Cottonjaw wrote:You are.... major league confusing gameplay fact, with fluff fact.
Neeeevveerrmind. Count me out.
Gameplay and fluff are tied.
Sorry if this isn't what you deem fact.
Everything has fluff.
The
IoM gets more time in the spotlight. But the design choice to have the ability to repair, isn't just there for gameplay as people seem to use the repair crews for anything but repairs. The ability to repair is part of both, game and fluff.
Models in codices and storys in
GW publications where tech is reclaimed, repaired, do exist.
I am not going to search through hundreds of pages to dig out what is wellknown. Too many other duties this weekend. Sorry.
TrollPie wrote:1hadhq wrote:
Stellar are the assumptions here.
The Tau will be put into their place by GW, their tech tied to the codex and balanced .
Not wanting to sound fanboi-ish, ...............................
Its maybe unclear written

, but I didn't intend to claim the
IoM is the epitome of research and innovation.
Should I not see the flaw in the claim of what happens in M42 as per Cottonjaw?
The
IoM has its place and function in the setting , as have the Tau.
The course
GW set is also not hidden. As is the reason they put the background into the eternal M41 freezer.
This way,
GW has not to care about the nids eating the galaxy, or the necrons fully awakening , or chaos usurping the material realm,
or the orks uniting, etc etc.
Thus, M42 may not look like the fanboy dreams of any faction.
Maybe the fact of
GW designers actively balancing units and adding believable fluff to them back in the day when the Tau were created,
says something of the foreseen future in Cottonjaws post.
I for one, would prefer a return to acceptable fluff, instead of the authors we have now who miss the theme and go overboard.
But maybe he's right and I am too stuck in the old ways.
Shouldn't say : unlikely, should say: welcome to cheese country. From swiss, netherlands or france?
TrollPie wrote:Give an example of in-the-field repairs for Eldar.
So I'm assuming they know little of technology.
See the flaw in that arguement now?
Eldar have their own repair model in Dawn of war. Has a hard time to do anything under fire tough. Could be the psychic part of their work and the loss of focus the battlefield may bring. But yes, Eldar have their own take on tech and know this approach on it very well.
The argument still stands.
The
IoM is able to repair its stuff.
Even under attack, where repairs are difficult.
nomotog wrote:
I can't think of a example of a tau field repair, but I also can't think of any example where a vehicle gets damaged, so there is that. Actually the tau seem to be obsessed with new things. If a old tank gets damaged, they are probably more likely to scrap it and replace it with the new model.
Maybe.
Tau like the shiny new things. I see that now. Like wargamers. The plot thickens...
Or they just keep their work-crews behind, out of danger. So no in-the-field-repair, but recycling the vehicle if the battle was won.
What happens if they have to retreat? Give up on the ressources? Destroy what has to be abandoned?