Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Mr_Rose wrote: We could have it completely wrong and it actually should say “melamine” referring to the (sensibly) long-forbidden practice of covering useful surfaces in tacky synthetic veneer. Just another mark of the true depths of depravity the Dark Mechanicum is prepared to sink to.
The horror! Those hereteks should stick to skulls and brasswork!
Now I'm imaging a Dark Mechanicum ship, but the interior is all 80's decor with veneers and dado rails... *Shudder*
Can you hear the piped-in elevator music in all corridors too?
It's deliberately tinny and loops endlessly, but the loop is a bit jarring and poorly synchronised...
ChargerIIC wrote: If algae farm paste with a little bit of your grandfather in it isn't Grimdark I don't know what is.
Could be worse, could be post Mark & Lard Radio One, specifically Friday Radio One, once again declaring the forthcoming weekend “a big one” and playing endless “can anyone tell when one track ends and another begins?” dunce music.
Fed up of Scalpers? But still want your Exclusives? Why not join us?
Mr_Rose wrote: We could have it completely wrong and it actually should say “melamine” referring to the (sensibly) long-forbidden practice of covering useful surfaces in tacky synthetic veneer. Just another mark of the true depths of depravity the Dark Mechanicum is prepared to sink to.
The horror! Those hereteks should stick to skulls and brasswork!
Now I'm imaging a Dark Mechanicum ship, but the interior is all 80's decor with veneers and dado rails... *Shudder*
Can you hear the piped-in elevator music in all corridors too?
It's deliberately tinny and loops endlessly, but the loop is a bit jarring and poorly synchronised...
That'll be the theme music from "Hong Kong '97" then...
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-px27tzAtVwZpZ4ljopV2w "ashtrays and teacups do not count as cover"
"jack of all trades, master of none; certainly better than a master of one"
The Ordo Reductor - the guy's who make wonderful things like the Landraider Achillies, but can't use them in battle..
i just want to know if the new book has the same quality controll as the last one.... e.g. NONE AT ALL because dear lord blackshields still don't work-
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/766717.page A Mostly Renegades and Heretics blog.
GW:"Space marines got too many options to balance, therefore we decided to legends HH units." Players: "why?!? Now we finally got decent plastic kits and you cut them?" Chaos marines players: "Since when are Daemonengines 30k models and why do i have NO droppods now?" GW" MONEY.... erm i meant TOO MANY OPTIONS (to resell your army to you again by disalowing former units)! Do you want specific tyranid fighiting Primaris? Even a new sabotage lieutnant!" Chaos players: Guess i stop playing or go to HH.
Mr_Rose wrote: Wait, black shields? What’s wrong with them?
If you’d said shattered legions I’d have sort of agreed but the black shield rules are fine.
if you read the oaths f.e.: "Panoply of old is rather" infamous due to a lack of definition, making it basically unusuable.
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/766717.page A Mostly Renegades and Heretics blog.
GW:"Space marines got too many options to balance, therefore we decided to legends HH units." Players: "why?!? Now we finally got decent plastic kits and you cut them?" Chaos marines players: "Since when are Daemonengines 30k models and why do i have NO droppods now?" GW" MONEY.... erm i meant TOO MANY OPTIONS (to resell your army to you again by disalowing former units)! Do you want specific tyranid fighiting Primaris? Even a new sabotage lieutnant!" Chaos players: Guess i stop playing or go to HH.
Gert wrote: So, one example that can be solved with the old adage of "Don't be a tryhard".
The Shattered Legion rules are way more of a pain in the butt.
ohh nooo it goes on and on with the oaths. The Panoply is just so badly written and often kind of necessary for blackshields that it is my go to exemple, but the shattered ones i agree are worse.
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/766717.page A Mostly Renegades and Heretics blog.
GW:"Space marines got too many options to balance, therefore we decided to legends HH units." Players: "why?!? Now we finally got decent plastic kits and you cut them?" Chaos marines players: "Since when are Daemonengines 30k models and why do i have NO droppods now?" GW" MONEY.... erm i meant TOO MANY OPTIONS (to resell your army to you again by disalowing former units)! Do you want specific tyranid fighiting Primaris? Even a new sabotage lieutnant!" Chaos players: Guess i stop playing or go to HH.
Gert wrote: So, one example that can be solved with the old adage of "Don't be a tryhard".
The Shattered Legion rules are way more of a pain in the butt.
In either case, the original point that the book could have done with a few additional rounds of playtesting and proofreading is well proven I think. I wouldn't hold out too much hope of the next one being an improvement tbh except insofar as it probably won't include army building rules that deviate so much from the standard template and so will have less to rooster up - and I'm not being negative incidentally, just encouraging realism, we already know that SGS are obviously either strained for resources, prefer "here you go, sort it out for yourselves" as a publishing strategy, or both based on Nucromunda, AT etc. It just is what it is.
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote: This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote: You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something...
Glorious! The LI stuff is pretty thin on the Astartes dept, once we have the Tallarn book we'll know what else is coming..
"The larger point though, is that as players, we have more control over what the game looks and feels like than most of us are willing to use in order to solve our own problems"
SamusDrake wrote: Given the requirement to field a Knight, would it not have been better to have had a Knight and two Armigers? Its pretty cool mind, but just odd.
Oddly it's the same configuration for the LI box for that pair as well. I guess they must share some parts of sprues?