Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 23:11:28
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
Nvs wrote:Sad Panda wrote:
Feel free to enjoy the summer of '16 before checking back. Minimum. We're talking the long game.
Boo! It's almost Christmas! Can't you just lie or something!?
BOLS, when are Rubrics coming?
BoL(lock)S wrote: Nvs I think you'll find they are to be released November 31.
Disregard the fact that it's already December and that there's no such day as Nov 31.
I'm sorry I just had to
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 23:12:19
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Tzeentch Aspiring Sorcerer Riding a Disc
Battle Barge Impossible Fortress
|
Nvs wrote:
Boo! It's almost Christmas! Can't you just lie or something!?
BOLS, when are Rubrics coming?
They already did, don't your remember? We got them in June. Thanks, BoLS
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 01:53:50
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
Sad Panda wrote:
Feel free to enjoy the summer of '16 before checking back. Minimum. We're talking the long game.
Sooooo, next Christmas! Or is it next century's next Christmas?!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 04:41:07
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Sad Panda wrote:
Feel free to enjoy the summer of '16 before checking back. Minimum. We're talking the long game.
I've got to ask since youve got the inside information, can you shed any light on how and why the decisions are made as to what armies get updated and when? I don't mean it in the "my army gets screwed" way, I'm genuinely curious. It seems arbitrary, but surely they have good reasons for the decisions.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 09:32:16
Subject: Re:2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Sorry. I have no insights on the "why".
I only get glimpses of things already in the pipeline.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 09:53:21
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Thats too bad, but thanks anyway. It will remain a mystery to us all.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 12:49:28
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Actually, I am a SoB player no more. I still own an army, but I just never play it. I do not own the current rulebook, I don't know much about the new codex (I just know they are a massive PITA where when you see some model, you have no idea what their rules are because they get a ton of terrible stupid rules that comes out of formation non-sense).
I am a TROLLBLOOD player now.
Grimtuff wrote:Oh please. The old "vocal minority" schtick is about a decade out of date. Just about everyone in this hobby in the western world has a mini pc in their pocket.
Pretty sure the “vocal minority” is not about people with access to the internet, but about people choosing to dedicate time to post messages on forums about their miniatures.
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 14:16:34
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
Yes, and the fewer barriers there are, the more inclined people will be to do so. Therefore the easier the access to the Internet is, the more representative the vocal "minority" becomes.
I also think we need a name for the law that the longer an Internet thread about non-specific future 40K releases continues, the chance that SoB players will make it all about them approaches 1.
|
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 15:25:00
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Azreal13 wrote:
I also think we need a name for the law that the longer an Internet thread about non-specific future 40K releases continues, the chance that SoB players will make it all about them approaches 1.
Make sure the equation includes the duration it takes to arrive at the inevitable "bewbplate" discussion, as well.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 15:32:46
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Did someone say bewb plate?
|
warboss wrote:Is there a permanent stickied thread for Chaos players to complain every time someone/anyone gets models or rules besides them? If not, there should be. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 16:54:02
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Wondering Why the Emperor Left
|
sadly, i never though my "i bet we will see sisters of silence before sisters of battle" joke will come true >.>
atleast FW will give us some love soon ^,^
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/13 17:04:57
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 18:50:31
Subject: Re:2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
At this point, I'm starting to realise that when GW gave Chaos Marines the VotLW upgrade, it's really meant to represent the wait that Chaos players endure before getting an actual codex release.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 19:00:16
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Leaping Khawarij
|
Azreal13 wrote:Yes, and the fewer barriers there are, the more inclined people will be to do so. Therefore the easier the access to the Internet is, the more representative the vocal "minority" becomes.
I also think we need a name for the law that the longer an Internet thread about non-specific future 40K releases continues, the chance that SoB players will make it all about them approaches 1.
Why not call it the Sisters law.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 19:10:41
Subject: Re:2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
pontiac, michigan; usa
|
Experiment 626 wrote:At this point, I'm starting to realise that when GW gave Chaos Marines the VotLW upgrade, it's really meant to represent the wait that Chaos players endure before getting an actual codex release.
Veterans of the Long Wait?
|
Join skavenblight today!
http://the-under-empire.proboards.com/ (my skaven forum) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/13 19:58:15
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Leaping Khawarij
|
Atia wrote:
sadly, i never though my "i bet we will see sisters of silence before sisters of battle" joke will come true >.>
atleast FW will give us some love soon ^,^
Actually I'm not keen on the Sisters of Silence aesthetic. I think the bald top knot thing looks dark eldar or Ork.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/15 08:08:21
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
I already had my hopes up for a new CSM codex once this year. I've moved on and am using mainly chaos daemons.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/15 08:10:45
Chaos daemons 1850
Chaos Marines 1850
2250+
2500++ (Wraithwing)
I moved so starting from scratch. These were the armies I had, rebuilding my Chaos. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/16 11:35:47
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Repentia Mistress
|
Blood Bowl rumour: http://www.war-of-sigmar.com/bloggings/387
Edit with content from link:
Today i heard rumors that Specialist games are going to release, Blood Bowl.
A reliable source told me about BB re release
2nd quarter 2016, i guess. Because he told me before the end of the league and we end around june each year
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/16 11:57:34
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/16 11:48:09
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
There's no rumour at that link other than "Bloodbowl is coming!"
That's not helpful.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/16 12:01:08
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Lady Atia already mentioned what was coming: http://www.war-of-sigmar.com/bloggings/349
rather than what appears to be just a link to BoLS
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/17 09:19:37
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Age of Sigmar terrain boards are almost certain. For the first time in a while, I went to my GW store today (they're not anywhere close to where I work or live, so it's rare), and I saw this on display: They are definitely plastic, and they seem pretty nice. It does say SIGMAR on the lava bridge... When I asked about it, the GW guys said it came with their stuff to display AoS. They thought surely it would go on sale before Christmas, but no such luck. Yeah, yeah, we've seen lots of photos of these in the books and online, so it's not really news, sorry  But it was cool to see them in person. Incidentally, humorously, I saw a little 8.5x11 poster that had 3 small boxes with photos across the top with labels that read something like "Assemble", "Paint", "Play" and then a giant thing that filled 2/3 of the page that said "Collect", lol (I may be misremembering the exact words of each title, but it's pretty close to that). Wonder where their minds are?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/17 09:22:22
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/21 14:17:17
Subject: Re:2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Leashed Pupnik
Terra! - U.K. to be precise!
|
Dont know if anyone else feels / see's it this way but if they are going to do a CSM overhaul - I'd like to see 6 codex's - one for each of the four powers
including the marines , daemons and cults - one for chaos undivided marines and cults and one stand alone codex for the Alpha legion with marines,
allies, agents and the possibility of some xenos / strange equipment.
I'm not a csm player, but for anyone who reads any of the Horus Heresy novels I think some might agree that the legacy of the Alpha legion has
a real scope for some more abstract possibilities.
GW - if your reading pay attention - free ideas here!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/21 14:17:56
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 00:37:47
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'm just going to leave something here, but while I definitely don't want to be a rumor-guy, I did think it worth sharing something I heard repeated a few times today in circles that might know (the same folks who mentioned how multi-wound monster multi-profiles would work in Age of Sigmar well before we knew what that game was actually like... so I give them some credence).
Apparently "something" nasty is brewing involving 40k and reps are beginning to try to hype up bigger retail stores regarding it (or rather they are starting by talking to high-volume stores).
All I gleaned was that it isn't a new edition, it isn't a new army, and when sarcastically pressed about all the things players would actually want (IE better pricing, etc...) I was ensured it wasn't any of those things.
Whatever it is, it is supposed to be very big, however, and should be discussed by the end of January.
|
11527pts Total (7400pts painted)
4980pts Total (4980pts painted)
3730 Total (210pts painted) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 01:15:28
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Is 'Eavy Metal Calling?
|
NewTruthNeomaxim wrote:I'm just going to leave something here, but while I definitely don't want to be a rumor-guy, I did think it worth sharing something I heard repeated a few times today in circles that might know (the same folks who mentioned how multi-wound monster multi-profiles would work in Age of Sigmar well before we knew what that game was actually like... so I give them some credence).
Apparently "something" nasty is brewing involving 40k and reps are beginning to try to hype up bigger retail stores regarding it (or rather they are starting by talking to high-volume stores).
All I gleaned was that it isn't a new edition, it isn't a new army, and when sarcastically pressed about all the things players would actually want (IE better pricing, etc...) I was ensured it wasn't any of those things.
Whatever it is, it is supposed to be very big, however, and should be discussed by the end of January.
Switching to square bases so the models can be moved around on trays easier. It'll make apocalypse games go faster removing squads by trays.
|
LOL, Theo your mind is an amazing place, never change.-camkierhi 9/19/13
I cant believe theo is right.. damn. -comradepanda 9/26/13
None of the strange ideas we had about you involved your sexual orientation..........-Monkeytroll 12/10/13
I'd put you on ignore for that comment, if I could...Alpharius 2/11/14 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 01:24:44
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
Well, at this point I'm not sure I could be less interested in playing 40K, so from a purely personal standpoint, it can't be any worse!
|
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 01:26:37
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
NewTruthNeomaxim wrote:I'm just going to leave something here, but while I definitely don't want to be a rumor-guy, I did think it worth sharing something I heard repeated a few times today in circles that might know (the same folks who mentioned how multi-wound monster multi-profiles would work in Age of Sigmar well before we knew what that game was actually like... so I give them some credence).
Apparently "something" nasty is brewing involving 40k and reps are beginning to try to hype up bigger retail stores regarding it (or rather they are starting by talking to high-volume stores).
All I gleaned was that it isn't a new edition, it isn't a new army, and when sarcastically pressed about all the things players would actually want (IE better pricing, etc...) I was ensured it wasn't any of those things.
Whatever it is, it is supposed to be very big, however, and should be discussed by the end of January.
Plastic Thunderhawk confirmed!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 01:28:16
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
That wouldn't qualify as "nasty" would it?
Would help to know if this were a crunch thing or a fluff thing (I've a big campaign or something.)
|
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 01:32:18
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
40k endtimes?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 02:36:06
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
I didn't see this posted elsewhere so I'm dropping it here. A bunch of "battalion" style boxed sets are going to be up for sale. Some are better value than others but basically you get a free HQ for the price.
From Facebook.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 05:05:24
Subject: Re:2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Hmmm, I kinda want the Space Marine one for that SFU Terminator Captain, but I will just watch for him to show up on eBay. I don't need another Tactical Squad, and definitely don't need/want another Dreadnought.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 05:30:34
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
Oz
|
NewTruthNeomaxim wrote:I'm just going to leave something here, but while I definitely don't want to be a rumor-guy, I did think it worth sharing something I heard repeated a few times today in circles that might know (the same folks who mentioned how multi-wound monster multi-profiles would work in Age of Sigmar well before we knew what that game was actually like... so I give them some credence).
Apparently "something" nasty is brewing involving 40k and reps are beginning to try to hype up bigger retail stores regarding it (or rather they are starting by talking to high-volume stores).
All I gleaned was that it isn't a new edition, it isn't a new army, and when sarcastically pressed about all the things players would actually want (IE better pricing, etc...) I was ensured it wasn't any of those things.
Whatever it is, it is supposed to be very big, however, and should be discussed by the end of January.
Ooh, now *that's* a rumour! What could it be? A change in the trade terms? Boring but potentially nasty, and i could see them needing to hype their bigger customers to get on board with it. Another idea i can think of involves this game i found once on the net, where it was a ttmg but the game mechanics/resolution was handled by a computer, and when you bought your minis you had to 'register' them with the official company website to get them to be playable in your individual army/software. It's a lot of a stretch, but that would be nasty if they brought that to 40k. Bring on january, this could prove interesting.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|