| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/12 21:11:31
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
I don't think it is mandatory. We've survived without it for a while and I think we'll do okay.
Found out there's a 6th 1750 tournament next month that I'm going to try to hit up. I'll post lists as we get closer and probably get a BR afterwards. Right now, I'm definitely leaning towards SoB with Guard Allies and an Aegis.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/12 21:20:00
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Concerning our lack of psychic defense, allies can help with that a little in theory. Why not ally with the eldar to mess up enemy psychic powers?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/12 21:20:35
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/12 21:21:48
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
SoB ally with Eldar? HERESY!
Desperate Allies as well, so we'd have to hide the Farseer in the corner somewhere and hope he doesn't get killed.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/12 22:25:50
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Big advantage is that SoB don't have psykers, so taking a farseer with Runes of Warding won't hurt your own..
But a Farseer + 1x 5 Pathfinders would be 250-300 points depending on the powers you buy and give you a sniping unit + pyschic defense that's very hard to shift from cover (2++ re-rollable save in ruins, oh yeah).
Of course you could take 5 Dire Avengers as the mandatory troop choice, but they'd do even less than the Rangers/Pathfinders.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/12 22:26:32
Cratfworld Alaitoc (Gallery)
Order of the Red Mantle (Gallery)
Grand (little) Army of Chaos, now painting! (Blog) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/12 23:42:04
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Warp-Screaming Noise Marine
Canada!
|
If I remember correctly, doom only effects the targetted critter, so anything attacking it, no matter their relationship to the eldar, are more likely to hurt em.
|
It's just a show, I should really just relax... It's just a show, I should really just relax... It's just a show, I should really just relax... It's just a show, I should really just relax... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 12:51:43
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
|
And 16% of the time they aren't going to do anything.... Sorry I need everything functioning. Automatically Appended Next Post: What is the AP for Neural Whips? Did I miss it in the book?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/13 13:01:40
4000pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 13:45:12
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
The whips are power weapons with special rules, so 'Unusual' i.e. AP3.
|
Cratfworld Alaitoc (Gallery)
Order of the Red Mantle (Gallery)
Grand (little) Army of Chaos, now painting! (Blog) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 13:54:48
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
|
|
4000pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 14:38:05
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Calm Celestian
|
Even better, the Sisters of Battle get a particular mention in the description on the ForgeWorld site. I'm not sold on the design, but the fact that someone is paying attention to the Sororitas (positively that is) makes me happy
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 14:52:58
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Spidey0804 wrote:And 16% of the time they aren't going to do anything.... Sorry I need everything functioning.
Yeah, you would have to hide the Pathfinders and Farseer way off in a corner somewhere and hope that no one glances in their direction. Not sold. Although it would be cool from a fluff standpoint, the Eldar secretly manipulating the flow of the battle unseen by the Sororitas.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 14:57:29
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
pretre wrote:Spidey0804 wrote:And 16% of the time they aren't going to do anything.... Sorry I need everything functioning.
Yeah, you would have to hide the Pathfinders and Farseer way off in a corner somewhere and hope that no one glances in their direction. Not sold. Although it would be cool from a fluff standpoint, the Eldar secretly manipulating the flow of the battle unseen by the Sororitas.
Well the pathfinders are only vulnerable to assault/flamers, really. And with 36" range they can be hidden out of the way.
Problem is they don't do much really, even when you take 10 and have a farseer for guide to re-roll anything but a 6.
|
Cratfworld Alaitoc (Gallery)
Order of the Red Mantle (Gallery)
Grand (little) Army of Chaos, now painting! (Blog) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 14:58:45
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Yeah, I think a Farseer with Stones and RoW, Guide and Doom would be the best bet with 5 PF. Still not awesome though.
I can do better things with Guard for the points.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 15:11:36
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Calm Celestian
Florida, USA
|
Something I've been wondering since 6th dropped, with the ability to use Melta Bombs in CC against MC's, is there still a point to taking Eviscerators on any Vet Superiors? Sure you get to use your WS and get more attacks with the Eviscerator, but for the points cost of equipping one Eviscerator, I could instead get Melta Bombs for most of my Superiors. I could then use that savings on points for something else. So given that Melta Bombs now have a wider range of targets that mainly overlap with Eviscerators, is it worth taking Eviscerators at all?
|
There is a fine line between genius and insanity and I colored it in with crayon. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 15:15:30
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
MB are damn good now, so yeah I swapped out some stuff to get MB on my sups for Seraphim at least. Eviscerators aren't as necessary to get us out of combat.
I don't think I'll take any right now.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 15:52:33
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
|
Avenger is also carrying a 85 pounds price tag.... Hmmm what do I need to scratch built this.
|
4000pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 20:48:43
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Calm Celestian
|
Shandara wrote:
Of course you could take 5 Dire Avengers as the mandatory troop choice, but they'd do even less than the Rangers/Pathfinders.
The troop selection to consider would be Guardian Jetbikes. Last turn objective grab, anyone?
|
The Little Sisters of the Apocalypse in the Triple EX! Road Show
The 10K Waagh!
Iron Warriors Local 631: Khorne-forsaken CSM
The Tallarn 2nd (Hand): "Towel Heads" to you! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 20:55:43
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Yeah, but then your farseer would be all by themself somewhere very exposed.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 20:59:07
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Calm Celestian
Windsor Ontario Canada
|
If you read the decription that is an Imperial Navy Ship that is often requested by the sisters of battle (also all its fluff is related to sisters of battle). Thus you probably won't need to field guard to field this (in fact guard will probably have to ally in sisters to field that).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 21:12:27
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Calm Celestian
|
pzbw7z wrote:Shandara wrote:
Of course you could take 5 Dire Avengers as the mandatory troop choice, but they'd do even less than the Rangers/Pathfinders.
The troop selection to consider would be Guardian Jetbikes. Last turn objective grab, anyone?
pretre wrote:Yeah, but then your farseer would be all by themself somewhere very exposed.
Only for a turn.
|
The Little Sisters of the Apocalypse in the Triple EX! Road Show
The 10K Waagh!
Iron Warriors Local 631: Khorne-forsaken CSM
The Tallarn 2nd (Hand): "Towel Heads" to you! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 21:15:25
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Why only for a turn? Are you going to sit the GJB with the Farseer attached somewhere and wait for the objective grab?
Just seems really gimmicky to me. I like the pathfinders better.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 21:42:15
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
I'm guessing if the farseer is exposed for one turn, it'll be dead the next.
|
Cratfworld Alaitoc (Gallery)
Order of the Red Mantle (Gallery)
Grand (little) Army of Chaos, now painting! (Blog) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 01:02:37
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Calm Celestian
|
pretre wrote:Why only for a turn? Are you going to sit the GJB with the Farseer attached somewhere and wait for the objective grab?
Just seems really gimmicky to me. I like the pathfinders better.
No, I'm not going to take any Eldar at all. Taking a Farseer is gimmicky, taking any Eldar at all is gimmicky. Allies are gimmicky, the whole thing was a huge mistake. One giant can of worms that was best left unopened.
|
The Little Sisters of the Apocalypse in the Triple EX! Road Show
The 10K Waagh!
Iron Warriors Local 631: Khorne-forsaken CSM
The Tallarn 2nd (Hand): "Towel Heads" to you! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 01:04:39
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
That's going a bit far. Especially from a sob player. Not that long ago we were the ally codex.
Most allies I have seen were pretty cool so far.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 01:23:35
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Calm Celestian
|
Actually, the Jetbikes are useless as allies to SoB. My bad, should have looked at the chart before suggesting it.
|
The Little Sisters of the Apocalypse in the Triple EX! Road Show
The 10K Waagh!
Iron Warriors Local 631: Khorne-forsaken CSM
The Tallarn 2nd (Hand): "Towel Heads" to you! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 04:49:06
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
|
On the subject of allies.
I've been considering dark angels lately for the following reason
1- Next box set will have dark angels vs chaos space marines
2- other than 7k sisters I have 8k chaos marines.
They also have a codex update likely coming down the road.
In it's current state, what do you think from the dark angels codex would provide what sisters are missing in an ally?
Ravenwing seems to provide some quick, tough mobile infantries.
Deathwing on the other hand feels like something that could be deepstriked behind enemy lines to distract your opponent while the sisters move forward.
Without speculating on the new codex, what would be good currently?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/14 04:49:32
18 / 3 / 6 since 6th ed. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 11:53:51
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Calm Celestian
|
Voldrak wrote:On the subject of allies.
I've been considering dark angels lately. . .
Without speculating on the new codex, what would be good currently?
Belial and a squad of 'hammer 'Nators would be a thought. It's a tough, scoring unit with deep-strike for potential line-breaker points and distant-objective holding/contesting as well as just good, old-fashioned mouth-smashing. A second squad of 'Hammer 'Nators would be okay, and heck, if you want, play a third in the available elite slot. It has to stated that that might not leave many points left for your Sisters.
Ravenwing Attack Squadrons can cause mischief with their scout ability.
Ravenwing Support squadrons offer cheap-ish, fast skimmers which can be useful to contest objectives or tooled up to go vehicle hunting. The Typhoon upgrade is pretty reasonable.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/14 11:55:10
The Little Sisters of the Apocalypse in the Triple EX! Road Show
The 10K Waagh!
Iron Warriors Local 631: Khorne-forsaken CSM
The Tallarn 2nd (Hand): "Towel Heads" to you! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 20:26:58
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Yeah, Bel and terms is your best bet. Cheap typhoons maybe.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 20:48:50
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Hi could I have your thoughts on the below list for a doubles tournament, I dont know who my partner will be so going blind as usual.
This will also be my first time playing Sisters
Saint Celestine
115
Seraphim Squad
Two extra girls
Two Inferno Pistols x1
Two Hand Flamers x1
160
Battle Sisters squad
Meltagun
Multi-melta
145
Battle Sisters squad
Meltagun
Multi-melta
145
Exorcist
135
Retributer Squad
Heavy Bolter x4
One extra girl
97
Aegis Defence Line
Quad gun
100
Total 897 of 900
Celestine will go with the Seraphim Squad giving them fearless. The Retributers will use the Quad gun, as a rending Quad gun sounds like it could be a good idea. The Exorcist will also go behind the defence line while the normal Sisters take objectives.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 21:27:28
Subject: Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Looks good, but i would swap the infernos for the hand flamers Snd give the superior mb. Nasty at low points.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 22:03:25
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Thanks pretre, I'll be going with your advice. I just need to paint them all now
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|