Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 02:00:07
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I think the main point here is that if you want a pair of lascannons and a scoring unit in a transport, get yourself a Las Predator to babysit a Tac squad in a Rhino. It's cheaper and puts out more shots.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 02:09:54
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
@Nurgz - That's a fair comment. To be honest, i'd never put a tactical squad in a LR (of any variant). Land raiders are for shuttling terminators and sword brethern
On my Custom Land Raider Design:
2 TL plasma cannon sponsons
1 Frontal Battle cannon
2 Sponson mounted Auto cannons
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 02:11:46
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Mesopotamia. The Kingdom Where we Secretly Reign.
|
NuggzTheNinja wrote:I think the main point here is that if you want a pair of lascannons and a scoring unit in a transport, get yourself a Las Predator to babysit a Tac squad in a Rhino. It's cheaper and puts out more shots.
And watch them both get obliterated with Missiles and Autocannons? Lollerskates!
Seriously though, a scoring land raider isn't the reason to take one, but it's a good use for it after it's dropped of the goods.
|
Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 02:17:13
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
Monster Rain wrote:Seriously though, a scoring land raider isn't the reason to take one, but it's a good use for it after it's dropped of the goods.
QFT.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 02:20:54
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
Garden Grove, CA
|
Monster Rain wrote:NuggzTheNinja wrote:I think the main point here is that if you want a pair of lascannons and a scoring unit in a transport, get yourself a Las Predator to babysit a Tac squad in a Rhino. It's cheaper and puts out more shots.
And watch them both get obliterated with Missiles and Autocannons? Lollerskates!
Seriously though, a scoring land raider isn't the reason to take one, but it's a good use for it after it's dropped of the goods.
Didn't we establish that like 4 pages ago?
|
"Do not practice until you get it right, practice until you can not get it wrong." In other words, stop effing up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 02:22:02
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Mesopotamia. The Kingdom Where we Secretly Reign.
|
xxBlazinGhostxx wrote:Monster Rain wrote:NuggzTheNinja wrote:I think the main point here is that if you want a pair of lascannons and a scoring unit in a transport, get yourself a Las Predator to babysit a Tac squad in a Rhino. It's cheaper and puts out more shots.
And watch them both get obliterated with Missiles and Autocannons? Lollerskates!
Seriously though, a scoring land raider isn't the reason to take one, but it's a good use for it after it's dropped of the goods.
Didn't we establish that like 4 pages ago?
We did. I was just reiterating it for someone who missed it, apparently.
|
Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 02:25:24
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
This has been a very informative thread. It's not always easy to visualise the multiple applications of a land raider given a particular army list.
I still wish we got redeemers though - I do prefer the crusader, but it couldn't hurt to try it out with my BT's.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 03:08:28
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought
|
Once the redeemer closes its weapon is devastating. The godhammer lascannons are subpar at any range. Yes you can get melted up close if you're worried about that don't run land raiders. It's a transport it gets close. Sitting back and shooting lascannons is a miserable use of the points, taking pot shots on the way in is just that - taking pot shots. You're much better off devastating a whole infantry squad than you are hoping and praying that 1 lascannon shot will kill it's target against all odds. I mean I wish I could get you lascannon guys to appreciate how pitiful the odds of actually killing a vehicle with it are. If the target is in cover it's 1 in 6 if you hit if you penetrate. Get with it. Lascannons blow. AF
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/09/04 15:00:54
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 04:22:01
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Mesopotamia. The Kingdom Where we Secretly Reign.
|
liam0404 wrote:I still wish we got redeemers though - I do prefer the crusader, but it couldn't hurt to try it out with my BT's.
Run your BTs as Vanilla Marines and see how you like it!
|
Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 05:20:43
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
If I need one reason to say why the Phobos is good, it's because it is the only one that can kill Monoliths. Also, it will not be vulnerable to melta as often as the others will. What is it's best use? Providing support for a Tactical Terminator (as opposed to Assault Terminator) squads, typically with heavy flamers. They can kill lots of infantry, but when the big bad tank comes, they won't need to waste an assault on it, whereas otherwise they would need to.
|
I have 2000 points of , called the Crimson Leaves.
I will soon be starting WoC, devoted to
I have 500 points of , in blueberry and ice cream (light grey and light blue) flavour. From the fictional world Darkheim.
DarkHound wrote:Stop it you. Core has changed. It's no longer about nations, ideologies or ethnicity. It's an endless series of proxy battles, fought by mercenaries and machines. Core, and its consumption of life, has become a well-oiled machine. Core has changed. ID tagged soldiers carry ID tagged weapons, use ID tagged gear. Nanomachines inside their bodies enhance and regulate their abilities. Genetic control. Information control. Emotion control. Battlefield control. Everything is monitored, and kept under control. Core has changed. The age of deterrence has become the age of control. All in the name of averting catastrophe from weapons of mass destruction. And he who controls the battlefield, controls history. Core has changed. When the battlefield is under total control, war... becomes routine.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 05:21:59
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Monster Rain wrote:liam0404 wrote:I still wish we got redeemers though - I do prefer the crusader, but it couldn't hurt to try it out with my BT's.
Run your BTs as Vanilla Marines and see how you like it!
I think running BT as BA would be better
Suped up Chaplain HQ's and Red Thirst rules seem to make an ok proxy
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 06:11:25
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
Garden Grove, CA
|
AbaddonFidelis wrote:Get with it. Lascannons blow. AF
While we are on lascannons. So how do you feel about vendettas? I know it's not a land raider but you say that the phobos sucks mostly due to it's lascannons (the TL- HB is also subpar I admit, feels more like an afterthought).
|
"Do not practice until you get it right, practice until you can not get it wrong." In other words, stop effing up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 07:58:05
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Angered Reaver Arena Champion
|
AbaddonFidelis wrote:Once the redeemer closes its weapon is devastating. The godhammer lascannons are subpar at any range. Yes you can get melted up close if you're worried about that don't run land raiders. It's a transport it gets close. Sitting back and shooting lascannons is a miserable use of the points, taking pot shots on the way in is just that - taking pot shots. You're much better off devastating a whole infantry squad than you are hoping and praying that 1 lascannon shot will kill it's target against all odds. I mean I wish I could get you lascannon guys to appreciate how pitiful the odds of actually killing a vehicle with it are. If the target is in cover it's 1 in 12 if you hit if you penetrate. Get with it. Lascannons blow. AF
Hi broken record. I see we have still been unable to turn you off.
Everyone knows your opinion. You don't have to keep spamming the thread every time someone offers up their opinion.
Your assertion that lascannons blow completely incorrect. Its no surprise that you can't figure out that they are good at damaging vehicles, you can't even do simple math. If the target is in cover and you have already got your hit and penetrate, its a 1/6 chance to destroy it (2/6 chance to destroy multiplied by 1/2 chance for cover to negate).
Cover affects metaguns and lascannons the same, so I don't see why you are including it in your analysis at all anyways.
Its hard to explain to you why the lascannons are good, because you completely take range out of your thinking. Most people can see why this is a mistake, but you are just going to go on playing your broken record.
|
Sangfroid Marines 5000 pts
Wych Cult 2000
Tau 2000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 08:32:38
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
University of St. Andrews
|
You also have to remember, that hiding a Land Raider Phobos away in the back increases its survivability a LOT. Hiding in the back means that melta equipped infantry can't really get to it very easily, not can melta bomb armed assault units. For Imperial factions that means you need a really lucky lascannon or artillery shot to take it out.
I do believe there was a nice article on dakka which explains exactly why the normal Land Raider is a decent vehicle in its own right...
|
"If everything on Earth were rational, nothing would ever happen."
~Fyodor Dostoevsky
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
~Hanlon's Razor
707th Lubyan Aquila Banner Motor Rifle Regiment (6000 pts)
Battlefleet Tomania (2500 pts)
Visit my nation on Nation States!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 08:36:37
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
Garden Grove, CA
|
ChrisWWII wrote:You also have to remember, that hiding a Land Raider Phobos away in the back increases its survivability a LOT. Hiding in the back means that melta equipped infantry can't really get to it very easily, not can melta bomb armed assault units. For Imperial factions that means you need a really lucky lascannon or artillery shot to take it out. I do believe there was a nice article on dakka which explains exactly why the normal Land Raider is a decent vehicle in its own right... QFT. Though I bet someone will say this: drop pod with sternies and combi-meltas will kill it. Also you may not wanna charge the enemy as soon as you can, sometimes (read: a lot) you may want to hang back a little bit and let them come to you, shoot them on the way, AND then you get out and beat face. Who you say? Orkz. Certain Nid lists. And generally other Land Raiders.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/09/04 08:37:06
"Do not practice until you get it right, practice until you can not get it wrong." In other words, stop effing up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 08:43:54
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
University of St. Andrews
|
Oh well of course a drop pod with fancy meltas can kill it....but by then we're really getting far away from the original thing about the land raider. There are LOTS of ways you can kill a land raider easier than a ridic lucky lascannon shot. The IG can shoot it with a Medusa, or drop a Manticore rocket on it. The Tau can blast it with railguns. Space Marines can drop pod. Eldar can lance it to death....
Land Raiders aren't invincible, not by a long shot. Getting them closer, really just makes them more vulnerable....something AF needs to grasp.
On a side note, it's not fair to call him a troll. He'd be a troll if he was making crap up to piss us off. I think he's telling us he really believes....those things are just really fething stupid.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/09/04 09:02:10
"If everything on Earth were rational, nothing would ever happen."
~Fyodor Dostoevsky
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
~Hanlon's Razor
707th Lubyan Aquila Banner Motor Rifle Regiment (6000 pts)
Battlefleet Tomania (2500 pts)
Visit my nation on Nation States!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 08:59:46
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
Chris, your reasons for saying why the land raider isn't the best at movement are my main argument as to why it should have its points cost lowered slightly
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 09:05:38
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
University of St. Andrews
|
liam0404 wrote:Chris, your reasons for saying why the land raider isn't the best at movement are my main argument as to why it should have its points cost lowered slightly
Thank you.  But still, I'm in favor of keeping its cost high as an AV14 all around METAL BAWX can still absorb a HUGE amount of fire before dieing. If we were to start dropping its cost, I would demand that its armor value be lowered, at least on the rear section. The Land Raider spam is still devastating, even if it does get easier to kill them while they get closer, and I don't see a reason to make it easier to do.
|
"If everything on Earth were rational, nothing would ever happen."
~Fyodor Dostoevsky
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
~Hanlon's Razor
707th Lubyan Aquila Banner Motor Rifle Regiment (6000 pts)
Battlefleet Tomania (2500 pts)
Visit my nation on Nation States!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 12:19:34
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
I have to completely agree with you, ChrisWWII, since I would hate to see an LR in 500 points with tacticals (normally the only thing you can do is two groups of 5 scouts, and 1 captain. Then, the land raider.
|
I have 2000 points of , called the Crimson Leaves.
I will soon be starting WoC, devoted to
I have 500 points of , in blueberry and ice cream (light grey and light blue) flavour. From the fictional world Darkheim.
DarkHound wrote:Stop it you. Core has changed. It's no longer about nations, ideologies or ethnicity. It's an endless series of proxy battles, fought by mercenaries and machines. Core, and its consumption of life, has become a well-oiled machine. Core has changed. ID tagged soldiers carry ID tagged weapons, use ID tagged gear. Nanomachines inside their bodies enhance and regulate their abilities. Genetic control. Information control. Emotion control. Battlefield control. Everything is monitored, and kept under control. Core has changed. The age of deterrence has become the age of control. All in the name of averting catastrophe from weapons of mass destruction. And he who controls the battlefield, controls history. Core has changed. When the battlefield is under total control, war... becomes routine.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 13:26:06
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
What happens if I destroy a Redeemer using a normal Land Raider from across the table?
Always a possibility
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 14:58:38
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Warp-Screaming Noise Marine
|
I think we have all lost the point of this post.. The man asked which would be best to transport assualt terminators, not which land raider is the best to use all around, The guys probably thinking to himself (god i didn't mean to start a war) i mean some of you guys are really getting to each others throats with this
|
"Decadence Unbound..."
10,000+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/04 15:01:49
Subject: Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
liam0404 wrote:Here's a slightly off topic one - at a cost of... approx 265 points, what would you put on your landraider if you had:
-2 Sponsons
-1 Front weapon
-2 pintle mounted weapons
Imperial/CSM guns only!
2 plasma cannon sponsons
Demolisher cannon or reaper autocannon
2 combi-meltas
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/10 13:26:55
Subject: Re:Which Land Raider would you choose?
|
 |
Reliable Krootox
|
Well... I transport my lovely Vulkan He'Stan with a veterans squad in a heavily upgraded redeemer and hunt for enemy CQB threats.
If I used a crusader, I would maybe use it with a large squad of terminators and get it in place fast. I could counter any vehicle type.
If I used the standard, I would probably put anything in it that would harm tanks in close combat. Maybe CQB terminators, but I haven't thought out the tactic alot yet.
|
|
 |
 |
|