappy troops, a push for no vehicles, and 100$ in books to keep playin' my Iyanden army. Oh well, no thanks GW. We'll meet back here in another ten years or so and you can take another go at it.
That's a pessimistic view of the new codex. Kelly is not the best codex writer. We'll see.
Really hope you are wrong on the Kelly part cause if this eldar codex sucks and because 6th will be here a long time I might even sell my Eldar and linger to GK and Chaos.
Erm, isn't chaos still Phil Kelly?
|
Blacksails wrote:
Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:25:49
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Mr.Church13 wrote:Ahhh, cenimatic psychic powers, no new jet bikes, still crappy troops, a push for no vehicles, and 100$ in books to keep playin' my Iyanden army. Oh well, no thanks GW. We'll meet back here in another ten years or so and you can take another go at it.
Neither book is out yet. It's still a tad early to be forecasting gloom and doom already. Basically nothing has been mentioned about vehicles either.
|
Black Bases and Grey Plastic Forever:My quaint little hobby blog.
40k- The Kumunga Swarm (more)
Count Mortimer’s Private Security Force/Excavation Team  (building)
Kabal of the Grieving Widow (less)
Plus other games- miniature and cardboard both. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:30:18
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Plaguelord Titan Princeps of Nurgle
Alabama
|
UNCLEBADTOUCH wrote:Yes but it does mean all those new shiny op toys that GW wants you to buy don't compete with each other and only invalidate those silly old models you never wante to use again anyway. Exactly as planned. ;-)
Exactly.
"People already have Wraithlords, so what are we going to do to sell them more Heavy Support choices?"
"Wraithknight! Drop it in the Heavy Support slot and they'll go the way of the Carnifex."
"Brilliant!"
|
WH40K
Death Guard 5100 pts.
Daemons 3000 pts.
DT:70+S++G+M-B-I--Pw40K90-D++A++/eWD?R++T(D)DM+
28 successful trades in the Dakka Swap Shop! Check out my latest auction here!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:36:52
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Sister Oh-So Repentia
|
So they just repackaged the jetbikes and added a "new" transfer sheet. There goes my idea for a Saim Hann army...grr.
|
Peace through superior firepower. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:37:41
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
Haven't read all the 84 pages, so sorry.
The battleforce looks like really bad value.
The models look quite nice as well, except for the large walker whose chest seems to stick out a bit too much.
The Iyanden book looks interesting, but for the same price as the codex?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:41:27
Subject: Re:Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Gwyidion wrote:With almost no information except some of the following:
A sniper rifle with 120" range exists
the wraithknight has the ability to fire six S6 AP2 small blasts
the flyer has access to aspect warrior pilots, two brightlances and a pulse laser
I think its safe to say the codex won't be a complete failure.
Not to say it wont be without problems.
I'm actually unimpressed with that new flyer because it's almost identical to the Nightwing. Yes it's FW but the newer flyers from GW tend to be at least somewhat different than the FW versions. We'll see if it has vector dancer and titan holo fields.
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:53:29
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Whats the normal timescale from White Dwarf to release?
Am I right in thinking it's probably something like the following?
25/05 - White Dwarf
01/08 - Pre-orders available
08/08 - Stock arrives in GW
|
Blacksails wrote:
Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/22 14:54:12
Subject: Eldar rumours (More pics plus complete release list added to first post)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Sinful Hero wrote:Mr.Church13 wrote:Ahhh, cenimatic psychic powers, no new jet bikes, still crappy troops, a push for no vehicles, and 100$ in books to keep playin' my Iyanden army. Oh well, no thanks GW. We'll meet back here in another ten years or so and you can take another go at it.
Neither book is out yet. It's still a tad early to be forecasting gloom and doom already. Basically nothing has been mentioned about vehicles either.
Maybe some gloom and doom. I wanted new bikes because I don't like the current ones, wanted better vehicles but 6th's basic rules killed that, wanted my guardians and DA to be pretty good troops but since neither kit is being improved I can assume that guardians will get no special weapons and still be limited to one or two super expensive heavy weapons making allies or a shoehorned HQ a must for useful scoring troops, wanted to be able to pick my powers so I can build a list knowing what my options are, nope, gotta spin the wheel of fate when it's already too late to adjust the list because of crappy rolls, and I would love to be able to get into assault with my small elite strike of squad aspect warriors but I have a strong feeling that there will be no possible way for them to ever get there in effective numbers and even if they get lucky and make it I'm pretty sure they will have dulled the weapons enough to make it not matter too much. After all, Eldar player already own enough aspects and troops so why worry about making them appealing.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|