Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 16:08:10
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
I think we've covered the two sides of possible viewpoints on SoB release / non-releases well enough, now.
Let's drop that and return to the topic of 40k release schedule based on the current info we have. Thanks all
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 16:13:47
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
NM.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/02 16:14:09
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 16:19:27
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Crazyterran wrote:I suspect we'll see KDK/World Eaters whenever they are getting ready to release Angron. Either will make sense for Angron, since Angron is pretty firmly team Khorne, rather than mostly his own thing like Kharn.
That makes no sense. Khorne Daemonkin are a religious cult worshipping Bloothirsters as deities. That was why Kharn, Karanak and a few other, less-than-religious guys weren't in the codex. I doubt Angron would've found the faith and been grovelling at the feet of Bloodthirsters 10,000 years later.
If they absolutely have to dumb down everything Chaos in 40K 8th with Heresy-references, they probably should include some Khorne-only Word Bearer guys like the Sanctified in KDK, but certainly no World Eater stuff. Overall, I'd certainly prefer KDK, Crimson Slaughter, etc.. to remain Heresy-free, no Heresy-characters, no VotlW, etc..
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/03/02 16:23:33
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 16:20:40
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Sunny Side Up wrote: Crazyterran wrote:I suspect we'll see KDK/World Eaters whenever they are getting ready to release Angron. Either will make sense for Angron, since Angron is pretty firmly team Khorne, rather than mostly his own thing like Kharn.
That makes no sense. Khorne Daemonkin are a religious cult worshipping Bloothirsters as deities. That was why Kharn, Karanak and a few other, less-than-religious guys weren't in the codex. I doubt Angron would've found the faith and been grovelling at the feet of Bloodthirsters 10,000 years later.
Given the last time he was given stats he had an entire bodyguard of Bloodthirsters, I really doubt that as well.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 16:36:42
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
Had to remove a few posts. Let's stay on topic and drop the tangent from last page. Thanks all
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/02 16:37:02
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 16:39:48
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
Seems like it'd work fine for KDK if you establish that Angron is one of the entities being worshipped.
But as ZebioLizard said, what we'll get is Codex: World Eaters -- possibly with some kind of evolution of Blood Tithe. And I expect that the fluff will see Kharn returning to the fold somewhat and he'll therefore be in the codex. Note that this has happened with both Ahriman and Typhus.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 16:53:39
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
I'm surprised that both Ahriman and Typhus returned to their parent legions, as both were seen as outlaws / rogue elements.
Isn't Khârn an outcast due to his breaking of two Legions?
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 17:15:21
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
BrookM wrote:I'm surprised that both Ahriman and Typhus returned to their parent legions, as both were seen as outlaws / rogue elements.
Isn't Khârn an outcast due to his breaking of two Legions?
Breaking of his own legion. Basically he had the flipout to end all flipouts, butchering a bunch of his own guys. The WE turned on each other and then fragmented into smaller warbands and ceased to be a functioning legion.
So the narrative for the codex will likely be a return of the prodigal son thing, with the reforming of the WE legion under Angron another sign that End Times have truly arrived, etc.
Basically the narrative for all these legions is evolving to allow for all of the affiliated units to be captured in a single codex. I'm sure there are folks upset by this, but to me it only makes sense. *shrug*
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/02 17:15:46
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 17:25:47
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
Didn't the Emperor's Children also break during that event?
It would be neat if they also got their own codex, complete with a big ass Naga Primarch.
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 17:34:41
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Ute nation
|
The world eaters reforming into a legion seems a bit unlikely, It's not like Angron ever wanted to lead a legion in the first place, and what's left of Kharns brain after millenia of the nails cooking his noodle probably isn't capable of the detachment necessary to effectively lead a legion ethier. I think it's more likely they could be the exception to the legion per god thing, and instead of getting codex world eaters, we get codex khorne daemonkin and friends.
|
Constantly being negative doesn't make you seem erudite, it just makes you look like a curmudgeon. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 17:59:15
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Northridge, CA
|
Angron clearly DOES want to reform and lead his legion, as seen in the lore for the First War for Armageddon where he successfully gathers the legion together with the Khorne Daemon legions to invade the planet. It was temporary but he WOULD like his legion to at least be able to attack a common foe without killing themselves.
...In this case, the unity of the powers of Chaos was triggered by the arrival of the Space Hulk Devourer of Stars around a Daemon World within the Eye of Terror that was controlled by the Daemon Prince and former Primarch Angron and his World Eaters Traitor Legion. Angron had spent much of the last 10 millennia attempting to restore some level of unity amongst the divided warbands of what had once been his XII Legion of Space Marines. The World Eaters' dedication to the Blood God Khorne during the Horus Heresy had reduced them for much of that time into a fractious force of Khornate Berserkers just as likely to kill each other as their true foes. The emergence of the Devourer of Stars into orbit around Angron's Daemon World provided just the opportunity he had been looking for to recreate some semblance of common purpose for his scattered Legion. The Space Hulk proved sufficiently large enough to carry huge numbers of Chaotic troops but only on an erratic course into realspace. This is how the Forces of Chaos unexpectedly emerged from the Warp aboard the Space Hulk in the Armageddon System in 444.M41.
http://warhammer40k.wikia.com/wiki/First_War_for_Armageddon
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/02 18:00:01
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:00:45
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
Are we expecting to hear the next codex today or tomorrow, alongside T'au preorders, or will it not be until next weekend?
|
Setekh the Eternal, Phaeron of the Kopakh Dynasty, Regent of Nephthys 7660pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:05:19
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
BrookM wrote:I'm surprised that both Ahriman and Typhus returned to their parent legions, as both were seen as outlaws / rogue elements.
Isn't Khârn an outcast due to his breaking of two Legions?
He's not an outcast as there's nothing to be an outcast from - the WE legion doesn't exist in any recognisable form. You have a series of fractured warbands which are descended from the WE legion, but there's no central command structure to put a proper military organisation in place.
Kharn is more of a figure of legend than anything else - all Berzerkers would look up to him as a figure of aspiration[though this would mean they aspire to kill him and take his place, as is the behaviour of CSM] and follow him, though this would manifest as following in his wake rather than following his command.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:07:24
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
Scarey Nerd wrote:Are we expecting to hear the next codex today or tomorrow, alongside T'au preorders, or will it not be until next weekend?
Tau preorder is the 10th. We might know which is next if it goes for preorder the following week, otherwise we probably won’t know until the Sunday before it goes for preorder.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:07:42
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Powerful Ushbati
|
I hope the new Tau Codex gives riptides 20 wounds @ T8.
And I hope stealth suits get -2 to incoming shots.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:08:24
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
We won't know which codex is next until they make their weekly Sunday announcement as to what's going on preorder at the end of the week and that codex is listed.
Also note, Codex T'au is not on preorder this week.
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2018/02/25/coming-next-week-shadow-ruins/
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:17:03
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
We'll find out soon enough eh.
|
gorgon wrote: BrookM wrote:I'm surprised that both Ahriman and Typhus returned to their parent legions, as both were seen as outlaws / rogue elements.
Isn't Khârn an outcast due to his breaking of two Legions?
Breaking of his own legion. Basically he had the flipout to end all flipouts, butchering a bunch of his own guys. The WE turned on each other and then fragmented into smaller warbands and ceased to be a functioning legion.
So the narrative for the codex will likely be a return of the prodigal son thing, with the reforming of the WE legion under Angron another sign that End Times have truly arrived, etc.
Basically the narrative for all these legions is evolving to allow for all of the affiliated units to be captured in a single codex. I'm sure there are folks upset by this, but to me it only makes sense. *shrug*
I mean, it's not illogical, but is it necessary? I don't ever recall feeling a need for stuff to be all neatly roped together in an "official" narrative just because they shared a codex, as long as they were mechanically able to interact and had some evident connection to the theme of the book that was enough, and doing things this way really seems to be leading to "Small World Syndrome" where everything important happening everywhere in the galaxy features the same dozen or so characters. "This book has all the Khorne-aligned Marine stuff in it, use it how you like" is perfectly sufficient IMO. But I suspect the disconnect with GW's modern direction is that last bit there, they've moved away from providing a setting for us to do what we want with in favour of doling out a storyline that you either participate in or make do with nothing.
|
I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:29:02
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
Colorado
|
Togusa wrote:I hope the new Tau Codex gives riptides 20 wounds @ T8.
And I hope stealth suits get -2 to incoming shots.
I certainly hope not! Riptides should be decently durable so as to not be considered a glass cannon but they shouldn't be as tough as a Monolith. Sorry, but no.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:29:45
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Kid_Kyoto
|
Has there been anything official actually said about the Tau release other than the little WD bit?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:36:48
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
Yodhrin wrote: gorgon wrote: BrookM wrote:I'm surprised that both Ahriman and Typhus returned to their parent legions, as both were seen as outlaws / rogue elements.
Isn't Khârn an outcast due to his breaking of two Legions?
Breaking of his own legion. Basically he had the flipout to end all flipouts, butchering a bunch of his own guys. The WE turned on each other and then fragmented into smaller warbands and ceased to be a functioning legion.
So the narrative for the codex will likely be a return of the prodigal son thing, with the reforming of the WE legion under Angron another sign that End Times have truly arrived, etc.
Basically the narrative for all these legions is evolving to allow for all of the affiliated units to be captured in a single codex. I'm sure there are folks upset by this, but to me it only makes sense. *shrug*
I mean, it's not illogical, but is it necessary? I don't ever recall feeling a need for stuff to be all neatly roped together in an "official" narrative just because they shared a codex, as long as they were mechanically able to interact and had some evident connection to the theme of the book that was enough, and doing things this way really seems to be leading to "Small World Syndrome" where everything important happening everywhere in the galaxy features the same dozen or so characters. "This book has all the Khorne-aligned Marine stuff in it, use it how you like" is perfectly sufficient IMO. But I suspect the disconnect with GW's modern direction is that last bit there, they've moved away from providing a setting for us to do what we want with in favour of doling out a storyline that you either participate in or make do with nothing.
Nothing's necessary. But I think that it's simply dumb to keep Kharn separate from a Khorne book because of narrative nuance. People identify Kharn with Khorne...and they're supposed to, because GW intentionally named the character that way. What's more, 'Where's Kharn?" was a common refrain when the old KDK book was released.
This time around they'll give players what they want, and a more intuitive approach to content organization.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 18:46:23
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Powerful Ushbati
|
v0iddrgn wrote: Togusa wrote:I hope the new Tau Codex gives riptides 20 wounds @ T8.
And I hope stealth suits get -2 to incoming shots.
I certainly hope not! Riptides should be decently durable so as to not be considered a glass cannon but they shouldn't be as tough as a Monolith. Sorry, but no.
My attempt at levity and sarcasm failed. :( Automatically Appended Next Post: I had an idea for a change to Marker Lights.
"A unit with marker lights may forego shooting during their shooting phase in order to mark a target. This unit may not move or charge. A unit marked by a marker light has failed shooting attacks made against it of a 1 rerolled, and seeker missiles hit on normal ballistic skill when targeting marked unit."
Fluffy, and accurate to what a laser designator actually does.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/02 18:55:57
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 19:05:41
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
Just put Kharn in the Khorne Codex and have his lore saying that he don't follow their religious principles but hes the damm Kharn and he goes where is carnage.
|
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 20:45:51
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
We'll find out soon enough eh.
|
gorgon wrote: Yodhrin wrote: gorgon wrote: BrookM wrote:I'm surprised that both Ahriman and Typhus returned to their parent legions, as both were seen as outlaws / rogue elements.
Isn't Khârn an outcast due to his breaking of two Legions?
Breaking of his own legion. Basically he had the flipout to end all flipouts, butchering a bunch of his own guys. The WE turned on each other and then fragmented into smaller warbands and ceased to be a functioning legion.
So the narrative for the codex will likely be a return of the prodigal son thing, with the reforming of the WE legion under Angron another sign that End Times have truly arrived, etc.
Basically the narrative for all these legions is evolving to allow for all of the affiliated units to be captured in a single codex. I'm sure there are folks upset by this, but to me it only makes sense. *shrug*
I mean, it's not illogical, but is it necessary? I don't ever recall feeling a need for stuff to be all neatly roped together in an "official" narrative just because they shared a codex, as long as they were mechanically able to interact and had some evident connection to the theme of the book that was enough, and doing things this way really seems to be leading to "Small World Syndrome" where everything important happening everywhere in the galaxy features the same dozen or so characters. "This book has all the Khorne-aligned Marine stuff in it, use it how you like" is perfectly sufficient IMO. But I suspect the disconnect with GW's modern direction is that last bit there, they've moved away from providing a setting for us to do what we want with in favour of doling out a storyline that you either participate in or make do with nothing.
Nothing's necessary. But I think that it's simply dumb to keep Kharn separate from a Khorne book because of narrative nuance. People identify Kharn with Khorne...and they're supposed to, because GW intentionally named the character that way. What's more, 'Where's Kharn?" was a common refrain when the old KDK book was released.
This time around they'll give players what they want, and a more intuitive approach to content organization.
Where did I say they shouldn't put Kharn in the Khorne book? I said they don't need to write some big convoluted storyline to do so, he's already aligned with Khorne, so IMO just put him in the book and let players decide what the story reason for him being in their army is.
|
I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/02 23:45:45
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
They're constantly being obnoxious about it though. Nobody is allowed to complain about their model status whatsoever, even Chaos Marines with their ghastly Havocs or Eldar with their Finecrap Aspect Warriors, as long as Sisters players are posting. Even I have experienced this, who was told to shut it about wanting different Flayed Ones instead of the current...things.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/03 01:01:51
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Powerful Ushbati
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
They're constantly being obnoxious about it though. Nobody is allowed to complain about their model status whatsoever, even Chaos Marines with their ghastly Havocs or Eldar with their Finecrap Aspect Warriors, as long as Sisters players are posting. Even I have experienced this, who was told to shut it about wanting different Flayed Ones instead of the current...things.
I have experienced this as well. I once said I'd love to have plastic Lictors, I might have also mentioned plastic Fireblade. And I was shouted down by three sisters fans to the point that I left the facebook group.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/03 01:15:31
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
The same the world over...
BrookM wrote:I'm surprised that both Ahriman and Typhus returned to their parent legions, as both were seen as outlaws / rogue elements.
When you think about it, all the Legion-specific special Characters are/were renegades.
Typhus and Morty hate each other.
Ahriman and Magnus hate each other.
Kharn is responsible for his legion breaking apart, and I doubt Angron has much love for him.
Fabius basically wants nothing to do with the Emperor's Children.
(Lucius came later)
Form a narrative perspective I think it'd be better to leave them as opposing groups, so that not every army you build has to be in the same mindset. "Oh my Death Guard follow Typhus' example!" "My World Eaters are true loyalists and stuck with Angron after the breakup of the legion!", things like that, rather than "I play 1KSons, we do what ever Lord Nipplehorns says.".
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/03 01:35:14
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
We'll find out soon enough eh.
|
But if they did that, people might not buy Lord Nipplehorns.
|
I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/03 01:35:18
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
Thats the lore of both the TS codex and the DG Codex. Theres the bulk of the legions that follow the primarch (This is more prevalent in DG because they are one of the more organized Chaos Legions), then theres a big group that follow Ahriman/Typhus (In the case of Typhus they are inside the organization of the Death Guard but they act much more independently), and then theres other smaller groups that are more like "renegade" warbands, or follow other Chaos Lords in mixed Chaos groups, etc...
I don't see why you are asuming that is gonna change in a future World Eaters Codex. Youll have the bulk that follow Argron, a bunch that follow Kharn, and then groups that do whatever they want.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2018/03/03 01:37:29
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/03 02:00:37
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
To be fair to Ahriman he got cast out because Magnus was really, really pissed over everyone becoming dust. When Magnus forgave Ahriman and called him back, there was no real issue.
Kharn just went his separate way. Typhus is the one that actively rebelled and honestly dislikes the way Typhus does things, Fabius just doesn't really care about chaos as a whole and just wants to do his fancy experiments (Lucius would probably agree to come back to Fulgrim though, Lucius just wants to continue fighting the best of the best)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/03 02:20:13
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
Any GSC on that scheduel?
|
|
|
 |
 |
|