Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2013/03/26 17:38:13
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Stubborn Hammerer
|
Kanluwen wrote:
I have absolutely no clue.
If I had to guess, it is supposed to be "Bel Shanaar the Explorer"...but that can't be it because that would put a character into play for the High Elves from the time before the Sundering and the Dark Elves became a faction. Bel Shanaar was the second Phoenix King, directly after Aenarion.
I think though it is more likely that it will be Bel-Hathor, "the Scholar". He is a more recent Phoenix King(Imperial Calendar 1503 to 2162) who reversed the Interdict and allowed for the Bretonnians and Empire to have peaceful access to the isle of Ulthuan. He is dead in the "current" timeframe(Finubar the Seafarer, the "current" Phoenix King was Bel-Hathor's chosen successor), but there's not such a jarring time difference as there would be with Bel Shanaar.
Or it might be the guy that Kroothawk posted.
Interesting tidbit:
He's been whitewashed from Teclis' information at some point. The War Crown of Saphery entry in the previous army book mentioned him, but not the current one.
Yeah from the other rumours the "other" mage is looking like the everqueen which would make much more sense considering all things. Plus she was pretty bad ass back in the day knowing all spells in two lores at once. Poor Finubar, no one cares about the king of the elves. Are the High elves the only army that doesn't have there actual leader as a special character?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/03/26 17:41:16
|
|
|
|
2013/03/26 22:31:52
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
More on High Elves:
Best_Pone over at Warseer wrote:I can confirm the flying chariot. It looks like a tiny boat with wings, and is pulled by a single giant eagle. It looks kind of silly in my opinion, but not much that can be done about that.
As for the phoenix, it can be made up either as a fire phoenix or an ice phoenix. This one at least look pretty cool (or hot, depending on the option you choose I guess )
Here two predecessors:
Elf Swan Princess Boat by Grenadier and Griffon Chariot by Reaper:
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/03/26 22:37:48
|
|
|
|
2013/03/26 22:59:38
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Cold-Blooded Saurus Warrior
E. City, NC
|
I have no problems with a flying chariot. I like the idea. Basically a aerial shooting platform and flanker.
As to the obsolete army list comment: most players who claim their army lists become obsolete with new editions are blowing smoke. Sure there are rules changes, but most of the time "obsolete" is an overstatement. Maybe YOUR army is obsolete because you power gamed the last edition, but Warhammer is meant to be beer and pretzels, so if you are trying to power game all the time, expect your army to almost always get weaker with the new edition.
There are some exceptions, but I can't think of too many lists that I couldn't field a fun competitive army with after a new edition rolled out. (The exceptions mainly being 10 year old books that just plain need point values reassigned and a re-tooling altogether.) Automatically Appended Next Post: Oh, and ICE Phoenix sounds AWESOME!!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/03/26 23:00:28
|
|
|
|
2013/03/27 11:18:56
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Nimble Dark Rider
|
As for the phoenix, it can be made up either as a fire phoenix or an ice phoenix
Warhammer fantasy confirmed for pokemon.
|
|
|
|
2013/03/27 16:45:11
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Excellent Exalted Champion of Chaos
Lake Forest, California, South Orange County
|
GBL wrote:As for the phoenix, it can be made up either as a fire phoenix or an ice phoenix
Warhammer fantasy confirmed for pokemon.
Galrauch, I choose YOU!!!
|
"Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! ... It’s become the promotions department of a toy company." -- Rick Priestly
|
|
|
|
2013/03/27 16:58:51
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Wish they'd come up with some new infantry or redo the spearmen rather than all this flying nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/03/27 17:03:33
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Zealous Knight
|
Kroothawk wrote:More on High Elves:
Best_Pone over at Warseer wrote:I can confirm the flying chariot. It looks like a tiny boat with wings, and is pulled by a single giant eagle. It looks kind of silly in my opinion, but not much that can be done about that.
As for the phoenix, it can be made up either as a fire phoenix or an ice phoenix. This one at least look pretty cool (or hot, depending on the option you choose I guess )
Here two predecessors:
Elf Swan Princess Boat by Grenadier and Griffon Chariot by Reaper:
Ooh, if only that Griffin Chariot was a reaper model; it's actually a Ral Partha model (one of their best ever, IMO), no longer in production and stupendously expensive when they pop up.
|
|
|
|
2013/03/27 17:58:19
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Flashman wrote:Wish they'd come up with some new infantry or redo the spearmen rather than all this flying nonsense.
From Kroothawk's posting on the other page:
Do not expect to see spears/LSG core units in may. The rumor holds truth, but that belongs to a further miniature wave. "Silver boys" coming later on too.
So that's Silver Helms being redone and a combined Spearmen/Lothern Sea Guard unit. I can kind of see why they would hold those back a bit(the LSG plastics from Isle of Blood are currently available in a sprue of 5 rank and file, in addition to what you get from IoB. They're apparently very big sellers--and GW would be loathe to lose that), but I'm very curious as to what will be done with the Archer kit.
Will it simply go away?
Will we see it redone as a "launch" kit?
Will we see a radical redesign for the High Elf Archers and Shadow Warriors, allowing for a dual plastic kit?
|
|
|
|
2013/03/27 18:04:27
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Kanluwen wrote:Will we see a radical redesign for the High Elf Archers and Shadow Warriors, allowing for a dual plastic kit?
Ooh, hopefully
|
|
|
|
|
2013/03/27 18:48:25
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Kanluwen wrote:
Will we see a radical redesign for the High Elf Archers and Shadow Warriors, allowing for a dual plastic kit?
This seems the most likely, as dual kits are the major push for GW now. Shadow Warriors/Archers and Seaguard/Spearmen would not only get those two elite units into plastic multi-part, it would let them replace the older archer/spearmen resulting in 2 new boxes instead of 3 separate boxes. Also, bu pairing them with core units, the sales ought to be a bit stronger.
|
|
|
|
2013/03/28 00:19:06
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Death-Dealing Ultramarine Devastator
|
Just out of curiosity has anyone heard anything about the Lizardmen at all?
|
|
|
|
|
2013/03/30 14:07:44
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Nimble Dark Rider
|
Brand new high elf photos of new models! Found this posted on my local GW stores page.
https://www.facebook.com/GWDeerwoodVillage
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/03/30 14:09:13
|
|
|
|
2013/03/30 14:15:27
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
I am stoked for this release!
|
If you can keep your head, while all about you are losing their's, then you have probably completely misunderstood the situation!
6,000pts
5,500pts
3,500pts
2,500pts |
|
|
|
2013/03/30 14:18:32
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Lol, another classic leak.
Nice models though GW. You may be getting through your rough patch design wise
EDIT - Great find furbyballer
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/03/30 14:20:25
|
|
|
|
2013/03/30 15:46:05
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
Looks cool, thanks for sharing! I hate thrones riding on the backs of birds but the birds themselves look really good.
|
|
|
|
2013/03/30 16:08:42
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
Something's going on underneath the red phoenix. Maybe that flying chariot? I see a platform and a feather...
|
“It was in lands of the Chi-An where she finally ran him to ground. There she kissed him deeply as he lay dying, and so stole from him his last, agonized breath.
On a delicate chain at her throat, she keeps it with her to this day.”
|
|
|
|
2013/03/30 16:09:48
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
It looks to be the Eagle pulled Chariot, yup.
|
|
|
|
2013/05/05 01:40:34
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Some rumours on Lizardmen not yet deserving their own thread:
75hastings69 wrote:Liber wrote:I thought there were talks about a "giant lizard" kit ala a Tyrannosaurus Rex...and something about an Ethereal monster as well.
An Ethereal T-Rex?
Oh, also people were talking about a plastic kit for the Carnosaur for the Monsterous Cav entry.
That's the dread saurian entry from FWs Monstrous Arcanum
static grass wrote:I would anticipate all army books getting flyers towards 9th... So a Coatl sounds pretty reasonable centrepiece. LM already have some pretty large dino's.
..... and they're getting larger
Do you mean existing Lizardmen monsters are getting larger or that there are new larger monsters for Lizardmen?
New
One post poster over at Warseer:
Papegeai wrote:Nakai the Wanderer mini
Carnosaur cavalry as rare choice
New spawn a la chameleon
Dual Kit with big monster/machine of the old ones
New saurus on cold ones
Swarms now useful
Slanns more expensive
No sacred spawns
Kind regards
|
|
|
|
|
2013/05/05 12:24:07
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
Still no Wood Elves?
|
|
|
|
2013/05/05 12:32:21
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Ghastly Grave Guard
|
I don't think WE were rumored to be this soon anyway.
|
1500
500
Vampire Counts 2400
300
Circle Orboros 20 |
|
|
|
2013/05/12 10:31:53
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
75hastings69 wrote:I don't think I actually mentioned WE, Bret, O&G or Beastmen army "books"
updates and models yes, books ..... hmm, after 9th ed hits????
(I took the freedom to add a paragraph, as I think this is how it is meant)
|
|
|
|
|
2013/05/12 11:53:19
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Ghastly Grave Guard
|
Hmmm... that's interesting. Have they ever done White Dwarf updates for WHFB, ala 40k?
|
1500
500
Vampire Counts 2400
300
Circle Orboros 20 |
|
|
|
2013/05/12 12:13:57
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Daemons.
But that was before the content embargo
|
|
|
|
|
2013/05/12 12:26:09
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
Sheffield, City of University and Northern-ness
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013/05/12 13:47:29
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Ghastly Grave Guard
|
Warriors of Chaos got an update via White Dwarf? What got added - the cannon?
|
1500
500
Vampire Counts 2400
300
Circle Orboros 20 |
|
|
|
2013/05/12 15:04:26
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Skillful Swordsman
|
Skullcrushers?
|
"What holds the Empire together, lad, is that our mutual dislike of each other is less than our dislike of everyone else."
- A Priest of Sigmar |
|
|
|
2013/05/12 15:43:37
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
And Vampire Counts, who got the Ghoul King and Terrorgheist.
|
|
|
|
2013/05/13 21:34:55
Subject: Re:Warhammer Fantasy Rumour summaries by Harry (incl. release schedules)
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
75hastings69 wrote:I'm pretty sure LM, DE & Dwarf players WILL get a new book before 9th, but not sure about the rest.
(...)
As far as I know (and have posted last August) the release order remains unchanged. Your bland short fat humans (tre Manor's Red Box Games do dwarfs sooooo much better!) should be with you early next year. Out of interest have these same stockists been asked the same of their Lizardmen range?
(...)
Don't expect the policy of not updating existing plastics for WFB until there's nothing new to add to change any time soon. WFB just doesn't sell enough to justify it.
(...)
I kind of get what you are saying, Harry is quite cryptic at times but IMO that's part of the enjoyment of his posts, I'm just not very good at the cryptic stuff like for example if I said trishaws has done a "frimi mgeah" and also some "tozas"
So, new zoats and a fimir meargh eh? Thanks for that Hastings.
Harry wrote:Hastings, ifyou please - the difference is going in drastic changes of rules system or approach to armybooks and their existance?
I did try to make it clear months ago ....
.... significant changes to the rules, the timeline and the approach to armybooks.
75hastings69 wrote:He did too, the timeline thing I've also heard too. This would be an advantageous way perhaps of stopping production of individually named character models that don't sell big volumes.... perhaps all generic plastic lord kits in plastic with multiple options that appeared a while ago might be more sensible? that way they can represent you as the general on the battlefield not you playing someone else on the battlefield (who invariably gets killed by a single night goblin fanatic lol!)
And this way get rid of named characters - 500 years passed so some are dead and some are new phoenix kings etc so no reason to field them on the table?
Pretty much what I'm imagining.
Plus some random thoughts:
75hatsings69 wrote:My understanding is that the cycle of each books life before update is too long which causes issues, however increasing the frequency of updating each book multiple times per edition is even worse... would you buy a HE book if it were to be updated in under a year? This coupled with a fading popularity of WFB (sales wise) and the feeling some of the races are perhaps too generic fantasy and not "warhmer" enough leaves them with choices of either dropping WFB altogether or making some serious changes to the way in which races are represented and in which army lists etc are sold. It HAS to be the latter to make back the £ spent on all the manufacture/design work for the best return possible for investors/shareholders. I suppose they 'could' have gone down the road of putting updates in WD but that would mean WD having actual content and wasting advertising/store listing space lol!!
(...)
Popular armies will continue to receive more new units/kits/support whereas less popular armies (e.g. WE/Brets) may be 'lumped together' with their 'combined' force getting shared new kits etc. in all honesty what "warhammer" additions would any of you add to bretonnia army range???? big monster? No war machines? No, more horse types? No due to lack of variety etc. instead give them options to add say units from a wood elf force after all they are closely linked in the fluff. Then maybe when it comes time to add something new bret players would be happy to buy for example plastic WE stag riders as a MC choice and also pick up some existing WE kits to theme their army up more.
I feel the changes are going to allow much more freedom in building an "army" that will allow you to just take models from your collection and field them together as a force.... the only real concern then would be balance.... BUT if you're no longer going across 13 seperate publications produced years apart by different authors with different editions in mind it might not be such a big issue after all. Imagine if it was maybe 1 or 2 publications that could be updated almost annually, wouldn't that lead to better balance and also potentially bring more fun back to warhammer? just a thought
Avian wrote:I can't get that to mesh with what you said about them being worried that players would not want to buy a book that was invalidated a year or so later.
Because you'd not be buying A (singular) army book that would be updated once a year for example to keep balance issues and additions/new units etc. you'd be buying potentially a book that covered lists for EVERY army and allowed you to make your own army once a year. So if you had 3 WFB armies you wouldn't need 6 books in a 2 year period only 2 books. The yearly thing was just an illustrative point that I added as an example not an accurate forecast. The current model of updating armies etc is too imbalanced leaving some races behind etc.
Also IMO a system that allows people to play WFB with models they want to buy from various ranges is a winner for GW. For example I know people who like the NEW HE models but won't buy them because they hate the core plastics, if there was a way of fielding (and indeed selling) models to people that they could buy everything new they liked and add it to other existing kits they like/own then this would be better for GW and if sales improve because of this potentially better for WFB (so long as they don't allow stupid SoM HE with Deamon allow type fluff breaking crap - which of course they probably will to sell more models).
I don't understand where you get your comparison from. An army book lasts about 5 years on average, so if you had three armies under the current system you would need 3 books every 5 years. However under your example system you would instead need 5 books every 5 years, which is definitely worse from a customer perspective and gets worse the less armies you collect.....
Did you read my earlier post? The issue is one of imbalance, different authors writing with different editions in mind. Also supporting each individual army as an entirely different product when some don't sell well is not the best use of time. The yearly thing as I've now said twice was only an example. If there was 1 or 2 books that were updated even every 2 years there would still be better balance, faqs could be added into the update as could new units. Right now you have to pretty much wait 4-6 years for your WFB to get updated or get a new unit, what if that changed to every year or two years? Instead of a block release of 4 new HE kits then nothing for 5 years what if you got 2 HE, 2 DE then the following month 2 skaven & 2 WoC? these were all featured in your 1 more regularly updated book. I think it would sell more by miles. For example WFB players who don't play DoC, WoC or HE probably haven't bought anything since September last year now imagine there's a release for your army every 3 months in fact a release for every army every 3 months its a much more steady income IMO.
(...)
Ok these printed updates to update each army book and include FAQ/Errata etc. how does it get published/distributed? How much does it cost to print/store/transport/sell an update like this each time for EVERY army ON TOP of the above cost for each and every book? How does this streamline the process or make the cost better??? Answer it doesn't. It would be more costly and add more stuff to handle/print/store etc which is exactly what they want to head away from.
The answer is fewer books that contain more updated more often. Not the same number of books updated ever 4-10 years with 4-10 years worth of updates/ FAQs/Errata etc as well to go with them.
I'm by no means the sharpest knife in the drawer (and I mean no offence by my next statement) but I can't see why some people can't grasp this concept?
(...)
Mate im not nor are GW concerned if its cheaper for YOU im talking about it being cheaper for GW!!!! please try to understand that the WFB model as it is doesnt generate enough £ to allow it to exist in the way it does, it isnt making the returns on investment the 40k does, so it has to change. this means cutting costs and making the game more accessible and less rigid than it is now.
I'm not going to be drawn into debates about this any more, I kind of wish I'd not bloody posted about it now. Like it or not big changes are coming.
(...)
If I were still into GW/WFB I think I'd be happy to defend it, I actually quite like the idea... what I don't like are kits made of finecast, plastic kits that are poorly sculpted and cost £30 for 10 infantry style troops, models that are similar to Pokemon and models that get named using the new roll on 2 tables to come up with a name I.e. I rolled a 4 and a 2 that gives us the "slaughter" and "brute", yea well I got a 1 and a 6 which gets us the "Death Mauler" etc.
Daigar wrote:This all sounds like typical GW decisionmaking.
Kirby: Warhammer Fantasy is too expensive to get into. It hurts our sales. What do we do?
Employee 1: Lower the prices!
Kirby:...
Employee 2: Fiddle with the mechanics until it is viable to play smaller games!
Kirby:...
Employee 3: Let's force people to get all the army books they DON'T need!
Kirby: BRILLIANT!
You sir seem to get it entirely, it's about selling you stuff you don't need for armies you don't even collect, BUT also giving you the chance "in game" to make this fine. You could impulse purchase new stuff every month and feel no guilt as you could actually justify buying it.
Eldarin wrote:Sales, of course. But it also makes much more sense.
It becomes orders of magnitude simpler to balance the game and it gives a opportunity to affect all the meta at the same time rather than incrementally change it one race at a time.
For example, when 8th rejigged the magic phase and we had a good few releases to bring books in line (or how WE playstyle became much harder overnight). If it was the case that all rules were updated at the same time then everything gets a fix at the same time. This can only be a benefit.
Not having one-army based releases allows them to space out each army so you aren't having feast/famine if you are a 1 army person and allows them to keep drip feeding you and making you(r army) feel loved.
The fact that they could have individual background books for each army then also allows them to sell you another book, but also allows them to dig deeper into each army and really pull you in to the universe.
Finally, some variation of the 40k allies system, however it is implemented, is also good. Don't like it? Ignore it. Want to play around with your own combinations? Go nuts. It also allows the same sampling and then growing into a new army.
All in all, it sounds promising.
You win the thread.
I tried to say over a period of 4-10 years with different authors writing for different editions there was too much imbalance, if it all comes pretty much at once there's more balance, then people may be drawn to try another army that currently they wouldn't because under 8th they are unbalanced/broken until the army book gets updated in x years!
Finally! Thank you so much for posting
Avian wrote:While I do think that allies has some good potential to it, by allowing too much to this they are running the risk of watering down the imagery of the game and thus increasing the blandness they apparently feel is hurting it. 40k has shown the power of strong, reasonably original imagery and I doubt you'd get the same effect with Mishmashhammer.
You will get no argument from me on this front Tarj. As I wrote previously the SoM HE & Darmons for me destroyed everything that 25 years of fantastic fluff stood for, all in the name of sales. If its "governed" in a manner it could be great, if not?? Well...
Thing is are GWs target market actually that bothered about fluff? They can always peddle their fluff elsewhere for extra £
Avian wrote:Never mind the fluff, I'm surprised to hear that game balance being presented as a major reason for the shakeup....
My forecast is that GW use this as a selling/marketing point, much like the ludicrous claims of finecast. The truth is there is only one reason for the changes .... profitability.
Harry wrote:Is one way of looking at it.
The other way of looking at it is ... the reason for the changes is to try and save a much loved game that has become unprofitable.
It's not really in "financial trouble" it just isn't making the returns the would like on their investments. 40k tau models couldn't even stay in stock to fulfil orders (well that's not exactly true.... it was actually the printed boxes that ran out hence why some people received models in white citadel boxes) that never happens with any WFB release.
In other words, Warhammer Fantasy is shrinking, the old army book concept will go for combined-army-list-update books.
BTW, why do Harry and Hastings have to post that much when I am too tired to actually understand it all.
Fun fact: Avian started to attack the rumours by Harry and Hastings now, as there are not many rumour posters left on Warseer.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2013/05/13 21:56:58
|
|
|
|
2013/05/13 22:18:28
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumours (incl. release schedules): Massive update on page 6 (13th May)
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
So is the idea here that they will move to a release model somewhat similar to the one Privateer Press uses? Because that is something I have been wishing for for quite a while now.
|
|
|
|
2013/05/13 22:30:20
Subject: Warhammer Fantasy Rumours (incl. release schedules): Massive update on page 6 (13th May)
|
|
Excellent Exalted Champion of Chaos
Lake Forest, California, South Orange County
|
If this is the case, I'll end up only playing locally with house rules for damn near everything, using a revised 8th edition that is more balanced than what we have now.
Time to start looking at other game systems methinks, as WFB will become a left behind game.
|
"Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! ... It’s become the promotions department of a toy company." -- Rick Priestly
|
|
|
|
|