Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2017/05/27 16:10:44
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
Oh look a bigger verison of the box dreadnought to go with the bigger tactical marines and the bigger assualt marines and the bigger devastators....no way GW is replacing space marines with primaris.
2017/05/27 16:20:40
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
BrotherGecko wrote: Oh look a bigger verison of the box dreadnought to go with the bigger tactical marines and the bigger assualt marines and the bigger devastators....no way GW is replacing space marines with primaris.
Yea, but that won't prevent people from ignoring the writing pasted all over their walls.
EDIT: I don't actually mind an upscale BTW, though I won't be in any rush to buy the new guys considering I own about 360 fully painted and based old school marines.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/27 16:21:48
BrotherGecko wrote: Oh look a bigger verison of the box dreadnought to go with the bigger tactical marines and the bigger assualt marines and the bigger devastators....no way GW is replacing space marines with primaris.
You're correct, there's yet to be the slightest evidence.
2017/05/27 16:27:08
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
I'm trying to make out the psychic powers. Here's what I've got for Nurgle, but it's not great (things too blurry to make out are [???] and if I've put it in square brackets, I'm unsure of it):
Nurgle Discipline D3 Psychic power 1. [???] of Corruption --[???] of Corruption has a warp charge value of [5?]. If [marshalled?], [pick?] the closest enemy unit within 7" of the psyker. The unit suffers [D3] mortal wounds if it has fewer than 10 models and [D6] mortal wounds if it has 10 models or more. 2. [Virulent] Blessing --[Virulent] Blessing has a warp charge value of 6. If [marshalled], pick a Nurgle Daemon unit within [18]" of the psyker. You can add 1 to all wound rolls [made by this unit] in the Fight phase. [??????????????], any wound rolls of 7+ [???] that [unit] in the Fight phase [inflicts] double damage. 3. [Fl??? ???????] --{Fl??? ??????] has a warp charge value of of [?]. If [marshalled], select a friendly Nurgle Daemon unit within [16/18]" of the psyker. That unit [recovers] D6 [wounds] lost earlier in the battle
Pretty tough to make out. The top Tzeentch one is obviously a random buff affecting Tzeentch Daemons (+1 attack, +1 strength or +1 toughness) but my eyes already hurt from trying to do Nurgle alone.
Also, I'm slightly surprised GW put fully unobscured breasts next to the page. I guess if there was ever a step to make it more kid friendly, someone's thrown that in the bin - no need to worry about Slaanesh remaining then.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/27 16:29:43
2017/05/27 16:28:20
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
RoninXiC wrote: The current Dread is one of the worst models in the 40k line.. The legs are just plain bad.
The Whasing Machine with Baby legs is one of the most iconics thing of all of 40k. Is just a totally not-fuctional tomb with legs that can barely moves piloted by a guy that just keep fighting. Is the definition of 40k made model.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/27 16:29:08
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote: Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
2017/05/27 16:28:55
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
BrotherGecko wrote: Oh look a bigger verison of the box dreadnought to go with the bigger tactical marines and the bigger assualt marines and the bigger devastators....no way GW is replacing space marines with primaris.
Yea, but that won't prevent people from ignoring the writing pasted all over their walls.
EDIT: I don't actually mind an upscale BTW, though I won't be in any rush to buy the new guys considering I own about 360 fully painted and based old school marines.
I say why not! I can't wait to see the faces of the smug players I mow down with my "inferior" oop marines.
2017/05/27 16:29:32
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
So everyone will know Smite plus maybe a couple other powers.
You can make out a few basic rules from that, though it's stuff that was all confirmed in the Chaos Daemon Faction Focus article; i.e. Nurgle Daemons have the same Disgustingly Resilient special rule that all the Death Guard units have, whereas Tzeentch Daemons add 1 to their invulnerable saves, etc.
Can't make out much about the psychic powers or the Daemonic Ritual rule though. The first Tzeentch power involves a D3 roll and seems to give +1 Attack, +1 Strength or +1 Toughness based on that D3 roll.
2017/05/27 16:33:46
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
Anyone still going to argue Numarines are not using tau tech with the obvius Ghostkeel-based adaptation in this dude? the main gun is practically a Cyclic Ion Raker.
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now.
2017/05/27 16:44:34
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
Pretty pleased with the Genestealer Cults ability to take Imperial Guard formations. It's a good way to get some extra use out of my Guards both in matched play and narrative scenarios.
Aesthete wrote: Pretty pleased with the Genestealer Cults ability to take Imperial Guard formations. It's a good way to get some extra use out of my Guards both in matched play and narrative scenarios.
The article didn't make it sound like it had anything to do with GSC, rather that literally anything can ally with anything in 8th Ed.
11527pts Total (7400pts painted)
4980pts Total (4980pts painted)
3730 Total (210pts painted)
2017/05/27 16:49:27
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
Aesthete wrote: Pretty pleased with the Genestealer Cults ability to take Imperial Guard formations. It's a good way to get some extra use out of my Guards both in matched play and narrative scenarios.
The article didn't make it sound like it had anything to do with GSC, rather that literally anything can ally with anything in 8th Ed.
Spoiler:
One of my favourite aspects of the Genestealer Cults, though, is their ability to form their army using both their own faction, Tyranids and Astra Militarum, too. Huzzah! Due to the way that allies worked in the previous edition, making an army that mixed Genestealer Cult units and Astra Militarum wasn’t always straightforward. These are, of course, not “real” Astra Militarum, but devoted followers of the Cult who have turned from the Emperor’s light and betrayed their fellow man. The way it works in the new Warhammer 40,000 is really fun. You can take one Astra Militarum Detachment for each Genestealer Cults Detachment in your Battle-forged army. They each need to be entirely comprised of units with their respective keyword, but this allows incredible amounts of diversity in your army that is also quite characterful.
I guess it could be read as a description of new ally rules. I personally read it as a GSC army ability that for every GSC detachment they can take a AM or Tyranid one.
*witty comment regarding table top gaming*
2017/05/27 16:51:48
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
Aesthete wrote: Pretty pleased with the Genestealer Cults ability to take Imperial Guard formations. It's a good way to get some extra use out of my Guards both in matched play and narrative scenarios.
The article didn't make it sound like it had anything to do with GSC, rather that literally anything can ally with anything in 8th Ed.
I would assume that you wouldn't be able to take AM and GC in the same army without them having a special allowance to do so as neither would share any keywords. Nids and GC will probably both share "Tyranid" so they can just mix in normally. I expect all units in your army will need at least one high level keyword in common such as "Imperium", "Chaos", "Eldar", "Ork", "Tyranid" etc..
2017/05/27 16:52:00
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
Yeah now that I've had time to look it over that Dread has exactly the same number and arrangement of hard points as a Leviathan dread, whilst being significantly less cool. Pass.
As for the Tau thing: If they didn't mean for Cawl to be ripping off the Tau they've certainly did a phenomenal job of accidental parallels given he's invented imperial crisis suits.
2017/05/27 16:57:13
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
changemod wrote: Yeah now that I've had time to look it over that Dread has exactly the same number and arrangement of hard points as a Leviathan dread, whilst being significantly less cool. Pass.
As for the Tau thing: If they didn't mean for Cawl to be ripping off the Tau they've certainly did a phenomenal job of accidental parallels given he's invented imperial crisis suits.
Ah, the eternal question, 'angry hamster ball or angry washing machine?'
2027/03/04 23:04:34
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
changemod wrote: Yeah now that I've had time to look it over that Dread has exactly the same number and arrangement of hard points as a Leviathan dread, whilst being significantly less cool. Pass.
As for the Tau thing: If they didn't mean for Cawl to be ripping off the Tau they've certainly did a phenomenal job of accidental parallels given he's invented imperial crisis suits.
I feel the opposite - I hate the Leviathan Dread, it looks like someone stuffed pillows under the armour and the guy inside got really fat because it's softly rounded. This dread comes across as Leviathan mk II to me, or a mini warhound.
As for Tau resemblance, I don't see it. About the only thing they share in common is the 3 circular tanks at the bottom; everything else looks pretty much like the old Dread plasma cannon.
2017/05/27 17:05:28
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
BrotherGecko wrote: Oh look a bigger verison of the box dreadnought to go with the bigger tactical marines and the bigger assualt marines and the bigger devastators....no way GW is replacing space marines with primaris.
Yea, but that won't prevent people from ignoring the writing pasted all over their walls.
EDIT: I don't actually mind an upscale BTW, though I won't be in any rush to buy the new guys considering I own about 360 fully painted and based old school marines.
I say why not! I can't wait to see the faces of the smug players I mow down with my "inferior" oop marines.
Yea I know it right, although it makes finishing the guys I have on sprues or in the painting queue all the harder to finish.
changemod wrote: Yeah now that I've had time to look it over that Dread has exactly the same number and arrangement of hard points as a Leviathan dread, whilst being significantly less cool. Pass.
As for the Tau thing: If they didn't mean for Cawl to be ripping off the Tau they've certainly did a phenomenal job of accidental parallels given he's invented imperial crisis suits.
Until something is actually revealed that draws this...'connection' a little clearer, let's just leave this tangent behind, OK?
Thanks!
2017/05/27 17:10:33
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 27 May 2017: Rule Book Leak\WHfest Live Blog(all info in OP)
changemod wrote: Yeah now that I've had time to look it over that Dread has exactly the same number and arrangement of hard points as a Leviathan dread, whilst being significantly less cool. Pass.
As for the Tau thing: If they didn't mean for Cawl to be ripping off the Tau they've certainly did a phenomenal job of accidental parallels given he's invented imperial crisis suits.
It's also hard to ignore the coincidence that is the Tau's location near the Ultramarines as well