Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/23 16:19:39
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
yeah,
Is it possible to have a ignore thread button so that the thread disappears from my view of the forum list.
I'd love to be able to remove unwanted threads from view.
It would make news and rumors so much nicer to remove things like kickstarters or gamesystems that I have no interest in.
There are threads I know offer nothing to me and take up space.
There are certain threads that annoy me and seeing them bothers me.
Panic...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/23 22:40:28
Subject: Re:Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan
|
That would actually be a really cool feature.
|
lord_blackfang wrote:Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote:The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/23 22:57:03
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I could see this being quite handy.
It might also stop some of the whinging that goes on about Kickstarters taking up most of the N&R page.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:05:08
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
This would make me sooo happy.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/24 14:05:20
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/25 02:29:35
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Off-Topic should be opt-in to show up at all...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/25 17:19:17
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Typically we would just say ignore with your eyes  A cross-site user specific ignore feature for threads would be too database intensive. There is value in having people able to ignore threads as it lets us assign a negative score for algorithmic weighting, but it is nothing I'll add anytime soon on account of the level of work required.
|
Check out our new, fully plastic tabletop wargame - Maelstrom's Edge, made by Dakka!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/25 20:29:14
Subject: Re:Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
yeah,
As always Lego love your work, just throwing ideas of my ideal dakka out there to see what sticks!
Panic...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 03:59:30
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan
|
legoburner wrote: There is value in having people able to ignore threads as it lets us assign a negative score for algorithmic weighting
I'd like to know more about that - to what purpose do you weight threads, and how are the results displayed to users? Or is this something still in development?
|
lord_blackfang wrote:Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote:The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 08:58:37
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I dont at the moment beyond very basic weighting for home page promotion. If I was able to do so reliably then I could do more interesting things
|
Check out our new, fully plastic tabletop wargame - Maelstrom's Edge, made by Dakka!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 12:07:58
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
What is thread weight? What does it mean/do?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 15:21:24
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Just an automatic assumption of the quality of a thread based on various metrics.
|
Check out our new, fully plastic tabletop wargame - Maelstrom's Edge, made by Dakka!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/31 07:07:19
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Needs more noise-to-volume analysis.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/01 15:14:46
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
Don't you mean signal to noise?
Also, if something online is bothering you significantly, that is a personal problem. Perhaps you need to take a step back from the internet instead of trying to censor it.
|
Read my story at:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/515293.page#5420356
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/01 19:32:31
Subject: Re:Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
yeah,
I'd be self filtering out the gak, which is different to censorship.
If people wanna talk about stuff I'm not interested in like chapterhouse or gun ownership that's fine by me.
But when it takes up space on page I'd like to be able to filter it out so more good stuff fits on instead.
I also like the idea of thread weight being improved, hopefully it will show which threads are actually good and which ones are just a bunch of people making a lot of noise.
Panic...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 23:46:50
Subject: Ignore thread button?
|
 |
Rampaging Furioso Blood Angel Dreadnought
Potters Bar, UK
|
The thing is Panic that if you are only talking about one or two topics (and not a whole type of thread like Kickstarters for example) and those specific threads taking up space on the page, then you could just go to page 2.....
I dont disagree with you, im just pointing out that if it a small volume of threads that you dont want to view then its not too difficult to just not read them and keep looking for threads you do want to see...and i am only going by the specific examples you have given, apologies if its not relevant...
|
inmygravenimage wrote:Have courage, faith and beer, my friend - it will be done!
MeanGreenStompa wrote:Anonymity breeds aggression.
Chowderhead wrote:Just hit the "Triangle of Friendship", as I call it. |
|
 |
 |
|