Poll |
 |
what armor save do the current SOB minis *LOOK* like they have visually? (visually, not the fluff) |
3+ save: the look matches the fluff about ceramite armor equal to marine's protection |
 
|
50% |
[ 112 ] |
4+: it's noticeably lighter and less protection than marine armor |
 
|
48% |
[ 108 ] |
5+: while it covers the whole body, it looks like leather so shouldn't get better than a guardsmen |
 
|
3% |
[ 6 ] |
Total Votes : 226 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 17:40:42
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Of course SoB look like they have a 3+
Power armour - 3+ - full suit of rigid armour panels
Carapace - 4+ - soft suit with partial rigid panels
flak armour - 5+ - minimal armour (torso, shoulder pads, helmet)
This has been maintained consistently through the range.
Now, if you want a real debate, how the hell do catachans get any save at all, let alone a 5+?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 17:47:15
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
CT GAMER wrote:Every thread I have ever seen on Dakka Dakka about females and their armor has quickly devolved into "I HEART BOOBS111"
That doesn't say much about the quality of posters here... regardless, this thread doesn't seem to go along very well with that, as most of the posters in it have been mature.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 18:00:14
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
Sisters wear power armour. It's not the super strength-enhancing suit that marines wear, thus they s3 t3. But protection-wise, it's just as good.
|
40k Armies I play:
Glory for Slaanesh!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 18:01:10
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Newbie Black Templar Neophyte
Fairbanks Alaska
|
well the way I thought about it is that the armour save just dosnt account for what kind of armour they are wearing but other factors. the sisters of battle armour looks lighter but that would also mean they are more agile, and are faster then space marines, might not be able to run as far but still an example of this would be the assassins inv save because they are fast they get one
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 18:15:20
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Melissia wrote:
"Strength 3" is a very wide variance of strength levels. Untrained conscripts are strength three-- basically what amounts to an average civilian. So are Orks, and Eldar, and Tyranid Gaunts, and Tau, and...
Yeah, but in real world terms, I doubt you could find a power-lifter that could carry 200+ pounds of equipment all day AND fight...and they'd still be strength 3 in 40K.
Again, I don't have a problem with SoB having a 3+; Ijust don't think people should try and justify it with fluff/reason. It's a game.
If we went by fluff, Tau would be Strength 2 because they are stated to be smaller and weaker than average humans (even though the figs are comparable).
|
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 18:17:40
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Well yeah, they're power lifters, not endurance lifters. There's a huge difference between strength and endurance.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/02 18:17:58
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 18:18:45
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Melissia wrote:Well yeah, they're power lifters, not endurance lifters. There's a huge difference between strength and endurance.
Now, now there's no reason to be obtuse; you know what I was getting at.
|
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 18:21:18
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Wait, me not be obtuse and tangential? Perish the thought!
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 18:46:14
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Marine armour is bulky because it has all sorts of extra bits and systems stuck into it.
Sister armour is the protective plates and maybe small servo moters for added mobility. that backpack has oxygen supplies and the helmet is connected to that.
a suit of armour can be astoundingly heavy and the wearer will still be able to move quickely. this is because the weight is spreadout over the entire body, add in Servo moters and the armours weight becomes a non-issue.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 19:39:23
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Anointed Dark Priest of Chaos
|
Melissia wrote:CT GAMER wrote:Every thread I have ever seen on Dakka Dakka about females and their armor has quickly devolved into "I HEART BOOBS111"
regardless, this thread doesn't seem to go along very well with that, as most of the posters in it have been mature.
Give them time, blood in the water and all...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 19:49:07
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Veteran ORC
|
CT GAMER wrote:Melissia wrote:CT GAMER wrote:Every thread I have ever seen on Dakka Dakka about females and their armor has quickly devolved into "I HEART BOOBS111"
regardless, this thread doesn't seem to go along very well with that, as most of the posters in it have been mature.
Give them time, blood in the water and all...
Well lets face it, who DOESN'T heart boobies?
|
I've never feared Death or Dying. I've only feared never Trying. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 20:15:00
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Gay males?
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 20:23:24
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Veteran ORC
|
Melissia wrote:Gay males?
Point taken, but still.
|
I've never feared Death or Dying. I've only feared never Trying. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 20:23:29
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Melissia wrote:Gay males?
Or non-gay females.
|
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 20:37:13
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
St. George, UT
|
Did I really read a few posts where people said battle sisters were sculpted to be sexy? Really? Those pissboy haircuts and marbles stuck on the chest for breasts are what you guys are calling sexy?
Eldar Banshees - yes
Old style damonettes - very much so
Vect's slave girls - yummy
Battlesisters - hell no. The only reason they look like that is so that you would know they are female. The sisters repentia have more sex appeal in a leather/bondage fetish sort of way than your basic battle sister.
Anyway, I feel that they do have the 3+ save going for them because there is no obvious fabric (aside from loincloths and capes). It all clearly looks like form fitted prefabricated material. As such its full suit armor, thus able to have a 3+ save. The petite size of it doesn't matter. That representation is handled by the S3 and T3.
|
See pics of my Orks, Tau, Emperor's Children, Necrons, Space Wolves, and Dark Eldar here:

|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 21:13:46
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Austin/Dallas, Texas
|
agnosto wrote:Melissia wrote:Gay males? Or non-gay females. Most of my friends are females, and they always comment about how other girls boobs look. They might not heart them, but definitely envy them
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/02 21:14:08
Green Marines are the best marines!
:6500pts:
~~(Deathwing Complete *For now*; 3rd Company 100% done!! 6 tac, 2 asault, 2 dev, and lots of rhinos.)~~ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 21:23:51
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Newbie Black Templar Neophyte
Fairbanks Alaska
|
lol wow This post just changed subjects alot.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 22:03:40
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
The main factor in the save is what its made out of. SoB power armour is still Ceramite and Adamantium. The best stuff the Imperium has to offer.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 23:37:24
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Portland
|
xxmatt85 wrote:There suits don't seem to cover that much, but I put 4+ just because it looks hard enough.
It just looks imcompte to be 3+.
Doesn't cover much? The armor covers the entire body, from foot to chin (and the head, if the sister is wearing a helmet). What part looks incomplete? It's also incredibly bulky. The sister model is about the same size as most non-character marine models, and bulkier than most other troop models. Aside from marines, the standard sister model looks like the most heavily armored basic troop in the game. Yes, the marine models do look like they are armored a little better, but I can easily accept that both Sisters and Marine armor fall in the same general range.
That anyone could say that Sisters armor looks incomplete or that it doesn't cover much is just... trolling, I guess. Looks like I fell for it.
but I do agree, this armour they currently have is more of a Carapace with full hazardous protection. its need to look a tad bit more like armour
A tad more like armor? Really? Again, big, bulky armor that covers the model from feet to head? Look at the model!
overtly sexy sculpts feel oddly out of place.
I guess this is a matter of opinion, but I really don't feel like the models are overly sexy. They are designed to be much more gothic and ornate looking than other imperial forces (they are the forces of the space church, an organization known for that kind of thing), and the fact of their gender is played up in their design. But I don't feel like this makes the models overly sexy. I would call them very moderately sexy (and that may be splitting hairs), but I imagine most people wouldn't see the models as very sexy at all. There is a lot of sexy SoB illustrations, although most of it doesn't come from 40k, but related products. The Sisters have (in my opinion) never been portrayed as sexy in their own codex.
If it says 3+, it's 3+, there is no such thing as "looking 3+"
Truth. I think a lot of the arguments on this thread are coming from the assumption that Space Marine power armor = 3+ save is the standard for 3+ saves. This just isn't true. Probably power armor, along with the Carnifex carapace and Tau Crisis Suits (they have 3+, right?) are at the high end of the 3+ range, with other power armor, Aspect Warrior armor, Incubus armor and other stuff coming in at the low range. the important thing to remember is that it is a range.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 23:38:20
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Bloodfrenzy187 wrote:Actually, I think the Crux Terminus is part of Terminator armor and as far as I can tell the honor guard are not wearing terminator armor. The only reason the get the 2+ save is because their armor is artificer armor there is no 5+ invulnerable.
^this. The Crux is just a symbol. It doesn't give any bonus. The fluff indicates it's "just" a fragment of the Emperor's armor. They get an invuln save because they are wearing Tactical DREADNOUGHT Armor. It was either that or give them vehicle stats.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 23:40:26
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
No.
the Fragment actually projects a force field.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 00:21:27
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
Uh, pretty sure it doesn't.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 00:27:37
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Calm Celestian
Windsor Ontario Canada
|
DukeRustfield wrote:
^this. The Crux is just a symbol. It doesn't give any bonus. The fluff indicates it's "just" a fragment of the Emperor's armor. They get an invuln save because they are wearing Tactical DREADNOUGHT Armor. It was either that or give them vehicle stats.
Dude read the Codex. I don't know how many times I have to say it. They guy who you quoted already admitted he was wrong. Just read page 102 of the space marine Codex.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 02:11:24
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
So melissia, I ask you this. Are blood angels and space wolves space marines?
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/06/03 02:16:11
The next one of you that posts about Wraiths being I2 and ignores the whip coils mentioned 2000 times a week, and I am going to devote the rest of my life to becoming an ancient space god to trick and enslave a race, and turn them into soulless T-100s to rid the entire universe of life. At that point it will have been worth it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 02:23:06
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
Between Alpha and Omega, and a little to the left
|
Ok, seriously nightsbane, don't. Don't start with that.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 02:30:56
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Luke_Prowler wrote:You've got to remember that Space marine armor is bulky because space marines themselves are bulky. Power armor used by normal humans is much smaller compared to the walking refrigerators
Gasp! Logic! Burn the Witch! Automatically Appended Next Post: jake wrote:
Truth. I think a lot of the arguments on this thread are coming from the assumption that Space Marine power armor = 3+ save is the standard for 3+ saves. This just isn't true. Probably power armor, along with the Carnifex carapace and Tau Crisis Suits (they have 3+, right?) are at the high end of the 3+ range, with other power armor, Aspect Warrior armor, Incubus armor and other stuff coming in at the low range. the important thing to remember is that it is a range.
Gasp! More logic still! Heresy is rampant in this thread. *submits papers for Exterminatus*
What is this nonsense about an armor save representing "a range" of armors? That's like implying that game stats are some sort of abstraction of the fluff, rather than a hard and concrete representation of it. But I know no one is crazy to actually suggest that. I mean, come on, the fluff clearly states the average Guardsman is 75% as strong as a Space Marine, and 50% as strong as a dreadnought, and thus the game stats reflect this.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/03 02:37:55
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 02:40:21
Subject: do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Lol, we can't have logic on dakka-dakka.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 02:50:31
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Veteran ORC
|
What is this logic thing of which you speak? Is it contagious? Get it away from me!
|
I've never feared Death or Dying. I've only feared never Trying. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 02:54:19
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Elite Tyranid Warrior
|
On the topic of sisters only being s3 and wearing heavy armor with a heavy weapon... what the hell do you think the "powered" part of the armor is helping them to do?  They still don't have the raw strength of a marine, but it allows them to wield weapons with one sister that would normally require a heavy weapons team for the IG.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 04:41:06
Subject: Re:do current Sister of Battle models look like a 3+ save?
|
 |
Bounding Black Templar Assault Marine
|
Ok, so SoB have 3+ Sv. And that's a fact, no point in discussing that.
Now does their armour look like it grants 3+ Sv?
Honestly, not really.
marine armour grants 3+ saves because of the thick plating and the shape of the armour which is designed to deflect projectiles not just to stop them.
If you look at SoB armour, we see that the plating isn't clearly as thick, but this could be easily explained by the use of lighter alloys and the such.
But, when looking at the shape of the armour, well my friends that's when  hits the fan, the armour design isn't really useful for deflecting projectiles (sure some pieces do have the required shape, I'll give you that) but overall the design fails to do so and this is why it looks more like gear giving 4+ Sv rather than 3+ Sv.
The GW's logic is good, Marines are the best the Empire has to offer, so give them +3 Sv, guard is the "meatshield" and easily replaceable so we need to gear them with materials that we can mass produce 5+ Sv. if you're willing to pay the price you can get 4+ Sv.
But then they had sisters, which are better than Guard but are not as battle hardened as space marines, if they are better than guard, they must have better armour, and the best guard has is 4+ so lets give them a 3+ Sv, but hey, marines are the Elite, and sisters aren't as good as Marines, cut them on S and T and we're done.
This just shows a lack of effort by GW on the models.
P.S - In no way am I criticising the fact that SoB have 3+ Sv, just saying that sisters models should be redone to better represent their stats.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|