Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
NAVARRO wrote:Damn that fella has a really annoying way to express himself almost looks like he needs therapy quickly... yet he is quite right about many points he raises.
Some people just have no in-camera presence or ability to express themselves clearly, concisely and to the point. This fella is a very good example of a person lacking these qualities. Other prominent examples include the hosts of 40k Radio and almost all other gaming podcasts.
Panic wrote:yeah,
I skimmed that dudes review (it's a hour long!)...
It seemed fair and thought out.
Yeah, it seemed far fairer than I'd've been, highlighting what seemed to me rather serious issues with editing and production, but still ending with an overall rating of about 5/10. I didn't like some of the insinuations he made like "maybe the people who hated my first review spent all of their time looking at the chick's cleavage and not the DVD" (not nearly in those words, mark you). His complaining about miniature nudity felt almost quaint, too.
Agamemnon2 wrote: His complaining about miniature nudity felt almost quaint, too.
To be fair it's not his fault, it's very likely just because he's american. I mean they get upset with superbowl nipples and Katy Perry's nudity assault on elmo.
Seriously 'too much flesh for young eyes' outrage got this pulled from the airwaves...
Panic...
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/09/24 13:34:29
I enjoy the part where she is running in place hehe. Seriously though if your going to star on a kids show the least you could do is put some clothes on for modesty.
Fishboy wrote:I enjoy the part where she is running in place hehe. Seriously though if your going to star on a kids show the least you could do is put some clothes on for modesty.
sorry joe : ) i see no reason why she isn't being modest. she is almost completely covered....
No speech can survive that.
I do what the voices in my wifes head say... 
