Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 19:44:19
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
gungo wrote:So which warehouse worker is going to get fired for selling multiple stolen GW products weeks in advance of its shipping date to retailers? Not only was this moron dumb enough to sell product well before anyone outside the warehouse has access to it but he was selling it well below the msrp and shipping it via eBay before the product even goes up for preorder. If GW doesn't fire someone at the warehouse for this I'll be surprised.
Link?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 19:45:04
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Blood-Drenched Death Company Marine
|
I'm guessing the technical gem paints are either just very glossy clear paints, or some sort of paint that creates little cells over its surface so it looks like a faceted gem.
Really curious for a picture of the effect though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:02:11
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
They've already got a clear red technical paint for blood, so presumably the red gem one will have to do something else?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:03:21
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Rules... For shipping containers...
Dear Lord...
They're pretty, though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:10:38
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
insaniak wrote:Rules... For shipping containers...
Dear Lord...
They're pretty, though.
I'm kind of on the fence about rules.
I think that it's likely just them bringing in rules from existing sources(Cities of Death/Stronghold Assault) and making it so that you don't have to say "We're playing Cities of Death" or "We're playing Stronghold Assault".
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:14:45
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
I’ve used BftBG over metallics before, and while I enjoy the results, I’d not describe them as “gem-like” At least in the sense of how GW has been telling us how to paint gems for years.
(Of course, I did use it for gems, among other things. But I’m a lazy painter)
I am looking forward to seeing how the new paints look. Technical paints are great for mediocre guys like myself.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:15:41
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Zywus wrote:gungo wrote:So which warehouse worker is going to get fired for selling multiple stolen GW products weeks in advance of its shipping date to retailers? Not only was this moron dumb enough to sell product well before anyone outside the warehouse has access to it but he was selling it well below the msrp and shipping it via eBay before the product even goes up for preorder. If GW doesn't fire someone at the warehouse for this I'll be surprised.
Link?
This container rumour originated from
http://m.ebay.co.uk/itm/201589860415?_mwBanner=1
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:16:24
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
About those bases, any indication somewhere that the design will continue to other bases so we can have a cohesive look to our army?
Or is cohesiveness for the weak?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:32:13
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Ultramarine Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
After some thought I'm betting that the gem paints are nothing more than the old ink paints, if that's the case, they're nothing special.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:35:23
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
oni wrote:After some thought I'm betting that the gem paints are nothing more than the old ink paints, if that's the case, they're nothing special.
That's pretty much what their shades are already. Maybe they're experimenting with the medium they're using?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:35:29
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
oni wrote:After some thought I'm betting that the gem paints are nothing more than the old ink paints, if that's the case, they're nothing special.
I, for one, would love to get my old “Blue Ink” back.
That new-fangled Drakenhoff(?) Nightshade just isn’t the same.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 20:42:01
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Ultramarine Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
gungo wrote: Zywus wrote:gungo wrote:So which warehouse worker is going to get fired for selling multiple stolen GW products weeks in advance of its shipping date to retailers? Not only was this moron dumb enough to sell product well before anyone outside the warehouse has access to it but he was selling it well below the msrp and shipping it via eBay before the product even goes up for preorder. If GW doesn't fire someone at the warehouse for this I'll be surprised.
Link?
This container rumour originated from
http://m.ebay.co.uk/itm/201589860415?_mwBanner=1
eBay is actually how we found out about the revamped paints with new names a couple years ago. Automatically Appended Next Post: Breotan wrote: oni wrote:After some thought I'm betting that the gem paints are nothing more than the old ink paints, if that's the case, they're nothing special.
That's pretty much what their shades are already. Maybe they're experimenting with the medium they're using?
The current Shades are no different than the Washes they had a few years ago. The Ink paints are circa 4th edition - they came in the old school bolter shell pots. The old Ink paints were more of a high gloss glaze.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/23 20:47:15
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 21:29:49
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Is it just me..... or would those shipping containers possibly look good for the basis of a non-ridiculous looking StormRaven conversion?
Immagine the shipping container with a StormTalon cockpit on the from, Storm Raven wings, and Valkyrie engines, landing gear, and tail.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 21:38:47
Subject: Re:GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
So I am willing to bet the Promethium Barrels do something like reroll wounds for Flamers or add Torrent to flamers. It is kinda neat that the shipping containers come with Storm bolters. I would laugh if they were basically Drop Pods without Drop Pod Assault.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 21:48:38
Subject: Re:GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
casvalremdeikun wrote:So I am willing to bet the Promethium Barrels do something like reroll wounds for Flamers or add Torrent to flamers. It is kinda neat that the shipping containers come with Storm bolters. I would laugh if they were basically Drop Pods without Drop Pod Assault.
Ehhh...they're likely going to be "Mysterious Terrain" with either Promethium Barrels or Supply Caches inside.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 21:59:29
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
Kanluwen wrote: insaniak wrote:Rules... For shipping containers...
Dear Lord...
They're pretty, though.
I'm kind of on the fence about rules.
I think that it's likely just them bringing in rules from existing sources(Cities of Death/Stronghold Assault) and making it so that you don't have to say "We're playing Cities of Death" or "We're playing Stronghold Assault".
Well, yeah, rules. Otherwise how would you know how the official rule for how they block line of sight? Make it up?
Anarchy!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/23 22:00:48
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 22:05:40
Subject: Re:GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Wraith
|
jullevi wrote:Nice containers. Must have lots. It's interesting to see that 32mm Imperialis bases match perfectly the 25mm and 40mm bases that I have been building using oop Imperialis Basing kit, including the thin edge-of-no-details. We haven't seen it all yet. The text on the left refers to Large Base Detail Kit. Pics please! Regarding the bolded. That is simply the topdown view of the smooth beveled edge that is on all gw bases.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/23 22:13:41
Bam, said the lady!
DR:70S+GM++B+I+Pw40k09/f++D++A(WTF)/hWD153R+++T(S)DM++++
Dakka, what is good in life?
To crush other websites,
See their user posts driven before you,
And hear the lamentation of the newbs.
-Frazzled-10/22/09 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 22:05:53
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Well better rules be in there then nothing at all. its a free bee. not much to really complain about.
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 22:11:57
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Eh, rules for LOS blockers sounds silly BUT we all know red barrels explode! So splodey rules could be fun and make them risky cover. And Storm bolters on the bawkses, because why not?
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 22:16:57
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Wraith
|
Storm Bolters?
So how do they stack the containers if there are SBs on them?
And all the wasted space for cargo with the non squared shape.
The arches on top were enough to get the 40k look.
Making the bottoms have tapered sides moved it into stupid territory.
I would have liked a crate/barrel set all on its own. like the one that had pallets included that they had back a few years ago.
|
Bam, said the lady!
DR:70S+GM++B+I+Pw40k09/f++D++A(WTF)/hWD153R+++T(S)DM++++
Dakka, what is good in life?
To crush other websites,
See their user posts driven before you,
And hear the lamentation of the newbs.
-Frazzled-10/22/09 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 22:21:45
Subject: Re:GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
Storm Bolters?
So how do they stack the containers if there are SBs on them?
And all the wasted space for cargo with the non squared shape.
The arches on top were enough to get the 40k look.
Making the bottoms have tapered sides moved it into stupid territory.
I would have liked a crate/barrel set all on its own. like the one that had pallets included that they had back a few years ago.
Must...be...gothic....
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/23 22:23:02
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 23:32:39
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
Light it up! Light it up!
I don't know if I will by multiples, but I will have at least one set.
I like them a lot.
|
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 23:33:03
Subject: Re:GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Kanluwen wrote: casvalremdeikun wrote:So I am willing to bet the Promethium Barrels do something like reroll wounds for Flamers or add Torrent to flamers. It is kinda neat that the shipping containers come with Storm bolters. I would laugh if they were basically Drop Pods without Drop Pod Assault.
Ehhh...they're likely going to be "Mysterious Terrain" with either Promethium Barrels or Supply Caches inside.
I don't know. They seem like they will be a little more than just that due to the Storm Bolters. But who knows. I know I will be getting a set for some more battlefield terrain. Some Quake Cannon Craters and some Crates and whatnot will make some great combinations.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 23:38:01
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
RogueSangre
The Cockatrice Malediction
|
lord_blackfang wrote:I'm surprised the crates don't have melee weapons, TBH. Maybe one of the polish companies could do an add-on.
Instead of storm bolters the Chaos ones have combi-bolters with bayonets.
Also you'd better pay for the shipping insurance because the crates have a tendency to eat the contents.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 01:12:54
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
skrulnik wrote:Storm Bolters?
So how do they stack the containers if there are SBs on them?
Take the storm bolters off?
I would assume that they're just fitted as required to the containers on the top of the stack, rather then being a permanent fixture.
And all the wasted space for cargo with the non squared shape..
That's a fairly common issue with scifi shipping containers... The square box is more functional, but ultimately doesn't look as sexy or futuristic on the table.
This is one of those places I'm more than happy to trade function for form, and go with what looks cool on the table.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 01:25:48
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
My brass and copper colors in both Vallejo and Citadel have all gone wiffy, so probably grabbing those, and I'll give the new technicals a go, because I likes my FX stuff.
Can't think of too many applications for a gloss wash, anyone?
|
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 02:06:47
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
As usual there are photos on the spikey bits forums. The washes are for keeping metallics shiny according to the blurb. The following week is crates, broodlord clam pack (Lord of the brood) and enginseer clampack (master of machines) according to the hint.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 03:49:50
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Chikout wrote: The following week is... enginseer clampack (master of machines) according to the hint.
The one that up until now has only been available with his own pet Leman Russ tank?
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 04:35:06
Subject: GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ghaz, you ninja  Would be really awesome though. Basic Russ is kinda useless and by themselves the Engineseers go for like 25 quid without postage :(
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 04:36:20
Subject: Re:GW - 40k - Munitorum Armoured Containers & Scenic bases (urban)
|
 |
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
I like them, a lot. My dreams of a space port table come closer to reality.
I just wish they were bigger, I'd love a container that could carry a chimera or rhino.
And rules
OMG random chart for what you find, machine spirit for the storm bolters, chance of exploding from a penetrating hit... the mind boggles how stupid this could get.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|