Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 23:04:26
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Shas'ui with Bonding Knife
The Internet- where men are men, women are men, and kids are undercover cops
|
Furyou Miko wrote:Eternal Warrior exists to keep the heroes of the galaxy from dying like any jane schmoe. As mentioned earlier, it's the game mechanic answer to Plot Armour.
Except in the case of daemons and phoenix lords, in which case it's more literal - their bodies are gakky messes of immortal soul, so they kind of react weirdly to material effects.
It's not an answer to PlotArmor... it *IS* PlotArmor, in the worst possible way.
|
Jon Garrett wrote:Perhaps not technically a Marine Chapter anymore, but the Flame Falcons would be pretty creepy to fight.
"Boss, we waz out lookin' for grub when some of them Spice Marines showed up and shot all the lads."
"Right. Well, did you at least use the burnas?"
"We tried, but the gits was already on fire."
"...Kunnin'." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 23:26:46
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
It is a way to balance the game, to prevent your 300 point melee powerhouse from being oneshotted by a 40 point IG lascannon team.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 23:34:47
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
However, your 300 point melee powerhouse *should* be able to be one-shotted by a 40-point IG lascannon team.
That is what lascannons do. They are anti-tank weapons.
That's Grimdark, when your massive, Heroic Warrior-God gets taken out by three nameless dudes with an anti-tank cannon.
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 23:35:27
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Psienesis wrote:However, your 300 point melee powerhouse *should* be able to be one-shotted by a 40-point IG lascannon team.
That is what lascannons do. They are anti-tank weapons.
That's Grimdark, when your massive, Heroic Warrior-God gets taken out by three nameless dudes with an anti-tank cannon.
Un/fortunately, the game is not balanced with Grimdark in mind.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 23:35:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 01:55:15
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Ashiraya wrote:It is a way to balance the game, to prevent your 300 point melee powerhouse from being oneshotted by a 40 point IG lascannon team.
I would not see any problem there. If you put your 300 point melee powerhouse in the front of your unit, if the lascannon team is able to roll high enough to hit (with BS3  ) and wound, if you manage to fail both your LoS and invulnerable save, then I guess you somehow deserve to have lost your melee powerhouse. Next time he will not be at the front of the unit, with a big sign pointing to his/her head saying "Shoot me here, I do not have a helmet"  .
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 01:56:52
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote: Ashiraya wrote:It is a way to balance the game, to prevent your 300 point melee powerhouse from being oneshotted by a 40 point IG lascannon team.
I would not see any problem there. If you put your 300 point melee powerhouse in the front of your unit, if the lascannon team is able to roll high enough to hit (with BS3  ) and wound, if you manage to fail both your LoS and invulnerable save, then I guess you somehow deserve to have lost your melee powerhouse. Next time he will not be at the front of the unit, with a big sign pointing to his/her head saying "Shoot me here, I do not have a helmet"  .
There's also melee.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 07:58:29
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Psienesis wrote:However, your 300 point melee powerhouse *should* be able to be one-shotted by a 40-point IG lascannon team.
That is what lascannons do. They are anti-tank weapons.
That's Grimdark, when your massive, Heroic Warrior-God gets taken out by three nameless dudes with an anti-tank cannon.
Gotta admit though, it is a little disappointing when Abaddon or Lysander just drop.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 08:29:48
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
Selym wrote: Psienesis wrote:However, your 300 point melee powerhouse *should* be able to be one-shotted by a 40-point IG lascannon team.
That is what lascannons do. They are anti-tank weapons.
That's Grimdark, when your massive, Heroic Warrior-God gets taken out by three nameless dudes with an anti-tank cannon.
Gotta admit though, it is a little disappointing when Abaddon or Lysander just drop.
I second that.
|
"Glory to the Iron father!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 09:19:08
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It's developers being precious about their special characters. The concept of 300 point characters dying to a lot less in one go is common in other games, even past 40k.
I mean, in Infinity, the special characters don't get more wounds than their unit type gets (so a light infantry one would get 1W, similar or same armour to a standard trooper of his type). And even the biggest, baddest dudes like the Avatar can die to a single lucky Missile Launcher hit, or if he trips a monofilament mine.
I mean, even in 2nd edition 40k, most infantry commanders could be one-shot by a heavy bolter, and a Lascannon could (with a bit of luck) one-shot a Bloodthirster or Avatar.
|
hello |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 14:16:40
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Black Templar Dreadnought
|
Daba wrote:It's developers being precious about their special characters. The concept of 300 point characters dying to a lot less in one go is common in other games, even past 40k.
I mean, in Infinity, the special characters don't get more wounds than their unit type gets (so a light infantry one would get 1W, similar or same armour to a standard trooper of his type). And even the biggest, baddest dudes like the Avatar can die to a single lucky Missile Launcher hit, or if he trips a monofilament mine.
I mean, even in 2nd edition 40k, most infantry commanders could be one-shot by a heavy bolter, and a Lascannon could (with a bit of luck) one-shot a Bloodthirster or Avatar.
I remember an RPG game (think it was "James Bond") that had the concept of "hero points" which a similar mechanic is used in Lord of the Rings.
Something to add or subtract to a dice roll or change it's result to prevent at least the first "one shot kill" of a unique character model may be in order.
The Lysander and Abbadon getting dropped in an "un-epic" way does appear bothersome.
|
A revolution is an idea which has found its bayonets.
Napoleon Bonaparte |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 14:43:23
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
RPGs are a little different to tabletop battle games though.
|
hello |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 14:47:48
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Guardsmen in melee will at best have S6, using a power fist. I do not think there is any 300 points melee powerhouse without T4. Maybe some dark eldar are that expensive?
They would still be susceptible to walkers and MC. But then again, the big huge giant thing having an advantage over the tiny little man seems logic.
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 14:55:42
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Basically it's Dark Eldar but the only EW in their book is one of the few models that actually justifies it (basically a Phoenix Lord). And he's T4 anyway.
|
hello |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/13 11:46:24
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Why are we discussing things tha shood happen in reality or logic ?, Gork and Mork protect my Ghazghkul from eny rail gun and such or warp it self chews and spits your D weapon spears or rokkits. It's like discussing Jesus walking on watter in my opinion and I love it !
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/14 19:33:10
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
Daba wrote:Basically it's Dark Eldar but the only EW in their book is one of the few models that actually justifies it (basically a Phoenix Lord). And he's T4 anyway.
Vect is nearly 300 points and T3. And he does not deserve EW. If he gets scratched badly he is gonna quit the fight and retreat home or teleport out. One wound from str6+ and he will be removed from the tabletop. He wont be dead maybe, but he certainly isnt going to continue to fight.
Lelith is more like 200 points and also T3. Also doesnt deserve EW. Apparently she fights in gladiator combat constantly and never suffers a scratch. EW no, unhittable yes.
|
Dark Mechanicus and Renegade Iron Hand Dakka Blog
My Dark Mechanicus P&M Blog. Mostly Modeling as I paint very slowly. Lots of kitbashed conversions of marines and a few guard to make up a renegade Iron Hand chapter and Dark Mechanicus Allies. Bionics++ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/14 19:38:32
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Someone who certainly does deserve EW, despite being a puny human, is (as mentioned earlier) Yarrick.
Gets hit by a mag-train-equivalent, and just comes back for more!
Also, Yarrick regularly displays feats of badassery that makes even SM's feel inadequate.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/14 19:38:45
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/14 20:00:13
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
Selym wrote: Psienesis wrote:However, your 300 point melee powerhouse *should* be able to be one-shotted by a 40-point IG lascannon team.
That is what lascannons do. They are anti-tank weapons.
That's Grimdark, when your massive, Heroic Warrior-God gets taken out by three nameless dudes with an anti-tank cannon.
Gotta admit though, it is a little disappointing when Abaddon or Lysander just drop.
GrimDark should be disappointing, from the perspective of the "hero" faction most especially. Your every victory should be Pyrrhic. Your only dream to die well. Your only hope to delay the inevitable by one more day that you're alive.
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/14 20:12:14
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
Psienesis wrote: Selym wrote: Psienesis wrote:However, your 300 point melee powerhouse *should* be able to be one-shotted by a 40-point IG lascannon team.
That is what lascannons do. They are anti-tank weapons.
That's Grimdark, when your massive, Heroic Warrior-God gets taken out by three nameless dudes with an anti-tank cannon.
Gotta admit though, it is a little disappointing when Abaddon or Lysander just drop.
GrimDark should be disappointing, from the perspective of the "hero" faction most especially. Your every victory should be Pyrrhic. Your only dream to die well. Your only hope to delay the inevitable by one more day that you're alive.
False, your only dream is blissfulness.....
Btw, Chaos can help you with that! Come see us soon!
|
"Glory to the Iron father!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/15 03:01:53
Subject: Re:The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Posts with Authority
|
changerofways wrote:Yeah I don't think you should relate game rules to fluff.
You gotta realize that a game needs balance so game mechanics take priority over fluff, otherwise the game would be unplayable.
Are we still talking about 40K?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/15 23:24:32
Subject: Re:The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Vermis wrote: changerofways wrote:Yeah I don't think you should relate game rules to fluff.
You gotta realize that a game needs balance so game mechanics take priority over fluff, otherwise the game would be unplayable.
Are we still talking about 40K?
It sounds like he's talking about some kind of obscure as-yet-unheard-of franchise.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 11:24:56
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Moscow, Russia
|
I think EW isn't the big offender here. Which is T5 multiwound infantry models such as Ogryns, which are immune to Instant Death from anti-tank missiles. Which is quite ridiculous. Automatically Appended Next Post: Personally I don't think anything made of meat that isn't a monstrous creature should have a Toughness higher than 4.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/22 11:25:58
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 12:13:32
Subject: Re:The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan
|
I hope everyone arguing against EW realizes just how much cheaper melee Characters who currently have EW would have to become in order to still be viable choices?
Further, regarding the lascannon example, Calgar, Lysander, Abaddon or anyone else in Terminator Armour (or Mega Armour, for that matter) could easily take a hit from a lascannon and keep going. They're supposed to have comparable armour to heavy tanks and, in the case of Terminator Armour, was specifically designed to diffuse heat efficiently. It's like trying to kill someone named Prism-man with a Lasgun.
As a final note, I for one would be grateful if we stopped the damn "special snowflake" thingie already. The only thing it does is throw gak at people who disagree with your opinions. It's condescending and rude, which doesn't lead to honest debate.
|
For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 13:48:38
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
Alcibiades wrote:I think EW isn't the big offender here. Which is T5 multiwound infantry models such as Ogryns, which are immune to Instant Death from anti-tank missiles. Which is quite ridiculous.
Personally I don't think anything made of meat that isn't a monstrous creature should have a Toughness higher than 4.
So consider an elephant. Not above natural toughness, but large. Assume it gets hit by an anti tank gun. Would all hits lead to it's immidiate death? No. A shot to the head sure, a shot to some parts of its body might, but most shots would just go right through and while it might eventually kill it it would not immediately kill it.
I think the problem is not EW, it's the ID mechanic. Instead of just S double T, it should be something like if strength is 2 or more higher than toughness, then on a 6 to wound inflict ID. If S it double T, then on a 5 or 6 inflict ID. If strength is 5 higher than toughness then on a 4,5, or 6 inflict ID.
A hit is just a hit, it depends where the hit is and should have something to do with the wound mechanic. Not all wounds, even from incredibly nasty weapons will outright kill any lifeform.
|
Dark Mechanicus and Renegade Iron Hand Dakka Blog
My Dark Mechanicus P&M Blog. Mostly Modeling as I paint very slowly. Lots of kitbashed conversions of marines and a few guard to make up a renegade Iron Hand chapter and Dark Mechanicus Allies. Bionics++ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 19:15:09
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Lesser Daemon of Chaos
|
Personally I think EW is too rare a thing. I recognize that 40k is a game written on a HUGE SCALE, but part of the charm of it, for me, is that the individuals have a lot of character. They're larger than life.
Adrubael Vect is a 20,000 year old psychic vampire Machiavelli-meets-Hattori-Hanzo. But an autocannon team takes him out? Lame.
Kharn is a 10,000 year old veteran of some of the bloodiest and most epic conflicts in the entire galaxy. I don't want a scout with a missile launcher blowing him up.
|
5000
Who knows? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 21:41:10
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
So consider an elephant. Not above natural toughness, but large. Assume it gets hit by an anti tank gun. Would all hits lead to it's immidiate death? No. A shot to the head sure, a shot to some parts of its body might, but most shots would just go right through and while it might eventually kill it it would not immediately kill it.
Ehmm... yeah... no.
An actual anti-tank munition would pretty much obliterate (in a spectacularly messy fashion) an elephant, no matter where you hit it. If it wasn't killed by the massive damage to its body and organs, shock and traumatic exsanguination would probably pretty much insta-gib it.
Let us remember that an elephant gun is not an anti-tank weapon. A shoulder-fired missile launcher, however, is. As is a 75mm recoilless rifle. That's a *big* bullet, that is, also, HEAT (High Explosive Anti Tank). They pierce 100mm of steel armor, which is *far* tougher than any elephant.
An elephant can (and does) survive (and sometimes even ignores) hits from pretty much any small-arm. That's why they are hunted with high-calibre rifles by guys who know what they're doing (and using helicopters, in case they only manage to piss it off). But if you go elephant hunting with a missile launcher, you pretty much have it in the bag (though bring a shovel to claim your elephant bits),
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 21:49:16
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Calgar isn't going to survive a hit from a Strike Cruiser. Not in the current rules anyway.
He doesn't get any saves against StrD, and is taking at minimum D3+3 wounds unless a 1 is rolled. D6+6 if a 6 is rolled.
He will survive a direct hit from a lascannon because, even if he fails his invuln save, the combination of the save existing, his sheer durability, and the durability of Terminator armor, means that it won't kill him.
And remember that a direct hit doesn't always mean a direct hit. I'd wager that very few of the people killed by the main gun on a tank or artillery were actually directly hit by it. Those weapons kill by the explosion they cause, not by actually hitting an individual target. If you have armor which protects from the blast, like TDA or PA or a force field would, then you'd be pretty safe unless you were directly hit. Any inconsistencies can be dismissed by game abstraction.
It would be pretty silly for one of the greatest warriors ever to exist to die from a single lucky lascannon shot too.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 21:53:07
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
It would be pretty silly for one of the greatest warriors ever to exist to die from a single lucky lascannon shot too.
And yet, there was Stonewall Jackson...
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 21:56:12
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Psienesis wrote:It would be pretty silly for one of the greatest warriors ever to exist to die from a single lucky lascannon shot too.
And yet, there was Stonewall Jackson...
Yes, but Stonewall Jackson didn't wear the equivalent of a main battle tank, have the benefit intense genetic engineering, or have defensive force fields created by technology bordering on magic.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 22:14:35
Subject: The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
Neither does Yarrick. Or Creed. Or Marbo.
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/22 22:17:22
Subject: Re:The only things that should be able to survive anti-tank weapons are things that *can* survive them
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
None of those guys have EW IIRC.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
|