Switch Theme:

Cheese callers?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Thinking of Joining a Davinite Loge





Somewhere in the dark...

Grey Knights can be cheesyawesomesuper when looking at some units in isolation and in their favoured scenario (Purifiers using cleansing flame against a bunch of basic ork boyz and knowing that after cleansing flame, 10 halberds are going to swing down). But you can probably say the same for any codex.

Grey Knights weaknesses: Low model count. Lack of decent invul saves against ranged attacks. No storm shields on Terminators/Paladins. Generally short ranged - 24". Lack of ranged weaponry that has higher strength than 8. Lack of AP1/AP2 weaponry.

Now, there is the Henchmen side of the Codex that addresses some of these issues but then you're talking about far squishier troops as well. Overall, calling Grey Knights as a whole cheesy is a daft argument. The odd unit here and there is cheesy but the grey knights codex isn't the only one guilty of having those, and that's a fact.



 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: