Switch Theme:

Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit  [RSS] 

general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 15:43:21


Post by: EnTyme


Gamgee wrote:I want Kroot. :( Or Tau auxillaries. Will GW ever make an army for them you think?

Also DW are damn cool. One of the only two ways I like my marines. The other being Blood Ravens.


I doubt Kroot/Tau auxillaries would ever get more than a mention in a supplement I just don't see the demand for non-mech Tau right now. As far as my Blood Ravens go, my source (who's thus far about 50/50 on his rumor) says they are getting a mini-dex sometime in 2017.

H.B.M.C. wrote:
 Vain wrote:

Just don't be a 5-man Squad Box that somehow costs more than a 10-man Tactical Squad box.


Just thought I'd point out that the price of a kit has more to do with the overall number of pieces than the number of individual units that can be made with it. Supply and demand also factors in. If the DW kit cost $45 for 10 Deathwatch marines, why the hell would you ever pay $40 for a Tac squad?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 15:54:49


Post by: Dakkafang Dreggrim


Hope the Deathwatch codex is good vs eldar or necrons, because that's the only xenos I see anymore. Im.my area I'm pretty much the only xenos amongst a sea of marines =/

Last few weeks at the local shop ito been my orks and 6+ marines and an ig =(


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 16:19:42


Post by: migooo


 Dakkafang Dreggrim wrote:
Hope the Deathwatch codex is good vs eldar or necrons, because that's the only xenos I see anymore. Im.my area I'm pretty much the only xenos amongst a sea of marines =/

Last few weeks at the local shop ito been my orks and 6+ marines and an ig =(


Here is basically marines for current ed.

2nd you have a few more options.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 16:29:31


Post by: Forcast


Price list for the kits.

[Thumb - facebook_1470068655073.jpg]


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 16:32:23


Post by: Requizen


Box game and Codex price are about what we're used to. Is that a $200 Special Edition though? Jeez.

Datacards means Psychic Powers then? I suppose it could be some other sort of special rule.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 16:38:01


Post by: kronk


Requizen wrote:
Box game and Codex price are about what we're used to. Is that a $200 Special Edition though? Jeez.

Datacards means Psychic Powers then? I suppose it could be some other sort of special rule.


Also DeathWatch Specific Maelstrom objectives.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 16:41:42


Post by: zamerion


so, no independent kits? no aeroplane? :(


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 16:44:41


Post by: migooo


zamerion wrote:
so, no independent kits? no aeroplane? :(


I'm guessing its just the 13th releases, the kits are to follow


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 16:52:32


Post by: Forcast


The core game is super discounted for the kits included though. I love the new 40k discounted bundles in disguise as board games theme that seems to be the new norm.

So that is something to be happy about.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:00:30


Post by: kronk


GenCon starts Thursday. This will be a very expensive weekend for me if the DW box is on preorder Saturday...


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:03:43


Post by: unmercifulconker


I dont think I will last till the weekend to see pics.....

Hey, hey hey......yall got any more of dem leaks?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ha, with the rulebook its essentially a starter set, imagine going back in time a couple years and telling everyone the starter set will be Harlequins vs Deathwatch.



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:10:49


Post by: Binabik15


I just bought a box of Sternguard *blushes furiously* Actually the first SM plastic kit I bought, too. Would be just my luck if a super savings box includes them AND Harlis which I kinda want as well.


I don't really agree that the vanilla tac squad would stop being the GW sales juggernaut if a somewhat more expensive Deathwatch kit was released. There's the money savers, people who don't want the DW shoulder pads (and potentially engraved left vambraces), probably different weapon loadouts etc.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:20:17


Post by: Davor


 unmercifulconker wrote:

Ha, with the rulebook its essentially a starter set, imagine going back in time a couple years and telling everyone the starter set will be Harlequins vs Deathwatch.


Or Tyrandis vs Blood Angels. Did the Space Wolves vs Orks had a mini rule book? Dang I wish I could still buy that box set.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:24:57


Post by: BoomWolf


I am quite confused here.
How is the level of content rumored possible in a 150$ kit?

Had it been snap-fit starter, it would make perfect sense, but as the existence of an upgrade sprue means it probably isn't snap fit.

And its not getting rid of old stocks, or throwing in things that don't sell anyway-much of the set are brand new models.

What are we missing here?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:28:26


Post by: Kanluwen


 BoomWolf wrote:
I am quite confused here.
How is the level of content rumored possible in a 150$ kit?

Had it been snap-fit starter, it would make perfect sense, but as the existence of an upgrade sprue means it probably isn't snap fit.

And its not getting rid of old stocks, or throwing in things that don't sell anyway-much of the set are brand new models.

What are we missing here?

Nothing, beyond the fact that this is intended to be a "draw you in" product for potential new players and a "OMG MUST HAVE!" for people looking for value.

Look at the Imperial Knight Renegade box.
$195 for two Imperial Knights and a set of ruins.
Knight Warden alone is how much?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:28:31


Post by: Reese


 BoomWolf wrote:
I am quite confused here.
How is the level of content rumored possible in a 150$ kit?

Had it been snap-fit starter, it would make perfect sense, but as the existence of an upgrade sprue means it probably isn't snap fit.

And its not getting rid of old stocks, or throwing in things that don't sell anyway-much of the set are brand new models.

What are we missing here?

Think most would say it is part of a general trend towards more value in a box set.

We've seen it with the 1st Deathwatch Box, Calth and Silver Tower. Just another in that line.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:29:28


Post by: Bulldogging


 BoomWolf wrote:
I am quite confused here.
How is the level of content rumored possible in a 150$ kit?

Had it been snap-fit starter, it would make perfect sense, but as the existence of an upgrade sprue means it probably isn't snap fit.

And its not getting rid of old stocks, or throwing in things that don't sell anyway-much of the set are brand new models.

What are we missing here?


In fairness I don't think Harlequins are high sellers, and the Space Marine side is 10 Marines+1 Character+1 Dreadnought. It's not a lot.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:29:54


Post by: tneva82


 BoomWolf wrote:
I am quite confused here.
How is the level of content rumored possible in a 150$ kit?

Had it been snap-fit starter, it would make perfect sense, but as the existence of an upgrade sprue means it probably isn't snap fit.

And its not getting rid of old stocks, or throwing in things that don't sell anyway-much of the set are brand new models.

What are we missing here?


That GW current prices aren't how much it really costs them to produce?

GW could easily profitably outprice their competition if they wanted. Economies of scale and all. If it came to how cheaply they could sell profitably GW could win hands on.

Seems they are looking for finds to hook players in with cheap bundle like deals since internal policy prevents price decreases of existing products.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:31:37


Post by: rollawaythestone


Ive been eyeballing Harlequins since they came out but have always resisted the urge. This new box set has some ridiculous savings! I don't think i'll be able to say no.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:35:38


Post by: unmercifulconker


I have been meaning to finish a small Harlequin detachment although much less than contents of this box but they have been the most fun I have had painting in a long while. The value alone is too good to pass up.

I wonder if the Deathwatch sprues will have blank pads or actual chapter specific bits, if so I wonder how many they will cram in.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:41:47


Post by: Triszin


PLane should be the week after. along with standalone kits.

3rd week is probably nothin' but CHAOS
KAHRN KARN KHARN


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 17:43:09


Post by: Nostromodamus


I'm in for a couple of sets. Amazing value.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 18:22:03


Post by: Uriels_Flame


DEATHWATCH DICE!!! Didn't you see that part?

How cool should those be!!!?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 18:58:28


Post by: kronk


 Uriels_Flame wrote:
DEATHWATCH DICE!!! Didn't you see that part?

How cool should those be!!!?


On a scale of Margaret Thatcher to Jessica Alba, Death Watch dice would rate a Scarlett Johansson.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:00:52


Post by: MacMuckles


 Uriels_Flame wrote:
DEATHWATCH DICE!!! Didn't you see that part?

How cool should those be!!!?


Very to not at all, depending on the face that gets the symbol.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:05:21


Post by: General Kroll


I'm in for the box set and the dice for sure. I want more Harlies to put with the pile of others I'm too scared to paint, and who the hell doesn't want freaking deathwatch.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:11:10


Post by: ImAGeek


MacMuckles wrote:
 Uriels_Flame wrote:
DEATHWATCH DICE!!! Didn't you see that part?

How cool should those be!!!?


Very to not at all, depending on the face that gets the symbol.


It'll be 1. All their dice have the symbol on the 1.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:18:25


Post by: fresus


I hope this means Eldrad is moving to the Harlequin faction, as an HQ choice. Finally I harlies could be fielded in a CAD.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:19:28


Post by: ImAGeek


From FB

[Thumb - image.jpeg]


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:22:49


Post by: kronk


Part I of V?

4 more purple posts with prophetic pontifications or 4 more model/codex releases after this weekend's?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:23:22


Post by: ImAGeek


 kronk wrote:
Part I of V?

4 more purple posts with prophetic pontifications or 4 more model/codex releases after this weekend's?


4 more posts. I assume one every day til Friday.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:25:11


Post by: kronk


I see!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:26:11


Post by: Fayric


 ImAGeek wrote:
MacMuckles wrote:
 Uriels_Flame wrote:
DEATHWATCH DICE!!! Didn't you see that part?

How cool should those be!!!?


Very to not at all, depending on the face that gets the symbol.


It'll be 1. All their dice have the symbol on the 1.


At least if its an inquisitorial =I=, the 1s make visual sense.
If its a burning skull riding a jetbike, doing a guitar solo, it makes as little sense as the other symbol dice.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 19:39:20


Post by: ImAGeek


I don't have a problem if the symbols on the 1. If I liked them enough I'd use them for leadership tests.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 20:27:24


Post by: adamsouza


 ImAGeek wrote:
I don't have a problem if the symbols on the 1. If I liked them enough I'd use them for leadership tests.


$20 is a bit steep for Leadership test dice.



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 20:38:23


Post by: Gamgee



It's not the end of the world but you can see it from here.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 20:43:30


Post by: Warpig1815


Mmm, interesting that they mention Rhana Dandra and fate being twisted or broken - it's almost like they're toying with the idea of an 'End Times', but have a little disclaimer in there just in case it goes pear-shaped.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 20:56:42


Post by: puma713


 Warpig1815 wrote:
Mmm, interesting that they mention Rhana Dandra and fate being twisted or broken - it's almost like they're toying with the idea of an 'End Times', but have a little disclaimer in there just in case it goes pear-shaped.


The 7th rulebook makes mention to it being on the cusp of the End Times, iirc, much more than in previous editions.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 21:13:21


Post by: unmercifulconker


There is a terrible darkness descending upon the galaxy, and we shall not see it end.

A day will come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, An hour of wolves and shattered shields, when the age of men comes crashing down!

Winter is here!

Now shall faith be truly tested. cometh have the hour. I love me some Ragnarok.






general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 21:19:49


Post by: Gamgee


Or just come and join the Tau... free health care and shopping malls for everyone! The only place int he universe you can get meta and play miniatures while your playing miniatures.

Edit
5 campaigns rumored. Part 1 of 5.... I don't think we'll be seeing more posts. I think this is end times book 1/Campaign 1/Set 1.... my god the revelations!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 21:56:03


Post by: Triszin


Not 5 campagins.

I view this as part 1 of 5 eldar poems. released each day until Saturday.

Magnus is Red,
Rubrics are BLue,
Eldrads has altered fates for you.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 21:59:04


Post by: Warhams-77


http://astropate.blogspot.de/2016/08/traitors-hate-e-deathwatch-nuove-uscite.html

Recently Atia told us that a new CSM would be released soon. Not a new Codex, but new rules which include new psychic powers.
Yesterday Raziel, one of the few reliable sources on 4chan, revealed some details about this book and more info about Deathwatch releases.

Raziel on 4chan

The Upcoming White Dwarf that will be released in september will have a new CSM supplement: Traitors Hate, with new Rules for CSM aswell.

Also Deathwatch will not only get the Boxed set, there will also be Bikes, Landraiders, Razorbacks, a box with 10 marines and Character Models for example the Watchmaster.

Renegade Imperial Knights will be within the Book aswell.

It sounds like the Deathwatch upgrade frame mentioned in the leaked pictures today is going to be sold with several SM vehicles





general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 22:03:22


Post by: Gamgee


What if each post each day refers to a different prophecy for each of the five campaign books/sets they have plans for? Hmmm. So we're both right. Tricksies Eldar, but I'm far trickier.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 22:05:02


Post by: Warhams-77


Monday-Friday sounds more plausible


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 22:08:17


Post by: casvalremdeikun


Hype restored for Deathwatch. It looks like the Deathwatch squad is 10 Marines, so a couple of those will be a good way to get started. Looking forward to the upgrade sprue. I will definitely be getting some bikes for this army!

Also, the Chaos campaign being in September White Dwarf? Now THAT is the best cover mount ever. I hope we see more stuff like that in the future (Blood Angels, please?!)


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 22:13:43


Post by: Warhams-77


Sorry, I think you misunderstood the post. Traitors Hate is a seperate book, shown in WD.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 22:13:53


Post by: MajorWesJanson


Chikout wrote:
So this turned up on tg. A new 40k boxed set called death Masque. Price is RM590 which is the Malaysian currency. No idea what that converts to.


Contents seem equivalent to a getting started set for.each side. Bit less on the death watch side and a bit more on the harlequin side. Glad it is harlequins and not eldar proper so I can use both sides of the box.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 22:19:01


Post by: Warhams-77


Only five DW Marines in Deathmask, not 10



I would be carefull with the above quote posted by L'astropate. The info could turn out to be wrong.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 22:34:02


Post by: Lockark


Warhams-77 wrote:
Only five DW Marines in Deathmask, not 10
Spoiler:



I would be carefull with the above quote posted by L'astropate. The info could turn out to be wrong.


That almost sounds like a starter set, with the inclusion of the Soft cover core rule book, except without push-fit models. Interested to see what the Death watch upgrade frame is going to look like. I don't see myself starting a death watch army, but as a hobbyist I hope that if gives you enough parts to upgrade more then just the dread and 5 vanguard vets. That way you can use the left over parts to upgrade a tac squad or something for expanding the army.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 22:39:49


Post by: MacMuckles


Warhams-77 wrote:
Only five DW Marines in Deathmask, not 10



I would be carefull with the above quote posted by L'astropate. The info could turn out to be wrong.


Well, 5 Deathwatch Marines and (5 Marines + Deathwatch upgrade)


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 23:10:51


Post by: Mecha_buddha


So is this Captain Artemis a nod to the 54mm Inquisitor model? He was a Deathwatch spacemarine as well.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/01 23:16:26


Post by: Chikout


 MajorWesJanson wrote:
Chikout wrote:
So this turned up on tg. A new 40k boxed set called death Masque. Price is RM590 which is the Malaysian currency. No idea what that converts to.


Contents seem equivalent to a getting started set for.each side. Bit less on the death watch side and a bit more on the harlequin side. Glad it is harlequins and not eldar proper so I can use both sides of the box.

10 marines, hero and dreadnought is exactly the same as the regular space marine start collecting box except these are veterans. The harlequins are about double a regular start collecting box. Sorry to keep talking about this but it is the steepest discount of any bundle since the shield of Baal starter set.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 00:59:54


Post by: casvalremdeikun


I really hope the Deathwatch Upgrade sprue is more than just some vehicle icons. The Vanguard Veterans from the boxed set will need DW shoulder pauldrons and left arms. I am hoping for vehicle icons, left arms, pauldrons, and some DW bolters. Maybe the squads will come with some xenos weapons. My guess is that the Deathwatch Veterans kit will be a recut Sternguard kit with stuff like the Deathwatch Frag Cannon instead of one of the other heavy weapons. It won't be the Sternguard kit, but it will have a lot of similarities. I am hoping it clocks in at $40 USD or somewhere near that. The more I think about it, unless Watch Captain Artemis is ONLY available in this boxed set, I will probably skip it (and download a screen shot of his rules), because I really don't need another Vanguard Veteran kit or a Venerable Dreadnought (not to mention the hassle of the selling off the Harlequins). I really doubt they will make Artemis or Eldrad exclusive to the boxed set anyway.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 02:23:55


Post by: ZergSmasher


Man, if only money wasn't super tight for me right now I'd be all over that box set. I might even keep the Harlies instead of selling since no one around my area plays them that I know of.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 02:28:08


Post by: casvalremdeikun


I would keep the Eldar if it was standard Craftworlds Eldar with Eldrad. But since it is Harlequins and they don't really look like Eldar to me, I have no desire to keep them.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 03:30:31


Post by: General Hobbs





Crossing my fingers and hoping my existing DW models will still be usable!

I have a whole Space Wolf terminator army that was invalidated when the new rules came out making WG termies standard instead of customizable.

This moment I have waited for over 10 years, since GW told me the DW would not be a valid tournament army......


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 03:53:31


Post by: casvalremdeikun


To everyone that is afraid their existing Deathwatch stuff will be unusable, why exactly do you think that? Is there something incredibly off the wall about your army that makes you think they wouldn't be usable?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 04:05:24


Post by: iNcontroL


sorry if this was already said: Anyone have any idea when the Porphyrion goes on sale?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 04:07:35


Post by: Kid_Kyoto


With rumors of 8th edition and VAST SWEEPING CHANGES I might forgo the codex and just get the toys.

I would bet good money all our $50 codexes will NOT be usable in 2017.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 04:18:51


Post by: casvalremdeikun


 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
With rumors of 8th edition and VAST SWEEPING CHANGES I might forgo the codex and just get the toys.

I would be good money all our $50 codexes will NOT be usable in 2017.
Yeah, I am leaning the same direction. I don't want to spend a boatload of money on a book I probably won't use all that much. Art and model pictures used to be nice, but now they load the books up with cartoon-y nonsense that it isn't even worth it anymore.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 05:05:13


Post by: Malika2


Hmm, maybe it's about the Harlequins finding Eldrad in that Blackstone Fortress after the Thirteenth Black Crusade?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 05:23:24


Post by: Kanluwen


 Malika2 wrote:
Hmm, maybe it's about the Harlequins finding Eldrad in that Blackstone Fortress after the Thirteenth Black Crusade?

That hasn't happened yet per the current timeline.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 07:33:59


Post by: H.B.M.C.


Yeah, the nascent Eldar Goddess "R'het C'hon" awoke briefly during the 13th Black Crusade and made it as though that entire campaign never happened.

Anyway...

Also Deathwatch will not only get the Boxed set, there will also be Bikes, Landraiders, Razorbacks, a box with 10 marines and Character Models for example the Watchmaster.


Here we are, mere days away from Codex: Deathwatch, something I never thought would ever happen... and still my cynicism says "This is nonsense!" to all of this.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 07:39:03


Post by: Vain


You almost had me looking for an Eldar god "R'het C'hon"...


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 07:58:52


Post by: Kid_Kyoto


 casvalremdeikun wrote:
 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
With rumors of 8th edition and VAST SWEEPING CHANGES I might forgo the codex and just get the toys.

I would bet good money all our $50 codexes will NOT be usable in 2017.
Yeah, I am leaning the same direction. I don't want to spend a boatload of money on a book I probably won't use all that much. Art and model pictures used to be nice, but now they load the books up with cartoon-y nonsense that it isn't even worth it anymore.


Plus 2/3 of it will be reprinted from the RPG.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 08:02:20


Post by: Gamgee


 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
 casvalremdeikun wrote:
 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
With rumors of 8th edition and VAST SWEEPING CHANGES I might forgo the codex and just get the toys.

I would bet good money all our $50 codexes will NOT be usable in 2017.
Yeah, I am leaning the same direction. I don't want to spend a boatload of money on a book I probably won't use all that much. Art and model pictures used to be nice, but now they load the books up with cartoon-y nonsense that it isn't even worth it anymore.


Plus 2/3 of it will be reprinted from the RPG.

I have the RPG's collectors edition.


I was a Deathwatch player way before it became mainstream and cool. Not only did I play it, but I ran it.
Spoiler:

Spoiler:


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 08:03:20


Post by: H.B.M.C.


Played more Deathwatch than any other 40K RPG. Hell, my name and the names of my group are in most of the books as play testers.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 08:05:16


Post by: Gamgee


 H.B.M.C. wrote:
Played more Deathwatch than any other 40K RPG. Hell, my name and the names of my group are in most of the books as play testers.

Awesome it's the 40k rpg we played the most too (followed by Only War). I do hope they make a Deathwatch 2.0 out that rebalances the game. It got way out of hand in power levels for even me and my high skill in gming to handle. To the point where fights lasted horus in real life over multiple days to have any hope of challenging the large group (6).

Edit
Since this thread is waiting for more news and I have space I may as well say what the campaign was. The groups mission was to uncover a strange prophecy in the Jericho Reach. It turns out three factions were vying to see if it meant them. The two most likely contenders were the Necrons and Chaos and Eldar as third. They stopped the Eldar and sort of had a cease fire as they discovered more (only until they could kill the filthy Xenos farsight later). They also defeated the deamon prince and the greater deamon before being slain themselves. Which means the only ones left it could refer to is the Necrons awakening. In essence they sort of chose who was the greatest threat Voldemort style. Sadly the game had to end before they got to confront the Necrons. After that last battle two got transported somewhere by a weird spell, two died, and the only surviving one was the dreadnought who went into his stasis on the Fort. The Eldar were trying to see if there was a way to use this sector to hasten their grand plan to awaken Yennead and found it lacking. The demon prince was one of the Deathwatch Captains who slew the Master in charge of the Watchfortress. Their goal and the Bloodthirster were trying to create a new chaos god out of the Hadex Anomaly. So this just left the awakening of the great pharaoh over all the Necrons left to stop from being awakened.

Edit
Also I had another large plot going on with Tau, Chaos Space Marines, Ad Mech, and Space Marine/Imperial Forces breaking off from their respective groups to form a shadowy organization dedicated to surpassing all of them and conquering the region. They possessed advanced technology enhanced by warp powers and deamonic bindings as well as the raw zeal of the marines. A tau with space marine enhanced power armor, full invisibility field, enhanced jetpacks powered by souls, rail rifle loaded with warp rounds that can penetrate all known armor, genetically enhanced like a space marine, and equipped with all manner of advanced and supremely heretical gear. He was a constant thorn in their side all campaign and it was never resolved as well. Suffice to say he took out more than a few players and they were eager to see him dead swearing in game oaths and everything. Space Marines with plasma bolters and markerlights. If I recall their goal was to overcome fate.

As for the Nids. They actually got stomped quite hard by my group who seemed to have an affinity for destroying their hordes. This campaign took two and a half years to get as far as it did playing every week for four hours or so.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 08:20:16


Post by: Warhams-77


Regarding bits like shoulder pads, I guess the Deathwatch Veterans box will contain all the infantry bits

GW has been using the term frame - as seen in the leaked advertisement mail to retailers - for the large (A4-sized) vehicle upgrade sprues since at least third edition. Chaos, IG, Ravenwing - the latter being very diverse and including bits for bikes, land speeders (with Sammael/Master of the Ravenwing option) and tanks

https://www.games-workshop.com/en-GB/Imperial-Guard-Tank-Accessories
Description

WEBSTORE EXCLUSIVE

This pack contains 1 Imperial Guard Tank Accessory frame.






general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 08:26:34


Post by: casvalremdeikun


Warhams-77 wrote:
Regarding bits like shoulder pads, I guess the Deathwatch Veterans box will contain all the infantry bits

GW has been using the term frame - as seen in the leaked advertisement mail to retailers - for the large (A4-sized) vehicle upgrade sprues since at least third edition. Chaos, IG, Ravenwing - the latter being very diverse and including bits for bikes, land speeders (with Belial/Master of the Ravenwing option) and tanks

https://www.games-workshop.com/en-GB/Imperial-Guard-Tank-Accessories
DescriptionWEBSTORE EXCLUSIVE

This pack contains 1 Imperial Guard Tank Accessory frame.




Hmmm, I wonder just how far a box of Veterans will carry. I wouldn't like it if the boxed set didn't have enough bits to make the Vanguard Veterans decked out in Deathwatch armor as well. If there is enough parts in the box to go across multiple kits, I would pick up two DW Veterans and a Tactical Squad to make two 10-man Deathwatch Kill Teams. I doubt GW will be that generous though.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 08:45:29


Post by: Warhams-77


I guess they will put in enough bits to bling out at least another 5. Maybe it is even similiar to the Death Company boxed set. Two of them allow to bling out ~30 Blood Angels, although there are only 5 in a box. Sad Panda's hint about a Necron sword sounds like it will be a diverse kit which also comes with xenos weaponry.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 08:57:18


Post by: H.B.M.C.


I really want a DW shoulder pad for a Dread.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 09:05:27


Post by: Gamgee


I want to see the cool Deathwatch Gunship.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 09:09:45


Post by: Breotan


 H.B.M.C. wrote:
I really want a DW shoulder pad for a Dread.

I don't know if they'll continue the shoulderpad motif to Dreads or not. More likely is to replace the front armor plate with Deathwatch specific plating instead and have some icon for the shoulder(s).

 Gamgee wrote:
I want to see the cool Deathwatch Gunship.

Just get some Inquisition doors from Forge World and slap them on whatever SM vehicle you want to use.

I still have a fair amount of the metal conversion bits left. This upgrade sprue better be pretty sweet.



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 09:26:36


Post by: H.B.M.C.


 Breotan wrote:
I don't know if they'll continue the shoulderpad motif to Dreads or not. More likely is to replace the front armor plate with Deathwatch specific plating instead and have some icon for the shoulder(s).


I meant something like this:



 Breotan wrote:
Just get some Inquisition doors from Forge World and slap them on whatever SM vehicle you want to use.
Sorry sir. We won't try to have any wrongbadfun in the future. Apologies.




general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 09:27:06


Post by: Kid_Kyoto


I want Inquisitors and Xeno-exterminating henchmen spraying poisons everywhere like they were killing roaches.

That would actually make me buy this.

Marines in Black?

I can take them or leave them.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 09:51:34


Post by: MacMuckles


 casvalremdeikun wrote:
Warhams-77 wrote:
Regarding bits like shoulder pads, I guess the Deathwatch Veterans box will contain all the infantry bits

GW has been using the term frame - as seen in the leaked advertisement mail to retailers - for the large (A4-sized) vehicle upgrade sprues since at least third edition. Chaos, IG, Ravenwing - the latter being very diverse and including bits for bikes, land speeders (with Belial/Master of the Ravenwing option) and tanks

https://www.games-workshop.com/en-GB/Imperial-Guard-Tank-Accessories
DescriptionWEBSTORE EXCLUSIVE

This pack contains 1 Imperial Guard Tank Accessory frame.




Hmmm, I wonder just how far a box of Veterans will carry. I wouldn't like it if the boxed set didn't have enough bits to make the Vanguard Veterans decked out in Deathwatch armor as well. If there is enough parts in the box to go across multiple kits, I would pick up two DW Veterans and a Tactical Squad to make two 10-man Deathwatch Kill Teams. I doubt GW will be that generous though.


I have to disagree; I really don't believe GW will scimp on the bitz. GW'S kits, especially for marines are always crammed full of bits. The 10 man Space Wolves kit has like 210 components. 5 man Sternguard has around 120 components. The Bangles squad has at least 150 components. The basic tac squad clocks in at an extremely generous 170, iirc correctly. We'll be okay when it comes to DW customization options.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 10:20:42


Post by: Januine


 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
I want Inquisitors and Xeno-exterminating henchmen spraying poisons everywhere like they were killing roaches.

That would actually make me buy this.

Marines in Black?

I can take them or leave them.


This - much as I'm loving the DW stuff, and I really am, I would love to see some Inq backup/puppetmasters coming along for the glorious ride!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 10:27:16


Post by: Mr Morden


The Deathwatch veterans could just be five of the figures from the board game?



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 10:32:56


Post by: Rayvon


 Mr Morden wrote:
The Deathwatch veterans could just be five of the figures from the board game?



Aye, or some sort of veterans with an upgrade sprue.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 11:01:06


Post by: Yodhrin


 H.B.M.C. wrote:
I really want a DW shoulder pad for a Dread.


I need more Terminator-size pads for artscaling, casting the one from DW:OK has proven a pain in the arse.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 11:24:39


Post by: H.B.M.C.


Ah yes, Terminator pads. Forgot about them. Got most of mine from painful bitz buying as a single one is in the regular Termy kit.

One guy who I bought some from couldn't fulfil the order, so cast some extras up for me. They honestly look like they're made of white chocolate!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 12:13:41


Post by: Imateria


I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 12:29:09


Post by: General Kroll


 Imateria wrote:
I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


Agreed, I just wish it was easier to slot a Shadowseer in here and there.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 12:33:09


Post by: the_scotsman


 Imateria wrote:
I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


Honestly, it doesn't look good at all. First of all, what does Eldrad really bring to units of harlequins? Not a heck of a lot. He'd be better served palling around with something shootier since he has almost no melee power for his points cost, and definitely something more durable.

Death Jester, Skyweavers, Voidweaver...it's the trifecta of tax units that generally don't benefit at all from harlequin formations! There is almost no formation bonus they can come up with that will benefit all three.

This is basically a different flavor of Cegorach's Jest, the formation that doesn't benefit the skyweavers and voidweaver at all, and just forces you to take them because GW wants you to buy more models. Unless the benefit is something really head and shoulders better than most of the crappy bonuses we get, it's not going to be great. and given the track record with starter box/start collecting formations, I'm not expecting much for the massive points investment.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 12:33:43


Post by: kronk


 H.B.M.C. wrote:
 Breotan wrote:
I don't know if they'll continue the shoulderpad motif to Dreads or not. More likely is to replace the front armor plate with Deathwatch specific plating instead and have some icon for the shoulder(s).


I meant something like this:





That's pretty ballin'


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Yodhrin wrote:
 H.B.M.C. wrote:
I really want a DW shoulder pad for a Dread.


I need more Terminator-size pads for artscaling, casting the one from DW:OK has proven a pain in the arse.


I used the Grey Knight shoulder pads for my DeathWatch terminators and Power Armored dudes.





general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 13:17:52


Post by: Vain


Ive used the GK termi pads for termis but never got on board for using them on the PA.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 13:41:46


Post by: kronk


I can't wait to see the new kits.

 Vain wrote:
Ive used the GK termi pads for termis but never got on board for using them on the PA.


They still have the pricey conversion kits: https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/Deathwatch-Kill-Team-Conversion-Kit



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 13:48:44


Post by: Davor


Vain wrote:You almost had me looking for an Eldar god "R'het C'hon"...



I thought he meant it was a Necron Lord at first.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 13:51:46


Post by: EnTyme


Wouldn't it be awesome if GW included updated Kill Team rules in this codex based off of the HoR version? Not holding my breath, but what if . . .


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 14:07:07


Post by: Kanluwen


 H.B.M.C. wrote:

Also Deathwatch will not only get the Boxed set, there will also be Bikes, Landraiders, Razorbacks, a box with 10 marines and Character Models for example the Watchmaster.


Here we are, mere days away from Codex: Deathwatch, something I never thought would ever happen... and still my cynicism says "This is nonsense!" to all of this.

Who was it that posted that?

So far the only reliable rumormonger(Sad Panda) who put anything down said a Deathwatch Veteran box, some plastic characters, Watch-Captain Artemis, and a gunship.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 14:40:09


Post by: fresus


 General Kroll wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


Agreed, I just wish it was easier to slot a Shadowseer in here and there.


With a bit of luck, the formation will have optional units. Something like 1 Eldrad, 2-4 unites of players, 1-3 jesters, 0-3 shadowseers, 0-1 solitaire etc.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 14:41:00


Post by: Vain


 kronk wrote:
I can't wait to see the new kits.

They still have the pricey conversion kits: https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/Deathwatch-Kill-Team-Conversion-Kit


I have over 100 Tac/Assault/Stern/Tanker/Biker/Capt/Chap Masters with the plastic shoulder pads. I am not going to mix and match them at this point.
I am, waiting for the new set and hoping they are similar enough to slot in.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 14:41:39


Post by: Davor


What is HoR? Why would GW base Kill Teams rules off Hordes?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 14:45:13


Post by: Nevelon


Davor wrote:
What is HoR? Why would GW base Kill Teams rules off Hordes?


http://heralds-of-ruin.blogspot.dk/p/kill-team-rules.html

Heralds of Ruin, a fan-made kill team rule set.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 15:02:03


Post by: Kanluwen


fresus wrote:
 General Kroll wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


Agreed, I just wish it was easier to slot a Shadowseer in here and there.


With a bit of luck, the formation will have optional units. Something like 1 Eldrad, 2-4 unites of players, 1-3 jesters, 0-3 shadowseers, 0-1 solitaire etc.

Because boxed set formations are known for their flexibility?

It's going to likely be done up like Stormclaw, Deathstorm, or the two Damocles boxes.
You get squads with specific loadouts, the vehicles with specific loadouts and the characters, then a "big" formation incorporating them all at once.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 15:07:51


Post by: Davor


Nevelon wrote:
Davor wrote:
What is HoR? Why would GW base Kill Teams rules off Hordes?


http://heralds-of-ruin.blogspot.dk/p/kill-team-rules.html

Heralds of Ruin, a fan-made kill team rule set.


Thank you.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 15:35:22


Post by: zamerion


From Faeit:

Hi! FYI on the new White Dwarf: It will be like good old times. But lets focus on releases:
Free Gift Miniature is a Slaughterpriest with Hackblade(existing)

Kharn the Betrayer is a new release but not the free gift, coming alongside a new supplement that contains new rules for CSM, including Renegade Knights etc. It is called "Traitor's Hate" and has a Black Crusade label on it.

Deathwatch is going to be huge. There will be repacked boxes of existing Space Marines with additional Deathwatch sprues. What I remember is:
- Dreadnoughts
- Bikes
- Vanguard
- Razorback
- Land Raider
- Space Marine Characters
- New Character
- Flyer
- Deathwatch Squad

Aaaaaand:

The Void Shield Generator... yes, it is back in september - and its plastic! Same model as the limited one.

Thats what I remember. And trust me. The new WD is just awesome... good old times are back!!! 14 pages of battle report for example!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 15:38:41


Post by: Warpig1815


@Vain - I used the ones from the Command Squad, but at one point they were like gold dust on eBay - and priced to match.

@kronk - The bolters tend to go pretty cheap on eBay. I've seen two sets go for £0.99 in the last week alone. You can never find the pauldrons though.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 15:50:25


Post by: Davor


Problem is, what is "good times". For me the WD good times were early 2000's while some said their good times were 2010s which I thought were just horrible after mid 2005+


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 15:58:13


Post by: EnTyme


Davor wrote:
Nevelon wrote:
Davor wrote:
What is HoR? Why would GW base Kill Teams rules off Hordes?


http://heralds-of-ruin.blogspot.dk/p/kill-team-rules.html

Heralds of Ruin, a fan-made kill team rule set.


Thank you.


If you want to see how it's played, miniwargaming did a Kill Team narrative series that was a lot of fun to watch. They modified the rules a little to add more RPG/Campaign elements, but the core is the same.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 15:59:01


Post by: zedmeister


zamerion wrote:
From Faeit:

The Void Shield Generator... yes, it is back in september - and its plastic! Same model as the limited one.




Good one, Feait, I'll believe it when I see it


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 16:08:20


Post by: Desubot


 zedmeister wrote:
zamerion wrote:
From Faeit:

The Void Shield Generator... yes, it is back in september - and its plastic! Same model as the limited one.




Good one, Feait, I'll believe it when I see it


meh dont think i could care about the VSG

its REALLY ugly. imho


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 16:16:58


Post by: unmercifulconker


Just seems like the person has mashed together rumours that have been said in the past such as DW bikes, tanks etc and added the voidshield kit as their own and made it super legit by telling us the exact number of pages the new WD has on the battle report.



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 16:37:41


Post by: Lord Perversor


the_scotsman wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


Honestly, it doesn't look good at all. First of all, what does Eldrad really bring to units of harlequins? Not a heck of a lot. He'd be better served palling around with something shootier since he has almost no melee power for his points cost, and definitely something more durable.


Unless you are sporting a 2+ save or Eternal Warrior you don't want to mess up with a psyker with Ws 5 Init 5 that always wound at 2+ and quite capable to get ID on it's weapon, sure he's not durable but he's ironically one of the best all rounder to take care of MC and GMC creatures in melee.

And that's without taking into consideration the psy powers he can get on each match.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 16:55:15


Post by: the_scotsman


Lord Perversor wrote:
the_scotsman wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


Honestly, it doesn't look good at all. First of all, what does Eldrad really bring to units of harlequins? Not a heck of a lot. He'd be better served palling around with something shootier since he has almost no melee power for his points cost, and definitely something more durable.


Unless you are sporting a 2+ save or Eternal Warrior you don't want to mess up with a psyker with Ws 5 Init 5 that always wound at 2+ and quite capable to get ID on it's weapon, sure he's not durable but he's ironically one of the best all rounder to take care of MC and GMC creatures in melee.

And that's without taking into consideration the psy powers he can get on each match.


Yeah. But remember, Harlequins already have access to a WS5 I6 or 7 psyker who always wounds on a 2+. For 60 points. How many points does mr T3 no eternal warrior cost? 250?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 17:06:29


Post by: fresus


the_scotsman wrote:
Lord Perversor wrote:
the_scotsman wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


Honestly, it doesn't look good at all. First of all, what does Eldrad really bring to units of harlequins? Not a heck of a lot. He'd be better served palling around with something shootier since he has almost no melee power for his points cost, and definitely something more durable.


Unless you are sporting a 2+ save or Eternal Warrior you don't want to mess up with a psyker with Ws 5 Init 5 that always wound at 2+ and quite capable to get ID on it's weapon, sure he's not durable but he's ironically one of the best all rounder to take care of MC and GMC creatures in melee.

And that's without taking into consideration the psy powers he can get on each match.


Yeah. But remember, Harlequins already have access to a WS5 I6 or 7 psyker who always wounds on a 2+. For 60 points. How many points does mr T3 no eternal warrior cost? 250?


The Shadowseer's mistave has no AP, and doesn't have force, so it's quite different.
Current Eldrad is 195pts (and T4). But he also has only 1A (two with his two weapons), so it's not that easy to have a successful ID attack go through (as most things you want to ID have a 2+ or a good invul)


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 17:08:28


Post by: Azreal13


Just popped up..

[Thumb - 40kdeldar.jpg]


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 17:12:17


Post by: Slayer-Fan123


 Azreal13 wrote:
Just popped up..

I like that picture of the Jester, not gonna lie.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 17:33:52


Post by: Vorian


They're not actually going to have Ynnead come to life are they?! Great Scott!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 17:39:32


Post by: Mr Morden


Vorian wrote:
They're not actually going to have Ynnead come to life are they?! Great Scott!


Maybe he or she will have Avatars - new big model for Eldar.................bit surprised that using Eldread - isn't Illyanna the main believer in Ynnead - heaven fobid we have another female model in 40k I guess.

Isn;t there something in one of the recent BL novels about Slaanesh being taken down? Not sure what that would mean - although I guess the other Eldar gods could also break free - or at least the ones that Slaanesh consumed, reclaimed, ate?



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 17:55:17


Post by: gungo


 Mr Morden wrote:
Vorian wrote:
They're not actually going to have Ynnead come to life are they?! Great Scott!


Maybe he or she will have Avatars - new big model for Eldar.................bit surprised that using Eldread - isn't Illyanna the main believer in Ynnead - heaven fobid we have another female model in 40k I guess.

Isn;t there something in one of the recent BL novels about Slaanesh being taken down? Not sure what that would mean - although I guess the other Eldar gods could also break free - or at least the ones that Slaanesh consumed, reclaimed, ate?


With all the rumors of primarchs and demon primarchs coming back.
If GW is really going this route with most factions receiving a big bad lord of war type character I'd expect someone like illyanna to become the avatar of ynnead and take up that role. Meaning if such a model is coming it likely will arrive later as this story progresses.
Heck with GW recent love of new large kits, I'm fully expecting the finecast ghazskull thraka to be redone with the next Ork codex and become a new plastic monstrous creature size character. Possibly just as large as "the beast" from the beast arrives stories. That Ork was nearly the size of an imperial knight.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 17:56:03


Post by: Requizen


gungo wrote:
 Mr Morden wrote:
Vorian wrote:
They're not actually going to have Ynnead come to life are they?! Great Scott!


Maybe he or she will have Avatars - new big model for Eldar.................bit surprised that using Eldread - isn't Illyanna the main believer in Ynnead - heaven fobid we have another female model in 40k I guess.

Isn;t there something in one of the recent BL novels about Slaanesh being taken down? Not sure what that would mean - although I guess the other Eldar gods could also break free - or at least the ones that Slaanesh consumed, reclaimed, ate?


With all the rumors of primarchs and demon primarchs coming back.
If GW is really going this route with most factions receiving a big bad lord of war type character I'd expect someone like illyanna to become the avatar of ynnead and take up that role. Meaning if such a model is coming it likely will arrive later as this story progresses.
Heck with GW recent love of new large kits, I'm fully expecting the finecast ghazskull thraka to be redone with the next Ork codex and become a new plastic monstrous creature size character. Possibly just as large as "the beast" from the beast arrives stories. That Ork was nearly the size of an imperial knight.


If that's true, I want my Silent King model for Necrons. With a buff that makes all Reanimates happen on a 3+


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 18:04:26


Post by: migooo


I wonder if we will get an outsider figure too


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 18:07:19


Post by: Warpig1815


So what would the Adeptus Mechanicus get - the Void Dragon?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 18:12:20


Post by: Imateria


fresus wrote:
the_scotsman wrote:
Lord Perversor wrote:
the_scotsman wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
I think the Harley's formation is what I'm looking forward to most, at present the Masque detachment is really restrictive and the formations rather uninspiring (Most of them seem to be geared around Voidweavers and Starweavers rather than the Players) and the lack of any HQ choices makes it impossible to field them in a CAD. I don't think it even matters if the bonus is any good, the set up just looks more usable.

Eldrad
2 units of Players
Deathjester
1 unit of Skyweavers
1 Voidweaver


Honestly, it doesn't look good at all. First of all, what does Eldrad really bring to units of harlequins? Not a heck of a lot. He'd be better served palling around with something shootier since he has almost no melee power for his points cost, and definitely something more durable.


Unless you are sporting a 2+ save or Eternal Warrior you don't want to mess up with a psyker with Ws 5 Init 5 that always wound at 2+ and quite capable to get ID on it's weapon, sure he's not durable but he's ironically one of the best all rounder to take care of MC and GMC creatures in melee.

And that's without taking into consideration the psy powers he can get on each match.


Yeah. But remember, Harlequins already have access to a WS5 I6 or 7 psyker who always wounds on a 2+. For 60 points. How many points does mr T3 no eternal warrior cost? 250?


The Shadowseer's mistave has no AP, and doesn't have force, so it's quite different.
Current Eldrad is 195pts (and T4). But he also has only 1A (two with his two weapons), so it's not that easy to have a successful ID attack go through (as most things you want to ID have a 2+ or a good invul)

Biggest bonus though, Eldrad's ML4 with a Ghosthelm, Runes of the Farseer and Spiritlink. I wonder if they'll change his faction for this to Harlequins so that he can join with tooled up Player squad in a Starweaver during deployment, suddenly not having access to a Jet Bike isn't such a drawback.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Mr Morden wrote:
Vorian wrote:
They're not actually going to have Ynnead come to life are they?! Great Scott!


Maybe he or she will have Avatars - new big model for Eldar.................bit surprised that using Eldread - isn't Illyanna the main believer in Ynnead - heaven fobid we have another female model in 40k I guess.

Isn;t there something in one of the recent BL novels about Slaanesh being taken down? Not sure what that would mean - although I guess the other Eldar gods could also break free - or at least the ones that Slaanesh consumed, reclaimed, ate?


No, Eldrad is Ynnead's big believer, as I think it was him that discovered the nascent god in the firstplace.

An Ilyana model for an Iyanden army would be very cool though.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 18:22:53


Post by: gungo


 Warpig1815 wrote:
So what would the Adeptus Mechanicus get - the Void Dragon?

They get lumped in with all the imperial factions kinda like all eldar do with ynnead avatar.
The best a new imperial guard can hope for is a new "Solar" Creed character which still isn't the same power level as primarchs, avatars, silent King, ghaz character. Tyranids have thier rumoured hive mind bug.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 18:24:08


Post by: Don Savik


So this pretty much debunks all the nonsense eldar rumors of black library nonsense? (harlequin Yriel was the dumbest thing I've heard ever) I mean I doubt they're also going to make the new chaos campaign against eldar if this release is including eldar.


And this was all from the rumor mongers that people said were legit.



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 18:42:52


Post by: Warpig1815


gungo wrote:
 Warpig1815 wrote:
So what would the Adeptus Mechanicus get - the Void Dragon?

They get lumped in with all the imperial factions kinda like all eldar do with ynnead avatar.
The best a new imperial guard can hope for is a new "Solar" Creed character which still isn't the same power level as primarchs, avatars, silent King, ghaz character. Tyranids have thier rumoured hive mind bug.


Oh I was just musing. Having the Void Dragon wake up would be rather an interesting concept...


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 18:48:13


Post by: Lord Perversor


gungo wrote:
 Warpig1815 wrote:
So what would the Adeptus Mechanicus get - the Void Dragon?

They get lumped in with all the imperial factions kinda like all eldar do with ynnead avatar.
The best a new imperial guard can hope for is a new "Solar" Creed character which still isn't the same power level as primarchs, avatars, silent King, ghaz character. Tyranids have thier rumoured hive mind bug.


Tbh honest i always cheer up my local Nyd player telling him GW must make the dominatrix in 40k a real thing!!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 18:48:52


Post by: Imateria


 Don Savik wrote:
So this pretty much debunks all the nonsense eldar rumors of black library nonsense? (harlequin Yriel was the dumbest thing I've heard ever) I mean I doubt they're also going to make the new chaos campaign against eldar if this release is including eldar.


And this was all from the rumor mongers that people said were legit.


I don't think anybody believed that list to be anything more than wishlisting, no matter how good it all looked.

And as was repeatedly pointed out, Yriel joins the Hrlequins at the end of Valedor, so it wouldn't have been such a big thing if it was replicated on the table top.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 19:14:20


Post by: GoatboyBeta


 Don Savik wrote:
So this pretty much debunks all the nonsense eldar rumors of black library nonsense? (harlequin Yriel was the dumbest thing I've heard ever) I mean I doubt they're also going to make the new chaos campaign against eldar if this release is including eldar.


And this was all from the rumor mongers that people said were legit.



As salty as that big list tasted I don't see anything so far that contradicts it. Having a model(Eldrad) in the Death masque box doesn't mean that GW wont release another set further down the line with it in as well, especially if one of them is not a permanent stock item.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 19:15:43


Post by: pm713


 Imateria wrote:
 Don Savik wrote:
So this pretty much debunks all the nonsense eldar rumors of black library nonsense? (harlequin Yriel was the dumbest thing I've heard ever) I mean I doubt they're also going to make the new chaos campaign against eldar if this release is including eldar.


And this was all from the rumor mongers that people said were legit.


I don't think anybody believed that list to be anything more than wishlisting, no matter how good it all looked.

And as was repeatedly pointed out, Yriel joins the Hrlequins at the end of Valedor, so it wouldn't have been such a big thing if it was replicated on the table top.

I never got the impression he actually joined them.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 20:59:46


Post by: Pilum


"Long dead souls gather behind
The Rebirth of Ancient Days"

Hmm, plastic Aspects confirmed? Plastic is made from oil which is dead animals, and "Rebirth of Ancient Days" is the meaning of Biel-Tan...

Note: This may not be 100% serious..!

Jokes aside, its either going to be a major Craftworld per prophecy or there's something else in the background that's not just Eldrad running away with the circus. Or I'm reading far too much into this! (I know which I'm putting the mortgage on!)


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 21:03:59


Post by: Ian Sturrock


Davor wrote:
Problem is, what is "good times". For me the WD good times were early 2000's while some said their good times were 2010s which I thought were just horrible after mid 2005+


So for me, I can date the "good times" very precisely to 1981. The "Dungeon Architect" series by Roger Musson is still probably some of the best GMing / RPG worldbuilding advice I have ever seen, and still influential on my own game design and GMing processes.

OK so you have some dull pontificating from Lew Pulsipher around the same era, but Musson's stuff is still solid gold.

/old-timer


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 22:12:47


Post by: silverstu


Pilum wrote:
"Long dead souls gather behind
The Rebirth of Ancient Days"

Hmm, plastic Aspects confirmed? Plastic is made from oil which is dead animals, and "Rebirth of Ancient Days" is the meaning of Biel-Tan...

Note: This may not be 100% serious..!

Jokes aside, its either going to be a major Craftworld per prophecy or there's something else in the background that's not just Eldrad running away with the circus. Or I'm reading far too much into this! (I know which I'm putting the mortgage on!)


Long dead souls- maybe Phoenix Lords gathering with Biel-Tan?
Sounds interesting! I'd have thought plastic aspects would be saved for the next big edition of eldar in 8th maybe? [I don't want to get my hopes up and neither does my wallet!]


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 22:21:56


Post by: Vorian


The long dead souls are the Eldar in infinity circuits. They are causing Ynnead to coalesce into existence.

Then he will protect their souls from being devoured by Slaanesh, so they can go back to reincarnating again.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 22:33:25


Post by: scarletsquig


Vorian wrote:
The long dead souls are the Eldar in infinity circuits. They are causing Ynnead to coalesce into existence.

Then he will protect their souls from being devoured by Slaanesh, so they can go back to reincarnating again.


This seems like the most likely option, if current lore is being paid attention to.

Glad they're finally moving the storyline forward, although hopefully it is done well and a new square-based sci-fi game doesn't replace 40k. :p


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 22:55:28


Post by: MajorWesJanson


 zedmeister wrote:
zamerion wrote:
From Faeit:

The Void Shield Generator... yes, it is back in september - and its plastic! Same model as the limited one.




Good one, Feait, I'll believe it when I see it


I know it is Faeit, but I hope this is true. If it is, I'll be getting 3. And it does make sense, as it is one of the few units without an available model for sale, and a popular one to boot.

 Warpig1815 wrote:
So what would the Adeptus Mechanicus get - the Void Dragon?


No, they will get the obvious avatar of the machine god- a titan.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/02 23:42:58


Post by: FabricatorGeneralMike


zamerion wrote:
From Faeit:

Hi! FYI on the new White Dwarf: It will be like good old times. But lets focus on releases:
Free Gift Miniature is a Slaughterpriest with Hackblade(existing)

Kharn the Betrayer is a new release but not the free gift, coming alongside a new supplement that contains new rules for CSM, including Renegade Knights etc. It is called "Traitor's Hate" and has a Black Crusade label on it.

Deathwatch is going to be huge. There will be repacked boxes of existing Space Marines with additional Deathwatch sprues. What I remember is:
- Dreadnoughts
- Bikes
- Vanguard
- Razorback
- Land Raider
- Space Marine Characters
- New Character
- Flyer
- Deathwatch Squad

Aaaaaand:

The Void Shield Generator... yes, it is back in september - and its plastic! Same model as the limited one.

Thats what I remember. And trust me. The new WD is just awesome... good old times are back!!! 14 pages of battle report for example!


Wow....Faeit you just never give up do you? You are almost as bad as the hack/clickbaitduche know as larry velah aka BloS.... I mean I can make up crap to and post it on the interwebz. Or I can wait until proven people post stuff and then post it a day or two later and " Make it a little better"....

PS that post had nothing to do with you Zam, was not directed at you in any way.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 00:03:56


Post by: Davor


Ian Sturrock wrote:
Davor wrote:
Problem is, what is "good times". For me the WD good times were early 2000's while some said their good times were 2010s which I thought were just horrible after mid 2005+


So for me, I can date the "good times" very precisely to 1981. The "Dungeon Architect" series by Roger Musson is still probably some of the best GMing / RPG worldbuilding advice I have ever seen, and still influential on my own game design and GMing processes.

OK so you have some dull pontificating from Lew Pulsipher around the same era, but Musson's stuff is still solid gold.

/old-timer


lol you got me beat. I only started in Rogue Trader but stopped because nobody played and couldn't buy product. Got back in the 2000s.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 00:22:26


Post by: MajorWesJanson


 FabricatorGeneralMike wrote:
zamerion wrote:
From Faeit:

Hi! FYI on the new White Dwarf: It will be like good old times. But lets focus on releases:
Free Gift Miniature is a Slaughterpriest with Hackblade(existing)

Kharn the Betrayer is a new release but not the free gift, coming alongside a new supplement that contains new rules for CSM, including Renegade Knights etc. It is called "Traitor's Hate" and has a Black Crusade label on it.

Deathwatch is going to be huge. There will be repacked boxes of existing Space Marines with additional Deathwatch sprues. What I remember is:
- Dreadnoughts
- Bikes
- Vanguard
- Razorback
- Land Raider
- Space Marine Characters
- New Character
- Flyer
- Deathwatch Squad

Aaaaaand:

The Void Shield Generator... yes, it is back in september - and its plastic! Same model as the limited one.

Thats what I remember. And trust me. The new WD is just awesome... good old times are back!!! 14 pages of battle report for example!


Wow....Faeit you just never give up do you? You are almost as bad as the hack/clickbaitduche know as larry velah aka BloS.... I mean I can make up crap to and post it on the interwebz. Or I can wait until proven people post stuff and then post it a day or two later and " Make it a little better"....

PS that post had nothing to do with you Zam, was not directed at you in any way.


Splash releases of existing kits bundled with new upgrade sprues actually sounds plausible. They did it for Black Templars back in the day, and far more recently, Space Wolves saw Long Fangs, Sky Claws, and other box sets.

VSG in plastic I hope is true, as it is one of the few units without a model for sale, and a popular one at that. If this is true, they have me for 2-3 of them.

Agreed that Faeit is a worthless site. But even they get it right sometimes They are about 400 true to 900 false, but that is still about a 30% chance of being accurate


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 00:45:49


Post by: Yodhrin


 Warpig1815 wrote:
gungo wrote:
 Warpig1815 wrote:
So what would the Adeptus Mechanicus get - the Void Dragon?

They get lumped in with all the imperial factions kinda like all eldar do with ynnead avatar.
The best a new imperial guard can hope for is a new "Solar" Creed character which still isn't the same power level as primarchs, avatars, silent King, ghaz character. Tyranids have thier rumoured hive mind bug.


Oh I was just musing. Having the Void Dragon wake up would be rather an interesting concept...


This is a genuine enquiry, not snark, because it baffles me and perhaps you can explain: why do people find fluff advances that fundamentally change the nature of their subject appealing? I don't mean edge-tinkering "advancement" of a storyline or soft-retcons to introduce new elements to support model releases, I mean theme-and-tone-shattering shifts that must inevitably alter most if not all of the things that characterise the subject of the changes.

There's no way GW confirming 100% no-ambiguity that the Dragon is on Mars, did actually cause the AdMech, and has now awoken could do anything other than fundamentally change the faction, perhaps even destroy it utterly in favour of multiple new and very different factions - so where on earth is the appeal of that for someone who actually likes the Adeptus Mechanicus for what they are?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 01:04:10


Post by: Breotan


 H.B.M.C. wrote:
 Breotan wrote:
I don't know if they'll continue the shoulderpad motif to Dreads or not. More likely is to replace the front armor plate with Deathwatch specific plating instead and have some icon for the shoulder(s).

I meant something like this:

Spoiler:

Yes, I understood what you were after, I just wonder if they'll actually do it or if they'll just replace the front plate? Given they're including the Ven Dread, it seems like the front plate is the easiest way to go. Then again, who knows? Maybe GW will go the extra mile.

My assessment of Faeit's "predictions" added inline, below.

- Dreadnoughts (Front plate of sarcophagus, plus icons on upgrade sprue)
- Bikes (Front fairing on upgrade sprue)
- Vanguard (Bits, plus DW weapons/shoulderpads on upgrade sprue)
- Razorback (Doors plus icons on upgrade sprue)
- Land Raider (Doors/ramp plus icons on upgrade sprue)
- Space Marine Characters (none specifically except for the one below)
- New Character (Artimus, the big metal 50mm guy from Inquisitor redone as plastic clamshell)
- Flyer (Doors/ramp plus icons on upgrade sprue)
- Deathwatch Squad (new plastic multi-part kit)




general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 01:18:15


Post by: casvalremdeikun


I anticipate the bikes upgrade to just be the Special Ammunition variation of the bike bolters like what the White Scar from Deathwatch Overkill had.

The DW flyer is supposed to be something completely new, not a Stormraven. The talk was that it looked similar to a Tau flyer.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 01:20:40


Post by: russian69hitman


Not seeing all the Deathwatch info in one spot yet....

The Codex Layout and Rules:

This is a very different layout and organization than the traditional Codex: Space Marines.
The codex will contain a very small number of units and many characters.
Every Character from Deathwatch Overkill is included.
There will be a HQ choice.
There will be 1-2 Troops unit choices.
3-5 Formations.
Drop Pods are in the codex.
The big theme of the codex is customization. While the number of units is very small, there are lavish and exhaustive upgrade options for each and every model in the army. Things such as wargear, weapons, and even originating chapters all can be picked and have in-game effects.


There’s a pretty cool, very sleek dropship/flyer dual kit with an enormous Inquisition =I= as fuselage.

28mm Capt. Artemis is also a go, probably a single character clam pack.

Deathwatch Kill Team Kit
Kit is built atop the Plastic Sternguard kit

SM-box-sternguard
Includes an additional Deathwatch sprue loaded with Killteam bits including:

– Over a dozen shoulder pads (Half Deathwatch logos, half various chapter logos)

– New Deathwatch heads

– Multiple Deathwatch equipment back/powerpacks

– Unique Killteam weapons (both shooting and assault)

– Deathwatch pouches, seals, etc, minor bits.



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 01:28:04


Post by: Breotan


 russian69hitman wrote:
There’s a pretty cool, very sleek dropship/flyer dual kit with an enormous Inquisition =I= as fuselage.

I don't see how you get "very sleek" from the shape of the =I= symbol. I'm not a fan of the Cestus or the SW version and that's what's coming to mind, but I'll keep the optimism going for this.

 casvalremdeikun wrote:
The talk was that it looked similar to a Tau flyer.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

Spoiler:




general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 01:35:14


Post by: Lockark


 Breotan wrote:
 russian69hitman wrote:
There’s a pretty cool, very sleek dropship/flyer dual kit with an enormous Inquisition =I= as fuselage.

I don't see how you get "very sleek" from the shape of the =I= symbol. I'm not a fan of the Cestus or the SW version and that's what's coming to mind, but I'll keep the optimism going for this.



SM fliers are meant to fly like a brick threw a window.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 02:10:57


Post by: Gamgee


The talk said it was like a cross between an Imperium aircraft and Tau, but not as sleek as Tau. What does that mean? Is it actually a hybrid craft? Which would be sick as hell. Or does it mean from an artistic and aesthetics point? It then said it had the Inquisitorial I on it.

I think it's the latter in this case. Either way I'm looking forward to it.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 02:42:45


Post by: casvalremdeikun


 Gamgee wrote:
The talk said it was like a cross between an Imperium aircraft and Tau, but not as sleek as Tau. What does that mean? Is it actually a hybrid craft? Which would be sick as hell. Or does it mean from an artistic and aesthetics point? It then said it had the Inquisitorial I on it.

I think it's the latter in this case. Either way I'm looking forward to it.
I could see it being more sleek and less boxy. Perhaps not B-2 Spirit level, but maybe like an F-117 Nighthawk.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 02:47:08


Post by: Kanluwen


 russian69hitman wrote:
Spoiler:
Not seeing all the Deathwatch info in one spot yet....

The Codex Layout and Rules:

This is a very different layout and organization than the traditional Codex: Space Marines.
The codex will contain a very small number of units and many characters.
Every Character from Deathwatch Overkill is included.
There will be a HQ choice.
There will be 1-2 Troops unit choices.
3-5 Formations.
Drop Pods are in the codex.
The big theme of the codex is customization. While the number of units is very small, there are lavish and exhaustive upgrade options for each and every model in the army. Things such as wargear, weapons, and even originating chapters all can be picked and have in-game effects.


There’s a pretty cool, very sleek dropship/flyer dual kit with an enormous Inquisition =I= as fuselage.

28mm Capt. Artemis is also a go, probably a single character clam pack.

Deathwatch Kill Team Kit
Kit is built atop the Plastic Sternguard kit

SM-box-sternguard
Includes an additional Deathwatch sprue loaded with Killteam bits including:

– Over a dozen shoulder pads (Half Deathwatch logos, half various chapter logos)

– New Deathwatch heads

– Multiple Deathwatch equipment back/powerpacks

– Unique Killteam weapons (both shooting and assault)

– Deathwatch pouches, seals, etc, minor bits.


Where does that list come from? Because the "Sternguard with additional Deathwatch sprue" thing was debunked by Sad Panda.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 03:06:12


Post by: Uriels_Flame


Wouldn't you be able to look at the Deathwatch game and figure out what will be released? How many different pieces are there?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 03:26:02


Post by: Nostromodamus


 Uriels_Flame wrote:
Wouldn't you be able to look at the Deathwatch game and figure out what will be released? How many different pieces are there?


No. That was entirely composed of special characters.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 03:47:00


Post by: tneva82


 MajorWesJanson wrote:
Agreed that Faeit is a worthless site. But even they get it right sometimes They are about 400 true to 900 false, but that is still about a 30% chance of being accurate


And how many of those they simply grabbed from elsewhere ergo you could have gotten them faster from the real source rather than try to figure out what from faeith is crap and what was taken from elsewhere? How much accurate stuff Faeith has up first?

Accurate stuff from that list as well were posted elsewhere before faeith...

There's no reason to follow that site. Lots of trash, when they put in accurate stuff you have already seen them elsewhere.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 04:05:33


Post by: MajorWesJanson


tneva82 wrote:
 MajorWesJanson wrote:
Agreed that Faeit is a worthless site. But even they get it right sometimes They are about 400 true to 900 false, but that is still about a 30% chance of being accurate


And how many of those they simply grabbed from elsewhere ergo you could have gotten them faster from the real source rather than try to figure out what from faeith is crap and what was taken from elsewhere? How much accurate stuff Faeith has up first?

Accurate stuff from that list as well were posted elsewhere before faeith...

There's no reason to follow that site. Lots of trash, when they put in accurate stuff you have already seen them elsewhere.


Fully agreed.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 04:59:38


Post by: Vain


tneva82 wrote:
And how many of those they simply grabbed from elsewhere ergo you could have gotten them faster from the real source rather than try to figure out what from faeith is crap and what was taken from elsewhere? How much accurate stuff Faeith has up first?

Accurate stuff from that list as well were posted elsewhere before faeith...

There's no reason to follow that site. Lots of trash, when they put in accurate stuff you have already seen them elsewhere.


Sounds like you suffer from a lack faeith...



Edit: A simple one liner is defeated by constant quotation fails


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 06:26:08


Post by: Moopy


 Yodhrin wrote:


This is a genuine enquiry, not snark, because it baffles me and perhaps you can explain: why do people find fluff advances that fundamentally change the nature of their subject appealing? I don't mean edge-tinkering "advancement" of a storyline or soft-retcons to introduce new elements to support model releases, I mean theme-and-tone-shattering shifts that must inevitably alter most if not all of the things that characterise the subject of the changes.


This is a terrific question. It's a topic that I discussed with one of the Black Liberary writers a couple months ago.

The answer: Currently 40k feels like professional wrestling.

I've been playing since 1988 and at this point I'm not excited about any big conflicts at this point.

Orks hit Armaggeddon and are making a mess of things. So what? There's no reprocussions for the lost output of the Forgeworld.
Tyranids hit the Shield Worlds, made a mess of things and weren't stopped. So what? There's no reprocussions to the Blood Angels for losing so many warriors in that fight.
13th Black Crusade where Chaos gets on Cadia. So what?

None of it changes the way the game is played or fundamentally alters the structure of the universe. The Imperium is still bloated and endlessly big, Eldar are still "waining" or whatever that means, Chaos is still plotting to get back in. There's huge fights with heroics and trechery, and secrets are revealed or knowledge lost! But nothing really changes in the big picture- it means nothing. Oh sure there's some fluff text here and there about how "desperate" things are or "teatering on the edge" but all those vauge words haven't altered a thing for a very long time. My army composition isn't changed, etc... etc...

Just like the Imperium fluff, the setting has become static and imobile while only sounding vaguely new. If these events aren't going to actually effect things, then all the excitement is drained out of it. Thus the wrestling example. There's lots of promises of events that could happen, or might happen, but for over twenty years, they haven't happened; you an only tease people so much with a posibility before they stop paying attention to it.

If this is a change, a REAL change, then I'm very excited for it.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 07:31:17


Post by: tneva82


 Vain wrote:
tneva82 wrote:
And how many of those they simply grabbed from elsewhere ergo you could have gotten them faster from the real source rather than try to figure out what from faeith is crap and what was taken from elsewhere? How much accurate stuff Faeith has up first?

Accurate stuff from that list as well were posted elsewhere before faeith...

There's no reason to follow that site. Lots of trash, when they put in accurate stuff you have already seen them elsewhere.


Sounds like you suffer from a lack faeith...



Edit: A simple one liner is defeated by constant quotation fails


The less one hears from that useless junk size the less time one wastes by having to filter off anything anybody posts from that utter waste of internet space only existing to filling purse of whoever is running that. Readers don't benefit unless they enjoy reading made up junk.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Moopy wrote:
None of it changes the way the game is played or fundamentally alters the structure of the universe. The Imperium is still bloated and endlessly big, Eldar are still "waining" or whatever that means, Chaos is still plotting to get back in. There's huge fights with heroics and trechery, and secrets are revealed or knowledge lost! But nothing really changes in the big picture- it means nothing. Oh sure there's some fluff text here and there about how "desperate" things are or "teatering on the edge" but all those vauge words haven't altered a thing for a very long time. My army composition isn't changed, etc... etc...


This assumes 40k is advancing story(that by nature then stiffles players freedom) rather than setting for players to make up their own stories.

You are supposed to do your own stories in the setting in which case there's changes. You aren't supposed to just read what GW feeds you on.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 07:38:21


Post by: H.B.M.C.


But 40K isn't a story. It's a setting. It's a place you can tell endless stories in, not a story unto itself.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 07:53:33


Post by: General Kroll


 Moopy wrote:
 Yodhrin wrote:


This is a genuine enquiry, not snark, because it baffles me and perhaps you can explain: why do people find fluff advances that fundamentally change the nature of their subject appealing? I don't mean edge-tinkering "advancement" of a storyline or soft-retcons to introduce new elements to support model releases, I mean theme-and-tone-shattering shifts that must inevitably alter most if not all of the things that characterise the subject of the changes.


This is a terrific question. It's a topic that I discussed with one of the Black Liberary writers a couple months ago.

The answer: Currently 40k feels like professional wrestling.

I've been playing since 1988 and at this point I'm not excited about any big conflicts at this point.

Orks hit Armaggeddon and are making a mess of things. So what? There's no reprocussions for the lost output of the Forgeworld.
Tyranids hit the Shield Worlds, made a mess of things and weren't stopped. So what? There's no reprocussions to the Blood Angels for losing so many warriors in that fight.
13th Black Crusade where Chaos gets on Cadia. So what?

None of it changes the way the game is played or fundamentally alters the structure of the universe. The Imperium is still bloated and endlessly big, Eldar are still "waining" or whatever that means, Chaos is still plotting to get back in. There's huge fights with heroics and trechery, and secrets are revealed or knowledge lost! But nothing really changes in the big picture- it means nothing. Oh sure there's some fluff text here and there about how "desperate" things are or "teatering on the edge" but all those vauge words haven't altered a thing for a very long time. My army composition isn't changed, etc... etc...

Just like the Imperium fluff, the setting has become static and imobile while only sounding vaguely new. If these events aren't going to actually effect things, then all the excitement is drained out of it. Thus the wrestling example. There's lots of promises of events that could happen, or might happen, but for over twenty years, they haven't happened; you an only tease people so much with a posibility before they stop paying attention to it.

If this is a change, a REAL change, then I'm very excited for it.


I didn't think I would, but I actually agree with the sentiment of this post. It would be nice to shift things along a little. They just need to be careful about what they do. I'm not one to hate on AoS but I think regarding the fluff, they dropped the ball there. 40k has a rich and deep background, souring that milk would be very unwise IMO. Part of the attraction to the game, and the reason so many people are willing to overlook all the rules inconsistencies and imbalance is the fluff and how flexible it is for players to make their own faction and drop it into this insane and crazy world that has a long and complicated history.

Sure, move things forward, but tread carefully.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 H.B.M.C. wrote:
But 40K isn't a story. It's a setting. It's a place you can tell endless stories in, not a story unto itself.


That's fine, the setting should be set in stone IMO. But there are still tonnes of stories within that setting that can be advanced without ruining it.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 07:58:53


Post by: angelofvengeance


Don't think this has been posted yet(Spoilered for image size):

Spoiler:


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 08:00:39


Post by: aracersss


that has been out since what ... Friday?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 08:14:34


Post by: Moopy


tneva82 wrote:

 Moopy wrote:
None of it changes the way the game is played or fundamentally alters the structure of the universe. The Imperium is still bloated and endlessly big, Eldar are still "waining" or whatever that means, Chaos is still plotting to get back in. There's huge fights with heroics and trechery, and secrets are revealed or knowledge lost! But nothing really changes in the big picture- it means nothing. Oh sure there's some fluff text here and there about how "desperate" things are or "teatering on the edge" but all those vauge words haven't altered a thing for a very long time. My army composition isn't changed, etc... etc...


This assumes 40k is advancing story(that by nature then stiffles players freedom) rather than setting for players to make up their own stories.

You are supposed to do your own stories in the setting in which case there's changes. You aren't supposed to just read what GW feeds you on.


But is IS an advancing story, at least on paper. All the big summer events that I took part of are now part of the narrative in the timeline (Armageddon 3, 13th Black Crusade, Fall of Medusa, etc)- these are in most of the codexs/main rule box in some form or another. The let down is that they changed nothing.

Also, YES, you can make up your own stories AS WELL, but they're within the framework of the larger one. There's no "Supposed to" anywhere; you can but there's no rule saying that's the only way.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 08:16:51


Post by: H.B.M.C.


 General Kroll wrote:
... the setting should be set in stone IMO. But there are still tonnes of stories within that setting that can be advanced without ruining it.


Stories can be advanced, as long as they don't change the setting.

I've always seen 40K as the opposite of Battletech in structure:

40K is a setting. Battletech is a story. One is static and allows you to tell stories. The other moves forward and you can pick where to jump in.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 08:45:32


Post by: tneva82


 Moopy wrote:
tneva82 wrote:

 Moopy wrote:
None of it changes the way the game is played or fundamentally alters the structure of the universe. The Imperium is still bloated and endlessly big, Eldar are still "waining" or whatever that means, Chaos is still plotting to get back in. There's huge fights with heroics and trechery, and secrets are revealed or knowledge lost! But nothing really changes in the big picture- it means nothing. Oh sure there's some fluff text here and there about how "desperate" things are or "teatering on the edge" but all those vauge words haven't altered a thing for a very long time. My army composition isn't changed, etc... etc...


This assumes 40k is advancing story(that by nature then stiffles players freedom) rather than setting for players to make up their own stories.

You are supposed to do your own stories in the setting in which case there's changes. You aren't supposed to just read what GW feeds you on.


But is IS an advancing story, at least on paper. All the big summer events that I took part of are now part of the narrative in the timeline (Armageddon 3, 13th Black Crusade, Fall of Medusa, etc)- these are in most of the codexs/main rule box in some form or another. The let down is that they changed nothing.

Also, YES, you can make up your own stories AS WELL, but they're within the framework of the larger one. There's no "Supposed to" anywhere; you can but there's no rule saying that's the only way.


Yeah. It's advancing story. Which is against what 40k really is. Setting. Not advancing story.

And yeah you can make up your own stories as well. You just need to rewrite those all the time when GW decides to change things...

GW should just keep 40k what it was originally. Setting. Not a story. When you have a story you need things to change which then will piss off customers whose army gets screwed. And it stiffles players own freedom as either they refrain from changing story or they have to rewrite their story all the time GW decides to spoonfeed next part of change in the story.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 08:58:08


Post by: Moopy


tneva82 wrote:


Yeah. It's advancing story. Which is against what 40k really is. Setting. Not advancing story.

And yeah you can make up your own stories as well. You just need to rewrite those all the time when GW decides to change things...

GW should just keep 40k what it was originally. Setting. Not a story. When you have a story you need things to change which then will piss off customers whose army gets screwed. And it stiffles players own freedom as either they refrain from changing story or they have to rewrite their story all the time GW decides to spoonfeed next part of change in the story.


I completely disagree that a setting has to be static. Static is ultimately boring. The Imperium will never lose the Gothic Sector no matter how many ork/necron/crazy-go-nuts things happen in it. So who cares if those things happen at all? I will say that too much change too fast is also not good, but if these rumor are true, then we're look at the first real change in the way things work in what? Over twenty years? About time.

Change does not stifle the players freedom- it offers new venues for different stories. If changes cripple a player's army, then yes that's a bad design choice, but inherently change isn't always bad. If it offers them new ways to play, then that can be fun.

If you don't agree, that's ok. I think we've made our points here for those that like and don't.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 09:34:58


Post by: tneva82


 Moopy wrote:

I completely disagree that a setting has to be static. Static is ultimately boring. The Imperium will never lose the Gothic Sector no matter how many ork/necron/crazy-go-nuts things happen in it. So who cares if those things happen at all? I will say that too much change too fast is also not good, but if these rumor are true, then we're look at the first real change in the way things work in what? Over twenty years? About time.

Change does not stifle the players freedom- it offers new venues for different stories. If changes cripple a player's army, then yes that's a bad design choice, but inherently change isn't always bad. If it offers them new ways to play, then that can be fun.

If you don't agree, that's ok. I think we've made our points here for those that like and don't.


Again you are mixing with setting and story. Setting is static. It's not supposed to change. It's there to give players freedom to take story where they want.

Change the setting and it invalidates players own stories. Players have advanced story so that chaos is at the doorsteps of Earth itself? Then GW releases next instalment and boom chaos isn't anywhere near earth. Back to drawing board player. Don't try to advance story where we didn't want you to go.

Or howabout player story has advanced to the point that hive fleet overran earth. How that makes sense when GW changes setting again and Earth is still standing? Huh?

And if story changes don't have change in armies and world then it's irrelevant change. Say hello to what GW has been doing.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 10:13:24


Post by: Moopy


tneva82 wrote:


Again you are mixing with setting and story. Setting is static. It's not supposed to change. It's there to give players freedom to take story where they want.

Change the setting and it invalidates players own stories. Players have advanced story so that chaos is at the doorsteps of Earth itself? Then GW releases next instalment and boom chaos isn't anywhere near earth. Back to drawing board player. Don't try to advance story where we didn't want you to go.

Or howabout player story has advanced to the point that hive fleet overran earth. How that makes sense when GW changes setting again and Earth is still standing? Huh?


Uhhhhhh... sorry, the content holder is not held prisoner to events made up by it's followers, nor should it be. We use your logic then as soon as someone writes a story that the imperium has stopped using bolters, then GW shouldn't make figures with bolters? Complete hogwash.

Player stories aren't cannon, as everyone tells their own stories that would contradict each other. They hold no bearing on the bigger picture, even though they are fun for the individual. The IP holder does that, and if the IP holder wants to advance things, then great! More opportunities to tell new stories! Just because you haven something in your head about how things go in your house, doesn't mean everything has to stop because it might upset you.

And again, NO, the setting never has to be static.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 10:22:37


Post by: angelofvengeance


 Moopy wrote:


Uhhhhhh... sorry, the content holders are not held prisoner to events made up by its followers, nor should it be. We use your logic then as soon as someone writes a story that the imperium has stopped using bolters, then GW shouldn't make figures with bolters? Complete hogwash.

Player stories aren't canon, as everyone tells their own stories that would contradict each other. They hold no bearing on the bigger picture, even though they are fun for the individual. The IP holder does that, and if the IP holder wants to advance things, then great! More opportunities to tell new stories! Just because you haven something in your head about how things go in your house, doesn't mean everything has to stop because it might upset you.


Quoted for truth.

Fascinating as this discussion is, can we get back to the releases and rumours, please?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 11:51:33


Post by: tneva82


 Moopy wrote:
Uhhhhhh... sorry, the content holder is not held prisoner to events made up by it's followers, nor should it be. We use your logic then as soon as someone writes a story that the imperium has stopped using bolters, then GW shouldn't make figures with bolters? Complete hogwash.

Player stories aren't cannon, as everyone tells their own stories that would contradict each other. They hold no bearing on the bigger picture, even though they are fun for the individual. The IP holder does that, and if the IP holder wants to advance things, then great! More opportunities to tell new stories! Just because you haven something in your head about how things go in your house, doesn't mean everything has to stop because it might upset you.

And again, NO, the setting never has to be static.


Yes you are correct. However that's the point of SETTING over STORY. Players are free to create their own stories in a setting. Story however players can't do that because they get overwritten by company.

That's the difference between SETTING and STORY. You keep mixing them up.

40k used to be a SETTING. Now you want it to be STORY which is completely different to SETTING.

Whole god damn point of setting is that it is set. Then players are free to do their own stories.

Again: I'm talking about SETTING which is what 40k used to be. You are talking about STORY that you want 40k to be.

40k isn't about waiting GW to tell us whether Abbadon succeeds in 13th black crusade or not. You play it out yourself. Then you have next part of story to be played out.

You want GW to spoonfeed us the story. But that's not how 40k used to be. If you want stories there's plenty out there. Lot less settings...


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 11:59:40


Post by: Crazyterran


... They've been adding or changing or moving the timeline around since before third edition. We had campaigns from GW such as the infamous eye of terror campaign, Armageddon, that one that introduced vostroyans.

Advancing the setting isn't w bad thing, it gives you more room to base your games/campaigns/stories on. Can set your campaign during the Beast Arises, or perhaps the time of two Imperiums, or now, with the return of the primarchs and (potential) birth of Ynnead.

I'm pretty sure more people will be happy they finally are moving things a long a little bit, than will be actually upset by it.

Spoiler:
in summary, qq


On topic, I want to see the actual Deathwatch upgrade sprue and the veterans kit. Hard to see them having much room for things after the shoulder pad/elbow shield thing.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 11:59:41


Post by: Warpig1815


Errmmm - more of the releases, less of the semantics gentlemen/women? You've made your points, and you're unlikely to concede on each others, so lets not jam up the thread with an OT conversation please. I'd suggest moving over to 40k General Diiscussion for this.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 12:13:01


Post by: reds8n


Indeed.

Thanks.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 12:23:08


Post by: H.B.M.C.


But there aren't any. No pics or nuthin'.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 12:28:14


Post by: Yodhrin


Fine, moving to General. link


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 18:17:33


Post by: daemonish


It seems all the Pictomancers are on their jollys (vacation for all those people that don't speak niche English).


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 18:26:49


Post by: Kanluwen


 daemonish wrote:
It seems all the Pictomancers are on their jollys (vacation for all those people that don't speak niche English).

The pictures generally come from White Dwarf. If there's no Weekly White Dwarf(which August is supposed to not have any Weekly White Dwarfs), then there's no pictures.

September is supposed to have all the Deathwatch stuff in it, since WD is going to look at the previous month's releases.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 18:51:07


Post by: Requizen


Around this time next week we'll get some shaky pics of the box and codex, maybe also that one cool dude from Warseer will start leaking the codex this weekend or so.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 19:25:32


Post by: Nostromodamus


Requizen wrote:
Around this time next week we'll get some shaky pics of the box and codex, maybe also that one cool dude from Warseer will start leaking the codex this weekend or so.


Aren't they going up for preorder on saturday?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 19:53:17


Post by: migooo


 Nostromodamus wrote:
Requizen wrote:
Around this time next week we'll get some shaky pics of the box and codex, maybe also that one cool dude from Warseer will start leaking the codex this weekend or so.


Aren't they going up for preorder on saturday?


from what i understand yes this weekend, they are out the 13th. its very odd that no pictures are about. very odd


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 20:01:23


Post by: Warpig1815


Don't worry - think how much 'Squeeeee' you'll get when they all come around at once.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 20:01:51


Post by: ImAGeek


migooo wrote:
 Nostromodamus wrote:
Requizen wrote:
Around this time next week we'll get some shaky pics of the box and codex, maybe also that one cool dude from Warseer will start leaking the codex this weekend or so.


Aren't they going up for preorder on saturday?


from what i understand yes this weekend, they are out the 13th. its very odd that no pictures are about. very odd


It's not, because as Kanluwen said, the leaks come from White Dwarf. There's no weekly WD this month, and the September issue will look back at these releases, so there's no magazine for leaks to come from yet.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 20:15:56


Post by: EnTyme


It's likely one of the driving forces behind the new WD format was to better control the leaks. GW probably wants leaks to help build hype, but without WD to supply pics in advance, they have more control over the flow of information.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 20:17:24


Post by: Azreal13


Which was one of the exact same reasons cited when they switched to a weekly format.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 20:21:48


Post by: russian69hitman


https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-V_MkbPT6Uog/V6Dwt8BvScI/AAAAAAAALWk/EVBX1zzW03QcW4cxWniSaua_Qr_MS9q7gCLcB/s320/Novedad%2B40k%2Bdeath%2Bmasque.png

Deathwatch prices....

Boxed set of 29 with Artemis & eldar 125 euro

Codex 33 euro

Deathwatch dice 16.50 euro

Deathwatch data cards 10.50 euro


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 20:38:30


Post by: rollawaythestone


 russian69hitman wrote:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-V_MkbPT6Uog/V6Dwt8BvScI/AAAAAAAALWk/EVBX1zzW03QcW4cxWniSaua_Qr_MS9q7gCLcB/s320/Novedad%2B40k%2Bdeath%2Bmasque.png

Deathwatch prices....

Boxed set of 29 with Artemis & eldar 125 euro

Codex 33 euro

Deathwatch dice 16.50 euro

Deathwatch data cards 10.50 euro


29 models agrees with the listing of contents suggested a few days ago.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 20:38:59


Post by: Requizen


 Azreal13 wrote:
Which was one of the exact same reasons cited when they switched to a weekly format.


Weekly format was great for showing off new stuff but now they decided to join the 21st century (a decade late, but hey they got there), and realized they can use Social Media to do the same thing.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 20:44:21


Post by: Ghaz


Part III posted...


[Thumb - Phrophecy.jpg]


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 21:04:20


Post by: whembly


Yup... seems like reincarnation is going to be a thing in eldar lore...and maybe the birth of Ynnead.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 21:04:52


Post by: Gamgee


Do all of you know what this means?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 21:10:04


Post by: whembly


 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 21:11:22


Post by: Gamgee


 whembly wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.

Wrong. It means... I was right. Feels good calling the future lore movement. I got called crazy so many times when I told them GW was going to do this.

Hahah.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rre3zgL7eMk#t=1m14s



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 21:18:49


Post by: OrlandotheTechnicoloured


Hmmm

I wonder if the dying star Watch Fortress Erioch orbits might just be the forge that Eldrad needs to kick start his new goddess ?

Could be why the Deathwatch gets cross enough with him to need a new box set if the star comes back to live and melts their main home base


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 21:31:12


Post by: EnTyme


There'll be no living with Gamgee now.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 21:31:26


Post by: MacMuckles


 Gamgee wrote:
 whembly wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.

Wrong. It means... I was right. Feels good calling the future lore movement. I got called crazy so many times when I told them GW was going to do this.

Hahah.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rre3zgL7eMk#t=1m14s



How were you right?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 21:33:08


Post by: Requizen


 Gamgee wrote:
 whembly wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.

Wrong. It means... I was right. Feels good calling the future lore movement. I got called crazy so many times when I told them GW was going to do this.

Hahah.

Literally everyone was calling a lore movement. Nostradamus you ain't.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 22:22:50


Post by: Kanluwen


Requizen wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
 whembly wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.

Wrong. It means... I was right. Feels good calling the future lore movement. I got called crazy so many times when I told them GW was going to do this.

Hahah.

Literally everyone was calling a lore movement. Nostradamus you ain't.

It gets even better if you filter by his posts or read some of the crap he's put out there for AoS.

Gamgee has this weird obsession that Slaanesh is being removed for the sake of "kid friendlying" GW's products.

PS Gamgee? Yneead, the nascent Eldar god of the dead? The intention of the Eldar is not that Yneead "replaces" Slaanesh. It's that Yneead defeats Slaanesh.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 22:28:21


Post by: russian69hitman


More Deathwatch info (from Spanish site, translated)

The box will apparently bring enough new minis:
1 Watch Captain Artemis
5 Deathwatch Veterans
5 Vanguard Veterans
1 Deathwatch Upgrade Sprue
1 Venerable Dreadnought
1 Eldrad Ultran
12 Harlequins
1 Death Jester
1 Voidweaver
2 Skyweavers
1 Harlequin transfer sheet.

208 pg 40k Rulebook with special Death Watch Cover (I imagine that the 40K Softcover manual) quite a lot of minis at one price more than likely from $150.

If the minis of the Deathwatch Overkill half are cool foresee them a great success...


Another source just hours ago -

Have could see them news dedicated to the Deathwatch that landed in prepedido this Saturday: Death Masque, new box of Warhammer 40,000 that faces to the Eldars of Eldrad Ulthran against a nothing despicable force of the Deathwatch led by the captain Artemis.

Among the innovations that accompany this launch there will be rumored Codex for the Deathwatch faction - the price is possibly less since they have fewer pages, objective and given themed cards.

If we compare the price with other boxes of 40 k see that stays online games specialist as Deathwatch Overkill, but for a basic box (includes rules of Warhammer 40 k) a little hands will be if we compare it with the price of dark revenge, with a price that was around one hundred euros. Hobby topics already know, scabies to taste...

Death Masque contents are as follows: Eldars: 1 Eldrad Ulthran 1 Death Jester 12 Harlequins 1 Voidweaver 2 Skyweavers 1 sheet of decals for Harlequins Deathwatch: 1 Watch Captain Artemis 5 Deathwatch Veterans 5 Veterans 1 Venerable Dreadnought 1 matrix of improvements for the Deathwatch box includes a copy of the 40 k rules in softcover (208 pages) with the cover of Captain Artemis , rules for all the miniatures included, as well as a sheet of training for each faction. The conflict between both forces are situated in Port Demensus, giving it a narrative to confrontation, divided into three playable scenarios.

Unfortunately the flying of the Deathwatch commented Sad Panda has fallen from the launch, so if leave will do so later. Also with this succulent box now can begin the hostilities.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 22:36:53


Post by: privateer4hire


 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

That if this is a starter with a rulebook and a load of harlequins for current 40k that I'll:
Potentially start playing 40k again (not likely)
or
Sell the little rulebook and probably the DW stuff


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 22:39:58


Post by: Azreal13


 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?


That by crowing this early you've lined yourself up for a massive karma slap?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 22:45:07


Post by: Sersi


 OrlandotheTechnicoloured wrote:
Hmmm

I wonder if the dying star Watch Fortress Erioch orbits might just be the forge that Eldrad needs to kick start his new goddess ?

Could be why the Deathwatch gets cross enough with him to need a new box set if the star comes back to live and melts their main home base


It's not about a new Goddess. Their talking about killing "She who Dance-moans, She who Thirsts....Slaanesh. They think they can kill her. But 40k being 40K they will fail at it, or will somehow make it worse. With some minor victories along the way. Maybe Ynnead manifests, but if it does it won't be walking into the Warp and punching Slaanesh in the face. Even Khorne was unable to kill Slaanesh or prevent its birth.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 22:53:24


Post by: Kanluwen


 russian69hitman wrote:
More Deathwatch info (from Spanish site, translated)
Spoiler:

The box will apparently bring enough new minis:
1 Watch Captain Artemis
5 Deathwatch Veterans
5 Vanguard Veterans
1 Deathwatch Upgrade Sprue
1 Venerable Dreadnought
1 Eldrad Ultran
12 Harlequins
1 Death Jester
1 Voidweaver
2 Skyweavers
1 Harlequin transfer sheet.

208 pg 40k Rulebook with special Death Watch Cover (I imagine that the 40K Softcover manual) quite a lot of minis at one price more than likely from $150.

If the minis of the Deathwatch Overkill half are cool foresee them a great success...


Another source just hours ago -

Have could see them news dedicated to the Deathwatch that landed in prepedido this Saturday: Death Masque, new box of Warhammer 40,000 that faces to the Eldars of Eldrad Ulthran against a nothing despicable force of the Deathwatch led by the captain Artemis.

Among the innovations that accompany this launch there will be rumored Codex for the Deathwatch faction - the price is possibly less since they have fewer pages, objective and given themed cards.

If we compare the price with other boxes of 40 k see that stays online games specialist as Deathwatch Overkill, but for a basic box (includes rules of Warhammer 40 k) a little hands will be if we compare it with the price of dark revenge, with a price that was around one hundred euros. Hobby topics already know, scabies to taste...

Death Masque contents are as follows: Eldars: 1 Eldrad Ulthran 1 Death Jester 12 Harlequins 1 Voidweaver 2 Skyweavers 1 sheet of decals for Harlequins Deathwatch: 1 Watch Captain Artemis 5 Deathwatch Veterans 5 Veterans 1 Venerable Dreadnought 1 matrix of improvements for the Deathwatch box includes a copy of the 40 k rules in softcover (208 pages) with the cover of Captain Artemis , rules for all the miniatures included, as well as a sheet of training for each faction. The conflict between both forces are situated in Port Demensus, giving it a narrative to confrontation, divided into three playable scenarios.

Unfortunately the flying of the Deathwatch commented Sad Panda has fallen from the launch, so if leave will do so later. Also with this succulent box now can begin the hostilities.

I love how these sites are posting this stuff after retailers have posted pictures of the order sheet with prices and the "promo material" stuff that gets sent to them...and people are still acting as if it's new when posted on other websites.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 22:59:34


Post by: GoatboyBeta


Still seems to me that GW are building up to a return and expansion of the events of the 13th black crusade. IIRC Eldrad was killed trying to capture a Blackstone fortress/Talisman of Vaul from Chaos. "Moving the story forward" probably amounts to just after Chaos breaks through the Cadian gate into the wider Imperium. The perfect moment for various villains and hero's of myth to make there dramatic entrance in a cliff hanger ending.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 23:00:30


Post by: mhsellwood


 russian69hitman wrote:
More Deathwatch info (from Spanish site, translated)


Another source just hours ago -

Have could see them news dedicated to the Deathwatch that landed in prepedido this Saturday: Death Masque, new box of Warhammer 40,000 that faces to the Eldars of Eldrad Ulthran against a nothing despicable force of the Deathwatch led by the captain Artemis.

Among the innovations that accompany this launch there will be rumored Codex for the Deathwatch faction - the price is possibly less since they have fewer pages, objective and given themed cards.

If we compare the price with other boxes of 40 k see that stays online games specialist as Deathwatch Overkill, but for a basic box (includes rules of Warhammer 40 k) a little hands will be if we compare it with the price of dark revenge, with a price that was around one hundred euros. Hobby topics already know, scabies to taste...

Unfortunately the flying of the Deathwatch commented Sad Panda has fallen from the launch, so if leave will do so later. Also with this succulent box now can begin the hostilities.


That translation.

It is... almost... English. Still, I like the sound of scabies to taste.

p.s. not a shot at you russian69hitman


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 23:07:21


Post by: Azreal13


Unless he translated it..


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/03 23:28:04


Post by: Desubot


That translation.

its..its Beautiful its like an amazing foreign film


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 00:53:44


Post by: russian69hitman


mhsellwood wrote:
 russian69hitman wrote:
More Deathwatch info (from Spanish site, translated)


Another source just hours ago -

Have could see them news dedicated to the Deathwatch that landed in prepedido this Saturday: Death Masque, new box of Warhammer 40,000 that faces to the Eldars of Eldrad Ulthran against a nothing despicable force of the Deathwatch led by the captain Artemis.

Among the innovations that accompany this launch there will be rumored Codex for the Deathwatch faction - the price is possibly less since they have fewer pages, objective and given themed cards.

If we compare the price with other boxes of 40 k see that stays online games specialist as Deathwatch Overkill, but for a basic box (includes rules of Warhammer 40 k) a little hands will be if we compare it with the price of dark revenge, with a price that was around one hundred euros. Hobby topics already know, scabies to taste...

Unfortunately the flying of the Deathwatch commented Sad Panda has fallen from the launch, so if leave will do so later. Also with this succulent box now can begin the hostilities.


That translation.

It is... almost... English. Still, I like the sound of scabies to taste.

p.s. not a shot at you russian69hitman


Google translate all the way!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 01:03:41


Post by: Chikout


Presumably all the individual Deathwatch stuff is coming the following week as it will be in the codex.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 02:42:17


Post by: streetsamurai


Wow. Weird that we dont have pics yet. Is that the most leak proof release ever?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 02:43:46


Post by: Swampmist


 streetsamurai wrote:
Wow. Weird that we dont have pics yet. Is that the most leak proof release ever?


as has been said, no available WD pics (won't get those for a few weeks now!) changes a lot


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 04:43:20


Post by: Gamgee


Requizen wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
 whembly wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.

Wrong. It means... I was right. Feels good calling the future lore movement. I got called crazy so many times when I told them GW was going to do this.

Hahah.

Literally everyone was calling a lore movement. Nostradamus you ain't.

I've been saying this since last year and beyond when there were zero peeps. You can check my post record if you don't believe me.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 05:08:54


Post by: Rygnan


 Gamgee wrote:
Requizen wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
 whembly wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.

Wrong. It means... I was right. Feels good calling the future lore movement. I got called crazy so many times when I told them GW was going to do this.

Hahah.

Literally everyone was calling a lore movement. Nostradamus you ain't.

I've been saying this since last year and beyond when there were zero peeps. You can check my post record if you don't believe me.


And there's still zero evidence they're actually removing Slaanesh, in fact there's more substantial evidence to the contrary. For an example, check the All-Gates AoS book, which has Slaanesh followers making a pact with Clan Eshin for an as yet unknown reason, and AoS as a whole, which you are using as an example, is building up to a Slaanesh comeback in some way. As for the 'toning down' of Slaanesh, if you read any of the Slaanesh fluff from AoS they've doubled down on the debauchery and depravity, so not toned down exactly.

From a 40k perspective, there's nothing to say the Ynnead plot will be a major success, or even a success at all. Looking at all the other recent campaigns, all sides have had significant losses to offset the victory (death of Aun'va and the Raven Guard CM, loss of Damocles to both sides, possible loss of the Fenris system and loss of the Cryptus system) so who is to say it won't happen again? It's just as possible Ynnead will be birthed but won't defeat Slaanesh, or Ynnead won't be birthed at all. The 'big prophecy' all you people are touting as proof isn't even that Slaanesh will go away, it's only that the Eldar will be freed from Slaanesh devouring their souls, probably through Cegorach's treachery


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 05:53:44


Post by: FabricatorGeneralMike


 Gamgee wrote:
Requizen wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
 whembly wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.

Wrong. It means... I was right. Feels good calling the future lore movement. I got called crazy so many times when I told them GW was going to do this.

Hahah.

Literally everyone was calling a lore movement. Nostradamus you ain't.

I've been saying this since last year and beyond when there were zero peeps. You can check my post record if you don't believe me.


SO...from a fellow Canadian what you want to here is "Look! I was right, GW is getting rid of Slannesh to make their game/miniature line more 'kid friendly' and they are going to do it by bringing in the Eldar God of Death who is suppost to come to life (sic) when all the craftworlds infinity circuits meld into him then he will totally pwnzer Slannesh so that little timmies mom will buy him more GW miniatures because now there is no overt boob on it?

If that's the case you really have won the internet...here have 10,000 internets on me cause what are friends for right? Just watch out when you mix injecting the internets and marijuana strange things happen my fellow Canuck


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 07:10:00


Post by: Gamgee


So I might get one tiny detail wrong in that the new god is added into the pantheon and Slaanesh doesn't go away. Point is people called me crazy for suggesting any of this at all and end times.

Edit
Thanks for the internets. I like to keep tabs on this stuff.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 07:19:01


Post by: Fayric


To be fair, I Think Gamgee has received alot of ridicule for saying early on that this story arc is focused on the eldar scheme to get rid of she who thirsts.

Its a a bit early to say how the setting will be affected by this Campaign, but I Think Gasmgee is entiteled to some credit here.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 07:26:37


Post by: motyak


Who did and didn't 'call it' isn't the point of this thread. Keep it on topic, that's 2 red text posts in just a couple of pages, this thread needs to do better.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 07:36:16


Post by: H.B.M.C.


It would do better if we had any damned pics!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 07:52:45


Post by: Stormonu


Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 07:58:10


Post by: H.B.M.C.


 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


We don't actually know if this comes with dice/templates.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 07:58:23


Post by: tneva82


 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


And the sick thing is it's still ridiculous money compared to buying individually. One part being the ridiculously inflated character prices due to GW's obsession with plastic eventhough plastic isn't ideal material for everything.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 07:58:52


Post by: angelofvengeance


 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


Well, it's not being sold as one so there you go. This is absolutely going to be a Shield of Baal: Deathstorm-style release.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 08:35:32


Post by: migooo


 angelofvengeance wrote:
 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


Well, it's not being sold as one so there you go. This is absolutely going to be a Shield of Baal: Deathstorm-style release.


Well save that it kinda is.
it has everything that a starter set has save for one thing its a multi mini part kit instead of a a pushfit one.

It's not really a campaign box as that part is going to be sold separately.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 08:48:27


Post by: MajorWesJanson


 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


Well, starter sets are snapfit models. This is just the multi-part kits all combined in a box.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 08:52:28


Post by: Lockark


 Rygnan wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Requizen wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
 whembly wrote:
 Gamgee wrote:
Do all of you know what this means?

Nope... it's all conjecture at this point. Maybe the fluff is "moving forward" a bit.

But, who knows what the impact will be in 40k gameplay.

As a Harlequin player, I am hopeful for some goodies, so... we'll see.

Wrong. It means... I was right. Feels good calling the future lore movement. I got called crazy so many times when I told them GW was going to do this.

Hahah.

Literally everyone was calling a lore movement. Nostradamus you ain't.

I've been saying this since last year and beyond when there were zero peeps. You can check my post record if you don't believe me.


And there's still zero evidence they're actually removing Slaanesh, in fact there's more substantial evidence to the contrary. For an example, check the All-Gates AoS book, which has Slaanesh followers making a pact with Clan Eshin for an as yet unknown reason, and AoS as a whole, which you are using as an example, is building up to a Slaanesh comeback in some way. As for the 'toning down' of Slaanesh, if you read any of the Slaanesh fluff from AoS they've doubled down on the debauchery and depravity, so not toned down exactly.

From a 40k perspective, there's nothing to say the Ynnead plot will be a major success, or even a success at all. Looking at all the other recent campaigns, all sides have had significant losses to offset the victory (death of Aun'va and the Raven Guard CM, loss of Damocles to both sides, possible loss of the Fenris system and loss of the Cryptus system) so who is to say it won't happen again? It's just as possible Ynnead will be birthed but won't defeat Slaanesh, or Ynnead won't be birthed at all. The 'big prophecy' all you people are touting as proof isn't even that Slaanesh will go away, it's only that the Eldar will be freed from Slaanesh devouring their souls, probably through Cegorach's treachery


This is why I'm sick of all the slaanesh haters who keep saying slaanesh is going away from the fluff. It's clear slaanesh isn't and if anything points towards a big story involving slaanesh, witch as a fan of them I can't wait for some slaanesh focused stuff.



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 08:55:27


Post by: Devilmixer


 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


well this is not a starter, it is a campain pack


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 09:02:01


Post by: unmercifulconker


Wow still no pics, gg GW, although at least we can know the exact contents of upcoming releases, suppose it adds more hype.

Show us da Harlequin vs Deathwatch artwork, cant wait for that, although I hope the book doesn't have some overly cartoony art like Curse of the Wulfen did.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 09:11:03


Post by: migooo


It's why I don't care really. If I had pics of the DW I might have think about splitting it. Ill just buy another overkill for the cult


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Devilmixer wrote:
 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


well this is not a starter, it is a campain pack


Eh not really as the campaign bit will be maybe 2/3 scenarios. The main fluff will be in books which will be sold separately. It's not like Grudge of Drong where you got quite a bit of stuff.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 09:48:39


Post by: Warp Rider


Excited for this release, also, if you've liked the recent dice like the Orruks and Sylvaneth ones, you'll be happy on Saturday alongside this release.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 11:05:27


Post by: Aexae


Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 11:22:00


Post by: migooo


Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!


please let it be true. its not but please.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 11:29:55


Post by: Januine


Here's a pic courtesy of spikey bits.

[Thumb - image.jpeg]


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 11:42:23


Post by: angelofvengeance


Already been posted, Jan.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 11:44:53


Post by: Januine


Knickers. Missed that ><


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 11:49:53


Post by: unmercifulconker


Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!


You're playing with my heart.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 12:19:26


Post by: Imateria


Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!

I think you just got trolled.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 12:33:16


Post by: Aexae


That would be sad :(
But only if you truly believe in the Emperor of Mankind his most zealous followers will come and purge the heretics!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 12:51:47


Post by: gungo


 Imateria wrote:
Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!

I think you just got trolled.

well There is a fairly strong runour stating sisters are coming in the prospero box game from GW.
Whether that means sisters of silence and how those fit into sisters of battle for 40k I don't know.

However it's pretty obvious at the moment GW is heavily utilizing box games to test market desires on products. If there is a sisters box and it doesn't sell I can certainly see sisters being squatted.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 12:53:06


Post by: casvalremdeikun


gungo wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!

I think you just got trolled.

well There is a fairly strong runour stating sisters are coming in the prospero box game from GW.
Whether that means sisters of silence and how those fit into sisters of battle for 40k I don't know.
It was pretty strongly implied it was Sisters of Silence in that boxed set.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 12:55:25


Post by: gungo


 casvalremdeikun wrote:
gungo wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!

I think you just got trolled.

well There is a fairly strong runour stating sisters are coming in the prospero box game from GW.
Whether that means sisters of silence and how those fit into sisters of battle for 40k I don't know.
It was pretty strongly implied it was Sisters of Silence in that boxed set.

That's what I said please read
Sisters of silence artwork is not really that different that sisters of battle artwork. They are both power armoured bolt gun wielding witch hunting fanatics with long red cloaks.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 13:11:28


Post by: gorgon


gungo wrote:
 casvalremdeikun wrote:
gungo wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!

I think you just got trolled.

well There is a fairly strong runour stating sisters are coming in the prospero box game from GW.
Whether that means sisters of silence and how those fit into sisters of battle for 40k I don't know.
It was pretty strongly implied it was Sisters of Silence in that boxed set.

That's what I said please read
Sisters of silence artwork is not really that different that sisters of battle artwork. They are both power armoured bolt gun wielding witch hunting fanatics with long red cloaks.


But they aren't the same thing.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 13:13:36


Post by: casvalremdeikun


 gorgon wrote:
gungo wrote:
 casvalremdeikun wrote:
gungo wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!

I think you just got trolled.

well There is a fairly strong runour stating sisters are coming in the prospero box game from GW.
Whether that means sisters of silence and how those fit into sisters of battle for 40k I don't know.
It was pretty strongly implied it was Sisters of Silence in that boxed set.

That's what I said please read
Sisters of silence artwork is not really that different that sisters of battle artwork. They are both power armoured bolt gun wielding witch hunting fanatics with long red cloaks.


But they aren't the same thing.
Which was my point. It is Sisters of Silence in the box, not Sisters of Battle. Obviously intrepid modelers are going to use these models to make Sisters of Battle, but they aren't Sisters of Battle right out of the box.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 13:47:46


Post by: Kanluwen


tneva82 wrote:
 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


And the sick thing is it's still ridiculous money compared to buying individually. One part being the ridiculously inflated character prices due to GW's obsession with plastic eventhough plastic isn't ideal material for everything.

There's 3 character models in there. The Death Jester is $26, Eldrad and Watch-Captain Artemis are the two unknowns.

Removing them from the equation and looking strictly at the Harlequin half of the box? The issue isn't the $26 Death Jester--it's the $40 Harlequin Troupe box with 6 models.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:23:02


Post by: Captain Vyper


SO $150 for both factions and a rule book, vs two $85 start collecting box sets (provided you are interested in both factions) and an $85 rule book totaling $255 even after what ever saving the $85 start collecting's would give us off of the standard box price of the individual units...right what a rip off! Really? Geez some folks just like to punch the gift horse in the mouth I guess. I for one am pretty excited for this one.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:39:17


Post by: Ghaz


 Captain Vyper wrote:
... and an $85 rule book...

Its a softcover rulebook, most likely the mini version.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:41:29


Post by: Captain Vyper


Is the soft cover available out side of a boxed set?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:42:37


Post by: Chikout


The starter sets are all monopose miniatures with no options. This box will include full multipart kits with all the options and extras that entails. In terms of pure number of pieces of plastic there will be far more in this than in your typical starter set.
Look at it another way it is 4 infantry units at £10 pounds each it is 2 vehicles and a pair of bikes for £10 each. 3 characters for £5 each and £10 for a rule book and scenario book. Any way you look at it that is a good price.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:44:48


Post by: angelofvengeance


 Captain Vyper wrote:
Is the soft cover available out side of a boxed set?


eBay is your best bet for that, I think.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:45:21


Post by: gungo


 casvalremdeikun wrote:
 gorgon wrote:
gungo wrote:
 casvalremdeikun wrote:
gungo wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!

I think you just got trolled.

well There is a fairly strong runour stating sisters are coming in the prospero box game from GW.
Whether that means sisters of silence and how those fit into sisters of battle for 40k I don't know.
It was pretty strongly implied it was Sisters of Silence in that boxed set.

That's what I said please read
Sisters of silence artwork is not really that different that sisters of battle artwork. They are both power armoured bolt gun wielding witch hunting fanatics with long red cloaks.


But they aren't the same thing.
Which was my point. It is Sisters of Silence in the box, not Sisters of Battle. Obviously intrepid modelers are going to use these models to make Sisters of Battle, but they aren't Sisters of Battle right out of the box.

To be fair you can't even make this assumption because you simply don't know what happened.
After the heresy the remaining sisters of silence completely disappeared with a single reference of ar least one sister of silence becoming one of the founding inqusitors. Which makes complete sense because they were dedicated witch hunters during the heresy.
Roll forward 10000 years later the ecclessiary is formed somehow an entire regiment of sisters of battle is already around and become the militant arm of the eccleissary and again becoming part of the ordo heretic once again witch hunters.

This isn't exactly giant leaps of difference between the two factions except for the odd ability to be blanks for sisters of silence an ability that exists on 40k but hardly explored in the rules anymore. I'd put money down the sisters of silence are the precursor to the sisters of battle. They are that similar. It's about as different as a heresy army for space marines and a second founding chapter.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:48:22


Post by: angelofvengeance


Chikout wrote:
The starter sets are all monopose miniatures with no options. This box will include full multipart kits with all the options and extras that entails. In terms of pure number of pieces of plastic there will be far more in this than in your typical starter set.
Look at it another way it is 4 infantry units at £10 pounds each it is 2 vehicles and a pair of bikes for £10 each. 3 characters for £5 each and £10 for a rule book and scenario book. Any way you look at it that is a good price.


Age of Sigmar is the only starter set so far with options. Or the Bloodreavers did, at least. Gave you options to make a musician, standard bearer, and champion, or just leave em as ordinary bloodreavers for a huge mob.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:50:10


Post by: Azreal13


Part 4...

[Thumb - image.jpeg]


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:55:11


Post by: migooo


 casvalremdeikun wrote:
 gorgon wrote:
gungo wrote:
 casvalremdeikun wrote:
gungo wrote:
 Imateria wrote:
Aexae wrote:
Heard from my FLGS that the plastic SoB are coming and she already ordered some. no more reference than that, but hope is what we live for!

I think you just got trolled.

well There is a fairly strong runour stating sisters are coming in the prospero box game from GW.
Whether that means sisters of silence and how those fit into sisters of battle for 40k I don't know.
It was pretty strongly implied it was Sisters of Silence in that boxed set.

That's what I said please read
Sisters of silence artwork is not really that different that sisters of battle artwork. They are both power armoured bolt gun wielding witch hunting fanatics with long red cloaks.


But they aren't the same thing.
Which was my point. It is Sisters of Silence in the box, not Sisters of Battle. Obviously intrepid modelers are going to use these models to make Sisters of Battle, but they aren't Sisters of Battle right out of the box.


SoS basically vanish after the HH for some reason, perhaps they are part of the Black ship thing in present day 40k but they are not SoB, first they have that silly eldar top knot , their Armour is quite different , they are also more like the custodes than SoB, acting extremely rarely in if ever (if they even exist) 40k


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:57:38


Post by: Hanskrampf


Ugh, I need leaked pictures already!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 14:58:40


Post by: Accolade


Man, it looks like we really won't see pictures before they show up on pre-order!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:08:34


Post by: Ghaz


As has been said no White Dwarf = no early pictures.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:09:03


Post by: EnTyme


Gather unto them the Dead.
Legion, they drift within the sands, . . .


Is that referring to Necrons?

The blackened shield becomes the sword, . . .


So the plan is to use the Deathwatch against Slaanesh?

Calling it right here:

Eldrad is dead. This imposter is The Deceiver who was not actually shattered. The Harlequins become the new Necron Pariahs.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:09:45


Post by: Ragnar69


I quite like how GW builds suspension with these prophecies.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:10:50


Post by: migooo


 Ghaz wrote:
As has been said no White Dwarf = no early pictures.


Which shows that leaks were possibly not inentional.and that they finally have it locked down


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:11:03


Post by: Wachaza


migooo wrote:

SoS basically vanish after the HH for some reason, perhaps they are part of the Black ship thing in present day 40k but they are not SoB, first they have that silly eldar top knot , their Armour is quite different , they are also more like the custodes than SoB, acting extremely rarely in if ever (if they even exist) 40k



The only blanks I'm aware of in 40k are the Culexus and a few in the fiction like Bequin in the Ravenor novels. If the Sisters are still around in 40k they're well hidden. Perhaps around the throne webway links?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:13:56


Post by: Accolade


migooo wrote:
 Ghaz wrote:
As has been said no White Dwarf = no early pictures.


Which shows that leaks were possibly not inentional.and that they finally have it locked down


Right, which was more what I was thinking about when I posted. But this is dakka, so unnecessary over-explaining abounds! I'll make sure to add in all the disclaimers about what I'm already aware of in the future when I make general statements.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:14:35


Post by: migooo


Wachaza wrote:
migooo wrote:

SoS basically vanish after the HH for some reason, perhaps they are part of the Black ship thing in present day 40k but they are not SoB, first they have that silly eldar top knot , their Armour is quite different , they are also more like the custodes than SoB, acting extremely rarely in if ever (if they even exist) 40k



The only blanks I'm aware of in 40k are the Culexus and a few in the fiction like Bequin in the Ravenor novels. If the Sisters are still around in 40k they're well hidden. Perhaps around the throne webway links?



It's possible


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:15:56


Post by: Alpharius


Ragnar69 wrote:
I quite like how GW builds suspension with these prophecies.


Are you posting on a phone?!?

But yes, they are doing a good job of keeping things interesting and confusing!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:20:44


Post by: migooo


 Alpharius wrote:
Ragnar69 wrote:
I quite like how GW builds suspension with these prophecies.


Are you posting on a phone?!?

But yes, they are doing a good job of keeping things interesting and confusing!


Leaks did this far better than this.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:20:58


Post by: Kanluwen


 EnTyme wrote:
Gather unto them the Dead.
Legion, they drift within the sands, . . .


Is that referring to Necrons?

Possibly, or possibly it's referring to the Tears of Isha that the Eldar harvest from the Croneworlds within the Eye of Terror.

The blackened shield becomes the sword, . . .


So the plan is to use the Deathwatch against Slaanesh?

Or against something that is a big enough threat that it would necessitate the Eldar aligning themselves with or exposing themselves to the Deathwatch.

Calling it right here:

Eldrad is dead. This imposter is The Deceiver who was not actually shattered. The Harlequins become the new Necron Pariahs.

Eldrad being dead necessitates the 13th Black Crusade having happened. We're currently still pre-13th Black Crusade.
Also, Harlequins do not have the Pariah gene. That's the whole reason the Necron Pariahs were given the moniker of "Pariah" by the Inquisition.



general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:24:53


Post by: Dowager Countess M


Lambent glow becomes shining beacon,


Could it be referring to the Astronomican?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:26:33


Post by: vitki


Wachaza wrote:
migooo wrote:

SoS basically vanish after the HH for some reason, perhaps they are part of the Black ship thing in present day 40k but they are not SoB, first they have that silly eldar top knot , their Armour is quite different , they are also more like the custodes than SoB, acting extremely rarely in if ever (if they even exist) 40k



The only blanks I'm aware of in 40k are the Culexus and a few in the fiction like Bequin in the Ravenor novels. If the Sisters are still around in 40k they're well hidden. Perhaps around the throne webway links?


Weren't the Sisters of Silence blanks? In the Prospero HH novels, they went in in ones and twos to stop the psychics on the Thousand Sons if I remember right.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:28:05


Post by: gungo


Wachaza wrote:
migooo wrote:

SoS basically vanish after the HH for some reason, perhaps they are part of the Black ship thing in present day 40k but they are not SoB, first they have that silly eldar top knot , their Armour is quite different , they are also more like the custodes than SoB, acting extremely rarely in if ever (if they even exist) 40k



The only blanks I'm aware of in 40k are the Culexus and a few in the fiction like Bequin in the Ravenor novels. If the Sisters are still around in 40k they're well hidden. Perhaps around the throne webway links?


Blanks still exist they are an extremely rare but natural phenomenon.
Remeber culexus assassins as individual blanks that are discovered, "recruited", and augmented to be a blank+ weapon.
Blamks are not simply grown in a lab but just like any psyker thru are born naturally.
40k basically washed away most blanks rule wise for whatever reason, same reason necron pariahs simply vanished.
As witch hunters I'm sure Blamks exist in sisters of battle however GW gave up on doing anything with sisters but at least they still have condemnor rounds.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:29:24


Post by: casvalremdeikun


If the Eldar do plan to manipulate the Deathwatch into killing Slaanesh, Eldrad's Magnificent Bastard reputation is well earned.

I have to give GW credit, these prophecies are kind of awesome. I still want to see what models are coming out, but these little tidbits are fun to read.

Perhaps the stuff here will lead into the WD Chaos campaign. Or the WD Chaos Campaign will have some stuff for Deathwatch, Harlequins, and Eldar too.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:32:46


Post by: migooo


 vitki wrote:
Wachaza wrote:
migooo wrote:

SoS basically vanish after the HH for some reason, perhaps they are part of the Black ship thing in present day 40k but they are not SoB, first they have that silly eldar top knot , their Armour is quite different , they are also more like the custodes than SoB, acting extremely rarely in if ever (if they even exist) 40k



The only blanks I'm aware of in 40k are the Culexus and a few in the fiction like Bequin in the Ravenor novels. If the Sisters are still around in 40k they're well hidden. Perhaps around the throne webway links?


Weren't the Sisters of Silence blanks? In the Prospero HH novels, they went in in ones and twos to stop the psychics on the Thousand Sons if I remember right.


We mean more modern 40k if they were about.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:42:31


Post by: unmercifulconker


 EnTyme wrote:
Gather unto them the Dead.
Legion, they drift within the sands, . . .


Is that referring to Necrons?.


Ooooooo didnt think of that.

Weren't necrons rumoured to be part of the campaign later on? Or am I imagining that?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 15:58:06


Post by: Verviedi


Stolen Seers = Wraithbone Choir of Altansar. Calling it now.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:03:46


Post by: tneva82


 Kanluwen wrote:
tneva82 wrote:
 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


And the sick thing is it's still ridiculous money compared to buying individually. One part being the ridiculously inflated character prices due to GW's obsession with plastic eventhough plastic isn't ideal material for everything.

There's 3 character models in there. The Death Jester is $26, Eldrad and Watch-Captain Artemis are the two unknowns.

Removing them from the equation and looking strictly at the Harlequin half of the box? The issue isn't the $26 Death Jester--it's the $40 Harlequin Troupe box with 6 models.


I didn't say it was only reason. Just one reason. But 90 for 3 infantry sized characters is ridiculous price. If troupe would be same price it would be 180 rather than 40...

Characters shouldn't be plastics. They can't sell enough sprues of those to make it viable to sell them at sensible price. Plastic isn't ultimate solution for every use.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:17:54


Post by: migooo


 Verviedi wrote:
Stolen Seers = Wraithbone Choir of Altansar. Calling it now.


Didn't Tazyn have them?

I have to say generic characters are fine as plastic. I like metal but I know a lot of people do not. Their attempt with finecast was just awful.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:20:17


Post by: Requizen


migooo wrote:
 Verviedi wrote:
Stolen Seers = Wraithbone Choir of Altansar. Calling it now.


Didn't Tazyn have them?


Plot twist: The Black Library is just Trayzn's storehouse. Both the Eldar and the Deathwatch bust in to find him chilling in a recliner polishing his Primarch Armor collection.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:23:50


Post by: Kanluwen


tneva82 wrote:
 Kanluwen wrote:
tneva82 wrote:
 Stormonu wrote:
Wow, when I hopped back into this hobby, the starter set was somewhere around $80 (Assault of Black Reach/Necron re-release). Now it's going to be $150? That's ridiculous.


And the sick thing is it's still ridiculous money compared to buying individually. One part being the ridiculously inflated character prices due to GW's obsession with plastic eventhough plastic isn't ideal material for everything.

There's 3 character models in there. The Death Jester is $26, Eldrad and Watch-Captain Artemis are the two unknowns.

Removing them from the equation and looking strictly at the Harlequin half of the box? The issue isn't the $26 Death Jester--it's the $40 Harlequin Troupe box with 6 models.


I didn't say it was only reason. Just one reason. But 90 for 3 infantry sized characters is ridiculous price. If troupe would be same price it would be 180 rather than 40...

How are you getting $90 for 3 infantry sized characters?
The ONLY model we have a price point for, in terms of the characters, is the Death Jester. He's $26.
Eldrad is likely to be $26 as well--$30 if we're really going on the high side, but from what we have seen of the leaked sprue? $26-$28 is probably going to be the price point for Eldrad when he's sold by himself later.


Characters shouldn't be plastics. They can't sell enough sprues of those to make it viable to sell them at sensible price. Plastic isn't ultimate solution for every use.

Why shouldn't characters be plastics? It clearly is working well enough that they will keep making them.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:31:25


Post by: angelofvengeance


Characters should be plastic if it's possible to do them that way. Resin or metal is a pain in the arse to prep for painting.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:36:43


Post by: tneva82


 Kanluwen wrote:
Why shouldn't characters be plastics? It clearly is working well enough that they will keep making them.


You really enjoy paying that much money for characters that used to cost lot less before?

Plastic for characters mean they will be priced up higher. If they were other metal they could be sold for less money with same profit for GW. You haven't thought why character prices have gone up way more than troop? Answer is plain simple: They went plastic.

(also plastic means reduced maximum detail quality. Characters if anybody benefits from maximum detail quality which GW threw away)


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:43:04


Post by: casvalremdeikun


 angelofvengeance wrote:
Characters should be plastic if it's possible to do them that way. Resin or metal is a pain in the arse to prep for painting.
This is my thought too. Plastic characters are infinitely more customizable than Metal and all the detail of resin is wasted when there are bubbles everywhere and bent parts.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:44:51


Post by: Verviedi


migooo wrote:
 Verviedi wrote:
Stolen Seers = Wraithbone Choir of Altansar. Calling it now.


Didn't Tazyn have them?

I have to say generic characters are fine as plastic. I like metal but I know a lot of people do not. Their attempt with finecast was just awful.


The prophecy also refers to Legions of Dead and sand.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:46:47


Post by: Cataphract


In this one is sounds like they reference the Thousand Sons?

The shield bit I think references the Deathwatch. They will become the sword to what? The death of Slaanesh?

Will Humanity be the instrument of the Eldar's salvation?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 16:51:30


Post by: unmercifulconker


Cataphract wrote:
Will Humanity be the instrument of the Eldar's salvation?


*Black Templars and Sisters burst into the room by smashing down the door with a drop pod door.*

"Not on our watch!"


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:14:14


Post by: Kanluwen


tneva82 wrote:
 Kanluwen wrote:
Why shouldn't characters be plastics? It clearly is working well enough that they will keep making them.


You really enjoy paying that much money for characters that used to cost lot less before?

Don't like it? Don't buy the new character sculpt. Very few of the models being changed from metal/Finecast to plastic have radically different options to the point where you need to buy the character again.

Plastic for characters mean they will be priced up higher. If they were other metal they could be sold for less money with same profit for GW. You haven't thought why character prices have gone up way more than troop? Answer is plain simple: They went plastic.

Which character prices have gone up as significantly as you're insisting?

Eldrad Ulthran, right now, is $20.75 in Finecast. He's been that price since Finecast was a thing. Prior to that, he was probably $10-$15 USD.
The plastic Farseer model that came out awhile ago is $20.

Special characters have always been more expensive than generic characters.

(also plastic means reduced maximum detail quality. Characters if anybody benefits from maximum detail quality which GW threw away)

This is patently false. Plastic does not mean "reduced maximum detail quality" by any stretch of the imagination.

Are there technical limitations that necessitate shifts as to how the character might look? Sure. But the detail is generally good; unless it's just a bad sculpt to begin with.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:22:39


Post by: Skullhammer


Feiht has pictures!!!!!!!!! Cant link on my phone.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:24:05


Post by: unmercifulconker


Ooohhhhhhhh shi-------


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:24:36


Post by: BrookM


Huh, so it does. I'm quite surprised that the plastic Artemis is an almost direct copy of the classic 54mm one, I foresee people whining about it being a lazy move by GW.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:25:13


Post by: unmercifulconker


http://natfka.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/new-images-of-deathwatch-codex-and.html







Thanks Skullhammer!

Edit: Tiny tiny pics, get ya microscopes out.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:27:11


Post by: unmercifulconker


Bro that looks like a Necron sword. Bringing heresy all up in this codex.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:28:09


Post by: bubber


there's an echo on this thread!!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:28:51


Post by: Chikout


I like that Artemis's pose is the same.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:30:42


Post by: bubber


original 54mm for refernce:


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:33:41


Post by: tneva82


 Kanluwen wrote:
Which character prices have gone up as significantly as you're insisting?


Like all? I know I didn't pay this much for any of characters 10 years ago. And the price has gone up way more than inflation. Reason: Plastic molds are expensive as hell. Since you don't sell as many character sprues as troop sprues you NEED to ask more per sprue than troops sprues. Plastic is good for mass producing crapload of sprues. Characters are dead opposite of that goal. Whereupon SM army can easily field 50+ tactical marines you don't see 50+ characters in it...

2006. Farseer 12$. Now 20$. Used to be even cheaper. And again don't bother claiming inflation. Inflation has NOT been 75% in 9 years.


This is patently false. Plastic does not mean "reduced maximum detail quality" by any stretch of the imagination.

Are there technical limitations that necessitate shifts as to how the character might look? Sure. But the detail is generally good; unless it's just a bad sculpt to begin with.


Lol you really have no idea of casting techniques. There's REASON why every high level models are resin. Why you think FW uses it? Different material requires different mold material which affects what you can do with it.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:34:39


Post by: Wachaza


Chikout wrote:
I like that Artemis's pose is the same.


Apart from the cape. :(

Need a bigger pic of the Deathwatch grunts. Can't see a thing in that picture. That's the big question now-the contents of the upgrade sprue and the Deathwatch squad.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:38:19


Post by: Stormonu


Am I misremembering, or wasn't this "prophecy" from like a 2E or 3E Eldar codex?


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:38:43


Post by: M0ff3l


Holy crap, Xenos (inspired) weapons in the codex? Yes please. Also Assault Marines in the Death Masque box, hopefully that means we can use the two Assault Marine characters from Overkill a little bit better now.


Super excited for this!


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:38:49


Post by: Bulldogging


Though its tiny those don't look like Sternguard bodies. Hoping it really is a new box.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:39:38


Post by: Barzam


Artemis is a terrible name for a guy. Why did they name him that?

I was hoping for at least a little bit more new stuff in this release beyond two characters and an upgrade sprue. Preferably some more new Eldar stuff. Looks like the only thing of interest for me here is Eldrad. I wouldn't be surprised to see a Start Collecting Ulthwe box in the near future with Eldrad and some Wraith stuff.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:43:16


Post by: unmercifulconker


 Barzam wrote:
Artemis is a terrible name for a guy. Why did they name him that?

I was hoping for at least a little bit more new stuff in this release beyond two characters and an upgrade sprue. Preferably some more new Eldar stuff. Looks like the only thing of interest for me here is Eldrad. I wouldn't be surprised to see a Start Collecting Ulthwe box in the near future with Eldrad and some Wraith stuff.


Cas he's Ard te miss.....


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:50:59


Post by: Warhams-77


It's a nice first week of releases, tiny pics but I like what I see




general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:51:15


Post by: angelofvengeance


That and artemis was a god of hunting... Deathwatch are xenos hunters...


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 17:59:56


Post by: Barzam


 angelofvengeance wrote:
That and artemis was a god of hunting... Deathwatch are xenos hunters...


God dess of hunting... and childbirth and virginity. Hardly the domain of the Deathwatch.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 18:00:31


Post by: Requizen


 angelofvengeance wrote:
That and artemis was a god of hunting... Deathwatch are xenos hunters...


Though I think his point was

Artemis was a goddess.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 18:03:31


Post by: Desubot


 Bulldogging wrote:
Though its tiny those don't look like Sternguard bodies. Hoping it really is a new box.


Indeed those legs dont have 20 pounds of robes on them at all.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 18:32:58


Post by: Kanluwen


 M0ff3l wrote:
Holy crap, Xenos (inspired) weapons in the codex? Yes please. Also Assault Marines in the Death Masque box, hopefully that means we can use the two Assault Marine characters from Overkill a little bit better now.


Super excited for this!

It's Vanguard Veterans actually. Some of the retailer info leaked earlier this week. It's a box of Vanguard Veterans, a Deathwatch Veteran set, Watch-Captain Artemis, a Venerable Dreadnought, and something called the "Deathwatch Upgrade Frame".

There are definitely some parts from the upgrade frame on the Vanguard Veterans. The box doesn't include any 2h weapons, nor does it include the giant tower shield that the one model is toting.

The Deathwatch Veterans are rocking a really cool backpack it seems. Looks like there is a targeting device, or something of that nature.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 18:42:31


Post by: EnTyme


Sternguard have tabards, so it looks like they aren't just using Sternguard with an upgrade sprue.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 18:49:16


Post by: M0ff3l


 Kanluwen wrote:
 M0ff3l wrote:
Holy crap, Xenos (inspired) weapons in the codex? Yes please. Also Assault Marines in the Death Masque box, hopefully that means we can use the two Assault Marine characters from Overkill a little bit better now.


Super excited for this!

It's Vanguard Veterans actually. Some of the retailer info leaked earlier this week. It's a box of Vanguard Veterans, a Deathwatch Veteran set, Watch-Captain Artemis, a Venerable Dreadnought, and something called the "Deathwatch Upgrade Frame".

There are definitely some parts from the upgrade frame on the Vanguard Veterans. The box doesn't include any 2h weapons, nor does it include the giant tower shield that the one model is toting.

The Deathwatch Veterans are rocking a really cool backpack it seems. Looks like there is a targeting device, or something of that nature.


Assault Marines, Vanguard Veterans, whatever makes the 2 characters from Overkill more viable is great in my book.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 18:50:33


Post by: angelofvengeance


Requizen wrote:
 angelofvengeance wrote:
That and artemis was a god of hunting... Deathwatch are xenos hunters...


Though I think his point was

Artemis was a goddess.


Sure, Artemis is commonly used as a girl's name, but boys can be called that too.

Anywho... has anyone seen the Regimental Standard post on Facebook re Eldar?

https://regimental-standard.com/2016/08/03/lies-damn-lies-and-the-eldar/





general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 18:56:47


Post by: casvalremdeikun


 angelofvengeance wrote:
Requizen wrote:
 angelofvengeance wrote:
That and artemis was a god of hunting... Deathwatch are xenos hunters...


Though I think his point was

Artemis was a goddess.


Sure, Artemis is commonly used as a girl's name, but boys can be called that too.



Actually, Artemis is more commonly a boys name now. It is basically the reverse of names lIke Ashley, Lindsay, Kelsey, Kim/Kimberly, etc. All of those names are boys names that became girls names.

I take it the detractors haven't heard of Artemis Fowl or Artemis Enteri.

As for the set itself, it looks pretty awesome. I like the Artemis figure. It looks like he traded his regular old Bolter in for a Combi-Flamer.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 18:59:31


Post by: General Kroll


Damnit GW...why must you drain my wallet with all this cool stuff !


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 19:00:11


Post by: angelofvengeance


 casvalremdeikun wrote:

Actually, Artemis is more commonly a boys name now. It is basically the reverse of names lIke Ashley, Lindsay, Kelsey, Kim/Kimberly, etc. All of those names are boys names that became girls names.

I take it the detractors haven't heard of Artemis Fowl or Artemis Enteri.
I haven't either, but I'm perfectly fine with the name.
 casvalremdeikun wrote:
As for the set itself, it looks pretty awesome. I like the Artemis figure. It looks like he traded his regular old Bolter in for a Combi-Flamer.


Yep. Eldar witches need that extra purging, you see.


general 40k release rumours : deathwatch vid page 18 @ 2016/08/04 19:03:22


Post by: casvalremdeikun


 General Kroll wrote:
Damnit GW...why must you drain my wallet with all this cool stuff !
Agreed. I have a Tactical Squad, a Vanguard Veteran Squad, and a Venerable Dreadnought that are all patiently waiting for the Deathwatch Upgrade Sprue so they can join their Deathwatch:Overkill brothers. Seriously, this is going to be awesome.