TheNewBlood wrote:Makumba wrote:Compared to codexes that have actually been updated to 7th edition and don't have a massive suite of internal problems. Why do I get the sneaking suspicion that you are the sole negative vote as of this post...
I don't vote. And If I did, why would I then tell
OP to buy an eldar army? So they are balanced vs necron more or less right?
If the Eldar player doesn't spam the broken and
OP units, Eldar are on the same level of balance as any of the other 7th edition codexes*^
*Not including Orks. Their 7th edition codex is awful.
^Tau are balanced well for a 6th edition codex.
I'd argue otherwise, Orks,
DE,
SW,
BA all have decent Codexes (might be missing some before Necrons). It's just generic power creep left them in the dust. Why go
BA when
SM do everything better? Why play
DE when you can just take their transports for Craftworlds? The only Codex that might stand up to the latest Codexes is
SW, but
TWC/Iron Priests are just so good that it's probably the only reason why I see my friend start to collect them, particulary when you can use super-friends to make them super killy.
Tau have aged well, I will give you that. They be getting a new Codex soon, ayeesh. Cannot wait to see what I will have to deal with next
@the thirteenth praetorian
CAD is impossible with Harlequins as they have no
HQ. You need either a Masque detachment or one of the formations. Cast of Players works well for a FootDar list mind.
EDIT: Did I seriously answer something that was answered already? Gah. Too early need coffee.