Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Zed wrote: *All statements reflect my opinion at this moment. if some sort of pretty new model gets released (or if I change my mind at random) I reserve the right to jump on any bandwagon at will.
You’ll also get a bitter taste of the Ash Wastes of Necromunda in a special Battle Report, pitching the Ash Waste Nomads against an Orlock gang tooled up in outdoor gear.
Quite obviously I mean that it's locked behind the W+ paywall.
I have no problems with video batreps from them to showcase new things. I have a problem when they could, instead of dripfeeding out itty bitty rules teasers here and there, have a decent showcase.
Zed wrote: *All statements reflect my opinion at this moment. if some sort of pretty new model gets released (or if I change my mind at random) I reserve the right to jump on any bandwagon at will.
Chopstick wrote: Paying to see an ad early is quite a GW thing to do.
Exactly. Thats what Games Days were all about. Thats also what Gen Con is all about. If people would srop paying for that privilege, then you might see it stop.
So i see something in on W+? I automatically discard it from my mind as it doesnt even exist to me. If im around people talking about it, i go find something else to do. Better things to spend my attention on than such things.
Chopstick wrote: Paying to see an ad early is quite a GW thing to do.
Exactly. Thats what Games Days were all about. Thats also what Gen Con is all about. If people would srop paying for that privilege, then you might see it stop.
So i see something in on W+? I automatically discard it from my mind as it doesnt even exist to me. If im around people talking about it, i go find something else to do. Better things to spend my attention on than such things.
Well, personally, when I attended both, it was about playing games. And getting free swag. And (for gen con) a lot of vendors I don't normally have in-person access to (and the last time I went was pre-Amazon or Ebay, so that mattered a lot more). For Games Day, better access to Forge World mattered at the time, too.
If you were/are going to either for 'ads,' I'm really not sure what you're doing. Especially given GW's non-presence at GenCon, and their terrible seminars at Games Day (Also known as the 'We can't talk about <subject>' talks)
It does make sense to do the Orlock SC with the Orlocks.
Somehow that looks less bad than starter box quads, even if I'm not completely certain the launcher is attached to the bike (physics would have fun with the gunner if its not) and a belt fed missile launcher on a quad just inherently bothers me. There is some sort of stabilizer arm that is half-hidden behind the missiles, so I guess it is.
However, I really can't unseen the princess from Disney's Brave screeching at enemies in an unreasonable thick brogue, and I'm not sure if that's a good or bad thing.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/04/18 15:10:13
It looks like a pretty standard launcher design, so shouldn't blast her off the back (the backwash counters the recoil). Just don't stand behind her...
ChargerIIC wrote: If algae farm paste with a little bit of your grandfather in it isn't Grimdark I don't know what is.
So the woman seems to be standing? Not even sitting like the vanilla squad gunner who lacks a backrest? House Orlock must be a subsidiary of Walmart as their cashiers are not allowed to sit either which makes working a chore. Seems working conditions haven´t changed in the future. Poor sods. Calling it now: After a campaign ends all gunners have probably to retire due to back problems.