Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Being go through my ePub copy of PA Saga of the Beast.

Happy to report Big Mek with KFF is back.

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
Being go through my ePub copy of PA Saga of the Beast.

Happy to report Big Mek with KFF is back.

I mean, the datasheet showed up in the ToC preview - but do they show a model for him, and if so, is it new?

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
Being go through my ePub copy of PA Saga of the Beast.

Happy to report Big Mek with KFF is back.

You're a bit behind the curve. We're currently waiting for the FAQ for the numerous issues with the datasheet.

Ah, fair enough


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 Dysartes wrote:

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
Being go through my ePub copy of PA Saga of the Beast.

Happy to report Big Mek with KFF is back.

I mean, the datasheet showed up in the ToC preview - but do they show a model for him, and if so, is it new?

Sadly not.

Gaen wrote:
So last PA book is going to be Necron, Harleis, Inquisition and DW or are we missing some more?

Inquisition were never on the original faction list, people keep mixing them up with the Deathwatch icon.

DW, Sisters, Necrons & Harlies could make for one or two PA books depending how much they want to stretch things.

 xttz wrote:

Gaen wrote:
So last PA book is going to be Necron, Harleis, Inquisition and DW or are we missing some more?

Inquisition were never on the original faction list, people keep mixing them up with the Deathwatch icon.

DW, Sisters, Necrons & Harlies could make for one or two PA books depending how much they want to stretch things.

Sure, but Assassins and a double-dip into Chaos Marines / "Agents of Bile" weren't on the original faction list either. And the preview claim "new rules" for the assassins as well now (?), so not just a White Dwarf re-print? Kinda throws the door wide open again.

 Dysartes wrote:

tneva82 wrote:

 Grimtuff wrote:


Prove it.

GW flat out saying so is not proof enough?

Lol why GW even bothers to say anything when players don't believe them

If you've been keeping an eye on the thread, that's probably a jab at some of Apple Peel's lunacy on the previous page regarding the Lion, more than anything else.

And looking at your posting over a couple of threads today, dude, you might need to take a step away from the forum and re-centre yourself.

He asks proof for what GW flat out said open. Why should anybody need to prove it to him when GW already did? He's just being lazy denier. "no it can't be true. GW said it is so so obviously it's false. Prove me otherwise!"

GW provided proof. What else any forum user can provide as proof? What other info forum user has that GW doesn't have? Do YOU know better than GW?

You don't need to follow this forum to find the proof. Just what GW says. Don't read forums for news. Read what GW says. They provide you faster and more reliably.

tneva82 wrote:

 Dysartes wrote:

tneva82 wrote:

 Grimtuff wrote:


Prove it.

GW flat out saying so is not proof enough?

Lol why GW even bothers to say anything when players don't believe them

If you've been keeping an eye on the thread, that's probably a jab at some of Apple Peel's lunacy on the previous page regarding the Lion, more than anything else.

And looking at your posting over a couple of threads today, dude, you might need to take a step away from the forum and re-centre yourself.

He asks proof for what GW flat out said open. Why should anybody need to prove it to him when GW already did? He's just being lazy denier. "no it can't be true. GW said it is so so obviously it's false. Prove me otherwise!"

No, it was a joke.

Glad my fellow Brits can see the obvious veiled jab being thrown...

Better prove it was really meant as a joke!!

Sunny Side Up wrote:
Better prove it was really meant as a joke!!

M E T A
E
T
A

 ImAGeek wrote:

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
It's almost silly how much better the new Bile is. GW did a good job on this one.

It’s awesome. Everything is pretty much identical to the old one, just better.

Yeeeeeah! He looks badass.

 NinthMusketeer wrote:

 ImAGeek wrote:

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
It's almost silly how much better the new Bile is. GW did a good job on this one.

It’s awesome. Everything is pretty much identical to the old one, just better.

Yeeeeeah! He looks badass.

I like that there isn't any terrain he's standing on. I've absolutely hated that recent trend,

 Dysartes wrote:

tneva82 wrote:

 Grimtuff wrote:


Prove it.

GW flat out saying so is not proof enough?

Lol why GW even bothers to say anything when players don't believe them

If you've been keeping an eye on the thread, that's probably a jab at some of Apple Peel's lunacy on the previous page regarding the Lion, more than anything else.

And looking at your posting over a couple of threads today, dude, you might need to take a step away from the forum and re-centre yourself.

Put him on ignore, best decision I've made on these forums.

Holy gak did someone seriously claim that the Lion, who had a specific Horus Heresy logo before his promotion, was part of PA? Lol. Insane.

 An Actual Englishman wrote:
Holy gak did someone seriously claim that the Lion, who had a specific Horus Heresy logo before his promotion, was part of PA? Lol. Insane.

I posted the new conjoined pic that was new that concerned PA and people got butthurt about it. Besides, this was before the stream actually got going to any info at the time.

 An Actual Englishman wrote:
Holy gak did someone seriously claim that the Lion, who had a specific Horus Heresy logo before his promotion, was part of PA? Lol. Insane.

apparently.

Engine War article

Alright, so breakdown time!
The two Pteraxii units are called the:
Sterylizors


Skystalkers


The Archaeopter variants:
Transvector is the transport variant


Fusilave is the bomber variant


Stratoraptor is the gunship variant

The kit is incredibly customisable, with optional wargear and the ability to be built in flying or landed mode, with the landing skids and legs modelled in different positions.

No point rehashing the cavalry, since we knew them before.

New Engine artcile with better shots of the new models
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2020/03/30/engine-war-requisition-approvedgw-homepage-post-2/

haha beaten to the punch^

I’m not sure how I feel about ‘Sterylizors’ haha.

Well, it doesn't seem like they're slowing down on the pa previews. So maybe they are saving the big stuff originally slated for Adepticon for this weekend.

C'mon new fw Indexes.

Edit:

Oops, wrong thread.

The new Skitarii look like they'll go seamlessly next to the Skitarii we already have. Shame points are always so limited!

CAVALRY




Every time I see them I want to think of ways to add some to an AoS army. But as I don't collect Cities of Sigmar I'm at a loss each time - Chaos, Daughters of Khaine - Slaanesh - Bonereapers - gah none of them use machine firebreathing hosedogs

They're great, I'll definitely be picking those up. Possibly the birdmen too but probably not the ornithopter for me.

These new Ad Mech units are actually starting to grow on me. I really didn’t like them at first, but I’m beginning to quite like them. They are, at least, much better than the ugly hovercraft.

Still not a patch on FW’s Heresy era Mechanicum though.

pariah, next book after spider?

zamerion wrote:


pariah, next book after spider?

I'm interested...

Could this be an actual meaningful development in this series of books?

Pariah has to be Necrons no? Hopefully they get a decent release (for a change).

 An Actual Englishman wrote:
Pariah has to be Necrons no? Hopefully they get a decent release (for a change).

It could also be a reference to Sisters of Silence.

 MonkeyBallistic wrote:

 An Actual Englishman wrote:
Pariah has to be Necrons no? Hopefully they get a decent release (for a change).

It could also be a reference to Sisters of Silence.

Nope - they're confirmed in War of the Spider aren't they?